Is Sup Forums as retarded as they claim?
Is Sup Forums as retarded as they claim?
35 squares
26
36
17
1
30
i agree with that
This is correct
40
40
32
The guy who said 35 here. A fuck i missed the middle 2x2 square
40
This
367
I got 39, can't seem to find the 40th one
44
...
27 but you don't need a square test to prove how retarded Sup Forums is. If you need to have a test to know if Sup Forums is the most retarded of all retards then you're retarded.
You need to add 1 more for the whole square that is holding all of the squares inside so 37
this was me
actually 40 is correct
First ignore the two groups of four squares near the middle. Count each individual square, that's 16. Count the groups of four squares (there are nine of them), that's 25. Then count the groups of nine squares (there are four) and then the one big square, that's 30. Then count the two groups of four, so that's eight more and adds up to 38, but then the two groups of four make squares themselves, so that's two more squares. The final number is 40.
Gonna go with 40 on this one.
stop agreeing with yourself
step by step
16
...
You treat them like they're transparent. They're technically all squares because they overlap.
37
+10
26
40th one is the big square that's holding all of the smaller squares
ok, no
Actually they are 41
Correct solution 17
16.
The "big square" composing the entire image doesn't count because it's not an individual square, but is a construct of your mind because the lines are all straight along the 4 sides. If you "pushed" one of the columns/rows out of alignment this illusion would be broken.
+5
31
We got some real fuckin' brainiacs in here with some liberal arts associate degrees...
The answer is 0 idiots, the squares don't exist without your sense of sight interpreting the sense-datum information being relayed to you. In external realism (that which exists independent of the medium of human perception) - we cannot scientifically prove they exist at all
>autism intensifies
+5
36
I agree, 40.
0.5*0.5 -> 8 small squares
1*1 -> 16 singles and 2 from the small ones in the middle
2*2 -> 9
3*3 -> 4
4*4 -> 1
total = 40 squares
Try harder faggot. We can't prove its existence but seeing as how we can see it, we can interpret it. We pretend it exists and go from there.
Why did I do this...
+4
40, my final answer.
did i miss something?
What about these
40
That means there's 44!
41
The image itself
Jesus Christ people, am I the only one that sees the background of this photo
53!!
Is bounded in a square
do overlapping ones count? does all the square bullshit in the background count? does the square fucking border count?
Those are just compression artifacts
there is 40
18 1x1 squares
9 2x2 squares
4 3x3
1 4x4
8 .5 x .5
do yo math
There's the frame too, so that means there's 54!
you're right. my second screen is square too. also all the keys on my keyboard... shit i need to recount...
Math is for pussies
If you said the answer is not 40, you are retarded. Carry on /b.
I like to think that most people here have the common sense to interpret that the question at hand refers to the black figure in the middle of the picture. not some abstract "Think outside the box" bullshit.
Yeap, these 2 are the same I guess.
Thanks
>pic is 403x403
Then there are 41 you slimy faggot
>my garage door
>my glasses frames
>my personality
well then why did i get an a in quantum physics and mathematics??
27
If you measure the smallest 'squares' pixel by pixel they are 14x15 and thus not squares.
You have a square screen? Are you living in 1973? By the eighties even, most computer terminals had 4:3 screens...
It's clearly 16. Jesus Christ.
>98% will fail this test
because 98% of Sup Forums can't even count to 40
what is 40?
Because you have a pussy? Seems obvious to me... TITS OR GTFO!
None
That or 17, if you count the whole square.
>how many squares?
>I see some squares
>but if I move them
>illusion broken
Excellent logic.
This is correct, every other answer is objectively wrong.
shit I mean 31
you are all cancer cells and this thread is/ should be banned as it is a tumor
>my personality
it's hip to be square user
it's 16 or 17 as stated before
tits?? sorry bro but i have a big ass dick
yes, my second screen is square. it's pretty old but still good enough.
Well, having a dick doesn't rule out you having tits.
As well as a pussy??? This I gotta see!
TITS OR GTFO, ALSO SHARPIE IN POOPER!
>think outside the box
Given the circumstances, this is funny to me.
95
here take a selfie i took back in 2010
40
>tits?? sorry bro but i have a big ass dick...
...penetrating my pussy.
Is it a true square, or just a 4:3 rectangle? What is the make and model number?
the pixellated purple background adds at least 50 more squares
19
You're OP for the incest threads arn't you?
Great, now show us your tits, as well as your dickpussy
40, if you want to be a cunt and count the 403x403 square that makes up the image itself then 41.
>>tits?? sorry bro but i have a big ass dick...
>...penetrating my pussy.
better hope i don't split you
Its 40. Done and done.
It's spelt wincest
16 or 17 if were counting the outside
you know not of who i am
In Twain... Mark Twain....
162,409
>y you want my tits so bad?
you gay fag?
this guy