ITT Album cover revelations

>it's an album, not a guitar

its da earf

Holy shit, you just blew my fucking mind, OP. I always thought that was a guitar.

It's a girl in a dress spinning.

peenio in vageenio

Damn, I thought it was a girl grabbing your hand and taking you off to shoegaze land

is it an album or a magazine? if it's an album, what album?

woah what

a shoegaze album with a blurry cover? who would've thought!

I always thought it was like a wizard hat lmao

its a potato

Its a harpers bazaar magazine i believe

The lion is made of faces

It's a tambourine

its one of those things that you stick your head in to take a picture or just generally look silly.

How many times? It's a coconut cut in half.

There are people in the bottom corner

It's a drum

it's a close-up of soiled diaper

It's a guitar

A coconut cut in half looks nothing like that you dingbat.

It's obviously a banana slice

I've never been able to see this one.

wut

I realize that's what it is but I honestly cannot make out the image at all.

There's a cat hiding under the foot stool

It looks like a female pov to me

Oh shit

...

the members of the group are on the cover.

A cutout of Stuart Sutcliffe is in the far top-left corner.

The dick is going down into her. Most of the image is the guy. The remaster is much less obscured, though I think it looks shitty.

there's a baby's face in the flower

Knowing this album, that was probably a deliberate choice. Probably the scene in Prelude to Agony.

WHAT?

WHERE??

who the fuck looks at raditude enough to notice that?

Holy shit!

>it says "weezer" in the top right

Back cover of pinkerton has a very faint old photo of a japanese woman.

Pic relates is a bit clearer than my record and cd at home

>Falling for the bait.

There's no baby dude.

shes kind of cute

Agh, damn you internet trolls...

he's wearing pants

How new are you?

hm!

its two pictures, hes not in a corner.

HOLY FUCK

damn

this might be obvious but it took me a while to realize

the guy doesn't have crazy hair, it's just a shadow, he's actually got a buzz cut

Oh wow, how did I never notice that. Good one, user

it's radio gnomes in a flying teapot

I challenge someone to figure this.

they're on television

also, not a revaluation of the cover, but of the band name

>Tom Verlaine
>TV
>Television

...

Rocky cliff edge with burned trees?

is this the full image?

beautiful

kinda looks like a cartoony rendition of a cyst exploding

...

oh fuck i get it now

That's a big penis.

Top jej user, thank you for that. People like you make Sup Forums worth visiting

for you

oh shit I always just saw a flying saucer

Looks like a fucked up rose to me. Like the petals are being torn apart by those metal bits, and the stem is at the bottom there.

How new are you?

this is a blue board!!!!

*one pic cut

...

that's nothing

I think EWOK did the art for that. could be wrong.

most people should know this one by now, but, it's missiles, not a plane

I thought it was a propeller, I'm a retard

the thing lou is holding?
>how the fuck does that look like a guitar

Necklace says, "Medulla"

It's not a fence, they're creases of a folded picture

Literally no one thinks it's a fence

Quality content.

holy shit

People didn't know this one?

My first reaction to looking it up on youtube was "lol benis in vagoogoo XDDDD"

damn this is a good one i thought it was a fence until now lmao
i did

No you didn't

Upside down forest fire.
And band members are in the top half/

why would i make that up on an anonymous image board?

He's leaning against a wall.

Holy shit
How could I never notice this about my favourite album?

There's hands in the corners pulling the strings

upside down

Chris (Long-nose dude) is in between Corey's (dreadlocks) legs

>Rockets Fall on Rocket Falls

>The plane crashed.

>3MTA3
>EATME

also there's a helmet on the front left cross

Matt's head is photoshopped on

The font is slightly different from all the other covers

It's just a waterfall

band name is in there. (XTC)

aids

2D has normal eyes

This is now an album cover clarification thread.

Just hopped on Sup Forums to post about this very record. Waterfall and conch shell, though this has been known for a long time, just never really revealed until that instrumental release.

Perhaps spare me from starting a new thread - is the "remaster" (in quotes as I've been told that it's pretty much the record run through a digital limiter) worth listening to? I've only listened to the Deviations thing and even though it's brickwalled yet again, I'm hearing details I hadn't noticed before and wasn't sure if that was just the mix being different as it is in many areas or that the reissue is actually worthwhile, even if highly compressed.

Also, if you've got a dropbox link on hand, that'd be highly appreciated.

Still waiting on the 5.1 mix that was "finished" like eight years ago but didn't come out. I swear, it's like TR knows people are eager to fix the work he's neglected or some shit.

>it's a pair of sunglasses, not a bowl

If I had a dollar for every time I've had to point out that the reason for the weak cover was that it's the same thing post-nuke plus an extra fifty cents for pointing out that's what that light was, I'd have enough to buy an authentic Old Tunes tape off some sleazy prick on discogs.