Let's see what we all think

Let's see what we all think

politicalcompass.org/test

Other urls found in this thread:

filteries.com/politics
libertyheadlines.com/20-times-bad-guys-stopped-armed-citizens-2016/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

you're a good man OP

perfect spot on the compass, hats off

...

...

Rifles illegal but handguns legal? Have you ever handled either of those?

Where is this from?

I've shot a rifle before, can't remember what it was exactly. Good for the revolution. After the revolution, it's a danger. People need nothing more than handguns and shotguns to defend themselves in their homes.

filteries.com/politics

so many republicans in this thread, proves the main stream media right. Sup Forums is an alt-right paradise.

I think we'd get along well together.

On Isidewith.com i got jill stein so somethings off with that algorithm because i don't think I (libertarian) align with her hippie socialist shit

If you think anybody in the purple square even remotely falls under the label of "alt-right", you know jackshit about this compass and political theory as a whole.

I just keep moving up and right

lol, last time i answered one of these, people didnt believe my results, so i took it again, posted results for each question and the final scoring position.

Quick question, why would rifles be any more dangerous than pistols in the long run? I read somewhere that some 95% or so of shootings are done with a handgun. Caliber hardly equals lethality in the civilian world, because you can take down an unarmored person with just about any caliber. What is to say that a person seeking mass damage won't acheive their goal by using multiple handguns?

>tfw your superior libertarian viewpoints get lumped in with the alt right

...

...

...

If someone wants to commit a massacre, it is much easier for them to do so if they have a rifle. Not so much if they have a handgun. And also those with handguns wouldn't take advantage of gun free zones because I would have armed police on duty at every gun free zone.

libertarians get along with socialism much more than mainstream american politics.
The only difference is the right leaners think mafias running the country is better than corporate democracy

>libertarians get along with socialism

pls stop

I get further right each day, it seems.

Soon my brother, soon

...

The only reason why it's easier to use a rifle over a pistol is because of accuracy and magazine count, which you can compensate for by using an assortment of pistols. There are plenty of lethal pistol rounds which also have decent accuracy, such as .38 or .45.

Armed guards hardly do shit in case of mass shooting. Every major mass shooting that was heavily covered in the news in the past several years was comitted in a gun free zone. Meanwhile, every single day shootings are stopped by lawful gun owners with concealed carry permits.

guess my age

I think this test is inaccurate. Any other test I take makes me peak libertarian or slightly off to the right of libertarian.

What does thinking some people are naturally unlucky have to do with this?

You missed what I said. I said in a gun-free zone, there would be heavily armed guards on duty.
>every single day shootings are stopped by lawful gun owners
[source needed]

>libertarians get along with socialism much more than mainstream american politics.
The only difference is the right leaners think mafias running the country is better than corporate democracy

>libertarians get along with socialism much more than mainstream american politics

>libertarians get along with socialism

TOP
FUCKING
KEK

I hate politics and never vote wtf does this mean?

24

Also, you say using an assortment of pistols. As if having multiple pistols will make a difference if you're shot early on in your shooting spree.

Obvious no gun experience is obvious.

You probably would have voted for Bernie

...

...

Its an economically center view that is socially against state control...
What don't you get about that? There are left and right leanings to libertarian ideology.
Is it that you are a brainwashed baby boomer that thinks socialism is synonymous with state forced communism and dictatorships?
Or that you are an edgelord 16 year old that thinks an-cap is equal to libertarian?
Please decide.

Not true about armed security in gun free zones. Just about every business in a commie state like Cali, Maryland, NJ, or NY is a gun free zone. Do they all have armed security?

...

This is mine what does it mean?

Okay Sup Forumsros, explain this to me.
I hate all SJW activity, and everything having to do with BLM / feminism.
I'm like low-tier middle class but I know taxation on the rich is fucking ridiculous.
Proud of my country, against illegals and whatnot.
I voted trump and fully support him atm.

Yet I'm stuck right in the middle, leaning liberal.
I'm not very religious at all, does it make that much of an impact on the political compass?

It means you're a faggot

ama

I never said they do. I said I advocate that gun free zones must have armed guards on duty at all times. Also, you have to be one dense motherfucker to think those states are communist in the least.

