On this day, exactly 100 years ago, Tsar of All the Russias Saint Nikolai II Aleksandrovich abdicated his throne, signaling the end of the Russian Empire which had stood for nearly two centuries.
A few months later, the 'Russian' Soviet Federative Socialist Republic would be established under the leadership of communist Jews, the world's first socialist state and the one that would export cultural marxism to all white countries.
Press F to pay respects.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>cultural marxism
Stop.
JIDF is here in record time, I'm impressed
>Tsar of All the Russias
Anglos are retarded
feel free to edit the wikipedia page, smart guy
Still wrong, but better than the idiocy that you typed.
why is it wrong
While 'autocrat' might be used as a translation for the word 'caмoдepжeц', it takes a special kind of retard to translate 'вcepoccийcкий' as 'all the Russias'. How many 'Russias' do you think are there?
Three Russias, idiot. Great Russia, Little Russia, White Russia.
>would export cultural marxism to all white countries.
except it's Clapistan which did that from the 60's onwards, it has absolutely nothing to do with the USSR
Kek
You're one to talk about mistranslations, Borisovich Sergeyov.
murrifats had to first get subverted by USSR before exporting subversion ourselves
>It's da commies DAT made us do it! Dey put secret thoughts into our heads to have gay pride parades and start sucking nigger dicks! It's they fault!
Kys
that's what happened lad. why would our extremely religious conservative society suddenly become a hotbed of degeneracy at the same time communist states are spending huge sums of money on subversion and these events be unrelated? do you think McCarthy was just making it all up for the lols?
This is the most hilarious 'let me tell you about your country' that I have ever seen here.
As I said, anglos are retarded. When it comes to the knowledge of this neck of the woods, at least.
also, you're a fucking clueless moron if you think Nicholas II didn't have it coming
He and his wife could not possibly be more incompetent and clueless about the situation that was developing in their own country. Their death was their own doing, as was the creation of the USSR.
except you haven't disproven my argument
saying "I'm from Russia and you're not" doesn't make you any less wrong and I expect an apology
00.5 shequels have been deposited on your account
even if the USSR did make attempts at subversion, it's still so fucking pathetic of you to just blame it all on the USSR
>it's not at all our fault we started being degenerate fucks, we wuz subverted n shieet! we had no choice!
It's the USA's fault first and foremost, end of story.
*inhales*
*opens Lithuanian web browser*
*types in your favorite chatroom on an international board on an anime imageforum*
BY THE GRACE OF GOD
It's time to take some responsibility my man.
The USA was always incredibly degenerate and pushed degeneracy on the rest of the world. The United States of America shouldn't exist at all.
what you're saying is equivalent to saying a shopkeeper who got robbed is the one at fault because he didn't fight back hard enough
do you understand that your country literally underwent the exact same subversion and is as degenerate as ours?
Your what, again?
Emperor and Autocrat of All Russia, Moscow, Kiev, Vladimir, Novgorod; Tsar of Kazan, Tsar of Astrakhan, Tsar of Poland, Tsar of Siberia, Tsar of Chersonese Taurian, Tsar of Georgia; Lord of Pskov and Grand Prince of Smolensk, Lithuania, Volhynia, Podolia, Finland; Prince of Estland, Livland, Courland, Semigalia, Samogitia, Belostok, Karelia, Tver, Yugorsky land, Perm, Vyatka, Bolgar and others; Lord and Grand Prince of Nizhny Nogorod, Chernigov, Ryazan, Polotsk, Rostov, Yaroslavl, Belozersk, Udorsky land, Obdorsk, Kondia, Vitebsk, Mstislav, and all of the northern countries Master; and Lord of Iberia, Kartli, and Kabardia lands and Armenian provinces; Circassian and Mountainous Princes and their Hereditary Lord and Owner; Lord of Turkestan; Norwegian Heir; Duke of Schleswig-Holstein, Stormarn, Dithmarschen, and Oldenburg, and others, and others, and others
...
>00.5 shequels have been deposited on your account
okay then wise guy, prove me wrong
Because as far as I can tell, continuously remaining extremely close to Rasputin when literally EVERYBODY in Russia hated him is tantamount to digging your own grave.
As far as I can tell, failing to realize that things might be going to shit once Rasputin is assassinated is nothing short of being completely fucking clueless.
