>Generic ass trap album
>Pitchfork gives it a 7.3
>pretty interesting array of textures, sonically
en.wikipedia.org
DUDE WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS BULLSHIT
Why does pitchfork give generic ass rappers good reviews?
Why were they so fucking hard on rock music for so long, yet they give all these wack ass rappers a pass?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
pitchfork.com
pitchfork.com
pitchfork.com
pitchfork.com
en.wikipedia.org
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
Say it with me kids,
>W H I T E G U I L T
white guilt or some dumb lefty shit like that
and just to show you guys what I'm talking about:
youtube.com
>MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS MOLLY PERCOCETS
>CHASE A CHECK NEVER CHASE A BITCH
>pretty interesting array of textures, sonically
Suck my fucking dick Pitchfork
DESU, a pitchfork 7 is just a lazy number they attach to an album when the don't wanna think too hard. HNDRXX is beyond FUTURE in about every single way quality wise, but even that doesn't deserve above a 7. FUTURE should've gotten a 4, but Pitchfork didn't feel like thinking that day, or any day. It's why critical reviews, especially numbered reviews, should NEVER be taken seriously. Numbers are for products, not pieces of art.
Dis you even listen to the album
they are racists who hold africans to a lower standard
>DESU, a pitchfork 7 is just a lazy number they attach to an album when the don't wanna think too hard.
Yes, to black rappers.
en.wikipedia.org
here's a generic uninspired album by an otherwise great rock band.
They harshly gave it a 5.9, perhaps appropriately so.
There's fucking memes out there that show critics giving rock albums great reviews, and Pitchfork notoriously giving it a harsh review or a subpar review.
Yet with rappers - black rappers in particular when you consider they're harsh on Eminem - they refuse to rate them in a Pitchfork style of doing so.
Why?
en.wikipedia.org
>Tool: Lateralus - 1.9/10
of course all Pithfork reviews aren't written by a same guy, sure.
But when you consider that the theme throughout their rock reviews is a theme of harshly judging them, you get the idea that they're told to not hold back in reviewing.
Yet with specifically black rappers (As we know Eminem's reviews are harshly judged) they notably don't do this.
>future
>generic ass rapper
Only Desiigner sounds like him. Future is in his own niche he carved out.
>rap
>good
Pick one.
youtube.com
Your curiosity of music doesn't go further than a jr high lunch room table if you think that sounds impressive
pitchfork.com
pitchfork.com
pitchfork.com
pitchfork.com
these are just four rock reviews in the past few days, all 7's. They gave Drake's Views a 6, Rick Ross' recent album a 6.9. What's your point? it is't anything to do with race, it's just pure laziness lol.
You're not gonna like everything pal. Doesn't mean it's bad.
That didn't answer my question
Reddit is down the hall to the left.
Tell them I said hi.
Who are your favorite artists?
Everybody knows his bloody p4k scores are inflated, you dorks, but you can deny that he's innovated his own very influential sound
>says the "mature" "cultured" 20 year old on his way back from the coffee shop
Pitchfork review:
This new hip hop album has a unique distinction that sets it apart from its contemporary rivals: its bleak texture and aural vibe give it an ethereal quality that vastly supercedes expectations and creates an almost viral atmosphere of sheer gloom (with unexpected tinges of bright poppy glamor!). The lyricism evokes a simplistic torment, painting a vivid image of an emotionally starved beaurocrat thrashing about in a stinking pit of his own creation. Fantastic!
All in all this is shaping up to be an aoty; I give Kodak Black's "cum licker swan song" an 8.5/10.
(Composition, chord progressions and time signature are all absent from being mentioned in this review, shockingly)
>bashes pitchfork review by making up a fake review
2/10
sounds like you're just mad because the jock who fucked your crush posted a Mask Off meme
lyrics =/= textures
Wow, you sure got me!
I certainly wasn't making a joke. Nope, my intention was to trick you!
>Composition, chord progressions and time signature aren't mentioned in pitchfork reviews
expecting that much from a company owned by conde nast is on you
>when the review doesn't mention time signature, BPM, or the software the beats were produced in
EPIC FAIL, Pitchfork, EPIC FAIL INDEED!
>Other people like the music I don't like
RRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
i guess its popularity is just a fluke....right
this is the best future release especially out of the ds2, evol, etc era. most consistent production
do you know what texture is you fucking idiot lmfao here you go en.wikipedia.org
Mask Off has some of the nicest production I've heard. The rest of the album trash though, and Future is sooo boring, one of the rare artists who really needs features to succeed.
post your favorite Future
youtu.be
The Percocet & Stripper Joint