Reddit is going to far, particularly R/The Donald...

Reddit is going to far, particularly R/The Donald, they're literally trying to justify and support a fucking islamaphobic Nazi right now.

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5tqp0b/her_name_is_nazi_paikidze_and_shes_the_united/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

nazi? have you read his tax plan? he genuinely wants poor people to become rich

reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5tqp0b/her_name_is_nazi_paikidze_and_shes_the_united/

...

Donald is a racist end of story

This, Nazis had a welfare program and the Fascists in Italy also practiced socialist economics mixed with syndicalism.

Not fucking drumpf, this bitch

>Godwin's law
Opinion discarded.

>drumpf
Opinion discarded.

Im talking about this islamaphobic slut, her fucking parents named her Nazi, don't tell me there isn't a connection.

Reminder, Fascism is not evil, even if Nazis are. Nazis were facists, yes, but not all facists are Nazis.

Also, I feel you're in the wrong neighborhood or looking for the easy rustles.

Make that more clear next time, retard. Besides, it's good she's standing up to those far right reactionaries in Iran.

...

Nazis weren't fascists. Nazis care about race, fascists care about the collective.

The quality of this bait is acceptable.

Not sure if idiot or just a fucking libertarian

this is noe a taco thread

Fuck you and fuck Islam sand nigger

Fuck you drumpf, you really think telling me fuck you is going to change anything get a real argument boy fuck you

4/10 troll because you got some responses, but honestly just boring. You should aim higher.

HAHA! Sometimes i wonder do you americans even know what word nazi exactly means.

Nazi = national SOCIALIST

Trump is the exact opposite of socialism.

thank you for clearing that

antifa is fascist

they wear uniforms, they use violence and fear to try to subdue their enemies, they promote this behavior openly and practice it

in europe antifa is sponsored by the state, and in america antifa is sponsored by state actors here and abroad

hitler was the state and sponsored his brown shirts, mussolini was the state and sponsored his black shirts

both of these parties and their brown/black shirted sycophants believed they were fighting on the right side just like antifa today

The best indicator that the left has gone too far is the rise of extreme right wing movements. Keep it up long enough and there could be free helicopter rides for socialists

socialists are racists,=

because marching behind a sharia lover slut with half of her family in hamas is intellectual and the right thing to do.

gtfo

>Opinion discarded.

Opinion discarded.

Nazis didn't care as much about race or skin color as you think. BUT they did care aboit peoples loyalty to Germany and German Reich. That's why they procecuted Jews because their loyalty was foremost to Judaism and not to Germany and German people.

Did you seriously just try to justify Nazism???
Gtfo

they clearly don't, they are confused about marxism as well.

I love the videos where actual legal immigrants from eastern europe for example are shocked while watching these protests; they left their shithole culture that was thorn by both nazis and socialists for 60 years for a better and more peaceful life in the united states / canada. Only to see their peers burning down starbucks while wearing hammer and sickle stickers.

It's so fucked up

>>Opinion discarded

>Opinion discarded

Opinion discarded

> justify and support a fucking islamaphobic Nazi right now

Muslimfag here, I have high hopes for Trump. Bans muslims, creates a registry...I don't give a fuck, I don't live in the USA.

Liberals like Obama and HRC are responsible for the mess that is libya, syria, yemen. Billy did his work in Iraq (sanctions and no-fly).

So, step the fuck back a little. Trump has yet to kill 0.5 million muslims or make 10 million refugees.

Then you can tell me how much of a nazi he is. Until then, FUCK YOU.

most obvious bait thread ive wseen in my entiore life

>opinion accepted

...

they persecuted jews because jews on the whole manifested communism and the lying media

it was unfair that common jews were blamed but that's just how people react

hitler could have been wiser and routed out the communists without resorting to generalizing all jews and would have succeeded in his efforts

the communist jews killed more of their own kind before and after the holocaust, but we dont learn about that in public school

Go to bed

...

Oy vey!
History is racist

Dumb Nazi facade, sure they weren't actually lured to death camps? God knows how much the right wing governments of today have tried to cover up

All these people making fun of the situation, and nobody talking about how fucked up it is that there's a *Women's Chess* League. Like, literally any other sport might have some grounds for a division by gender (maybe, but probably not) - but fucking chess? Really? Do their boobs get in the way of how fast they can hit their clock, and thus require their own league because they can't compete with boobless men?

>>>/reddit/

Better than her or him being a schlomo

I disagree

It's because women are less inclined to play a game like chess and would rather do something that stimulates them emotionally. If you compare modern competing women players to modern men they wouldn't even stand a chance, it has to be segrated because women wouldn't get a fair chance to compete. Chances are the women who have the most potential as chess players simply never had an interest, they're probably out there doing something more productive.

...

Ohhhhh shit, op better pack up his bags and gtfo cus he just got berned.

...

Oh look a Wikipedia article where anyone can make anything up, the fuck outta here

get this: most sports have balls... e.g. "football" "baseball "baketball"

and balls are inherently male. therefore sports are sexist.

......... can we all fuck off to Sup Forums?¿

...

This is readily avalible, know information.
Look up the attempted Jewish communist revolution right after ww1 also. The marxist attempting to seize Germany had everything to do with Hitler actually becoming a thing.
As I said before, when the left push to hard the right will react with deadly effiecency

I assume this answer comes from a statistical analysis of ELO ratings between men and women, and results from all the co-ed tournaments that must have occurred in order to produce such data, and not some post-hoc rationalization for what would seem to be pretty obvious literal misogyny, right?

