Oi you got a problem o somefin? Move on, ew yew fink you're lookin at Slytherin cunts

Oi you got a problem o somefin? Move on, ew yew fink you're lookin at Slytherin cunts

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/96SrWO5Na54
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You wanna toss bruv? slimely little git, piss off before I rip you a new arsehole.

You want the fucking lightning to come down yea innit? This is my castle, ill bury you alive out back without my wand

This tosspot tea wanker thinks he's havin a go, you wanna massacre?

Yea we broke the rules, the fuck you gon a do about it

Save the plesantries for someone who gives a shit you retarded cock jawed fag

...

Would Harry Potter be made watchable by having everyone act like chavs?

They probably thought Rupert and Daniel would grow to be like 6'0" each, too bad lmao

>young Hermione

Would molest/10

Dumbledore will be hearing of this you albino cislord, kiss your fucking dreams and arsehole goodbye

A trio of white kids wouldn't be accepted today, NOT DIVERSE ENUFF

She looks very similar now after puberty imo in her face. She qt

Those childhood years were so comfy. Nagging parents to let me buy the next book.

where has all the time gone?

Don't make me hex your cheeky cunt red raw

Fucking slytherinshit

>that look in her eyes

Someone had already entered her.
Who was it?

She always looked like that she's just naturally qt/sexy

Aye goodluck winnin that house cup yea mate?

I bet you it was the Weasley brothers doubleteaming her.

Look at that little whore, showing off her legs like that.
What a little cocktease.

...

>harry potter has better fight choreography than most modern action movies

She was always very self aware. She qt

shit thread sage

Malfoy let her hit him, he suggested it, like a true kinographer

But Hermione is black, she's always been black.

You need me to come down there and tear your sissy arse inside out?

...

...

Nuh uh, cuz JK said so.

There's no way some shady producer didn't have her bent over a chair at some point.
There's simply no way, in a world that's filled with pedophiles with media interests, that that fine little piece of ass gets through unblemished.

Her parent were lawyers and the guy who bought the rights for hp and produced them all wasn't a jew.

But for real they had a series planned and disnt want to fuck their own shit up right? Raping your child actors is a good way to fuck your shit up they grossed almost 8billion.

The behind the scenes stuff actually looked like it was very friendly and fun environment.

Doesn't matter fuck her. Plus its a play. Just a big deal about nothing. We all know a majority of black BLACK people don't have golden hair and freckles

How is Dan "The Hymen Collider" Schneider so successful then?

Nah she was fine in leavesden it would have been worse if they filmed in the states like they originally planned. Heyman and Rowling took care of them from the start even radcliffe would have been vulnerable but I don't think everyone is evil

Tv and america is vastly different from filming a film series in the UK. They were kind of protected I think. Tv is different and its nit as set in stone so there's lots of actors that get raped. They signed them on they wouldn't want to put the series in jeopardy. Its not as big of a deal as filming tens of kids shows. Sure it happens but not everywhere. The studio and filmmakers seemed like they cared about the product they put a lot of time into it

Its like apples and oranges. Two bit shows on tv have little regulations and security compared to signing on to the most financially successful franchise at the time

>The studio and filmmakers seemed like they cared about the product

All the films after the 3. one were absolute trash.
The only redeemable quality was jailbait Hermione.

You're wrong. Yates did a great job and 5 6 7.1 were really good standalone or complementary adaptations. Even the actors and dan would amit those are the ones he could watch Yates', because the they felt like they were able to do more which they were.

Its your taste. I like the early and latter ones and appreciate how different they are. You are kind of proving me right the series was allowed to go in the direction it did becsuse the studio stated with cuaron that letting the director do their own thing makes the best film happen.

Lots of people like them they were well recieved for a reason 6 and 7.1 are best along with 3. On rewatches they are really good

The first movies followed to story in the books.
In the rest we get bullshit like dragon chases sequences and removal of otherwise pivotal characters to make room for said bullshit.

I liked the books, I wanted to see the books become films, not some shitty hacks idea of what his books would have been like.

Yes, yes, well done Harry. Well done Harry!
HOWEVER!

You will never do Coke with the budding actors of Harrt Porter

>
>The studio and filmmakers seemed like they cared about the product. All the films after the 3. one were absolute trash.The only redeemable quality was jailbait Hermione

You cant just wave your wand and act like reality doesn't exist. They final ones were very good. You didnt like the directing for some reason that doesn't mean they weren't original projects. The last 4 films had three really good cinematographers.and the atmosphere and directing is great. They all have different feelings to them thats why I like the series.

I told you goblet was the worst stop acting like thay account foe the four movies afterwards. You sound like a butthurt bookfag. The books had lots of fat in the order of the lhoenix and half blood prince. They made them into good films. Films are a different medium stop comparing them to books they have different necessities.

