What do you think of the media attack on Milo?

What do you think of the media attack on Milo?

We all knew they were waiting for something.

Breitbart was definitely waiting for the right moment to back stab him. What did you think would've happened? He's gay, against Christian ideals, and likes black people

what goes around comes around

Did they actually want him to leave? Or did he resign so it wouldn't reflect badly on them?

Milo is too smart and wild for Breitbart to control and they can't risk the PR disaster now that Bannon is in the admin

George takie had similar story, leftwits say its not at all the same thing.

are you fucking retarded? nothing was taken out of context. sure, he could've been joking, people cope in a different way (and I'm no fan of his). but he was even trying to get Rogan to agree that he gets hard looking at hot 15 year olds.

go back to t_d you cunt.

Dude, he literally said a grown man having sex with a 13 year old is ok.

Nothing was taken out of context.

I believe two things: Milo is actually a pedophile and people take pedophilia waaaay too seriously.

It all comes down to what parents want, and parents don't want their children having sex, be it with another kid or be it with an adult, they just don't want it to happen because parents see children as property, not as human beings.

The result of this excessive control is the current hysteria and absurd legislation over something that, really, shouldn't receive a tenth of the attention it gets.

Now, one guy who sees things in a simpler, and less hysterical way, decides to speak his mind, and everybody loses their shit and start demanding his head on a spike for his blasphemy. That, just because he mentioned the holy subject in a dismissive tone. Now he will be "justifiably" persecuted, fired, deflected, dismissed, miss-characterized, and completely neutralized, simply because the label "pedophile" was attached to him by people who already hated his guts, but always feared his influence.

Was that a low blow? Yes.
Is there anything he can do? No.
Will it all just blow off and be forgotten, eventually? Hell no.
Is this his own fault? Absolutely not.
Is this the media's fault? No.
Is this the public's fault? Yes.
Is this really such a big deal? Not in the slightest.

If people weren't so retarded over pedophilia, the media would NEVER have this power to simply destroy someone with this accusation, which is, dare I say, 99% of the time used as a weapon to destroy people, than a defense for children.

>inb4: you're a pedo

You're a pedo

Tackling the points like a pro.

I wouldn't expect less from reddit 2.0

That's not true and you don't want it to be either. History proves it. Plenty of monsters died fat and happy.

> inb4 mah spirituals

Humanity aspires to far better than it can ever earn. This is the hope. Trust me, you don't want karma.

Soooo... Who else just watched Sargon of Akkad's take on this? I'm seeing some familiar talking points.

Watching the interview Milo had where this whole thing came out, yes, he was indeed talking about his own personal experiences of abuse as a 13 year old at the hands of a catholic priest, and said that it worked out because he learned how to give great head.

That sounds to me like making a rather dark joke to cope with what was probably a horrible experience. I don't recall a point where he said "molesting 13 year olds is a great idea and I myself also want to molest 13 year olds."

This was a set up.

The liberels are getting revenge for trump and are taking us out on by one.

First bearing
Then piediepie
Now milo
They're trying to take down shoeonhead with fake nudes
They paid thunderf00t to snipe Lauren Southern but luckily failed.

They wont stop until all skeptics and anti progressive are destroyed.

Trollers getting trolled. Guy's a cunt, deserving of no sympathy. All news is fake these days, just Mr Bulletproof finally got shot this time, and what a shame it wasn't shot for real.

fuck off kike

...

You're a pedo

Lets look at all the pieces.

He is was sexually abused as a child by a man.
Now he is a self-hating (if you've heard his policies regarding gays) overly flamboyant sub faggot who gets off to making a scene.

He is obviously an individual with profound psychological damage that has made him a generally non-constructive member of society. Most individuals like him aren't so lucky to find a niche as an anti-SJW and just end up becoming drugged up sluts with no futures.

In this case.. the guy doesn't even see the damage it had done. He would be a normal, successful journalist, not the center of hate.. good only in the eyes of the fringe members of society.... making his mark as an opposition of out-of-control ideals targeted at fairness.

Pedophilia.. although totally hot.. is really.. REALLY bad for the victim in the long run.

A liberal setup, and all they had to do was get milo to excuse paedophilia on camera of his own free will several times

Damn that's a clever trap. Obviously not milos fault at all

>rofl

I think the hysteria plays a bigger role on this "damage" than the sex itself, but convincing a hysterical person to calm down and see reason is way harder than it should, when it comes do pedophilia.

