"Villains" who did nothing wrong

"Villains" who did nothing wrong

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=azC1nm85btY),
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>defending a pedophile just to 'trigger' libruhls

this is officially rock bottom. I hope some of you morons take this as an opportunity to fix yourselves and get legit, the "alt-right" could really change this country if you weren't all wasting your time in the personal army of trolls and pedophiles

I POSTED IT AGAIN XDDDDDDDD
you're a faggot
your thread is shit
fuck off

...

He did do something wrong. In the eyes of god he is a sodomite, and celebrates his sin.

He won't be so smug when burning in the fires of hell.

There's always that one guy who beats me to it

this good looking, caring, loving young man wasn't even there when hi so called followers killed those folks

I'm out of the loop, who did he defend?

No. He gets turned into a pillar of salt. Get it right faggot

>mass slaughtered 6 million civilians
>nothing wrong
>pick one

dubs wins

ted

>implying LGBT people of all political parties aren't pedos

Your fucking grammar and desperation are utterly pathetic. Stop spamming this board with your homo craps just because we cared for it before.

And still he doesnt have the high score, not even the high score of russians/soviets killed

No, that was the leviathan whos dream Jacob interpreted you fucking theistic illiterate

...

It was over 10 million people, 6 million jews

He spent a LOT of time investigating that pizza parlor..

Victor did nothing wrong

Jesus.. you fucking idiots believe he is a pedo? Like John Podesta and Anthony Weiners? Bill Clinton? Naw. He is no pedo. But he was raped by an older man and he is gay. No pedo though. Get a clue, you fucking altLeft faggot.

Shecky Green did nothing wrong.

You can say that about 85℅ of liberals as well. George Soros army will be evaporated.

He drives around america promoting trump's ideals coz trump's too much of a fat cat to do it hisself

>civilans
>jews
Pick one

He's a faggot. He hungers for boy flesh.

He hangs out at cosmo and orders a little cheese pizza with a smidge of sausage on the side.

Milo pedophile a.k.a squinty eyes, he is so guilty tho.

He is a faggot, but no child chaser
Perhaps you are?

Ganondorf did nothing wrong.

He tried to help his people. But he was cursed.

If fascism goes wrong it means fascism is evil.

If communism goes wrong I-IT'S NOT REAL COMMUNISM THAT DOESN'T COUNT

I can and do. This is a great cleansing. We've been far too accepting of these faggots because the powers that be wanted political capital. It's time to eject these degenerates from our ranks.

I'm not the one going on podcasts talking about lowering the fucking age of consent to 13.

The sooner we rid ourselves of the fag brigade the better. Just because they hold some of our values doesn't mean they aren't subhuman degenerate child molesters.

>alt-rightists bitching about soros

delicious butthurt

Thinking about it, Nook was the villain the whole time.

>OJ
>Manson
>Dorner

Sauce please?

Wat movie?

Source?

...

Whatever. It's time we return to traditional conservative values and eject the mentally ill faggots like Milo out. It's like having people Keynote at CPAC and saying we need to increase spending on welfare.

Is this a stock photo, or screenshot from a movie?

...

French movie?

flesruoy llik

Tell us, user. Wut moovee?

He said that it wasn't so bad when he got molested when he was 14. He was the victim but that somehow still makes him a pedophile.

m00t

>wasn't so bad
No, he advocated for it. He said it was a beneficial experience, and claimed so in a general sense as well.

whos that ?

Villians who did nothing wrong

>He said it was a beneficial experience
for him

All I found on Flesruoy Llik was a white rapper. Link?

Villains who did nothing wrong

Who gives a fuck about this attention-whore faggot. Who cares. A homo was molested by someone? Wow. I'm shocked. Most, if not all of them were.

Being against the alt-turd doesn't make me alt-left. I'm actually a conservative. From back when it meant more than "whatever is th opposite of what a few liberals say"

...

I take issue with what he said. However I've seen the interviews, I've seen the full podcasts they got the clips from, and yeah they did some deceptive editing.

