What makes some countries so evil?

What makes some countries so evil?

>Gommies are on the same level with isis
Just what? I understand that early Soviets committed autistic crimes, but after Stalin's death I just don't understand how it is being compared to the most radical Islamists or nazis.

t. SF soviet apologist

Good argument

American propaganda

non-Greek culture
i am serious

>countries
>2 of these flags aren't even a national state flag
>italian educashun

>what is the Prague Spring

>implying non-evil superpowers have ever existed

They're full of retards that will believe the first thing they see written down provided it uses words they like

Minority

soviet doesn't fit in the list 2bh lad

Close, but actually Stalin was a good boy.

>superiority complex / extreme vanity
>brutal suppression of political dissent
>very militaristic

sounds like the US

They have a lot of number one and number three but not so much of number two.

killing to just live

These were not remotely evil.
Rather too just to exist.

...

ISIS IS NOT A COUNTRY!
>Not remotely evil
>national sport is finding the most creative way to kill infidels

>italy
Traitor

They didn't manage to kill all dissenters

Those were just politics, CS would have taken USA's side, which means having american bases and rockets just near Poland and other soviet countries. It wasnt a genocie or anything, more like czechs spitting on comrades and lying beneath the tanks.

Not having the color blue in your flag

Estonians

Nazi and Imperial Nippon doesn't fit this list.
I like them because they kill literal subspecies of mankind; JUDEN and CHINK.

This is what happens when you let under 6' manlets run your country. Tojo was a manlet, Hitler was a manlet and stalin was a manlet. Never trust a manlet.

Didn't the Soviets kill some 50 million odd people?

>Evil

Hitler did nothing wrong

Hirohito did nothing wrong

al-Baghdadi did nothign wrong

Stalin did nothing wrong

dey whe're gud bois, dindu NUFFIN'

What makes some countries so THIRSTY?

implying we were evil

True. Manlets simply can't be effective leaders.

Hot climate.

>we
You were not part of that, user.

The four are evils

The Nazis were less evil than the anti white world government we have today , that's for sure

>evil
implying theirs such a thing

Some might even say they did nothing wrong besides losing

This

your country was also like that. idk why you shunned it. but i understand you were just so powerless you couldnt be so relevant in modern history.

Italians were fascists, but they dont compare to japs, mate.

So were Czechs

You were pretty good at it too. And Romanians. Romanians were my favorite

>you were
Yeah, i know. Thats why it makes me laugh, still, when our people bring up "the massacre" that was Pražské Jaro. Like, choose your side, already.

I'm not familiar with that massacre tell me about it

Its not a fucking massacre. Czechoslovakians basically wanted to be secular from cummunist domination, so soviets and polish (i think? They were also in the commie pact) sent tanks as a warning, to hold the reformation. There was like 100 deaths, or something, cause those people were literally violent protestors.

Who do you agree with?

I dont think czechs are that much of a nazis, though, they hate both sides. There was literally a protectorate here, led by nazis, so you couldnt do much in that situation. Still, there were partizans, mostly in Prague.

I liked the Fascists in Romania the most. They had the coolest look and seemed like the best guys. What about you?

Wtf, I love Estonia now!

You forgot a flag

Who are you talking about? Both nazis and commies are cunts, while nazis actually killed quite a lot of people, during the occupation. Even now 15% of people vote for a communist party.

Your low tolerance to murder
That's what makes them evil, if you cared as little about a state murdering their citizen like you care about people starving to death, they wouldn't look that evil

I like the ones who looked the best. And the Nazis in my opinion had the coolest uniforms and appearance.

Look at this guy for example. You can't tell me this is not a man who looks very captivating.

>Two old world style Empires obsessed with authoritarian and racialist ideology
>An insurrectionist, reactionary religious guerrilla group
>The Soviet Union

None of these have any common denominators please go fuck yourself

>romanian fascists
I though gypsies were a part of the genocide (thats maybe the only reace, i could actually agree with nazis).
Germans had the coolest look. Hugo Boss did his job.

...

Why do you keep bringing up their looks? They had a style going on, no questions about that, but why is it seems to be the only thing you care about? Would you become a commie, jist because you like their sense of fashion?

Look up the iron guard

They were very strongly religious (Romanian Orthodox) fascists. Cool look IMO too. And the leader had good quotes and looks smart.

