Buffbutts

Buffbutts

Other urls found in this thread:

ipanon.com
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

I don't know what you mean?
Well it'll only make you stronger.
Sweet dreaming.
kek

Well wasn't that mouse/cheetah porn you found? It kiiinda looks like a cheetah anyway

Yeah
A guy with long hair is a label to be called a nigger here
Anyone who isn't LDS/Mormon is one basically

Are they going to kill you? I didn't think mormans did that nigger shit?
No it was not a cheetha i think

Got them cheetah spots at least, the rest is not very cheetah though

I think it's almost finished. I have to wait for the last layer to dry first.

I always do.

Oh nvm those aren't cheetah spots

...

...

Bananders' fursona is a mouse.

You're actually right

Everyone I work with thinks I'm mad. The manager broke a mop then accused me of sabotaging it. The couple that proof read my statement said it sent shivers down their spines. I felt like I was going to vomit and then pass out while looking at a balloon being blown by a fan. Today was very strange.

That means you're a bottom.

Switch ftw

That don't mean shit.

Thanks tigger

Nope, mouse means bottom

Moar like this
ipanon.com

On the bottom of a plump ass yeah

Kitty's gonna devour you... through rape.

That he will

Bottom of my ass!

Just don't make me snap in half plz :p

They linch gays Tig
Its a Trump and Mike Pense State

Then get a open carry / concealed license.

...

...

So, been gettin ass yesterday?

PTSD and Suicide record Tig
I can't
Even if Utah has the most open laws with firearms. If I had 1 of the two I could get an RPG.
Utah, almost no gun control.
Unless you have PTSD and Depression! The reason for those is the large rate of murders involving those two illnesses.

Ever since the school shoot-ups right?

Here's a tiger, answer my question.

...

Not really
USA fucking over VETs and them loosing it
Mall shooting lately
And a few schools have been invaded but never shot up here
Just children raped in the schools and it being ok

...

...

I think he left because he doesn't want to answer your question

Awful, he only wants to comment when its annoying.

...

Indeed, anyway, I shall return to lurking

...

...

...

...

...

There exist absolutely no acceptable synonyms for the word "scene" in the english language (scene in the dramatic sense; a part of a play or film). Episode is the very closest I could locate and it still doesn't capture the precise idea of moving between scenes; scene conveys a more fluid idea where episode comes across as somewhat staccato. This has made writing about film perhaps the most unpleasant thing I've done all week that didn't involve answering the borderline brain-damaged questions of insipid females who speak with terror in their voices at the prospect of actually forming an original fucking thought.

What about incident? Or instance? Or moment?

Or segment? Or even part?

I didn't accept any of those as being sufficiently harmonious for the purpose. Incident has an underlying negative connotation that I rejected because most of the scenes I was discussing didn't suit it, and instance and moment are too implicitly immediate to describe any of the scenes I was using (if any of them had been brief or violent I definitely would've used incident).

Segment and part apply to broadly. Your finger has segments. A lego set has parts. "Scene" conveys an entirely different concept. There isn't a word that's close enough to substitute for it.

Actually, one of the scenes was negative enough for "incident" but not petty enough; the enormity of the interaction was such that incident would've done it an injustice.

Literally the definition of scene in terms of film is a sequence of continuous action. Every single word I said is a synonym of that scene in the actual literal sense of the word.

Incident is used quite frequently to describe things that are actually quite grandiose. Filmmakers themselves have made entire films about things they dubbed incidents. Don't be pedantic.

But it's not an issue of literal definition here. I'm not questioning the literal definitions. The issue is the connotations of those words. The additional connotations of those words (in lay vocabulary, not for an audience of cinematic scholars) render them disqualified for my purposes.

...

In fact part of the problem is that those words are too technical. The thing I needed with the word "scene" was something that bore the connotation both of a temporal segment of drama and of a general place and feeling. The other words only carry the aspect of time.

For example, Incident at Blood Pass, a film by the Academy Award winning director Hiroshi Inagaki, which is about a plot to steal a shipment of gold being delivered to the Shogunate by some petty thieves that involves secret police, rogue Ronin, spurned lovers, revenge, and so on.

The connotation of the word scene in the sense of film is the definition of the word scene in the sense of film. If you are writing for lay people then using words like part, moment, instance, etc. would make absolutely perfect sense.

Part is not at all a technical word, it's the most basic word you could use.

Instance is also not technical, nor are incident, moment, or segment. These are all basic words that any person with a vocabulary beyond grade 2 would understand.

You're failing to understand why I have a problem with the synonyms for scene. "Part" and the other words are not technical in the sense that they're arcane or obtuse - they're technical in the sense of being precise, correct, and completely devoid of emotional content. It's worth mentioning, incidentally, that I'm using "scene" here to describe a segment of film, but also (and primarily) of narrative, as presented via the film. The narrative content as revealed through motion picture is more important than the medium of film.