As far as I can tell, changing war ministers as often as you change your fucking shoes is moronic in every way imaginable.
As far as I can tell, refusing to even adress the record amount of factory strikes and huge food shortages is criminally negligent (until March 1917 Nicholas II essentially never mentioned in his diary entries any of the huge problems that were brewing in the country, instead focusing on his various hobbies).
As far as I can tell, refusing to enact any real political and constitutional changes in regards to the powers of the Duma (in fact, even regressing on the issue) in such a tumultuous time is synonymous with being a power-hungry fuckwit.
So please, you moronic fucking jackass of Olympic proportions, enlighten me with your god damn Sup Forumstard view of history, how the fuck did Nicholas II and his wife NOT have it coming?
>Emperor and Autocrat of All of Russia
Now it's a decent enough translation. Btw, see how he wasn't a Tsar of Russia?
Dude, you're retarded. Your retardation is only matched by your stubborness.
In European history, there certainly were 3 Russias. It refers to regions in the same way that Old Tartary does.
A valid term to describe many of the current far-left movements in Europe and America, is it not?
Cultural marxism is like regular marxism but instead of believing in a wealth based class society, cultural marxists believe that the lower societal classes are defined by belonging to a cultural minority, blacks, gays, trannies etc. The upper class (cis white men) in turn are the opressors
actually in good usage it should be used plurally before ivan
not it is not a valid term, it is a misinfo term
Rasputin
>do you understand that your country literally underwent the exact same subversion and is as degenerate as ours?
Different user here but I'd argue that's because of our proximity to you. American liberals spread their ideologies here in the 60s. We used to be conservative and god fearing.
>Because as far as I can tell, continuously remaining extremely close to Rasputin when literally EVERYBODY in Russia hated him is tantamount to digging your own grave.
Rasputin was the only person who had demonstrated success in treating the Tsarevich's Haemophilia. Getting rid of him wasn't an option.
>As far as I can tell, failing to realize that things might be going to shit once Rasputin is assassinated is nothing short of being completely fucking clueless.
There had been many assassinations in Russian history of much more important figures, such as Nicholas' grandfather Alexander II. Things held together then.
>As far as I can tell, changing war ministers as often as you change your fucking shoes is moronic in every way imaginable.
What else should you do with incompetent ministers?
>As far as I can tell, refusing to even adress the record amount of factory strikes and huge food shortages is criminally negligent (until March 1917 Nicholas II essentially never mentioned in his diary entries any of the huge problems that were brewing in the country, instead focusing on his various hobbies).
Communists will chimp out regardless of their conditions.
>As far as I can tell, refusing to enact any real political and constitutional changes in regards to the powers of the Duma (in fact, even regressing on the issue) in such a tumultuous time is synonymous with being a power-hungry fuckwit.
This claim is inconsistent with the fact that Nicholas authorized the Constitution of 1906.
>So please, you moronic fucking jackass of Olympic proportions, enlighten me with your god damn Sup Forumstard view of history, how the fuck did Nicholas II and his wife NOT have it coming?
quite simply, they didn't do anything wrong and if you disagree you've been bamboozled.
tsar and emperor are equivalent terms in English. the original ascription of "Tsar of All the Russias" was correct.
>not it is not a valid term, it is a misinfo term
And why is that?
>Tsar
They were called Emperors since Peter I.
because that's not marxism and it's not cultural
that's just minority as a class
you're correct, I'm not arguing that. the virus spread from USSR to USA and then from USA to the rest of the world
same meaning in our language
Ra Ra Rasputin
Russia's greatest love machine
Your post makes no sense. Do you think blacks are an oppessed class? What race was your previous worthless nigger president again?
yea they are, black
With utmost determination you are trying to argue with me about the history of my country, a subject you know jackshit about. Do you have brain damage?
>is like regular marxism but
So nothing to do with Marxism then. Marxism is materialistic ideology. It's not about people who identify about bourgeoisie versus people who identify as proletarian. It's about who owns property and who performs labour and how that relates to wealth.
>The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles
ra ra rasputin
lover of the russian queen
>tsar and emperor are equivalent terms in English
Yep, anglos are retarded.
Hoo-hah, hoo-hah, hoo-hah, kazachok!