Not sure I would become either one I'm just saying I admire the aesthetics.

If I had to choose purely based on style I would go with the Nazis. If it was a fashion show. They do say there is no second chance for a first impression.

amen

WOW SO COOL! YEAH, DUDE! RAD!
Srsly?

What is your problem? Did your grandfather get turned into a bar of soap?

their enemies

...

>Why do you keep bringing up their looks?
Because hes a fag

>no american flag in that pic
o_o

t. Wears joggers and greasy t shirt everywhere

There's no second chance for a first impression user.

>Soviets

You mean, Russians?

No, but the only thing that you keep bringing up is fashion, which is retarted, everyone knew they looked cool. That has nothing to do with their policies, though.

Guys who look cool can't have bad policies.

real politik. How the USSR dealt with uprisings in Hungary and Prague wasn't nice, but not dissimilar to how a thousand other uprisings in history put down.

But i don't care what you think. What now?

If americans chose a guy who wanted to eradicate all leafs, but was dressed like a fashion idol, would you still spill the same shit?

Sorry man, i meant that guy.

Others care though and your lack of attention into your appearance turns them away.

I'm going to assume you meant to reply to me but yeah I wouldn't be opposed. Canada needs a hard reset

Girls have called me cute before. What now?

Wasn't Stalin a churka?

>imperial Japan
>Unit 731 killed for fun an got away with it
>not evil

Well that changes everything!

Okay, then, whatever, i would definetely agree with that dude, if it meant disposing the world of stupid leaves such as yourself.

I would help these hypothetical Americans, so they wouldn't want to hurt me.

ayy

Ye boi i got that style

Is a churka what you would call an eastern guy? O though there was another name for Caucas people, but i forgot it.

Just a normal rusák face, nothin to see here

I thought causus people where the ones called churkas

Hmm. Maybe. Ive definetely seen another word, some russian guys were telling me which are which. The other one is about asians, then.

>Even now 15% of people vote for a communist party.
It's just nostalgic old people who want pensions.

holy kek this. if I had a dollar for every "Muh pension muh pension" I've heard...

>pensions
They would need to look for that someplace else, kek. The only pension theyll have is a ticket for a slice of bread.

Time to repost "Life under communism":

*You have no freedom or right to control your own destiny. The state tells you where you can live and what jobs you can have.
*Consumer goods are poor quality and in short supply--it can take months to purchase a bicycle, TV set, or coffee table.
*Jobs are mostly assigned based on your status as a member of the proletarian class such as "worker" or "peasant", or because you have connections to some party bigshot, and you could be denied a job if a member of your family did something politically unacceptable.
*If you complain about anything, you go to jail or a labor camp.
*Religion is either banned or strictly controlled by the state.
*You need permission to travel outside the country.
*Food is poor quality and limited in supply--markets often only have a few items on sale. People literally get sick and experience malnutrition from the shitty diet.
*There are no free elections and government officials do not have to answer to the public.
*All media, art, and entertainment must conform to the state agenda--this includes glorifying the party or the leader and schlocky propaganda art of muscled factory workers while demonizing whatever ideologies/people/countries the party wants demonized.
*The print and electronic media only report whatever news the state wants you to hear while not mentioning what they don't want you to know.
*There is no independent judiciary and you do not have a right to a fair trial or legal representation.
*Hotels and apartments are bugged, so be careful what you say.
*Some cities are "closed" meaning you cannot visit them without official permission.

Yeah, no one says communist was something good.
>media
Ive seen lots of non so bad soviet cartoons and moviet, desu. They werent even about soviet politics. I still talked to a lot of ruskies born in 60s - 70s, who were still praising ussr and how good they were living at those times.

>TFW parents sometimes say the USSR was pretty good

really makes me think

>Next time without Italy

>Akuma no housyoku is Morimura Seiichi's fiction novel.

The Victors define evil as they do history.

Just imagine had Nazi Germany and the Jap Empire won. The United States would have been on your image. seen as an evil entity.

Same with the Soviet Union and soon with ISIL

>"we dindu nuffin! we wuz gud boiz!"

e non fare il cuck proprio tu che sei italiano, leva le prime due dai

...

>African education

Canzone