They're wrong

They're wrong

who's navy is that? whoever they are "innovation" must come natural

why do i see the image of shamu in the top right hand corner??
>nice trips faggot

Looks like Russia's Kuznetsov.

Russians.

(Admiral) Kusnezow Aircraft Carrier

Currently in the Mediterranean

It's Chinese

It says Kuznetsov right on the side of the ship, you tiddlywink.

I will miss that catastrophic smoke stack of a ship

In chinabong letters, you rapscallion.

Trumplestiltskin will make them smoke again

Chinabongs don't have letters you scrimshanker

China's is a refurbished Russian one.

it is the russian kusnezow the number 63 prove it

the ramp method is how every country that isn't america launches its jets on aircraft carriers. i think china is trying to develop a launch system like the US, but they keep fucking up.

...

Yeah, it's still not this one.

this is the liaoning aircraft carrier

Y U no carry aircraft?

looks like a cargo freighter

Did you know that the Russian/Chinese "carriers" aren't technically aircraft carriers? Since they don't have aircraft catapults, but instead rely on their skijump fronts and V/STOL planes and helicopters, they are actually classified as "heavy aircraft-carrying cruisers."

While China and Russia are still dicking around with small, limp antiques, the US is getting ready to start replacing their ten world class Nimitz class carriers with a new generation of Ford class carriers. Coming very soon to an ocean near you.

but but but...China's new super hyper ultra mega cruise missiles that fall like heroic working class meteors will explode the weak Imperialist oppression carriers, while the Eternal Friend of the Worker class barges..err mobile islands with towed arty in sandbagged redoubts will make short shift of the remaining running dog American surface force!!


CHINA STRONK! YOU GOTO HELL G.I. YOU DIE!

They're also not classified as aircraft carriers because the Bosporus and Ardanells strait treaty forbids passage of such.

Also, the chinese bought theirs from the Ukraine for 20M$, unfinished after the collapse of the soviet union. They had a strawman buying it, pretending to turn it into a casino in Macao - it was sold under the premise that it is demilitarized, basically China violated a contract with Ukraine that way.

poor countries are funny

If it works, it takes complexity.

>Eternal Friend of the Worker class barges..err mobile islands

whatwhat now?

I wonder how they would hold up against the armed stealth drones the US is putting out now?

Not very well, I'd imagine.

Poor in experience yes. Knowing that a thing can be done is 1/2 the battle. But only 1/2 the battle.
No one can match the USN in terms of experience, doctrine and equipment in Carrier Aviation.

In 20 years China's navy will be at the level the USN is at now. Hopefully our lord Trump will continue to fund and give the USN a mission.

pic related.

Look, I'm from Brazil (hue). If the USA wanted, they would blow up the entire world. Your military budget is superior to the top 10 other country budgets combined.
The question is - would you do it ?
Also, this fact doesn't seem to deter others engaging in eternal warfare against America.

>Somali tier navy

>poverty ramp

Tank tanker

Well, if it looks stupid, but it works, it isn't stupid.

Russia sure could do that. They have enough tanks that don't roll anymore, and I bet China has, too.

Naw dog, its just a dick waving contest by and large. And you especially want to swing the biggest, hardest purple veined throbbing dick on your block, to keep the potentially rebellious but more easy cowed smaller dicks in a near constant state of flaccidity.

You bet your ass we would. America likes war because we're good at it. We didn't build all that shit just to have it sitting around looking awesome. Give the USA a reason, and we'll be happy to pound your ass into the dirt.

yeag ig

did I hear someone say HMS Europoor?

bump

Dude, you are in the Middle East forever now and still trying to figure out how to blow the sandniggers out of existence.
>But still no chance in sight.

What about the French Charles de Gaulle? It's capable of catapult launching.

All the last reasons for America to go to war were and are self made.
Didn't win a single genuine war since ww2. Got beat up by simplest tactics.
Rush into country in days, destroying all infrastructure and "military", be constantly ground up there trying to fix shit because local militia neither need infrastructure nor military.

Someones mad. We're the dominant military force in the world, basically uncontested. We may not have the manpower to take over someone like China or Russia, but we could stomp their military out in a matter of weeks.

France is cool guy

Yes, but you are not considering nuclear warfare, which would be, like, a little bit bad for some people in continental USA and the rest of the world.

Also, the argument is valid. Again, warfare makes money for the military industry. They fuel it and have to sell it to the population, autis.., er, Sup Forums users like you to support it.

You'd not win.

The world is legitimately mad because if someone invades a country to kill a bad people group, destroys all the infrastructure but effectively leaves said country in the hands of even more bad people groups, they fucked up.