You don't need to be a Russian to go on internet and read simple fact sheets that say there were three Russias and that the Russian tsar was tsar of all of them. just admit you were wrong and move on
see image in
unless you wish to argue the dictionary.
It's used by mainstream conservatives now. Suck it loser.
>he is still going
it's not correct doe
and alt-right doesn't like to be called mainstream
>he still hasn't refuted my facts or posted a single evidence against them
I've always wondered if his daughters were raped before being murdered like dogs.
>unless you wish to argue the dictionary
I'm not trying to argue the dictionary, I'm just telling you that you anglos are retarded for thinking that two completely different titles are the same. That's all.
no
too much hassle
they were kept in a house for like a few month
why would they rape at the last minute
Mulatto.
is never too late for rape
Which facts? 'Three Russias' is not a thing that existed in this reality, the very idea is idiotic by definition.
F
it is if you understand revolution
they were suppose to be the power structure that held the boundage of servitude
their wholeness represented that power
defiling it meant they were nothing but the process in which power takes place
anyway they would have always wanted to make them disappear but because there was a civil war brewing they decided to end them
maybe it is you is a retard, since "Tsar" comes from "Caesar" which meant emperor
en.wikipedia.org
>maybe it is you is a retard, since "Tsar" comes from "Caesar" which meant emperor
'Caesar' never meant emperor, you fucking moron. 'Imperator' meant emperor. Caesar was an adopted name and quasi-title, which not even all Roman emperors had. And tsar is equivalent to a european king. You are literally arguing about things you know nothing about, having read some incorrect bullshit on Wikipedia.
Kaisar was the official title of the emperor of Byzantium, which was the country that cucked Russia, nerrrd.
pay respect to a man who was a insecure little child when it comes to ruling and was afraid of his own shadow? He was a coward and his actions where the end of the Russian Empire after he get a prosperous realm from his father Alexander II. THAT is a man I press F to, but not this failure
>The term is derived from the Latin word Caesar, which was intended to mean "Emperor" in the European medieval sense of the term—a ruler with the same rank as a Roman emperor, holding it by the approval of another emperor or a supreme ecclesiastical official (the Pope or the Ecumenical Patriarch)
will I trust the word of an anonymous poster butthurt about being proven wrong or the internet encyclopedia?
Are you retarded? The actual equivalent is some guy walking the store and then telling you to sell your shit cheaper because all the prices are too high and then the same shopkeeper decides to slowly give in.
>butthurt about being proven wrong
Tell me, do you have brain damage or are you that stubborn that you deny the most basic historical facts? Can you literally not understand that tsar and emperor are two different titles that are not equivalent to each other?
except if you google the definition of Tsar the definition is literally "Emperor of Russia"
RIP :(
The Tsars were incompetent but they were better than the commies.
And I am telling you how and why this definition is completely wrong. Even the shitty English language Wikipedia article you posted says the same thing.
Rip great hero.
The Russian empire was one of the greatest empires now enjoy some Russian empire music,
You're pretty hard pressed to prove that claim you make when it contradicts the mountains of evidence that I've shown you
there's no shame in being wrong. after all, it's your second language.
The claim that tsar and emperor are 2 different things and that thinking that they are the same is wrong? Well, brain damage it is then.
How are they different though? Asking honestly, since at a quick glance it doesn't affect their political powers. Did Russian leaders gain new powers when they changed the title to emperor instead of tsar?
Chill, man.
English language articles, maps, etc. often have multiple mistakes when it comes to Russia. It just seems like almost zero scientific effort is put into this. I remember maps with "Novaya Zembla" and other hilarious stuff. That user is too rude but he is right, Tsar means Caesar, it was a fetish-word for Ivans III & IV because muh Roman Empire. Peter liked german stuff more and he changed it for Emperor. I think the word Tsar never existed in any titles since then.
if you have any evidence to support your claim then please present it. until then you're sadly mistaken
F
Russian tsar = european king.
See this nice white family? The communist murdered them, they didn't like seeing white families. Now the communist control your country.
I MISS YOUR TSAR YOU WERE A GREAT MAN
That analogy doesn't really help, since within Europe kings and emperors held essentially the same exact powers within their respective countries (ie. Napoleon being an Emperor of France had the same, if not less, powers than the old kings of France). The only difference being prestige, certain manners/customs (ie. since Emperor is technically superior to a king he would have more leeway in social situations for example) and religious authority if we're talking about those ordained by the Pope.
