What did she mean by this?

What did she mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34649495
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I think it's pretty clear cut.

OP were you in special education classes by any chance?

She steals razors

Analysis: why did you ask that question?

women believe that tampns and the like should be free. despite them not being a nesscesity

Razors are pretty expensive though......

She meant nothing, OP. Just another stupid cow that should be in a man's kitchen or cleaning his home.

If it's the UK it's about how Mens razors don't have VAT (an additional 20% tax) applied to them, but tampons do.

What the women fail to grasp is that if we lose VAT on Tampons the 3 major manufacturers will just up the prices to gain a sweet 20% profit

But you don't have to buy tampons. You can just clean your clothes you silly woman. Why aren't you freebleeding with your sisters?
Also you can buy a reusable cup.

College girls think they shouldn't have to pay for tampons. As for razors, I buy my own, like every other man. women?????

do you live in a county where razors are free as in free beer ?

but i do pay for razors already

She doesn't know what she is talking about. Both women and men use razors and mostly women use tampons, so I don't understand why she thinks women should get razors for free. There is no correlation between these two items. Dumb woman is dumb

do women think razors are free? i fucking wish they were, those things are expensive

Can I be getting free razors? If so how? Shits so expensive I just grew a beard.

she probably does freebleed just those feminists like to jump on anything they can bitch about because of their inferiority/victim complex

that doesn't make any sense, as if in making a product cheaper would make it more expensive.

the ladies of the left are nuts

But man already pays for everything that women buy.

If you show your White Male Privilege Pass at the checkout you get the cost of the razors discounted from your bill.

If it's the UK, it's because tampons/sanitary towels are considered luxury items and subjected to VAT. Razors (for both women and men) aren't. The question is why it's more important for women to shave and be smooth than it is for them to not uncontrollably squirt blood out their minges. Seems pretty reasonable, tbf

.. wait you guys don't get prescription razors? They are like the best ever and they are free, just go to your doctor.

>three companies can keep their tampons the same price by raising price 20%
>one doesn't
>the one that doesn't sells more and makes more money just by moving more product

Europe's economics are fucking stupid.

Wait do you guys not pay for razors?

Well that's because it doesn't. It'll make the product the same price and people generally wouldn't notice a change, but instead of the 20% going to the government or wherever the VAT goes, itll now go to the manufacturer

A bit of stupidity there. The point was about how tampons and other feminine hygene products are taxed but men's razors are not in many states.

She doesn't think women should get razors for free, nor does she think men get razors for free. The issue is about tax, and why tampons are taxed as a luxury good but razors aren't. The point isn't 'tax razors', it's 'don't tax female sanitary products'

Not if you get a double edged safety razor or a straight razor. Instead of tampons this woman could use a diva cup or a reusable and washable pad.

>Some random user's economics are fucking stupid.
ftfy

We don't pay VAT on razors? Fucking hell could have fooled me

What's a pack of 4 (decent branded, not the supermarket shit) razors going for? £10 nearly

Still way more expensive

Razors are more of a luxury item.

At least my beard won't stain the furniture with unfertilized fetus blood.

another stupid girl without argumens. She just want to be angry with the society without reasons

where is it?

>vat

euronig detected

your opinion is irrelevant

>Tampons are £8
>With VAT you pay £10

>Government removes VAT so now they're £8
Results in:
>Manufacturers choose to increase the industrial selling cost of Tampons
>Supermarkets now charge £10 for tampons

>The cost is the same and the government gets less money.

It's a free market and Tampon manufacturers have a basic monopoly to price fix if they want.

Besides the argument is invalid, Pads aren't taxed at all so use them.

So instead of saying "stop the VAT on tampons", this moron says this. She'd rather see VAT added onto razors than removed from tampons? Despite women also buying razors, probably more so than men? She'd fuck herself over just to get the smallest thing over men.

That, OP, is the future of womankind.

