AMSP

>phoneposter
>radiohead

why am i surprised

I went through a lot of different opinions on this. AT first, I thought it was their best work since at least HttT. But after seeing them live, and how shitty the songs translated, and how detached they seemed to be to it, it left a terrible taste in my mouth.

Its cut from the same cloth as IR and OKC, and at least has a lot more experimentation than IR, so that give's it a slight edge.

So the Late Radiohead career scores would be:
HttT: 9/10 (10 live, through footage I looked at when I was way younger.)
IR: 7/;10 (6 Live)
TKoL: 8.5/10 (11 live, this fucking shit was bonkers)
AMSP:7.5/10 (5 live)

I find it amazing that even then, they still put out songs that are some of the greatest in their history. This time Ful Stop was fucking GOAT. Daydreaming and Tinker Tailor are great too, among others.

TLDR it's ok.

Agree, same experience with me.

What a shitty, uninformed opinion. This was with out a doubt Johnny's album musically, only Thom's lyrically. There's even the only solo he's recorded in a decade in there.

As far as bass and drums, theres a lot of great shit in there too that are remnants of the King of Limbs era, like Ful Stop.

I'm not even saying they are good or not, but you are just flat out wrong.

I think it is really really good and it will stick through time like the classics.

I honestly feel like that TKOL is the only real band based approach since HttT. Its just that on top of it, everything got looped to hell and back, which honestly made it amazing.

Thoms singing is top notch, and no doubt had a strong hand in making the songs, but the rest of the band is way more present than in IR and even AMSP. Colin and Phil especially.

Thats why if felt it was so refreshing, after IR was all about butt rock and guitar work from Thom Ed and Johnny. KOL was all production and groovy shit.

>comparing radiohead to classical

I mean Radiohead albums

radiohead is pop tripe. go read a book and dont respond to me again

DECKS DARK FTW