Which dynasty was/is better?

Which dynasty was/is better?

>better
How can a dinasty be better or worse, fucking leaf?

Why are the spurs on there?

>Patriots
>was

Why past tense?

check the titles and win %

BATE Borisov, Olympiakos or Basel

Yeah they are more like the Cardinals of NBA.

lol at comparing thrm to the Yankees.

St. Louis or Arizona

>no 2011, 2012, 2013 49ers

St Louis.

Who the fuck cares about Arizona?

I hate the Yankees but they have 26 titles

27

And the majority of them were won pre amateur draft. Massive advantage over every club since they had the funds to write blank checks to prospects. Look at the story about how Micky Mantle was signed.

>pats
>3 wins
How long is the period of winless time to be no longer part of the dynasty?

Pats

I don't think any team in American sports can touch the Yankees over all of our history. 41 American League titles in about 110 years of existence is ridiculous. But in the 21st century, I think it has to be San Antonio or New England.

All time?

Bulls
Steelers
Canadiens
Yankees

I'd say Spurs, personally. It's incredible how consistent they are in such a fickle, superstar-driven sport.

>Canadiens

Wait, when did they have a dynasty? I thought the Russians were the ones racking up all the gold medals in hockey.

this is the power of the jew

The Yankees were never owned by jews. And the team with all the Jewish fans in New York was traditionally the Dodgers (then replaced by the Mets). All the big Jewish comedians (Stewart, Sandler, Seinfeld) are Mets fans.

they won 4 cups in a row during the 70s

also 8 of 12 cups in the first 12 seasons after the nhl expansion.

Spurs and Patriots

>Canadiens
>NHL

I don't understand. Are you just talking about Canadian teams in general? That doesn't count as a dynasty.

yes the other poster was referring to the Montreal Canadiens.

Not to be confused with Canadians. I understand this is tricky my burger friend.

I think you were tricked

Oh, so there's a team called the Canadiens? I don't really know much about hockey, but that seems kind of weird. It's like if we had a football team called the Americans.

I dont see how user

he is very clear which team he is referring to

instead u have teams like the nationals and the patriots.

the official name of Montreal is "le Club de hockey Canadien"

You have a baseball team called the Yankees

I'd say you could pick between the Bulls, Lakers and Celtics.

Not sure about the Canadiens because they won most of their Cups during the Original Six era and immediately after expansion when recruitment dramatically favored the Original Six.

Steelers were just awful for the first 30 years of their existence (Steelers fan, btw). Though if it's post-merger, then no doubt.

Yankees just abused their status as the most popular team to outspend everyone during the pre-draft era. And after for that matter. But there really isn't another answer.

...the Montreal Canadiens. Not the Canadian national team...

the Canadiens won their 4/4 cups 8 seasons after the expansion.

no other pro franchise has won that many consecutive championships

Yankee doesn't mean American. It means someone from New York.

where the hell are the Giants

It means American to those outside the states
Consider pic related

>apehoop in the 60s
>professional

keep your fraud championships to yourself

>Apehoop before the apes doesnt count

>wilt chamberlain was white

cucking the patriots twice in four years does not make you a dynasty

What the greatest dynasty in the MLS (Major League Soccer)

In the Major League Soccer (MLS) must also Dynasties

>If were drawing arbitrary lines in the sand, lets say championships before the 80s don't count.
Canadians are a bunch of bums, they will never have as many as the Red wings.

Except the Islanders the very next four years...

I think he meant SF Giants

And the oilers after that right?

>winning with the biggest players in an 8 team league

not even once

Yankees. It's harder to win it all in baseball

They won 5 out of 7, but never more than 2 back to back.

Oh that's right

They lost to the kings in the playoffs with those ludicrous high scoring games, that broke up the cup streak

Uhhh....

>It's harder to win it all in baseball

then explain how a team manages to win it all every year

hard work, grit, and sticktoitiveness. basically they just want it more

The talent disparity between the Original Six and the expansion teams was hilarious. Original Six teams won 10 of the 12 Cups from the expansion to the WHA merger almost entirely on that lack of parity.

OP's pic only referrs to late 90s/early 2000s dynasties

This one

Agreed. It's disrespectful to compare them to those other chump teams.

One title in the last ten years.

Pats
Red wings
Yankees
Spurs

red wings were essentially scotty bowman's wet dream.
If you just pick the team from the 90's and early 2000's essentially you have the greatest club hockey team ever.
Fetisov, Konstantionv, Hull, Shanahan, Hasek, Fedorov, Larionov, Yzerman, Lidstrom, Murphy, Vernon, Osgood, Datsyuk, Chelios, Draper, those are some of the greatest hockey players ever.
The wings for sure belong on there as they were one of the best teams in one of the most competitive eras of hockey.

And now look at them pure fucking hot garbage, couldn't even keep a leash on their monkey. Embarassing.