In the JRE clip, he cracked a mediocre joke: "If it weren't for Father Michael I wouldn't give such good head now" and says "at 14 I was the predator, I knew it" or something to that effect.

Then they cut to another part of the discussion where Milo speaks about "informed consent" on college campuses, but you don't get that context because of how they edited it, so the way these clips are edited you think that he's saying 14 year olds can consent and there's nothing wrong with it, when the first comment was about his own experience and the second was unrelated.

FYI "informed consent" means the man has to literally ask "Do you consent to sex with me?", then keep asking with every position change, anal, etc.

Then the clip from the Drunken Peasants podcast; to paraphrase, he says that "attraction to a 13 year old is not pedophilia" because 13 year old are sexually mature. He is wrong and right: 13 year olds are pubescent but not "sexually mature", rather they are matur-ING, so he's wrong on that.

He's right when he says attraction to pubescent people is not pedophilia; this is an uncomfortable taboo truth, but a truth nonetheless: pedophilia is attraction to pre-pubescent children, whereas attraction to pubescent people is hebephilia and ephebephilia, and does make some biological sense because people that age are beginning to display secondary sexual characteristics and are producing sperm and eggs, respectively.

He said that the "current age of consent laws are about right", but they cut that part out.

He's a coal burning fag, and is at high risk for AIDS because of it, but these accusations are bullshit. The comments are old by internet standards; 1st JRE appearance was a year ago and the Drunken Peasants podcast was about 6 weeks ago. This was planned and timed, and will backfire.

*obese cat

He loves young boy cock. He's now old enough to do to young boys that which was done to him. He craves it.

dorf dorf dorf dorf

Hotler

>flesruoy llik
Not sure if bait, or just hard to find movie

politics is a sport

...

...

The majority aren't saying. Most people are saying we want parts of socialism, like health care and education, universal basic income. We still want competition, corporate environments free from monopolies, and our liberties. Its possible to take care of the people and still be a free and mixed market economy. Look at the nuance instead of getting stuck in the binary.

Go post this in some porn thread or cuck thread you faggot

hahahaha, little bitch got what he deserved

Villains who did nothing wrong

Trips confirms

...

Ah, so you're the trad-cons who lost the culture war so badly and gave us the shit-show we have now? Good to know.

>nothing wrong
>giving Iran $150,000,000,000 to be a gud boi

That's just one, and a recent one.

You should go get a job Milo, and stop shitposting on a black velvet Italian cum-painting board

HO-LY SHIT

Villains who did nothing wrong

This handsome hero did nothing wrong

This is all he has left. He'll be declaring bankruptcy next, and an hero soon after.

His 15 minutes are up, and he has nothing to show for it other than being branded a pedo.

Milo was trying to rationalize his own abuse. He was molested by a catholic priest and tried to spin it as a positive experience.

Nothing was given to anyone. The money was Iranian money the USA had stolen from Iran.

Obama remains a "villain" who did nothing wrong, and a lot of things right.

> 88 dubs
>do not belive that Hitler did nothing wrong

Nah. He just loves cock. The younger the better.

Well yeah.

Fuck the culture war, all I ever cared about was states rights, shrinking the size of the government, selling off federal lands, tax reform etc.

Now being a Republican is about defending annoying millennial assholes like Tomi Lahren and Milo Yiannopedo. Trump is gonna double the deficit, balloon the size of the government and he won't stop sniffing the shit of private businesses but apparently as long as libruhls r triggered then he's a conservative

I fucking hate this new generation

I'm aware of his motive. It's because of it that I take issue. I can understand trolling. I can understand coping. I can't understand advocating illegal activities as a method of coping - Milo crossed a new sort of line.

Now don't get me wrong. He made some decent points regarding hebephillia and the arbitrary age at which we consider consent possible. This interview was a decent platform for getting those ideas heard, all things considered.

Milo just went to far against the establishment for his own well being, and I have a hard time seeing it as a worthwhile exchange for him or his ideas.

...

