Let's be smart, fags!

Let's be smart, fags!

10

10

6 + 4 = 10

-1/12

PLEASE EXCUSE MY DEAR AUNT SALLY

58

10 faggot

17

6^2 = 36
2(3) = 6

36/6 + 4 = 10

6^2 = 36
36/2 = 18
18 (3) = 54
54 + 4 = 58

oh my god kill yourself

6^2/2(3)+4
=36/6+4
=6+4
=10
>prove me wrong faggot

correct ones

58

go back to highschool
its not ((6^2)/2)*3

the order of multiplying and dividing are equal, you have to applicate the dividing first (in this expression)
The scope of the bracketing is just the 3 not the multiplying

17

BIDMAS
6^2/2(3)+4
6^2/6+4
36/6+4
6+4

=10

REMEMBER BIDMAS:
Brackets ()
Indeces ^x
Division /
Multiplication x
Addition +
Subtraction -

Thanks, niggers! Smarter then I expected...

36 : 6 + 4 = 10

58

42

ERROR
invalid function: 2

17

6^2/2(3)+4
=36/2(3)+4
=18(3)+4
=54+4
=58
you do whatever operation is in brackets first, but 2(3) is the same as 2*3. so 6^2/2(3)+4 = 6^2/2*3+4

If the expression was written like this:

6² ÷ 2 × 3 + 4

Then the answer would be:

36 ÷ 2 × 3 + 4
18 × 3 + 4
54 + 4
58

However, the fact that the 2 and the 3 are literally touching, through use of parentheses, indicates that they are a singular term.

6² ÷ 2(3) + 4
can be more easily visualized as:
6² ÷ (2(3)) + 4

therefore,

6² ÷ (2(3)) + 4
36 ÷ (2(3)) + 4
36 ÷ 6 + 4
6 + 4
10

5

Derp, I meant 10.

my last two digits

posting in these threads already disqualifies you from being smart.

it's always hard to tell if you fags are trying to troll or just new

this is like arguing semantics. pointless

>10
This isn't even "smart" is just average school knowledge

funny, I learned PEMDAS
parentheses, exponents, multiply, divide, add, subtract. but it's important to note that both multiply/divide and add/subtract are done simultaneously, in order

Probably bait, but are you retarded?

you expect too much of b at this time

I support this, and I shit on all faggots that thinks that this 2(3) has another meaning than 2*3

you need a bigger worm on that hook

I forgot that "literally touching" came before exponents in PEMDAS.

Thanks user.

10

Here is the REAL order:

Brackets () (or more exacty, what's IN the brackets)
Indeces
Division/Multiplication (there is NO priority)
Addition / Substraction (there is STILL NO priority)

Brackets have the priority on what's INSIDE of them, however, what's before AND after doesn't matter. If there's no sign before or after, then it's considered as a NORMAL multiplication, and as so, no priority over other multiplications/divisions

58, and now bring me a challenge, please.

This time, trips lies.

Because 2(3) IS 2 * 3

It givees nothing, as this is mathemathically incorrect.

2(3) has NO MEANING in maths. And as so, it can't be put in a calculation

>not just using proper notation
(+ (/ (^ 6 2) (* 2 3)) 4)
lmaoing @ ur life

if you didnt say 10 kys

Thank you!
IKR....

Did you finish elementary?

where'd you learn your maths?

not hating or anything, I've always thought x(y) was an accepted way to express multiplication. What's the proper way here?

3.6

36 ÷ (6 + 4)

It doesn't, and that's why I did the exponent first.

Parentheses come before everything except for exponents, which is why (2(3)) is the second term to evaluate.

No. Did you?

10. How is this supposed to be hard? rofl

  ▲

▲ ▲

>being this mentally retarded

2/10

Correct

Source: Math Major and not a retard

you are a faggot nigger.

58 is the answer. Nigger.

They never said it wasn't.