I'm failing to understand because it doesn't make any sense, stupid. You are saying, "I don't want to use words that are like scene because none of them are actually the word scene and only the educated would understand what I mean if I used the word 'part.'"

Scene has no inherent emotional content, when you say the word scene a specific feeling isn't evoked, it is the description of the scene that carries that weight. You could replace the word scene with the word part and still have it carry just as much emotional content.

It is important to note that I assumed you meant the definition of scene from the start. Why are you so bad at thinking? Seriously, that isn't a rhetorical question.

Here are two examples that are literally the same thing.

The scene in the film when Liam Neeson threatens the kidnappers with murder because they stole his kid.

The part in the film when Liam Neeson threatens the kidnappers with murder because they stole his kid.

BOTH OF THOSE SENTENCES MEAN THE SAME THING IT IS JUST REPLACING THE WORD SCENE WITH THE WORD PART.

I never said people wouldn't understand the word part. My problem is the connotations of the word scene (mostly defined by its other definitions) are not shared by any other word. I switched from "connotation" to "emotional content" to try and give you a second way of understanding what I'm trying to explain here but clearly that failed. In plainer English, scene, like many words, means a bunch of things simultaneously. The precise meaning I'm currently using it for benefits from drawing on those alternate meanings. None of the synonyms of scene do that. I'm actually amazed that the issue of connotation wasn't obvious here when I described the difference between scene and episode in my first post, actually.

Again, this is not about literal meaning, it's about coordinated meaning via connotation. At the core, it's an issue of writing beautifully rather than precisely.

If you are incapable of understanding how the word scene can be replaced with any of its synonyms and still have the exact same message come across then you can write neither beautifully nor precisely. Emotional content isn't attached to the word, the connotation in the sense of film is its definition.

Saying, words mean different things doesn't mean anything because they still have synonyms, which mean slightly different things, but not enough to change the message at all.

Episode is completely different from the word scene. Episodes contain scenes but encapsulate much more broadly. I have met actually mentally retarded people who are better at thinking than you. This isn't even a joke, you are terrible at this.

>the connotation in the sense of film is its definition.
I am actually uncertain you know what the word connotation means.

When saying scene in the context of a film you are connoting a specific segment of events from a film. Connote, to invoke, imply, suggest, indicate, or signify.

Pretentiousness of the thread increased exponentially.

In the context of both the film and the narrative that is conveyed via the film. It is not exclusively the film. A scene is something that occurs in any medium. It is truly ironic that I have to provide a precise definition of connotation here, but it is literally, by definition, an ABSTRACTION and a FEELING. It is not technical, which is why I cannot replace scene with part when connotation is the priority.

I mean for fuck's sake dude.

Holy shit, 2-3 years since I've bothered looking at a gfur thread and subjective still has the same dogshit pretentious personality despite being an idiot, lmao

put your name back on nibi

Nope, I haven't namefagged in about 4 years, and you wouldn't even remember me by name. Accept the fact that everyone thinks you're an idiot, tbh. I was in two or three seperate skype groups with you that pretty much everyone left because of how much of a dipshit you were, back in the day. Classic shit.

>the film and the narrative of the film
So the film is different from the thing that the film is about? I was unaware that the narrative of the film, the entire reason for the film existing, was a different thing from the film itself.
I mean for fuck's sake, dude.
>con-note
>/kəˈnōt/
>verb
>(of a word) imply or suggest

SCENE HAS NO INHERENT FEELING TO IT, THE FEELING IS WHAT IS DESCRIBED WITHIN THE SCENE, THE WORD CAN BE REPLACED WITH ANY OF ITS SYNONYMS AND STILL BE THE SAME THING NOT JUST IN A LITERAL AND PRECISE SENSE BUT ALSO IN THE INVOCATION OF THE FEELING OF THE SCENE.

You are actually stupid. You don't understand how words work.

Not me idiot

It's like a conversation in between two walls.

Yes, the film is different from the thing the film is about, obviously. The narrative is an aspect of the film, connected to but not encompassing various other mechanical features. Is that not obvious?

>Scene has no inherent feeling to it.
Maybe you don't share the connotations I do, although my connotations are predicated on other definitions of the word scene, but that's really the nature of 'feeling' - it's not necessarily universal. This is why semantics is a dubiously scientific field at the best of times and I wasn't speaking scientifically to begin with.

Wow, it only took you two posts to expose yourself. I've never been in a skype group associated with these threads. Nice try, though.

I didn't really think so either. I just saw the word pretentious again and ran with it.

hint: I never said it was associated with these threads, you dumb cunt. They were shota groups.

Read: pretentious yet idiotic

You're doubling down on the lie since I gave you a fake out on purpose. I've never been in any skype group; the most collectivized my skype has ever been has been in a handful of calls of about 5 people at most, all of whom were from the threads and none of which recurred at any point - because I barely use skype. I'm legitimately curious who would be annoyed enough with me to lie this badly though.

