The new Losers Club from the remake of Stephen King's IT

The new Losers Club from the remake of Stephen King's IT.

Now this is a club I can support

L to R:
Bill Denbrough
Richie Tozier
Eddie Kasprak
Mike Hanlon
Ben Hanscom
Stan Uris
Beverly Marsh

movie is set in the late 80s
Part 2 will be set in the present

Will they include the gangbang?

inb4 pedos talking about children fucking

Just missed it

If it's good enough for Stephen King to write about, it's good enough for me to critique it.

>Stephen King has 12 year olds celebrate their defeat of an interdimensional horror by running a train on the only female in the group
>It's the people that point this out that have the problem, not King

Kingfags literally see nothing wrong with this

You'd think they'd balance the genders.

so they all gang bang that cutie ginger

Im in like sin

>balance

It should be remade with 7 girls you misogynist shitbag.

SO DO THEY FUCK BEV IN THIS ONE OR NOT

When do you think King will finally fess up and admit he accidentally shuffled his personal fap material in with the rest of the novel when he sent it to his publisher?

I know he's proud but surely this has gone on long enough.

So this one is going to be shot and shown entirely chronilogically. I don't think that'll work as well as the 1990 version did.

But they, like, had to all fuck to find the power to get back out of the sewer or something.
Makes sense to me!

I haven't read it yet, but does it work in the narrative or is it as objective as you can get, completely unecessary?

Casting is fucking shit these days. All of these kids are too cute. They don't look anything like a mixed group of friends.

IT was written while King was at the peak fo his addiction to painkillers and coke. He doesn't remember writing 2/3rds of the book at all.

Doesn't justify thhe child sewer gangbang, but does explain it.

You're full of shit. The only novel he's admitted to not recalling having written was Cujo.

It has logic in the narrative, just been too long since I've read it.

It was necessary for them to make their bond stronger so IT couldn't separate them and pick them off one by one.

Bullshit, no girl just "hangs out" with 6 guys. She's definitely a whore. King was right.

Without getting too spoilery, the ids are lost in the sewer system. In order to tap into this mystic force that links them and helps them (the turtle), Bev offers the others to fuck her one at a time to calm down and get back into this state of mind.

It's incredibly jarring and uncomfortable to read, but so is the entire book. In my opinion, the story itself wouldn't lose anything with that scene removed, but the book would lose some of the horror and discomfort the reader feels reading it.

If you read his earlier work you'd realize that he specifically wrote that stuff to be as disturbing and fucked up as possible.

Especially anything he wrote in the 80's, tons of fucked up sex scenes and body horror. It was his gimmick, and nobody else at the time went as far as he did and it made him famous.

Barker was pretty fucked up in the 80s m8

>Beverly is abused on a grand scale by her cunt of a dad
>Beverly sees Patrick Hockstetter jerking off the other kid
>"Hello there, burgeoning sexuality"
>Beverly, like the other kids, knows that the bond between the seven of them (remember - seven, not six, not fucking five - if you even remember that god damn part) has to be at its absolute strongest, if they have any chance whatsoever to defeat It
>A few of the kids, especially Stan, are terrified as all fuck
>"Okay, I think I have an idea - it's crude and primitive, but it might just work"
>suddenly, GANGBANG!

Jesus Christ. It's like you daft cunts can't even into subtext. Read between the fucking lines, you morons. It's a horrifying moment, but in the context of a truly horrifying story, it WORKS.

Some random goodreads user put it in the most succinct way I've seen.

>When I first read it I thought that it is too controversial scene, but now, the more I think of it I guess that it meant to symbol some kind of "end of childish innocence". Only children were able to see and fight It and only they could enter it's domain. But in order to leave it they had to stop being children.

It was necessary to the narrative.

kek

I'd go a little further and say that Bev learns that sex can be a thing between people who love each other, not just used as a power play by abusers. But then the losers club leave Derry and the memories of what they'd done together fade, including what she learned, an thus she ends up in the abusive relationship we see her in at the start of the book.

go to bed stephen

>Stan is the only one who doesn't cum in the sewer scene
>Stan is the only one who doesn't return

Bravo Mr. King

DUDE SEWER GANGBANG LMAO

>you just know

The middle one's Cartman?

All looks like retard autistic kidz, except for the girl.

She has the face who has seen some dicks.