Tldr of course the shorter books were easoer to adapt films have different needs don't compare them to the books 5 6 7.1 were great film adaptations

I really enioy the latter ones and how the tone and atmosphere of the films progress. It went along with the books I'm sorry you didnt like them. But they are very good its completely intentional for the story to go from friendly to dark witchcraft. Witchcraft can be dark that's inherently what it is and its what the story is.

The films were garbage compared to what they could have been.

Absolutely I understand not being able to make carbon copies of the books with a film, but if you compare Lord of the Rings to this, there are very few significant changes.

When you feel that you absolutely need to have a dragon chase Harry around Hogwarts, but need to remove some side characters to make it fit in, you've fucked up.

I saw that film years ago in the cinema, there were many more things I took an issue with, that was the major one.

>watch all eight movies within 48 hours
>none of them were good enough to rate a tier above the others
I mean sure I can say without a doubt that some were better then others but still none were particularly notable.

I still have the books for nostalgia though.

I don't think watching them all in 48hours is a good way to judge it, you don't have enough time to really evaluate how you feel about each one

Holy fuck stop taloing about goblet of fire its the worst adaption and movie. You're a pleb Yates artisically adapted the others and go across everything to make the story work.

Lotr is pleb shit with pleb vanilla filmmaking. Fellowship is the only good one. I dont think you can deconstruct cinematography. 3 5 6 7.1 have more going on shot wise to analyse than lotr

It was at least the second time I'd seen all the films, and made it really easy to compare them to each other.

The HP films don't exactly make you think either.

>don't make you think
>literally oozes with brazilian and orwellian undertones
TThe entire thing is a mock of british politics and bat shit nature. Maybe you don't think. What is self deprecation? Something the brits do to cope. Jk used that humor

Its easy to tier them bro

Top top tier
2 3 6 7.1

Top tier
1 5

Ok tier
4 8

I feel really bad about your lack of taste.

There's a lot going on cinematograhy wise in Cuarons and Yates to think about when watching. To me at least. I find new things all the time

>Lotr is pleb shit
>defends Harry Potter

You are literally rddit.

No mate nice not even bothering to have a discussion. The themes in lotr movies are standard. The themes and cinematography of most of the potter films meld and speak for themselbes I'm sorry of you don't see it put to call the filmmaking bad and Delbonnel, Idziak, Sesserin, Serra, Cuaron and Yates bad goes against not only common sense but common decency. Theres a lot to admire by the shooting techniques and style.

>filmboard
>can't into proper discussion
>because memes come first
Lotr a shit

Liking lord of the rings movies is the most reddit thing imaginable, to actually rewatch them is fedora

Lotr is kino, HP films are mere flicks compared to that masterpiece.

See this is reddit. They are actually mediocre flicks except FOTR its pretty good. But that doesn't excuse you or anyone else for liking Hackson and not seeing his vanilla directing. Might as well been a play minus the cg. Shame on you.

Lord of the rings are movies and they are very plain. Not much to get excited about except of you are 12 and replay the action scenes. There's a reason JK rowling wanted Terry Gilliam to direct Philosophers Stone

Animated series when?

I think I standard show would be absolutely terrible like game of thrones is an example that more material doesn't mean its going to be better or even good.

Animated series would be cool tho

Harry Potter is literally a children's series.
Lotr is aimed at adults.

Which are you?

Tell me what is adult about lotr please tell me. I already told you harry potter mirrors british politics and self deprecation mocks the brazilian nature of real life by showing batshit wizardry. What's so special about lotr? I loved it when I was younger but I attest there's nothing special about it.

The harry potter books dealt with orwellian styled society and corruption. Yea not the first ones which were aimed at kids. The others are aimed at young adults. Lotr is not for adults.

DUDE WE HAVE TO DESTROY THIS RING AND WALK AND FIGHT ORCS

DUDE ALL THIS WALKING REALLY MAKED YOU THINK

So things like the novikov self consistency principle are children stories?

Harry potter's main cast is literally children

If the main characters of any form of media is younger than you, it was not intended for you.

That applies fully up until you're like 30

How is it possible to be this retarded

No, puberty hermoine is best.
No one can refute that

>Being this far up your own ass
Come on now, the Potter films and fanbase are completely dominated by children.

I bet you like capeshit you plebiean retards.

Just stop replying.

Nice deflection. The prisoner of azkaban accurately deals with no alternate reality time loops that would be accurate ny all means as per novikov self consistency principle. The director and cinematographer was 12 right?