Basically it seems to be understood as the contest of who makes the biggest turd. America with a big and shiny ass shat in the room, congratulated itself and got out again. Meanwhile, everyone attending the competitive dance contest just looks at the steaming pile of crap in horror and searches America's tard wrangler.

And you think China would accept a defeat in conventional warfare without resorting to unconventional warfare?

It's not the 1940s. A war with either Russia or China has no winners.

Ramps topkek

This is now A Pro United States of America Thread.

Works pretty well maximizing takeoff efficiency.
We'd do that too if our ships weren't built so long ago.

...

...

...

...

...

...

who is we?

Is ballroom dancing night at Archangelsk.

...

...

...

Does any body really care if ww3 occurs? put aside family members that you'd care about, but the state of affairs that we have, the rich, manipulative, greedy and selfish bankers and politicians are still in place and will be for as long as they are allowed to by the people. The gap between poor and 1% will continue to grow, only a huge happening like mass civil war/governmental overthrows will change that, or not. It's all getting worse every day, and war is only around the corner. Look at that retard Trump. Another financial collapse is inevitable and the average person will foot the bill as usual.

...

Yeah drones.
Good thing China doesn't konw anything about electronics, computers, or mass production.

...

totally right cause all their electronics suck cock and break a day after of use. also full of lead

...

>china
>sets the mass production lines
>building and endless quantity of small cheap light fast drones
>millions of them pouting into the sky
>monitoring for unidentified aircraft and swarming
>anything that is not them
>the horror
>the horror
>the horror

Admiral Kuznetsov was designed to carry 58 aircraft at peak capacity, which is little more than half of what Nimitz can carry.

>blissfully unaware that all consumer electronics have been made there for 20 years already

lol how is living in the 1980s user?

...

thats fucking funny cause my pc processor is made in Malaysia. hows being blissfully gay?

>building and endless quantity of small cheap light fast drones
>10% failure rate during first start
>12% crash shortly after takeoff
>16% suffer navigational failures, most are never recovered
>8% have hydraulic and avionic failures
>10% suffer midair collisions from the other failures
>all others are destroyed by CIWS
>Navy carrier battle group watch from the distance, eating popcorn

...

You're hilariously thinking the Kuznetsov is for engaging the US and not baltic muscle.

That's what the submarine nuclear arsenal has been for for half a century.

...which, a single sub carries more firepower today than the entire soviet nuclear arsenal had at its peak. You get proxy wars, and total war between superpowers, nothing in between.

It also introduces unnecessary stress to the nose gear. The whole ramp thing is unnecessary for our pilots and their aircraft.

>single sub carries more firepower today than the entire soviet nuclear arsenal had at its peak
lol

23%, 61%, 97%, and 25.23%, as long as we're pulling numbers out of our anus on a hypothetical.

also severely limits max take off weight

Our drones and aircraft are so numerous they would block out the sun.

The communist entered the room everybody!

I've never seen french planes on an American Carrier before, they must be practicing.

A single nights raid over tokyo of firebombing killed more than the explosions of both atomic bombs

lol @ this thread
who knew ameritards have the perfect military that dates from the 1970s and yet will never ever be beat by anyone forever and ever amen lol

U.S. hosts several nations for training and practice

topkek Nimitz class still has it beat by 100 meters
get fukt britbongs

they usually do it once a year

...

Then we will kill you in the shade.

um, no

Chairforce Avionics Tech here. Though I appreciate the vote of confidence, you and everyone else in this thread overestimate our capabilities to the point of absurdity.

Same with Dresden.

...

flat deck / catapult = more ordnance able to be carried by aircraft

Can launch in any sea conditions

significantly higher launch/recovery rate + more sorties

More useable deck space

etc.
dumbass.

This aircraft lands so perfectly on the deck of the carrier, that it will start to makes a divot where the nose gear hits repeatedly.

>first gen Pip Boy

I saw a brief docu on NATO joint operations a while back. I don't remember if it was UK or French aircraft, but they had to use some funky adapter that attached to their front gear to use our cats, and it is single use because it falls off during launch. I wonder how much the thing costs.

I'll try to find it.

...

I enjoy seeing what USA will look like in the next war, when all its hundreds of millions of retards who got the wrong idea after waltzing through WWII picking the pockets of europe finally learn what war is like.

yea cause wolrd war II only happened in europe

>I enjoy seeing what USA will look like in the next war

Who can attack the U.S. like this? literal question.

...

>after waltzing through WWII

Waltzing with the Japanese and the Germans?