Can we talk about this

Can we talk about this

Pretty good score desu

The non-top critics is 88%

After that godawful trailer might this be the upset of the year?

Upset or surprise hit?

Im not watching ANYTHING that uses a rihanna song to promote it.

You want the rihanna audience? fine but thats not me. I think youll find most trekkers will agree.

What a big fat baby you are.

the average score's a 7/10 so it looks like everyones in agreement that it's a fairly decent/fun sci fi movie
89% doesn't mean it's FOTY just that 89% of people agree it's more good than it is bad

Critics also gave the other two Star Trek movies good reviews.

This doesn't mean anything.

The other two Star Trek movies were good though

Into Darkness wasn't

>9 reviews
Fuck off

Star Trek 2009 was mediocre to say the least


Into darkness was straight up one of the worst ST movies ever made.

It has 25 right now, 88% and a 7.3 average rating

I think it's funny because Sup Forums was so adamant on declaring this a flop. Yet it's apparently really good.

If 4 reviews is enough to declare Warcraft a dud, isn't 9 enough to declare Star Trek good?

Why wouldn't I be surprised if the following was the case.

>most of movie
>Critics: meh, nothing special
>Sulu kisses boyfriend
>Critics: "OMG SO PROGRESSIVE!! LITERAL 10/10 BEST MOVIE EVER. SO FUN, SO MUCH EQUALITY!!"

Into Darkness got positive reviews too, and that was awful. Also, I've disagreed with 95% of RT's percentages for a while now, so there's that.

Still, it would be nice if a movie that looks as bad as it does is actually really good.

kill yourself

I personally don't like to think about gay shit when I'm watching star trek.

go away Chris!

There is literally nothing wrong with JJ's Star Trek films. Don't @ me.

Star Trek is literally about breaking social and cultural barriers, you pathetic fuck.

I don't because you're objectively right.

>7/10

lel it will be Into Darkness all over again

im def seeing this and bourne in theaters
hype as fuck

Overreacting baby

First one was really good. Second one might actually have one of the laziest climaxes I've ever seen.
>Hey, how'd you beat the badguy in your movie? We'll just do that.
>Oh no, Kirk died the way Spock died i-nevermind, he's fine

Star Trek for Teens

The first movie was an action oriented sci-fi movie, but it wasn't Star Trek. It was obvious in the first movie when we find out Spock is dating Uhura that this new "reboot" was made by people who have never actually watched Star Trek, they just know the characters names and caricatured them.

Ok, so they established their new wormhole universe with these empty shell characters. Fine. Then the sequel comes out and instead of doing their own thing they attempt to remake arguably the best Star Trek movie, WoK.

Seriously fuck you JJ Abrams.

>popular franchise using a popular singer to promote their film

triggered

you seem pathetically upset.

Kirk's promotion. He goes from first officer to captain in one movie.

Spock in love lel

Product placement, product placement

instead of exploration of socio political themes, generic action and splosions

Transwarp beaming

lensflare

Redmatter machina

Kobayashi Maru is wasted and means nothing

Horrible engine room design

Chekov the navigator is also the ship's transporter expert?

Spock ordering Kirk to be stranded on Delta Vega, not logical

Everything about part 2 reverse Kahhnnnnnn! so clever

Not really, I wont be watching the 3rd movie. Just pointing out your shit taste

it was a success the moment the fast n furious movies directed it

AWWWWWWWWW

CANT STAND IT

Your taste is shit though.

All the younger kids at my work love the new reboot, but the older guys who grew up with Star Trek hate it.

No, you're the one that likes the new films remember?

Exactly why my taste is infinitely better.

Nostalgiafags are cancer

>magic blood

And?

New timeline.

All movies have it.

There were sociopolitical themes, so much they triggered Sup Forums.

What's the problem?

What's the problem?

It wasn't a machine.

It means quite a bit if you pay attention.

No.

What? No.

He was not acting logically.

Okay.

A lot of the reviews are saying Beyond is pretty much like watching a big budget TV series episode.

I think the whole manbaby insult is applied to the wrong fanbase kek

That's a good thing, depending on the series.

TNG = Great
Voyager = meh
DS9 = Excellent
Original = The original sucks by later series standards

Why can't Spock date Uhura when his father a full vulcan married a human woman and had a child? Do you yourself know anything about Star Trek?

>Original = The original sucks by later series standards
Spotted the Trek pleb.
TNG has unwatchable first and second seasons with dogshit strewn throughout like alexander episodes and lwaxana and other just miserable trash. The first and second seasons of TOS are mostly flawless.

>Original = The original sucks by later series standards

This is what Reddit ACTUALLY BELIEVES

In any case they are a wasted opportunity to launch a tv series for the new fan base.

brb

He didn't park so good

It seems that your brain was able to delete the memories about Nemesis, Insurrection, Generations and Frist Contact. I envy you.

Did you used booze, lobotomy, shock therapy?

Please respond.

OH MY GOD TOTALLY, INTO DARKNESS WAS SHIT

I'VE ONLY SEEN JJ TREKS BUT I KNOW INTO DARKNESS IS TRASH

The song is good and the video is kino, you cuck.

>put a gay character in it
>it gets a high score
genius

>an we talk about this
id prefer not to

>Pretty good score desu
its 2016 it still has no value or weight.

>The non-top critics is 88%
'critics' 'journalists' etc dont exist in mass. if its good it has nothing to do with the critics, the film industry is so lackluster the last 5 years that pieces of shit get praised all the time, theres no way to know until YOU watch it

the scene where khan mercs the klingons was bretty gud

i havent heard of this but i agree fuck rhianna i might not see this now

you should kill yourself bourne is absolutely shit and the fact youre paying to see the fourth one is whats wrong with hollywood. they are worthless flicks

>There were sociopolitical themes, so much they triggered Sup Forums.
Like?

I can hear you reaching into that cheetos bag from here

>Not watching Skyfall

Shut up, you collosal faggot