Ghostbusters 2016

Blunder of the century?

share this

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/53842377/#q53842674
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/53842377/#q53842812
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/53912711/#q53912711
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/54039181/#q54039429
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/54120390/#q54120390
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/54122763/#q54122763
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/54122763/#q54122811
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69774489/#q69777739
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69780980/#q69788276
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69782862/#q69783417
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69774489/#q69775046
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69774489/#q69776524
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69816439/#q69818098
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69966705/#q69966705
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/70237675/#q70239035
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/70680783/#q70684098
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71189541/#q71191676
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71509039/#q71516035
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71559150/#q71560237
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71609570/#q71610045
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71925251/#q71926755
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It isn't good enough to share.

>Women

delete this thread
delete it now

>domestic: 78%

America confirmed pleb capitol of the world.

the fact that one out of two people liked this crap movie? yeah it is sad.

Too much effort. Literally nobody I know cares about this flicks.

youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8

>OH NO A MOVIE WITH THE FEMALE GENDER IN IT
grow up

>too much effort
literally 5 mins in paint

UNJUST ME, PLZ

That's every movie user. Grow up yourself.

One out of two people is a woman :^)

It's actually making more money than I thought it would. Also the imdb score and rottentomato score has improved from 4.2 and 44% to 5.2 and 57% respectively.

Does this mean that the movie isn't as bad as people initially thought and the much of the hate was undeserved?

Or could women be mass-buying tickets and seeing it to support it?

>Does this mean that the movie isn't as bad as people initially thought and the much of the hate was undeserved?

No, it means dudes are carpet-bombing it with 1's and chicks are carpet-bombing it with 10's. I'm not even joking, look up the rates by sex on IMDB.

>you now realise that Brexit did everyone a favour against this movie by reducing the GBP for a short while

The farage works in mysterious ways

Truly BTFO.

>imdb score and rottentomato score has improved from 4.2 and 44% to 5.2 and 57% respectively.

>average Males rating: 4.5
>average Females rating: 8.1

you must have recognized how dumb this was as the post button was being pressed

I take umbridge with both sides. They are both just trying to score one for 'their team'

THe movie is clearly not a 10, and clearly not a 1. Every 10 and 1 should just be dropped.

>this logic

How come the supposed roaring feminist audience is not giving this movie enough views and money? Could it really be that the audience that is all about that "GURL POWA" is not a big enough crowd, and that pandering to audience that doesn't exist is not a good idea?

Nah it's probably sexism.

>grossing 65 million is a blunder
lolwut, how much did it cost 500 million?

Why is Sup Forums so racist?


archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/53842377/#q53842674
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/53842377/#q53842812
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/53912711/#q53912711
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/54039181/#q54039429
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/54120390/#q54120390
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/54122763/#q54122763
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/54122763/#q54122811
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69774489/#q69777739
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69780980/#q69788276
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69782862/#q69783417
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69774489/#q69775046
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69774489/#q69776524
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69816439/#q69818098
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69966705/#q69966705
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/70237675/#q70239035
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/70680783/#q70684098
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71189541/#q71191676
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71509039/#q71516035
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71559150/#q71560237
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71609570/#q71610045
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71925251/#q71926755

About 300 million.

I'm not surprised the RT score is as high as it is. Actually surprised it isn't higher. Same shits happening as with Bad Neighbours 2 where it's being inflated by "yay feminism" reviews.

But the box office was always a wildcard because audiences are so fucking stupid.

CAN'T DISPARAGE THE FARAGE

no, but that's how much it needs to gross to save Fag

Fant4stic was a bigger blunder.
That's just a flop.
I hope the rest of the remakes down the line do just as bad.

>Bad Neighbours 2 where it's being inflated by "yay feminism" reviews

That movie pushes feminism?

Nice try, but this is the board that loves Alien, Terminator, Princess Bride, and Studio Ghibli films (which often features female protaganists), GitS, Paprika, Angel's Egg, Metropolis, Neon Demon, and generally likes the new Mad Max, as well as Black Swan, Labyrinth, The Force Awakens, etc.

Sup Forums has no particular hatred for films with women. We do, however, have a particular hatred for getting agendas shoved down our throats, and we also generally dislike shitty, unfunny comedies.

Yeah, there's some contrarians, but for the most part, Sup Forums is not anti-women. It is fairly anti-black, and you'd have a semi-valid point if you brought that up, but as it stands, you sound like a whiny newfriend from >>>tumblr

>Blunder of the century?

Hardly, take a look at something like Gods of Egypt for example, also $140 million production budget (but not near the same promotion budget, since the studio obviously realized they had a dud), made $31 million domestic and $114 million overseas, of which the studio gets at best 55% and 33% respectively.