The actors were legally able to drink for 4 or 5 ofthem. Hermione was the youngest ahe was 16 18 19 and 20 when theu filmed the last four. And the boys were older

That wasn't even me I hadn't responded yet

This is my response
And you didn't tell me what made lotr adult. You didn't evem bother to talk about th fiommaking either

I hate capeshit nice fucking shitposting when I actually bothered to discuss something. Nice le capeshit retort because someome doesnt like LOTR
I know its not what people usually do on this board but ou can try to have a cinversating instead of sounding and being a complete dunce.

>The director and cinematographer was 12 right?
No idea why you're pulling all that out of your ass but no, of course not.

I never said people who are currently adults couldn't like harry potter, I said that in the first books/movies, the characters were children, and thus the stories were meant for children. Who will eventually grow up, along the characters, which is what I'm assuming was sperging out over

Lotr's cast was adults, from the first release off.

You're the one claiming the the HP films aren't family friendly children's garbage, and the fact that you think having a time travel device is a good idea really proves my point, you retarded manchild.

STRAIGHT OUTTA HOGWARTS
CRAZY MOTHERFUCKER NAMED WEASLEY

You're right that the first stories are meant for children but witchcraft can be dark and the series was later on. Lots if deaths and themes like so with the ministry that children wouldn't connect with

Does anyone have a grid of The Prisoner of Azkaban in high res?

But people who were children when the first part was released will

Name 5 movies or series of which the main cast is younger than the target audience.

>Radcliffe used to be a tall kid

gotta get high before you taste the low

You're the one claiming the the HP films aren't family friendly children's garbage
I never said they were family friendly but they have things in the latter ones like deathly hallows part 1 where the atmosphere is very adult and the society is corrupted. This isn't children time

> and the fact that you think having a time travel device is a good idea really proves my point, you retarded manchild
I'm going to assume you're attacking it because you don't understand it but read the novikov self consistency principle. I know you're full of shit because.not only does the time travel work it fits the film perfectly. The themes have to do with the past harrys parents friends past the present, future, divination, prophecy. It all goes along with the time loop self fufilling prophecy. For a brief time travel for the one used 5-6 hours, this unparadoxical affect would take place. Hermione despite what she does never interfers directly with anything as to offer a paradox. Buckbeak mever dies there is no alternate realitu in which he doesn't die. Its why harry knows he can conjure a patronus so well evem though he hadn't done it yet because he had done in the past and future present.

Also the time travel device being given to take extra classes is british tongue and cheek humor its something so ridiculous of course the brits wouod do it. Reminder hermione is cranky in the film because she's aged 2-3 extra months

>harry potter then
>harry potter now
youtu.be/96SrWO5Na54
What happend?

And what is wrong with that? Some adults don't understand poa properly even

I don't you should make one

>Tv and america is vastly different from filming a film series in the UK
>implying the British media industry isn't a hotbed of pedophilia, too.

There's still nothing you've said to prove lotr isn't at the very least the same amount for kids if not moreso based on what I've said.

With what, the fact they were children when the first part was released?

There's nothing wrong with that, I was just explaining to you why harry potter was targeted more towards children than Lotr. Which several people in this thread had some trouble understanding.

I knew you would jump on that but that tv shit is different thay like I said Heyday films who bought the Harry Potter rights. Heyman isn't jewish and doesn't look like a freak. I said of course it happens but not in every single case you fuckwit

That guy was in tv. This was a huge deal and production compared to sunday teacups no

Who'd have thought that Ron would turn out so ugly?

I was the same age when I became fans of both. If anything and we are on the film board the lotr films are more kiddie than thebooks and the hp films (not all but 4) are more adult than the books

Do you think hes been secretly in love with her in all those years filming the series?

what do you think shes thinking about here?

They were laughing to cope with being uncomfortable. Yates said Emma knew she should go for it early so they wouldn't need 20-30 takes. They probably had less than 10

shes a feminsts that says she would never date a british guy because they are too shy, yet the tells other girls to go for the betas and not for the chads yet she had a tall chad bf

Dude check your studd before sperging. Look up photos of her other boyfriends Johnny Simmons and Jay Barrymore, they arent alpha as fuck and the latter is a skinny skinny lanklet. Also dated a chink

Just jerked it imagining i was the guy in that scene kissing qt prime emma watson. Now i'm depressed. Gonna go kill myself

Such a chad right?

Its ok user we will make it

If you aren't a good bit taller than emma watson you have a problem she 5'5

No, please stop, I can't take this.

It's not fair. I'm going to die alone, I will never have someone this beautiful.

if it makes you feel better, being with a girl that beautiful is just a different kind of suffering. Everyone is always trying to take her from you, always trying to make you look bad, sabotage you. And unless you are a rich 10/10, you know you may never get a girl like that again so you are always scared to death of losing her, which you probably will.

Trust me, it's better then being alone but it isn't exactly fun. Not to mention girls that hot are usually awful people once you get past their looks, they never had to be a good person people like them anyway.