Razers are fucking expensive, almost 20 bucks for a good Gillette with only one blade and no replaceables

That's why I switched to dorco years ago. They supply dollar shave club. Why pay a middle man. Dorcousa.com. check slickdeals too always good deals on them. Never buying at a store again

you misspelled cumdumpsterkind

it's a woman, they're stupid, what did you expect?

Yeah, I'd probably agree with this. Yet I don't think razors should VAT either. Seems pretty reasonable for tampons to not be considered a luxury item to me.

So imagine having to pay VAT on top of that. That's what she's upset about.

>Start new tampon manufacturing company, producing, say, £9 tampons. Get all the custom. Win.
Also, as I understand it, pads are for less intense periods or something. So they're not completely interchangeable with tampons.

I think she's more highlighting how ridiculous it'd be for razors to be taxed, and therefore it's not unreasonable to want tampons to be untaxed. "stop the VAT on tampons" wouldn't have had the same emotional impact on you.

background of pic: that was one of the protests in London.

In the UK, Tampons are priced including VAT (Value Added Tax).
Razors are exempt, because of a weird clause from the 70's.

So its not "free tampons", its that you're paying tax on a tampon, but no tax on a razor.

So, genuine inequality there, shitty placard that is inaccurate.


here's an article about it:
bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34649495

>pads are for less intense periods or something.

Both pads and tampons have various absorbency for differing flow rates. Pads simply sit outside the vagina while tampons are inserted.

In Canada the feds dropped the sales tax on hygiene products for women like 2 years ago because of some ass blasted feminists

So the two aren't interchangeable? I mean that if pads aren't taxed, it's not like all women can just but pads, some would still need/want tampons?

I'm 2nd on OP.. wtf

some women cant physically use tampons. some women find pads absolutely horrible.

Assuming a woman uses 4800 tampons in her lifetime (40 years menstruating, twelve periods a year, ten tampons per period, no panty liners), only buys name brand, and gets them from Walmart, she's looking at spending $10 per 36 pack of tampons. That gives us $1,334 spent on tampons in her lifetime. In my area we have a 9% sales tax so that results in a lifetime tax expense of $120 dollars, or $3 per year in taxes. A good quality menstruation cup will cost $30 dollars and is reusable.

But tampons have a luxury tax because it's only 5%, because it pays 5% it doesn't have to pay VAT, which is 20%. If they remove the luxury tax then tampons will increase in price by around 15% because they'll have to pay VAT instead, just like razors.

I don't know how nobody has researched this and people still complain!

Tampons are not ecofriendly. Plus you can make tampons with any cloth. You can't shave without a blade. So, in your socialist, what-is-a-need deciding country, razors should have priorities.

At best, the should ask for equal vat on NOT disposable razoers AND tampons. Go and use a fucking menstrual cum you filthy bitch.

i think it was sarcasm

>and is reusable
I can wipe my ass with my dinner napkin and technically it's reusable, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea

Have you seen a diva cup? I don't blame chicks for not wanting to shove that up them, take it out and empty it, clean it and shove it back up. And reusable, washaby pads, seriously?

>you can make tampons with any cloth
You're literally retarded, blood will soak through fabric.

tampons can't be recycled, double edge blades can be. good job polluting the earth with bloody, shitty plastics.

why do women pretend to give a shit about the environment, anyway? tampons and make-up can't be recycled. once they're done, that shit goes straight into the trash into a landfill.

good job.

>Getting confused over what we're talking about
She's complaining about tampon tax, not the environment, but I'm impressed your pair of brain cells rubbed together to make that link, even if it's non-sequitur and irrelevant.

>>or they agree to artificialy raise the price in secret instead.
No you are a dumb nigger to beleive in free market.

Ask your (grand)grandma what she used before disposable tampons.

Wow that's a retarded fucking law

I'm not a hurr durr tumblr blue haried feminazi, but that's pretty outrageous.