>the black kid is already getting swole
Anime was right, black people really do have a genetic advantage.

only 1 minority? how this get pass the SJWs??

she looks like she's had some gangbang experience

the black kid looks friendly and normal

>1 black
>1 jew
>1 girl
>4 white boys

Did tyler the creator dress all these kids?

>nigger head of the table

he's clearly the alpha of the pack

He took what was his without debate or struggle.

King is a terrible writer and It sucks. Why are you even excited for this movie?

I just realized that the racism that Mike experiences made a lot more sense in the context of the story taking place in the 1950's.

it's two square tables pushed together for the photo, you fucking idiot.

It's actually 3 square tables pushed together. Who's the fucking idiot now, idiot?

>that stupid spider at the end and some bullshit about space turtles
Just why?

Wasn't the black one the second most important character in the original?

>Another remake
Wow Hollywood really is doing great work nowadays

11 seconds, whew lad

I've seen pornos that start like this

Still you.

Still makes sense now apparently if someone gets insanely triggered by a child sitting at a table.

Potential for an underage gangbang of course, did you even read the thread?

drugs

I can't stand hollywood nepotism especially when it comes from Dan Schneider stuffing his kids in movies. You can tell his son is cucked for being so close to the bull

>King is a terrible writer and It sucks.
objectively wrong times two

It is literary kino, or "lito," if you will.

edgy losers on Sup Forums does not = the real world, moron.

it wasn't a spider, it was the closest the human mind could come to comprehending ITs true form

I'm imaging something way more diverse than that.

Mike and Bill were definitely the lead characters, followed closely by Bev and Ben, then Richie and Eddie, and last Stan and Henry.

It's a spider.

lmao check out baby O'riley

nice lucky 7s

Yeah racism doesn't happen anymore right?

Shut your face.

>cuck
>bull

when did you realize you were nothing but living smegma?

>racism is a thing that occurs
>every movie must address this
>in identical one-side manner

...

Yeah, what about the other side of racism where biggers should be all hanged for being monkeys?

Again: The racism Mike experiences makes A LOT MORE SENSE in the CONTEXT OF IT TAKING PLACE IN THE 1950's, YOU FUCKING RETARD!

Everyone talking about the sex scene

I'm more hopeful for the flood that destroys half of Derry at the end of Part 2.

>Standpipe topples over, spilling all of the town's water, which washes away more than a dozen houses

>downtown falls into the canal, forming a dam, causing the Kenduskeag river to flood the town

They have the budget for a real disaster climax as described in the book hopefully.

wow Stephen King looks better than I remember

I'm still confused about how he can write so many long books without being able to type

b8

Was Tim Curry the best part about IT?

KEE-REKT!

>takes place in 80 instead of 50's
>Henrys dad is now a racist abusive cop
Why?

Why is lit shit on the tv board you fucking asshats.

Yes. But the music was fan-fucking-tastic

Do you guys think Henry will poison Mr. Chips and pack mud into Mikes ears?

Instead of the gangbang, only the black kid will have sex with her, while the white kids masturbate in the corner

They better not fucking do this. Henry is a piece of trash and his dad is a drunk do-nothing piece of trash. If they shoehorn black lives matter bullshit into this I won't be watching this either.

>evil clown makes town evil

>they become racist

Yeah, real subtle you fucking kikes

I literally know nothing about this book but hearing about underage gangbang just got me hard. Can anyone post an excerpt of that scene?

Tim Curry is memorable but the sheer acting talent of the kids makes the first half of the series actually have merit.

lmao shouts out to gamergaters getting triggered over imaginary scenario is they've made up. shoe's on the other foot huh

There are no black people in Maine.

What the fuck is a gamergaters?

Tim Curry with the stroke boi

Most things from the 80s had a token black

>everyone has water except Ben the fat kid.

King was raised Methodist

Jessica Chastain will be cast as adult Beverly in part 2.

Screenshot this.

There are in Derry, the most violent town in the state.

Is the girl still gonna fuck them all?

IT's the scariest story ever.

He's also the only one with a plate of food.

He's cultivating mass for the role of a lifetime.

Seriously, you fags should just go read the book and stop spamming these threads with the same shit. Its not a difficult book, its just long.

It'll also put you on a good footing to shitpost TDT threads when that comes out.

The whole part with the flood and the stoner was boring as fuck. Yawn.

She had to so they'd let her in the movie.