That said, the best thing Ghostbusters can hope for is breaking even at the box office, but that's not very likely, in fact it's downright unlikely given the poor worth of mouth which is what this needed to fend off the new releases next weekend.

So, it's not near anything like 'blunder of the century', but it's a poor performer which isn't going to net Sony a single dime, and likely cost them quite a bit instead unless the post box office life of this title is spectacular, bluray, VOD etc, which I somehow doubt.

I saw someone post this on Twitter saying man-babies purposefully downvoting. I replied that it could be woman purposefully upvoting. Accused of misogyny.

finally we admit it HAS been all about women!

I hate women Sup Forums, don't you hate women too?

why would you type all that ,he doesn't deserve it ! just call him a faggot and roll away.

I didn't until I saw Ghostbusters (2016).

Women were a mistake.

145 million, production + at least that much in marketing.

It's already confirmed as a completely blunder since it will never make enough to break even at this rate. Making a profit is completely out of the question.

Friendly reminder that this film wasn't bad

It was just meh, an average summer blockbuster

Not as bad as the likes of Transformers
Not as borderline good as Marvel studios movies

Just meh

Nothing wrong with that and not a failure

>click top critics
>"Tomatometer Not Available..." since yesterday
Do you think if Sony paid RT money to disable the Top Critics rating for a week, that RT would do it?

Average summer blockbusters are bad though.

It's not bad in the sense that it wasn't filmed with an iphone in paul feig's backyard, but it's a shit movie according to anyone with even a semblance of standards.

Also it is a complete failure from a financial standpoint. Opening weekend barely made 1/3rd of the production budget and it isn't getting a Chinese release.

>but it's a shit movie according to anyone with even a semblance of standards.
It's a shit film according to neckbeards who need to be vindicated

Normal people call it as it is "meh"

>Not knowing how the tomatometer works

Yeah for sure having standards makes someone a neckbeard. You forgot to call us misogynist manbabies so please rectify that in your next post.

Yeah, what this faggot said.

>1h56min
Why can't modern flicks stick to 90min? Sometimes I'd like to turn my brain off and watch some fun capeshit but >3+ hours fuck that

>insult your consumer base
>they don't want to pay for your product anymore
It is weird how these things work.

>65 mil
>flop

haha fuck u manbabby we don't want your money xD

please we were just kidding please go buy a ticket

>cost 300 million to make and advertise
Just because 65 million seems like a lot to you doesn't mean it's a lot in Hollywood where every movie is overbudgeted.

>needs to bring 500 mil
>success

from a 144 million budget, not counting advertising and unless Feig was being cheeky, he said it'd need 500 million to be a success.

Not to mention how hard the drop off is going to be with Star Trek this week.

oh shit i forgot about Star Trek
yeah theyre fucked
>78% domestic

Your argument would make you look less of an idiot if those same neckbeards didn't have a big existing repertoire of movies with female leads and vital female roles which they liked long before Agendabusters was released.

merchandise,tv rights,blue ray sales,games,clothing lines.Eventually they will get a profit out of it.

...

>male rating closer to the aggregated rating
why do we listen to women when they can't be trusted?

>Merchandise
the toys are already on clearance

>video games
it was shitted on by reviewers

How does this empower women?
How is it not seen as incredibly fucking patronizing?

Actual women see right through this bullshit.
But womanchildren, which are becoming just as common as manchildren, fail too see how they are being manipulated and treated like little kids.

The video game is an even bigger flop and none of those things will even come close to making up the difference.

Profit is completely out of the question at this point, it would take a miracle for them to even make their money back.

>grossing 65 million is a blunder
>lolwut

The expectation of success at the box office has long been three times production budget. That means for every million dollars spent on a movie, it should gross three million. Given that the movie cost $145 million to produce, you'd need to rake in over $450 million at the box office to be considered a proper success. Now, you might say "it's just the first weekend" - but the first weekend is the only real weekend a movie has. If it founders there, it never recovers. The second week dropoff is always between 25 and 50%. So, if it made $46 million in the US opening weekend, it'll be lucky to make $34 million next weekend - probably more like $25 million (daily figures will add to it bit by bit, but not enough to make up the difference). It'll be lucky if it ties Independence Day: Resurgence (which had a very similar pattern in its opening - debuting at #2 against an already-released animated film, failing to achieve even $50m) in domestic figures - and it still hasn't passed the $100 million mark).