>Tsar means Caesar, it was a fetish-word for Ivans III & IV because muh Roman Empire. Peter liked german stuff more and he changed it for Emperor
facepalm.jpg
Forgive my ignorance on it then, I can only know what the English sources say, unfortunately.
can you explain the Novaya Zembla thing?
>the analogy didn't help
>proceeds to explain the difference
But I was asking about political powers, not social customs. If the difference between the titles is what I said then I'm satisfied with your answer, but I would also feel that calling it retarded to translate Tsar as Emperor is splitting hairs in the extreme.
Nah. It was originally about analysing culture through Marxism
Now it's just a right wing bogeyman. Shame because Adorno was very insightful
Good fucking riddance
Shame the Bolsheviks took power
>le commie joo conspiracy
Translating one title as a completely different title is pretty retarded, if you care about being correct. Which obviously is not a concern for English speakers when it comes to Russia.
But that's what translating is, if they just call the Tsar a Tsar then it's not a translation, you have to use an existing word for it to be a translation. And as far as some Finnish peasant was concerned, there was no difference between a King, Tsar or Grand Duke.
Point at my mistakes.
>mfw people think that just because they live on a piece of geography makes them a history expert of that piece of geography
This "tell me more about my country" meme needs to end. I know more about European history than most Europeans, it doesn't matter where the fuck I live, what matters is my knowledge.
The equivalent English word for tsar would be king. One would think that modern educated literate people would strive to be more knowledgeable than Finnish peasants.
Why aren't the various SSRs marked on that map?
Tsar comes from church slavonic and imperator is from latin, it has nothing to do with Germany.
Tsar = Kaiser = Caesar
>Anglos translate the rus's to Russia
>MFW
What you linked are only geographical locations and they're WESTERN NAMES. Rusins or Ruthenians for you westerners, never actually got to create their own states in history and were first part of Poland and Lithuania, and after we got rekt came under Russian rule.
They spoke a language very close to Polish, which can be seen in the Statutes of Lithuania, except they used the Cyrylic alphabet. The latinized copy of the document is basicly polish with some loan words.
Anyways the title emperor/tsar/king/ruler of all rus, was a political thing already established by muscovy to legitimize its claims on rusin lands. Since most rusins and muscovy were orthodox they saw those lands as thier people and their sphere of influence, even though muscovy and people further east are mongol rape babies and finnougric and have fuck all in common with Rusins, Poles and People who lived in the western bank dnierp part of ukraine.
People back in the day felt a bond not with their country but with the ruler, soo claiming you're the ruler of the ruses was a tool to sway those people under muscovy rule. Since orthodoxy and shit.
Wikipedia is shit and this thread is a trainwreck.
I think there's a misunderstanding. These terms came into being many centuries after Rus
And they're not only geographical locations by any means;
White Russians = Byelorussians
Little Russians = Ukrainians
Great Russians = Russians
the terms also refer to the languages/dialects of those people. In German, Belarus is still called Weißrussland.
so these three terms each refer to both a geographical region, a language/dialect, and an ethnic group. Although they fell out of common use after korenization, they were often heard during Nicholas II's time
>Little Russians = Ukrainians
Ukraine is loosely derived from the equivalent word for "borderlands".
they don't matter for this map and USSR was 1 year old yet.
Peter took fashion from germans, that's what I mean.
two words for the same geographical location, although it doesn't matter really. OP is correct, even if he's a putinshill. there were multiple "Russias" I don't get why its so controversial
Yeah but we had completly diffrent names for those places
Only there were many more Rus's than
Great, white and little rus, which are incorrect names of geographical/historical states and lands
For example there was
Red Rus
White Rus
Black Rus
Halicka Rus
Halick - Wołyn Rus
Subcarpathian Rus
Russians, just took the name to legitimize their claims on those lands like i said before.
They were know as muscovy and muscovites, throughout the ages untill they Ivan the IV coronated himself and the ruler of all rus, which we didnt recognize since those lands were in the PLC, only after the first partition our Sejm that had no choice legitimized their claim on those lands.
But the name Russia stuck.
Its the same thing with Lithuania taking the name Lithuania even though Belarus should be named Lithuania.