biggest musical redpills:
>the Beatles were trash
>rock and metal are boring genres that you cannot listen to without yawning and cringing when you have grown up
>pop is objectively the best musical genre
Biggest musical redpills:
Jason Reed
Other urls found in this thread:
books.google.com
en.wikipedia.org
recmusicbeatles.com
twitter.com
Owen Martin
Congrats to you special snowflake. Here is your trophy of one response in your shitty thread.
Ian Gonzalez
redpills =/= objectively wrong opinions
John Edwards
you cannot be a true poptimist without setting aside your problems with AC/DC
Jason Murphy
let them have their angsty opinions
Camden Bailey
when someone says that the Beatles are among top 10 bands ever I know right away that they know shit about music
Kayden Thompson
>>pop is objectively the best musical genre
The Beatles were pop though
t. I don't know music theory
Kevin Watson
>female musicians are and always will be terrible
>the last surviving core of originality music is in black metal
>(they) have coopted the entirety of the population into worshipping degenerate pop through mass indoctrination
Brody Kelly
>music theory
they just sound like nothing special, you don't need to go to school to tell good music from bad
the beatles are most overrated band of hacks who had 0 originality
Luis Fisher
>they just sound like nothing special
Show me a song that sounded like Tomorrow Never Knows before they did it.
>you don't need to go to school to tell good music from bad
What makes them bad?
Dominic Ortiz
"Real instruments" are objectively worthless pieces of overcomplicated garbage for pretentious cavemen who refuse to join the 21st century. Note how every half decent rock/pop album ever made would not be very good if it were not for its production.
Jack Bennett
More like nu-male pill
Aaron Roberts
>"Real instruments" are objectively worthless
Objectively wrong. Stopped reading right there
Julian Bell
Those are sentimentally valuable, they have no real value when everything they can do a MIDI can do better.
Brandon Smith
>real value
Monitory value is real; sentimentality is not.
Nice try though.
Nathan Morris
>what is modern jazz, classical, folk etc. music
You're probably a deluded millennial music fan who has probably never left his bubble of hip-hop/electronic/whateverthefuck to discover other music and/or people.
>rock/pop
>21st century
>good
Choose one. Is this bait? If not, you truly are a fucking moron.
>emphasis on production
Oh you're one of THOSE people...
Also
>objectivity
Get a load of this fucking spook.
Wyatt Davis
Why are people nowadays equating edgy contrarianism or straight up idiocy with redpillness? I see some legit retarded right wingers/religious fucktards do it all the time.
>lmao the earth is flat and hitler never existed I am so fucking woke #REDPILL
Cooper King
No music matters except classical.
Xavier Long
>Jazz
Dead genre because it was incompatible with electronic developments.
>Rock/pop
I'm not just referring to the 21st century. Find any album people praise as a masterpiece from the late-70s on and you will find that it's 100% because of the production (i.e. Remain in Light, which would just be shitty white guy funk if it weren't for Eno)
>Classical
The only relevant composers today are the ones experimenting with electroacoustics, tape music, stochasticism, etc.
>Folk
If you mean traditional music, that's for teenage cultural tourists who want to look intelligent or old people who have nothing better to do.
If you mean singer songwriter bullshit, that is a long irrelevant genre and many people have moved onto singing their useless political bullshit and >muh feels over electronic music instead.
Sorry grandpa, hip hop, /bleep/s and electonic classical are the only real music of this century and your toys are being left behind.
Asher Brown
Here's my redpill moment: It's purist faggots like these that make people afraid of classical music.
Adrian Cooper
>electroacoustics, tape music, stochasticism
Are you from the fucking 1950s?
Define "real music", please. I'd have no problems "being left behind" to be honest. But I'm not excluding modern music from my taste, some recordings, heavily electronic influenced, from the last 20 years are staples in my library. Only time will tell if they are really worth anything though. Some "hip" moments right now could just be another Disco. A lot of classical music is (for now) still proving to be timeless.
Lucas Harris
THIS.Rocktards BTFO
Austin Jones
>calls entire genre trash
>acts enlightened
W E W
E
W
Levi Watson
See You On the Other Side is the best Mercury Rev album
Parker Martin
>rap is not that good
Carson Gray
the only legitimate redpill in the thread
Aiden Parker
>Rock died in the 2000s
Zachary Nguyen
>genre is still being played to this day
Then its not dead, is it?
Ryan Jones
white people ruin every music genre they touch
Andrew Carter
Not him, but what people object to is their insincerity. They were experimental sometimes, but only to the point of being commercially acceptable and viable. But then again, what could you really expect from a pop band, which formed as a boy band?