Now, for a lot of movies, the saving grace of a weak US box office (or the cherry on top of a good one) has been the Chinese box office. But the Chinese authority in charge of letting movies in declined to give Ghostbusters a release. So, that's that. No Plan B. All of the other markets are smaller. Stick a fork in it, it's done.

Imagine being a female and being asked to be the stunt double for Leslie Jones. Obviously you take the job since work is precious but you'd have to feel a bit insulted on the inside.

Why is Sup Forums so racist against Leslie Jones?

archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/53842377/#q53842674
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/53842377/#q53842812
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/53912711/#q53912711
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/54039181/#q54039429
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/54120390/#q54120390
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/54122763/#q54122763
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/54122763/#q54122811
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69774489/#q69777739
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69780980/#q69788276
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69782862/#q69783417
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69774489/#q69775046
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69774489/#q69776524
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69816439/#q69818098
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69966705/#q69966705
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/70237675/#q70239035
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/70680783/#q70684098
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71189541/#q71191676
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71509039/#q71516035
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71559150/#q71560237
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71609570/#q71610045
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/71925251/#q71926755

>babby can't handle 3 hr kinos

you will never hate women as much as other women hate women.

It only did so bad because of all the misogynerds making a big stink over it

technically it would be speciest

...

Is that actually a female between McKinnon and Kristen Wiig?

>"This movie isn't for you, babymen, deal with it and if you don't like it, just don't watch it"
>movie tanks
>"WHY DIDN'T YOU WATCH THIS MOVIE, BABYMEN??"

Same neckbeards that literally tattoo Kusanagi's face on their skin? Fucking mysonigynistics yuck

what did she mean by this?

butthurt virgin detected

>>OH NO A MOVIE WITH THE FEMALE GENDER IN IT
This was a great movie.
I grew up.When will you,user?

This is a gloating thread why would I be butthurt?

butthurt roastie detected

honestly is it racist to call someone who looks like a gorilla a gorilla?
People said Bush looked like a monkey.

wtf now I hate Leslie Jones now

>The Thing 1981 has a woman in it

Did you really spend this much time fishing all of this out?

...

the anti-ghostbusters 2016 is so desperate for attention just like sjw,when you can like boycott the movie by not going to watch it.

65 million isn't a lot for such a big budget movie on opening week. Hell, some movies made that much in a single day opening night.

>No, fuck YOU
Drunk mike is best mike

>honestly is it racist to call someone who looks like a gorilla a gorilla?

What is historical context, Alex? Likening black people to lesser primates, while generally caring more about said primates than black people, has a long history in America. Now, yes, it is true that the Irish and other less-desirable whites were also once likened to apes, but that largely died out long ago, whereas it continues to happen with blacks. Case in point.

>they forgot this was going to be banned in China

if they don't hit it out of the part domestically then they are fucked

>butthurt that the people we don't like lost millions of dollars

>can't even beat the second most popular animated film of the month in it's second weekend
>has to compete with that + Star Trek next weekend
I would not want to be Amy right now.

NO WONDER THERE IS SO MUCH STUPIDITY IN THE WORLD :^)

>Also competing with Ice Age, Suicide Squad and Jason Bourne.

But no worries a sequel to a massive black hole is DEFINITELY happening.

Actually being Sony I think they'd be stupid enough to make a sequel and spend another 150 million on it.

>boycott the movie just like the SJWs

Well you're right about that. Not even they are seeing it.

It's been said before but I'll say it here. This was supposed to be for Sony's ghostbusters universe what Iron man was for the MCU. They even spent the same amount of money on GB2016 that IM cost 8 years ago.

GB made 65 million worldwide opening weekend in most markets while IM made 100 million domestic alone.

And the whole China thing. Really doesn't take an analyst to see this thing is fucked so it's weird to see box office mojo and others acting like it still has hope

Just follow the Amy Pascal formula:

Known franchise + big name stars + special effects = big $$$

Paying this faggot 20MM and the NBA finals, like 2 million per advert was a HUGE MISTAKE

Mojo and others' success is tied to movies either being successful or the odd absolute train wreck (see Fant4stic), but this was supposed to be a success, so they have to play pretend until everyone forgets in a month. Feig is done though.

$144MM film budget
$150MM advert budget

They could have saved this movie if they didn't try to advertise it as some kind of gender wars bullshit.

Politics & entertainment don't mix well. Who the fuck wants to go see a movie and get lectured and talked down to?

>hire celebrities to promote your movie
>they're all men
well done, feminism.

This.

The "MANBABY" war would have been fine for a smaller budget.

Why in fuck would you pull that on a movie you're expecting to be a universal success capable of starting a franchise? Where the fuck did you think the money was coming from?

its not my fault she is quite literally abbo tier ugly