Scene is literally just a container word used to signify a very specific segment from a film. You could not use the word scene and have it mean the entire film just as you can't use the word scene to describe an episode. Scene is a signifier for a small segment within the larger whole. There is no inherent feeling attached to the word scene itself.

Sure, in a super literal use of the word film to mean the actual medium itself, sure, but in a narrow sense, when talking about a specific film, you cannot separate the film from its narrative. You can separate the narrative from the film, but not the other way around. Film, like scene, is a container word. While scene means the segment which contains this specific thing, film is the container for all the parts of the film.

I'm almost positive that you were in several skype groups, Subjectivefag. I remember David going on about how much he hate being in certain skype groups because you were in them. David, of course, is too autistic to leave a group once he is a part of the group.

I like how this thread went from gay muscle furry porn to talking about scenes and films

>doubling down on a lie when you made an incorrect assumption out of idiocy
>trying to save face because you can't accept how much of a pretentious twat you are, even though none of it is justified

And yes, you have, you're full of shit if you're going to sit here and claim you weren't in the Skype groups that I have literally been with you in.

Tldr: give up, stop lieing, it's not helping you come off as any less retarded. Fyi, these groups were about ~2 years ago, maybe. Clearly you haven't grown up at all since then, though.
Yeah, he's full of shit. No clue who david is, tbh.

Like I said, "inherent feeling" isn't going to be universal at the best of times. There's no word that, once spoken, evokes the same emotion in every listener. You didn't share my connotation for the word scene - that's fine, because I wasn't trying to make a generalizable point to begin with, which is what you have failed to grasp this entire time.

I seriously never wasn't. I use skype for like 3 people. David may have been thinking of IRC - which I used for a few months between 2012 and 2013, on Scales' channel, but I was never in a single skype group.

I challenge you to prove this. Like this is just a strictly factual detail about my life history at this point that you've gotten 100% wrong. I've never used skype groups for anything at all.

>never wasn't
never was*
I should not argue without sleeping, christ.

subby always gets fucking rekt when he argues with fool.

People who suck dick dont deserve to have opinions, shut up with your pretentious shit sf.

james never understood what I was talking about here.

I am going to go ahead and believe David on this one. He hasn't lied to me about you as of yet.

I don't share the inherent feeling because there isn't an inherent feeling for the word scene, which is why you are an insultingly dimwitted individual.

>file too large
Not the first time I've been told something of mine was too big.

No, I understood what you were attempting to say, you're just too horrible to form a coherent argument.

sure, darling

jesus, I'm not even sure how skype groups work. James I really don't care if you believe me here, this is a tier of bullshit that approaches I did not have sexual relations with that woman. Or david just doesn't remember what IRC is, either one.

There isn't an inherent feeling for any word. There are feelings that are more or less common, but none of them are inherent, which, again, is why I wasn't attempting to make a generalizable argument about the word scene. That is not the point.

>I've never used skype groups for anything at all.
Kek, like that other guy already confirmed, this is pure bullshit. If you're going to try to come up with retorts at least make them grounded in some kind of fact, instead of trying to pussyfoot around all of the shitty assumptions you're making. I was actually pretty surprised after visiting this thread that you're still the same piece of shit that you were years and years ago, but I guess people don't really change when they see the world through alternative facts and just think anyone having a go at them are just crazy.

Best part of arguing with dumbcunts is how frivolous it is, you'll never walk away from one without believing that you won it, those are the joys of being pretentious yet ignorant, basically.

Also, way to save face after lieing like a retard by saying that you only said it to "fake me out on purpose". Nice logic, m8y
what name did David go by on here? out of curiosity

No, not every word has an inherent feeling to it. Bag does not have an inherent feeling to it. Paper does not have an inherent feeling to it. Shoe does not have an inherent feeling to it.

He called himself David.

>There isn't an inherent feeling for any word. There are feelings that are more or less common, but none of them are inherent, which, again, is why I wasn't attempting to make a generalizable argument about the word scene. That is not the point.

2deep4u, well done, keep spouting pretentious dribble to explain something that even 15 year olds are aware of. There is nothing objective about language, everybody knows it's fluid, you spud.

Eh, fair enough, has been years since I paid attention to circlejerk really, guess idk him at all.

Read my post again, james, I said "isn't" an inherent feeling for "any" word.

Prove I was on a skype group at any point. It has literally never happened. I don't use them. Your win condition here is all sorts of straightforward, but it's impossible because I can list the group conversations I've had on the fingers of one goddamn hand.

1. me, mak, katia when playing battlefront 2
2. me, spawn, freklz, zac, and...someone else, playing csgo

Every other mass conversation I've participated in online has been via mumble or...I guess ventrilo and teamspeak back in ancient history.

Right, except that james is under the impression that I was making an objective judgment about language which is why I needed to point out this obvious thing to him.