And no, taking off that extra tax would not just immeadiately result in the companies upping the prices.

If they had a monopoly, then yes it would. But that's just them figuring "they've been paying 10 euro anyway...They can keep paying 10"
It's not the act of getting rid of a tax that immeadiately results in a tampons being 20% more costly to produce.

>make them pay for child support since we have for eternity
>make women pay the same for car insurance as men
Curious what this cunt feels about that
>spoiler alert: she's against it

>ha ha im female !
>i have good ideas i promise
>gonna go march :)

free razors for all

Stop digging for equality, dumbshit.

Well that's because what you're reading is a complete lie. Razors are all taxed at 20% in UK (It's called VAT)

Tampons are taxed at 5% instead (called luxury, because EU law says we can't tax less)

Tampons are actually taxed less than razors anyway they just want it for 0% tax (which is illegal in EU as I mentioned before)

...

I see.
Do women pay VAT on their razors?

HURRRRRP

Bet you make the same equivalency between showing tits and cock.

Better comparison is tampons and condoms.
Condoms should be free for men, but cost 1,000 pounds sterling for women.

>make women pay the same for car insurance as men
No. Men are objectively more likely to get into crashes at certain ages, and those crashes are more likely to be more serious/more expensive. If you start insisting we all pay the same, you're arguing for exactly the kind of mindless 'equality' that you claim to hate, the kind that ignores actual facts and figures.

...

>if we lose VAT on Tampons the 3 major manufacturers will just up the prices to gain a sweet 20% profit
Wut. They'd still be making the same amount of money right? So why would they jack up prices?

shaun king is a white man

All women should be hanged in the streets from lampposts and trees.

Then men can finally enjoy the age of enlightenment that we have been awaiting since Adam lost his rib.

Did you know by EU law it's illegal to make car insurance cheaper based on gender? I agree with what you're saying but that other guy doesn't seem to realize we already pay the same.

So you support free bleeding?

Homosexual with mommy issues

I'm happy to limit it to only women that haven't researched what they're protesting about.

Cups are fine.

Also your comparison would have been better if someone were saying reuse a linen napkin instead of a tampon.

...

fucking women can use razers to you autist how is it inequality?

What struggle?

Putting down the fucking fork or walking?

My god. That thing claims to have self-respect?

I assume the sign is talking about handouts to prisoners?

>the 3 major manufacturers will just up the prices to gain a sweet 20% profit
don't razor manufacturers do this though?

In Canada and the US car insurance is based on stats, so men under 30 have higher insurance because statistically that's the demographic that has most accidents

see:

So their stupid fucking marches have been over having to pay for tampons?

because they can

Actually, back then it was taboo to use any form of tampon, cloth or not because it was believed that it took away their virginity and caused sexual pleasure.

I love how these two explain it perfectly, yet still this thread is filled with overly opinionated fuckheads who are mad at the bitch with the sign although they don't understand it.

I'm pretty aware of insurance laws etc, since it's my job. America is completely different to EU so I understand for you females get it cheaper, but over here where we get luxury tax they're the same. (It might be changing back though because brexit, but I think we'll keep that law)

>unwanted fat dyke detected

Google it, what they said isn't actually how they're taxed - always research yourself.

So why don't they do that now?

all the bitch stated with her sign is that shes hairy and doesn't shave

I'd prefer it if all women didn't wear tampons or pads. Just blood all over public transport, benches, just everywhere. I'd love to have a good, firm lick of blood

It's a start.

There aren't enough lampposts to hang them all at the same time.
We can reduce them into groups, and do them in lots as you suggested.

So fucking true. Back to the fucking kitchen with that ho

shaving doesn't mean you don't have to bay tampons

Back then when and where and who? How do you think generations of human beings, since the invention of fabrics, collected the SHIT and PISS of their toddlers? With Pampers(TM)

...

nah, just a straight dude who prefers a world where women exist you massive faggot

Get a load of this cuck