>Men better than women at something
>Literal misogyny

wew

satanic trips

>detailed logical conclusion
>misogyny REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Chess has no balls, wordsmith. Women's Chess League is pretty clearly sexist. It's not some liberal meme you're making fun of, it's actual bonifide misogyny. You can't pretend there's something other than the idea that women can't play chess as well as men behind that, and since there's nothing physical about chess, it's basically saying that women are cognitively inferior. It's fucked up, and it needs to be changed.

Your subjective view on the subject not withstanding, men are better than women at chess. To force the subject is misandrous.

Welcome to the 2010s
If women aren't better then men at something it's literally misogyny

...

I don't know most of history.

pleb/10

Naw, fuck you - don't play this shit off as some overreaction. I know a few chess teachers and tutors, and they all have stories of the five-year-old girls they've seen who can kick most everyone else's ass at the game. There's no goddamn reason why there should be a "women's chess league" in 2017. They probably just give up when they realize that they won't be allowed to beat men at chess, so they stop playing. This is something that could be changed pretty easily, and would signify steps toward equal treatment. There's basically no valid argument against the fact that chess leagues shouldn't be divided by gender.

robots are better than men at chess, we need to address the game's antimale bias

If we compare the best male and female players together, women wouldn't stand a chance. If men and women competed together you would also call that misogyny because there would be no women victors and they'd only compete in lower tier games. You'd expect some sort of system to prop women up, which would be literal misandry. Instead of fabricating something to blame white men for out of thin air lets get back to the point that Iran IS misogynistic as fuck and is interfering with women's ability to compete.

Learn some basics, the oppressors can't be oppressed, white men simply cannot be oppressed. I understand we're you were trying to go with that but try again.

What's the largest object you've ever inserted into your anus?

Notwithstanding is one word. And everybody's view is subjective. And saying "men are better than women at chess" is puerile. Fewer women play chess than men because it's historically male-dominated, but there's absolutely no reason why the best chess player in the world couldn't be a woman. The fact that I'd even have to say that is fucking sad.

No Anita you're just fucking sad

Not an argument

normie get out
REEEEEEE

Reminder:
I have your dox

Hey, how about the hypothetical league where men and women played together that I'd magically "still call misogyny," why don't we make a league where they actually do, and find out? I bet you I wouldn't call it that, because there's only one question I'd ask: do they let women into the chess league that's only for men? If not, then it's misogyny. Because, you know, it's pretty much basically one of the agreed-upon definitions of the term. For fuck's sake.

...

What's wrong with being a nazi?

Moralfags raus!

So, you think somehow this is related to #gamergate? Is that what you're saying? Because it's not some social criticism of hidden sexism, or anything that requires a deep-structure analysis: they literally don't let women play chess with men. Do you not understand how that's sexist? I'm not really that into labels, but this might be one of those rare cases where we should probably all agree that that's about as literal as you can get.

Women are too stupid to play chess.

Why are you so focused on this when the issue is that Irans inherent anti women culture is preventing this women from competing at all? Whether she was competing in men's or women's chess, she wouldn't be allowed to compete if she wasn't wearing a burqa, how are you so happy to gloss over that?

Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah blah Blah Blah blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah blah Blah blah Blah Blah Blah blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Waldo Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah blah Blah Blah blah

>Blaming men because they're better at chess than women

Why do you hate men so much? Why do you buy into the idea that the inability of one group to perform is the fault of those who are able? Your misandrous views are disconcerting.

Well, because I'm in America, where people are so happy to suck each other's dicks over how comparatively well we "treat our women" that they fail to see the problems that still exist. Of course it's fucking terrible that she would be forced to wear a burqa. That should be so obvious that it doesn't even deserve discussion; but here we are with douchebags who don't even see how having a "women's chess league" in the first place is the root of the entire problem.

>They don't let women play chess with men

Oh, the injustice!

...

>Stoning a woman to death for showing skin
>Separating leagues in a voluntary sport

Totally the same

I, too, support the erasure of the binary.

These two posts seem to think that just because women aren't getting literally murdered, they should just shut the fuck up about how they are presumed to be cognitively inferior. I say no, fuck you, it's still a problem, and you don't get to just gloss over it. You're downplaying things because facing it makes you uncomfortable.

Yet your measure by which women are "better" is the acknowledgement by men.

And you are a retarded social justice faggot

You brought up the parallel and now you're backpedaling on it. You know you are wrong.

If they were as good as men at chess they would be competing with them.

Ok, who are you trying to fuck and why does she play chess?

No, my measure by which *society* is "better" is its capacity to provide equal opportunities to all people. Separating chess by gender is preventing that from happening. This isn't that hard.

When Hitler became Fuhur he fixed the German economic situation (It was terrible).

You realize that you are helping Trump's polices right?

>If they were as good as men at chess they would be competing with them.
Holy shit. Can't tell if troll or seriously not getting this. They aren't allowed to compete because they separate the league by gender. What parallel are you talking about? I didn't bring anything up except the fact that not letting women into the "Men's" Chess League (even though it's not called that) is bullshit and the most obvious sexism in all sports.

Your mom.

They have every opportunity. That is a fact and literally not open for debate. When they can show an aptitude that is equal to men then they will compete. They separate them because they're not good enough and they're allowed to because it's a private club. Why part of this are you having issue with?

Your virtue signaling won't make women any better at chess. They don't play with men because they're not as good, not because they're not allowed.

user's right, Look at the "masters" of Chess that are female, than compare them to the masters that are male.

nigga you're posting this on Sup Forums, the site that got that russian puppet to where he is

that's like telling jared fogel that voat is full of sickos

Voat is filled with pedos?

Exactly, how can he say voat is filled with sickos when it's just pedos?

Haven't heard of this