How so?

I think the test is inaccurate. I'm total libertarian and it put me center right. I too voted for Trump, Rand Paul was my first choice, I voted for Ron Paul in the previous elections.

...

Who do you hope God picks as king during the next great jihad/crusade?

How can you say they aren't commie states? High taxes and high gun control

You won't be, if you target security first. Conceal 2-3 pistols and a few mags, and you can probably rack up a decent spree if that's what you want. If rifles are taken away, I guarentee you that people will just use similar tactics to this.

The questions don't pinpoint your authoritarianism well. I'm a Stalinist and it fucking put me here.

Because taxation and gun control doesn't make a nation communist. Jesus fucking Christ. Go back to the McCarthy era.

...

If that becomes an issue then police presence would just be increased. But with it would come increased police oversight.

...

im exactly where you are. its basically just lax secretly homophobic people standpoint.

don't have the photo but last time I did it i was -5, -5 (middle of green)

Everyone judge me based on this stupid chart

Trump falls very center. Just... way up higher in authority.\
Do you think his ideas are "fiscally conservative?" No... hes a liberal that is very socially authoritarian.
Do you guys see why he is so dangerous yet?

AnCaps should just call themselves feudalists because that's exactly what would result from a fully AnCap society

Yay I made it ^-^

I land in nearly the exact same spot and share nearly all your views listed.

What can we argue about?

you say that like it's a bad thing

does this mean im gay

How bad is it?

Test is broken

woo

It just depends what your idea of gun free zone is then, because schools, theaters, etc are all gun free zones, yet nearly every school has only one officer on duty if any. The only places where you can expect to have guards with sufficient firepower to stop a mass shooter would be police stations and the like. Even malls would be an easy target, seeing as mall cops aren't armed.

Just to clarify, earlier I meant that crimes are stopped every day by gun owners, not shootings.

libertyheadlines.com/20-times-bad-guys-stopped-armed-citizens-2016/

Here's a single source since I'm lazy, but if you're interested in looking further, there is tons of data out there.

...

my dad always told me that homeless people are where they are because they made bad decisions and they deserve to be there. I asked if it were possible they had just been unlucky at some point in their lives, he said no.

Im not much for politics but ive always thought of that as a very right ideology.

Ghandi reporting in.

They can't increase police presence everywhere. Do you really think that a mass shooting would happen twice in the same place, by different people (assuming that the first shooter was killed)?

I used to be farther right... fucking media.

I don't believe this chart.

Top kek

...

Please stop implying that the only available options are ancap, socialism, and communism. Libertarians don't like socialism not because they think that it's communism (although most people here probably think it's the same thing) but because the government steps in to force employers to pay employees a certain way in order to redistribute power. That's not freedom so libertarians don't like it.

>what can we argue about
Absolutely nothing.

We're in the sweet spot.
Despite who you talk to, there's a good chance you have some common ground with at least one of their ideologies.
I feel like our spot is focused less on leaning a specific way, and more on picking and choosing whatever fits best.

I'm the scary liberal your parents warned you about

Not too surprised

You're the colossal faggot everybody laughed at

Im an illiterate retard can someone explain what this means

Don't care too much about politics. What does this mean?

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

:))))

...

...

Socialism IS state control. There's no other way in which that system can manifest.

This gets stupider and stupider the more I see it posted.

Gary Johnson train right here. Moderate-Right Libertarianism is god-tier ideology.
Keep basic environmental/safety regulations so the earth isnt grtting trashed.
Keep basic welfare.
Massivrly cut down on Federal agencies that are doing more harm then good.
End natiom building
End war on drugs
Bring back civil liberties
Free the economy

If one type of Libertarianism goes mainstream, its going to be the modern moderate libertarianism. All this Ron Paul shit is too ideological.

>tfw you realize your government would fail immediately

Sounds about right

very odd result as i feel that i identify more with the right. must be the mild canadian in me...

...

>Keep basic environmental/safety regulations
>Keep basic welfare
>Bring back civil liberties
>Free the economy

>All this Ron Paul shit is too ideological