Good luck to them taking out the Monolith that is Pewdiepie.

His audience of 50 million know his humor, know that this is all taken out of context, know that this is all bullshit and taking satire too seriously, and are unilaterally deciding that the news is NOT TRUSTWORTHY.

50 million 11-20 year olds have watched the mainstream media try to destroy someone they enjoy for literally no reason. While 30 and 40 somethings that know nothing about Pewdiepie are up in arms about the nazi propagandist corrupting their children, the children themselves will never trust the news for anything ever again.

There is no pedophilia, its an euphemism for wanting to rape children.

Children just cant give a meaningfully consent I don't know what the appropriate age is and it definitely varies but the current law in e.g. the US is appropriate.

What does George have to do with this? Do you want him to resign from Breitbart too? His story was between two teenagers. And George is a nice guy. He doesn't make enemies by abusing the first amendment to troll people by making them feel bad for their beliefs.

See, here's the thing: all gays are pedophiles.

Yeah, that kind of attitude is exactly what creates the mysticism around the subject and gives it way more power to destroy people than it does to help children.

I don't expect to change the mind of someone so ideological though, so you can keep believing whatever the fuck you want to believe.

On the Howard Stern Show, Takei shared details of his first sexual experience with the host and co-host Robin Quivers, who gleefully enjoyed his retelling of how he, as a 13-year-old boy, was molested by an “18- or 19”-year-old counselor at summer camp at Lake Arrowhead in Los Angeles.

Technically teens, but only by the barest margin.

I have no doubts of that. Good luck getting faggots to admit that though. Not even straight guys admit they want to fuck 15 year, even though the most searched term for porn is still "teens".

Go figure?

Everything he said was token out of context

Disney has pulled their businesses from him and now also those 11 year olds parents have a negative view on him. The liberals have damaged piediepie.

I can't remember where I saw this but 100 men were surveyed and they were shown innocent pictures of females and they had to decide which was the most sexually attractive

Most voted 14

No one's going to admit anything but everyone knows the truth lol

So instead of making 20 million this year, he'll only make 16 million from ad revenue on Youtube.

The horror. He still has 99% of his original audience, and the ones that he's lost are at least partially being replaced by non-fans that are flocking to him out of sympathy for his position.

>Everything he said was token out of context
Let's be honest here, his intention was clear, and the only reason he didn't use a more direct language was because he knew it could be bad for him.

The problem isn't with what he believes, it's with the reaction of the public.

Finding 13-14 years old sexually attractive just shouldn't be seen as something this severe.

In aware of that. I remember listening to it that day. No one defended him. No one cared in fact. He wasn't making an argument for AoC laws. (Like Milo did at his press conference, referencing European laws) I also don't recall him ever attacking Milo. So, I'm still wondering, what is the point of bringing up George in all this.

Him trolling himself was inevitable in the business he is in.

he looks gay as fuck honestly

Exactly. We all know the truth. Women are no different either. We just want to condemn those for speaking up about it saying "you're a pedo, die in a fire" and such. Maybe in a decade or so, things will change.
until then, I'm going to Thailand every summer as usual. 

Well...

Because these people are looking for an aquivency to focus on so they can avoid the truth and spin things to their own narratives

Give it a rest.

There is no ideology, I never said sth. like "rape is immoral" just stated the fact that sex with underaged is always rape.

This.

MILO is a perfect example of the media twisting something into fake news. The biggest one-sided piece of shit for a journalist there is.
I don't have time to explain myself in great detail, but consider things like his interview at UC Davis which was broadcast on KDVS, wherein he denied saying many things which would have shown him to be lying through his teeth about his political positions, then KDVS relayed those clips where he said those things verbatim. Then later on, he does that annoying thing where he always has to be right, and so he does this "NO serious scientist has EVER said that X is 100% true." In this case, he was talking about people being born gay or not. When the fact is that being gay does have -some- environmental and developmental factors, there really is a genetic predisposition and basis for homosexuality. Yet, Milo wants to say that the "liberal left" was "lobbying" for gay rights by "fabricating an outright lie" that homosexuality is something you are likely born with. And all he says to support this is something to the effect of "NO serious scientist who is worth mentioning has EVER said that being gay is something you're born with. There are environmental factors." And when the interviewer pointed out what I highlighted, that in fact, there are genetic factors, and since they exist, Milo's point that it's an "outright lie" is false, then Milo literally goes "NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE". Then he says he never said it was an outright lie. Then they play the clip.