Jose Myers
>Sorry grandpa, hip hop, /bleep/s and electonic classical are the only real music of this century and your toys are being left behind.
Why did anyone make a genuine reply? It was a bait with a lot of effort, but come on.
Daniel Morris
>insincerity
Oh do you know them personally?
>which formed as a boy band?
[citation needed]
Lucas Peterson
No art matters and if you feel superior for liking any of it, then you're gay and dumb.
Music is shit
Henry Lopez
White people created every genre.
Every genre is shit then, thread over.
Wyatt Collins
good job deliberately misunderstanding him, fucktard
Blake Long
No, I understand him completely.
Maybe you don't know what dead means?
Dylan Price
>>insincerity
>Oh do you know them personally?
You know what I'm talking about.
>They were experimental sometimes, but only to the point of being commercially acceptable and viable.
>>which formed as a boy band?
>[citation needed]
books.google.com
Nolan Miller
What's your relationship with your father like?
Kayden Bell
Fine.
Answer the question
>You know what I'm talking about.
I don't, explain.
As to your other assertion:
en.wikipedia.org
Liam Butler
The greatest redpill is getting over the edgy contrarian phase and realising The Beatles literally wont ever be topped.
Brody Evans
Flawless recovery to not having any rebuttal whatsoever.
Sebastian Diaz
>tfw Hendrix topped the Beatles and made them irrelevant
Julian Sullivan
>claim """rock"" is shit
>only have a superficial knowledge of the genre
Jacob Gomez
Who?
Joseph Fisher
>>You know what I'm talking about.
>I don't, explain.
How many times am I going to have to repeat myself? I don't think I'll bother anymore, because you won't acknowledge it either way. And don't worry, I'm saging.
>They were experimental sometimes, but only to the point of being commercially acceptable and viable.
Jace Thomas
Anyone have the Perry bible fellowship version of this or any other ones?
Landon Smith
>How many times am I going to have to repeat myself?
Sounds like your mistake for not making sense the frist time.
You made a claim questioning their sincerity. Thus you know them personally, right? Otherwise you wouldn't know.
>because you won't acknowledge it either way.
Are you going to acknowledge you were wrong? I bet you won't
>They were experimental sometimes, but only to the point of being commercially acceptable and viable.
The later is not relevant, so I don't think you know what experimental means.
>And don't worry, I'm saging.
Announcing sage is a ban-able offense.
Luke Wright
redpill =/= defining which colors are bad
Where do you dorks come from? You can say that the Beatles are shit but you can't label your position as redpilled.
Grayson Taylor
>You can say that the Beatles are shit
Only if you'd want to be wrong.
Jordan Bailey
no one itt can tab out a beatles song to show what makes it good
Asher Miller
>doesn't understand something
>thinks it's because the thing is retarded
Brandon Peterson
you need a better site design
Luis Morales
>You're wrong
Great argument.
>You made a claim questioning their sincerity. Thus you know them personally, right? Otherwise you wouldn't know.
I never made such a ridiculous claim, but you keep asserting that.
>>They were experimental sometimes, but only to the point of being commercially acceptable and viable.
How is it not relevant? I was so bold as to dare criticize a band you like? Is that why? Let's be real for a minute; they weren't avant-garde composers challenging what music could be and doing it for love of music.
>Announcing sage is a ban-able offense.
That won't stop me from restarting my router and not giving presumably your thread any more bumps.
Christian Rogers
>Great argument.
Thanks. How does it feel?
>I never made such a ridiculous claim
Oh do you not know what sincerity means?
>How is it not relevant?
We are discussing experimental music. Viability is not relevant.
>I was so bold as to dare criticize a band you like?
Quote me where I said I liked the Beatles
>they weren't avant-garde composers challenging what music could be
That's not what experimental means.
>and doing it for love of music.
Oh did you know them personally?
>That won't stop me from restarting my router and not giving presumably your thread any more bumps.
I'm not OP. Have fun doing meaningless actions.
Parker Jackson
>Quote me where I said I liked the Beatles
Why are you so adamant on defending them then?
Gavin Ortiz
>rock and metal are boring
Except no, they're literally designed around rhythms and sounds that get you amped up, because the human body responds to agressive, fast sounds like that
If you yawn during a good metal track you are literally mentally ill
Nathan Evans
that's subjective
Justin Nelson
>the Beatles were trash
>pop is objectively the best musical genre
here's a free (you)