Prove your not dumb

Prove your not dumb.

Other urls found in this thread:

edwards.jondreyer.com/gemdas.html
en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/line
purplemath.com/modules/orderops.htm
mathgoodies.com/Lessons/vol7/order_operations.html
eduplace.com/math/mathsteps/4/a/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I don't have a "not dumb". Sorry i cant prove something i don't have.

*you're

81 onviously

Bruh

5

9

17

5 or 17, depending on which autism you prefer

5

>Prove your not dumb
>your not dumb
>your

5 faggots

yeah

The array "2" is not defined.

>post ends in 5
>answer is 5
>why the fuck are we still talking about this?

16 / 2[8 - 3(4 - 2)] + 1
16 / 2[8 - 3( 2 )] + 1
16 / 2[8 - 6 ] + 1
16 / 2[ 2 ] + 1
16 / 4 + 1
4 +1
5

4-2=2
3×2=6
8-6=2
2×2=4
16÷4=4
4+1=5
>The answer is 5

Nice try, 8/0 + 1.

Unless I am dumb. College grad, EE never used brackets therefore I will assume it is a bait and switch for parentheses to find people incapable of free thinking.

Oops did 2^3 like a dumb American. All my fancy education hasn't helped me learnt 2 reeeeed

lol
5

(4-2) = 2
(8-3) = 5
(5x2) = 10
(10+1) = 11
(16/2) = 8
(8+11) = 19

/thread

17

yes
same answer here, anyone not getting 5 is american or a troll

its fcking 1.8 -.-

16÷2[8-3(4-2)]+1
16÷2[8-3(2)]+1
16÷2[8-6]+1
16÷2[2]+1
8[2]+1
16+1
17

Most of you multiply the 2 and 2, but once it comes down to that, you simply follow the order of operations.

faggots don't know that the type of bracket dictates the order...

BIDMAS
FUCKING
BIDMAS

the answer is this vector: [65 -47]

yea you fucking idiot.
P
E
Multiplication comes before
Division
A
S

5 for christsake

edwards.jondreyer.com/gemdas.html

GEMDAS. It's 5. You people are retarded.

hahaha you think division and multiplication are different things
swap /2 with *0.5 and your logic fails

Parentheses
Exponents
Multiplication and Division (from left to right)
Addition and Subtraction (from left to right)

Now you know.

It's you're (your is possessive) and the answer is five.

B T F O

T

F

O

No Multiplication doesn't come first. MD are on the same tier, and come before AS, but one doesn't take priority. It's whichever comes earliest in the problem. Same with addition and subtraction.

TypeError: 'int' object is not subscriptable

You should know better, Christina. Forget about such simple equations and come back to the lab.

...

1+1=3

Fucking idiot

...

5

They way I learnt it would be 5. However, order of operations is actually dependant on where you were taught.

17

YOUR not dumb.
>having to prove anything to retards

>However, order of operations is actually dependant on where you were taught.
where do you need to live to teach you maths wrong?

being this retard must hurt

>your
You already fucked up.

This is real irony

Surely nobody is this stupid.

South park taught me to not feed the trolls. And you're as obvious and retarded as they get.

17

murica

>16 / 2[ 2 ] + 1
>16 / 4 + 1
that's where you're wrong kiddo

Pemdas or bodmas, etc is irrelevant. The 2 is next to the brackets. If it was 16 / 2 * (2) it would be arbitrary to where you learnt order of operations. However 16 / 2(2) means 2*2 must come first.

dude, 2(2) it's the same as 2*2

16
----- +1
2(8-3(4-2))

=(16/4) +1 = 5

Alternatively (though nobody reads it that way)

(16/2)*(8-3(4-2)) + 1
=8*2 +1 =17

In other news, Sup Forums still falls for decade old bait.

dog bless

5 stupid cuck

16/2[8-3(4-2)] +1
16/2[8-3(2)]+1
16/2[8-6]+1
16/2[2]+1
16/4+1
4+1
5

1 and 4 fifths

No, the first implies (2*(2)), and so 16 / (2*(2)) is 4, not 16

>Underrated
>/thread

bout tree fiddy

Depends on whether you solve right to left or left to right, since multiplication and inline division have the same operator precedence, even in the case of implicit multiplication.

Solution 1 (implicit multiplication first):
>4 - 2 = 2
>3(4 - 2) = 3(2) = 6
>8 - 3(4 - 2) = 8 - 6 = 2
>2[8 - 3(4 - 2)] = 2[2] = 4
>16/(2[8 - 3(4 -2)]) = 16/4 = 4
>16/(2[8 - 3(4 -2)]) + 1 = 4 + 1 = 5
>answer is 5

Solution 2 (inline division first):
>16/2 = 8
>8 - 3(4 - 2) = 2 (see previous solution)
>(16/2)[8 - 3(4 - 2)] = (8)[2] = 16
>(16/2)[8 - 3(4 - 2)] + 1 = 16 + 1 = 17
>answer is 17

that second way is incorrect though. you don't get to just choose how to do math and have more than 1 answer

jesus some of you are so fucking dumb

i'm leaving this thread in case i don't get contaminated with your stupidity

>half of the thread are middle school dropouts

16 ÷2(8-3)(4-2) +1
16÷2(5)(2)+1
16÷2(10)+1
16÷2(11)
16÷22
=0.72


EZ

it doesn't implies nothing, you do the first operation that comes from left to right

top fucking kek

5

17 you goddamn mongoloids

...

I mean this is clearly impossible from the first glance

>wrong
>pathetic
>google

16 / 2(8-3(4-2)) + 1
16 / 2 * (8-6) + 1
16 / 2 * 2 + 1
17

this is the true answer, thanks user

...

The answer reduces to 16 ÷ 2 x 2 + 1.

If you get 5, you're retarded.

no actually i am right

see:

Clearly you're retarded because it reduces to 16 ÷ 2(2) + 1, which does come out to 5.

Order of operations, bitch. You can't just alter how it's written to suit your dumbass trolling.

...

>reduces for no reason
What?
16/ 2[8 -3(4-2)] +1
16/2 [8 -3(2)] +1
16/2 [8 -6] +1
16/2(2) +1
8(2) +1
16 + 1
17

Multiplication and division are equal so you then solve from left to right

Implicit multiplication and inline division have the same operator precedence. The answer is therefore indeterminate because it depends on whether you evaluate from left to right or right to left, for which purpose there's no strict convention.

lol
>glanceagainfaggot

Explain.

I think you might be retarded
16 / 2x2+1

2x2=4
16/4=4
4+1= 5

Anyone saying something besides 17 lacks a full appreciation for the order of operations here

Hey retards.

16/2(8-3(4-2)) +1

16/2(8-6)+1

16/2(2) +1

16/4 +1

4+1=5

Conclusion, if you're answer is not 5, you're a fucking retard. KYS

bomdas

How do you justify evaluating that as 16 / 2x2 and not 16/2 x 2?

The fact of the matter is that there's no one answer to the problem.

I'll accept this answer.

Even if it's not a line in math terms.
en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/line

See:

being this stupid

Glad to see I'm not the only one here who got that

Fuck you for making me (a logical person) look it up:
purplemath.com/modules/orderops.htm
mathgoodies.com/Lessons/vol7/order_operations.html
eduplace.com/math/mathsteps/4/a/
Good job troll
(Inb4 b-b-b-utt their wong!

You do know that the they are grouped. You multiply and divide as it is written from left to right just the same as you add and subtract as it is written from left to right

The scary thing is, I don't think all the people that gave different answers are trolling.