He did nothing wrong.
Only the ones getting triggered are wrong

He never talked about lowering the age of consent. In fact in that same podcast he said the current age of consent was right.

fuck you niggers are dumb

He said it was about right, but there were exceptions.

Not sure if that's war hammer but it's heresy either way

>"Politics is downstream of culture." Andrew Breitbart (maybe he was quoting someone himself, but I think it's original)

You lost the culture, politics followed.

Yeah Trump inherited a fucked economy and is gonna fuck it even more. Buy gold and silver. You should already have steel and lead covered on principle alone.

You fucked up. Enjoy it. How old are you, bitch?

Except for the fact that he has other publishers lining up to sell his book.

He didn't advocate any illegal activities.

He advocated sexual relations with minors, within the context that some mature faster than others (like himself apparently).

The way I look at is that Milo said what he really thought about about the issue in the context of his own sexual experiences, and that is out of bounds for people who are in the spotlight. He didn't say that all 13 year olds are fair game for gay men, but he was saying that consent shouldn't be completely reliant on your age. He actually argued on the podcast that he felt that he was completely ready and able to consent by age 17, but some laws made what he did illegal. Not advocating for illegal activities but more trying to justify the men who had sex with him before he was 18.
>I WAS TOTALLY OKAY WITH IT, OTHER KIDS PROBABLY WILL BE TOO

>I can't understand advocating illegal activities as a method of coping
If you think sexual abuse has a negative impact on kids and you were sexually abused, I think it makes perfect sense to tell yourself that it had no negative impact on you whatsoever.
>WELL I TURNED OUT FINE
>I ENJOYED IT
>IT MADE ME A BETTER LOVER
Honestly, Milo is probably really underestimating the effect that his experiences had on him. So he does here what he has always done, spin it in the most controversial light.


In the grander scheme of things, Milo made many many political enemies, people who would never dare speak candidly about their sexual history. Someone found this and wanted to use it to damage his career, and it definitely worked. Non-millenials will certainly never take Milo seriously again if they ever did.

However, I listened to this podcast live (youtube.com/watch?v=azC1nm85btY), and I heard all of this the very moment Milo first said it, and my feelings about the situation haven't changed (other than realizing I completely overlooked the fact that he was admitting to being abused). So, I'm not one to be shocked and appalled by this resurfacing now. Frankly, I don't think Milo crossed any line at all, but I also don't believe for a second he was advocating for pedophilia.

>minors
"minors".
Also, puberty can happen anywhere from 8 to mid 20s. So he is correct.

Age of consent is fucking stupid and has no consistent standing between ANY country.
There's millions of adults abused daily. Never mind all those people consuming toxins on purpose, or getting in to huge debt.
You telling me these literal retards are fully capable of rational informed decision making? lmao fuck off.

Not even pedo or hebe, in fact, not really much, I care not for sex. (literal wizard )

>Not advocating for illegal activities
But you see...
>advocate: a person who publicly supports or recommends a particular cause or policy.
You may not have recommended it, but he clearly supports it. Like you said:
>Milo said what he really thought about about the issue in the context of his own sexual experiences

>I think it makes perfect sense to tell yourself that it had no negative impact on you whatsoever.
It sure does. It just doesn't make sense to tell the public.

>Also, puberty can happen anywhere from 8 to mid 20s. So he is correct.

Yes, I did say that.

>It sure does. It just doesn't make sense to tell the public.
On the Drunken Peasants podcast it make a lot of sense to talk about shit like that, to be honest.

I hope this ushers in a whole new age of politicians and celebrities going into disgusting detail about their sexual proclivities.

Fuck off Milo, you paedo faggot. You'll find no support here.

I still support you Milo!

I think we're pretty much in agreement.
My conclusion was:
>Milo just went too far against the establishment for his own well being, and I have a hard time seeing it as a worthwhile exchange for him or his ideas.
I don't think your ideal of transparency will become a reality. I think in stead, people will become more defensive in reaction to the outrage he has caused. If he had instead made his point without advocating illegal activities, I could see a response like the one you imagine as more likely.