>implying a math major qualifies you for anything related to calculation

Wrong use of brackets

no but given that I am a math major it is implied that I own a decent calculator

>Brackets
>Shows parentheses
Those aren't the same thing, user...

Not in America.

It's easy to know why in a logic way.

Why are the brackets for? To isolate a part of the calculation, to tell "What's inside has to be considered as a single number outside".
And as so, put a single number inside of brackets is a nonsense and can't be correct.

For simplification purposes, some people decided to remove the * sign if there was one before brackets. And of course, it's been accepted wordwide (we humans love to simplify things). The problem with this simplification is that people forgets that in x(y+z), between x and the brackets, there is a *. And that gives us situations like these.

Hahaha!
Epic trolle

Well, in every single North American school that I've ever seen, it is acceptable.
No difference between 2(x) and 2x, at least, in this case.

6^2÷2 (3)+4
Parentheses already done. Exponents next
6^2=36
36÷2 (3)+4
Now divide and multiply from left to right
36÷2=18
18 (3)+4

18(3)=54

add and subtract from left to right
54+4=58
>58
anyone else is absoulutely retarded

You trolling or retarded?

10 fags:

The problem is that between 2x and 2(x), the same simplification has been made.

Both means 2 * x.
but using brackets to isolate a single number is, as I said, a perfect nonsense

see

How the fuck is it nonsense if you just fucking simplified it?!
Jesus fucking Christ, lad, you must be retarded.

...

You fucking nigger you just added parentheses to the equation that were never there. Kill yourself immediately, and save the gene pool from your stupidity.

What is the use of brackets?

Separating 2 from 3, are you actually that fucking retarded? 2(3) is 2*3 you tard. It's 6^2/2(3)+4 = 6+4 = 10

Its a notational thing if you wrote just 2 numbers next to each other like 2x but lets say x is 2, 22 looks like 22 not 2×2.

see

Except it isnt you mong how its written isnt in fraction form. If you were to write it in fractional form it would very well be 6^2/2 ×2 just as it's written.
>lrn2maths

>itt
>10, 10, 10, 15, 25, 39.777~E
>PEMDAS
>the fuck is pemdas you americans are idiots
>at least I'm not a niggerfaggot, britbong
>rabblerabblerabble ad nauseum

prove me wrong just once, Sup Forums

and what IS 2x? 2x is 2 * x.

So, if x is 2, you write 2 * 2.

Brackets are MEANT to ISOLATE what's INSIDE of them from the rest of the calcul. For example, in THIS calculation:

2(34+5*9)

The calculation can be written as:

2 * x
where x = 34+5*9

cont.

and that's the exact reason why using this: (x) where x is a single number, is useless: It's already a single number, he can be isolated the way brrackets isolates

The autism here is real
2x=2×2=2(x) they are all literally the same. Its just easier to write 2(x) than 2×x and 22 looks like 22.

...

2(x) is a misuse of the brackets.

and who the fuck can write 22 as 2 * 2? That's just fucking stupid.

Fucking retards. It's just that the expression is written in a confusing way and there are 2 answers since there are 2 interpretations. It’s like trying to interpret the following sentence:“I saw the man with binoculars.”Did you use binoculars to see the man, or were you looking at the man who was holding binoculars?

>and there are 2 answers

Go seek professional help!

Have you met mathfags? they hate writing more than anything. They are lazy.You're just autistic as fuck.

because you are a nigger and, your calculator is also a nigger.

16
you imbred sandnigger fucks

They may be lazy, but as you said, they are fags

...arithmatic isn't "open to interpretation". It's math. 2+2 will ALWAYS equal 4 in our universe. It's not a fucking grammar problem, they're numbers. The answer is, for all intents and purposes, set in stone.

Ok how?

science

This so much the only people who complain it's confusing are idiots who cant read/do math.

You didnt show your work user you get a 0

58, you american cucks

This

Hurr durr some people use order of operations and some don't so faggots will argue. I m genus.

Go fuck yourself OP. Back to Facebook with your faggotry.