And later on, Breitbart news posts an article, in which the headline is something to the effect of Milo Destroys UC Davis Debate or some shit like that.

Milo used to be okay, but seriously, lately he has shown what a vain, narcissistic (yet curiously self-loathing) shit excuse for a journalist he is. I can imagine him finding a post like this which criticizes him and highlighting the fact that I'm not relaying it verbatim, and him going "none of this is true"

Whatever you want to believe, dude.

The lying mainstream media doesn't like that he's a gay conservative because it contradicts their narrative that everyone has to be a damn liberal or else you're homophobic. That's why they bring this up now 2 years after he said it.

Not up to speed, I saw news this morning he resigned

George Takei waxed poetic about an experience he had as a 13 year old being molested by an older man. No one gives a shit, even though he's implying a positive effect from a 13 year old being molested.

Milo made a crude joke about being glad that he got molested at 13 by an older man, because "he learned how to give great head," and implies that maybe people worry too much about pedophilia and that it isn't as big a deal as people make it out to be. People are up in arms claiming that he's an advocate for pedophilia, and that he himself is a pedophile.

It's a double standard. They both say they had a positive experience with being molested at 13, but one is completely ignored and the other is crucified.

This will only make him more popular.

If the 13 year old is okay with it, I have a real hard time figuring out what exactly is so objectionable about that.

Gonna have to agree with this user.
Anyone who does not please have a valid argument rather than muh feels.

It converts them to the gay.

maybe that a 13 year old cannot give consent, you fucking moron

Sex is an unspeakable act that only adults are allowed to do.

Explain why?

If a 13 year old has sex with another 13 year old, did they rape each other because neither of them can give consent?

Why did they wait all this time to mention it then?

Jesus said so obviously.

oh god you are stupid

Fuckin dumbass self styles himself as a "provocateur" and then gets his shit pushed in when News Media finally gets fucking provoked. Big fuckin surprise.

The only problem now is that without him it'll take organized demonstration to manage provoking the left into unjust violence, and that's been the culture wars major tipping point thus far. We can't rely on some retards to shit on pewdiepie or whoever once a fucking week for us. We need big stories that the News Media is forced to pass on or lie about in order for us to keep up the pressure. We need the fucking Snowflakes freaking out at Milo.

I swear to fucking shit if that greek faggot doesn't get his fucking ass back in the game post fucking haste we're gonna lose every inch of ground we've taken. Sargoy can't solo this shit for fucks sake and Alex Jones is a fucking meme.

Who's that fag in the picture? Is that you OP?!

He literally said those things, moron.

The boy would be branded a rapist and the girl would be the victim.

naw, the problem occurs when one is over the age of 18 and is fucking 13 year olds.

>a joke
>i was merely pretending, guyz

Yeah fuck off

Derp

Milo said what he said. There is no editing around the words and this is not the first time he has broached the subject during a recoding.

Like the 19 year old that molested George Takei, but it was totally cool because Takei was a fan of butt stuff?

it is technically illegal, since they cannot give consent, so they both rape each other.

...

Sex in general has always been a sensitive topic. Nothing seems to inspire hysteria quite like sex does. Consider how people reacted to promiscuity, masturbation, porn, and homosexuality in the past and how collective self-denial played it's role and how the most vocal people were always the most guilty of what they condemned in others. People often seem to be hysterical over what they desire...

dunno about this story. but if george takei was underage, then the 19yo committed statutory rape.

How exactly that make ANY sense to you, in your mind?

If the 13 year old is GIVING consent, how is he unable to give consent? Please, explain to me how that works.

IIT: pedo conservacucks defending their jewish homosexual pederast nigger-fucking hero.

i don't think so as statutory rape constitutes an adult (i.e. 18+) having sex with a minor (i.e. < 18)

unless there is some other rape law i'm not aware of outside of statutory and assault rape.

Somehow we got to a place where the alt-right is defending premarital homosexual sex, while making the argument that age of consent laws are totally arbitrary and possibly too strict?

How is this in any way conducive to conservative ideology?

>I know nothing about the subject
>But the law is definitely correct
You are retarded

watching conservatives and Sup Forums defend a nigger loving jew faggot is surreal. i don't even care if if the media set him up. watching you guys scramble around his ankles like dogs is awesome as fuck.

thats the most idiotic statement ive heard all day

By that rationale, 5 year olds can give consent.
I like this.
You are a true conservative and a patriot.

Yes, but he denied literally saying those things until they showed him saying those things. Then he tried to switch gears by saying that gay people are born gay when earlier he said that they were not and that no serious scientist has ever said they were. He's got this complex of always having to be right.

to break it down to subhumans like you: law is there to protect people. and with 13 you don't have the full scope of your actions and on top of that you are very easily manipulated. that is why, as a 13y, you are not allowed to buy a car or to have sex. you are too stupid to decide if you want to or not.

How exactly?

At what point does "giving consent" stops being consent and becomes a crime because the consent given is no longer valid?

>If the 13 year old is GIVING consent, how is he unable to give consent? Please, explain to me how that works
It's generally argued that a 13-yo is not mentally mature and experienced enough to work out and understand the implications of their actions and the motives of another person.

That's why they are generally, in civilized countries at least, also not allowed to enlist, vote, apply for credit, watch adult movies, drink alcohol in bars or pubs or drive;

tl;dr - they're children

>nigger loving

Yeah that's why he's shitting on muslims. Cause he loves them.

Technically, it wasn't a statement. It was a question.

Lrn2english shitskin

right?! i hope these guys never stop defending his honor. comedians go their entire lives trying to make shit as funny as this.

Also let's not jump too quick to conclusions. Im not saying Milo is outright lying, but he follows a pattern.

Gets called out for antisemitic diatribe, claims he's half jewish. Called out for racist rhetoric, he claims his boyfriend (who no one has ever seen) is black. Hates on lesbians and male gays plus outs a transsexual student, claims he himself is gay thus invulnerable to criticism. Talks about "very young boys" being sexed in private parties and him not speaking up, advocates for pederasty, and suddenly he's been sexually abused.

The pattern of self-victimization and manipulation is there.

u mad bro?

hahhahaa please, please tell me more. tell me how based and pure he is.

Now, do you equate a 5 year old giving consent to a 13 year old giving consent, then?

Are you REALLY sure a 13 year old wanting to have sex, or enjoying someone fondling their balls is the EXACT same thing as a 5 year old giving consent? Really?

Are you against 13 years old masturbating then? What if an adult is watching the 13 year old masturbating, is that also rape?

How is he supposed to speak up about it? Name names? With no proof? With no evidence?

That's called Defamation faggot.

Milo was making the point of if they looked older than they are right?
And If people find loli hot and there was CP on here...

yep you pretty much nailed it.

FUCK KIKES WOOOO

wow thats kinda fucked up?

sall good niga im a kike.

wow did u just say niga?

no problems faggot im suckin a black guys cock tonight

wow did u just say faggot?

ye cos im gay nigga WOoOoOOo

mILOoOoOo

not at all, i just like watching people flip out. gamergate was awesome, trump winning was awesome, i just like seeing a bunch of tag-alongs flip their collective shit whenever their favorite baby gets shit on.

>to break it down to subhumans like you
Stopped reading there.

No reason to listen to you if that's really how you see me, just for having a different opinion.

I think we're saying similar things here. With all this being said, I find it ironic that he's constantly bitching about the media doing what it does.

stay retarded then, subhuman scum

The media is attacking him because he is an ass and a easy target. He's a male gay Ann Coulter. His act is old and meant to offend. How would you expect people to react to him. All of the sudden anons are supporting him now that the pedo stuff came up. He ruined himself on Real Time. He can't butt heads with real smart people. His 15 minutes is over.

Taki isn't in the business of debating social constructs and or creating social commentary.

Milos whole business is built off of debating social topics and influencing through his social commentaries.

It's hypocritical and discredits his position when he attempts to hand wave rape when he is the one who is always telling others what constitutes rape and how they should protect themselves.

He is placing special circumstances and writing his own narrative because in his case he doesn't feel it was wrong for him to have had the experience, but he will be the first to tell someone else (and has many times) they are wrong for allowing themselves to be the victim of rape

So every psychological study about the subject was wrong... but you're right...
Its not about beliefs its about facts. And the facts say that child abuse leads to psychological damage. Even for the people that didn't say they were abused until they were adults, so you can't use the "it's the hysteria that surrounds it" argument.

Many 5 year olds masturbate too, bud. Also, youre ok with your 13 year old son being fucked by a 38 year old accountant? Shit, if the kid is lucky he might even get his bloody asshole pozzed by his tender mature lover.

Do you even notice the literal verbal shit youre vomiting?

you mad