More gifs related to filename of real life ones. Show me your taste, Sup Forums

More gifs related to filename of real life ones. Show me your taste, Sup Forums.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/FY9BwIhkbsg
ipanon.com
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

bumb for interest. This is now loli thread.

Did someone offer her pizza?

thinly failed cp request thread. reported

Why?

Someone has the gif of the gymnastic girl with captations?

you know damn well why paedo

British trolls are worst trolls.

>British
that alone makes them a better troll

Kys paedo scum. Your kind will be hanging from trees soon

What

Want some candy?

brits already have troll teeth, they just need to be green.

...

you know, the one where she says not to use her pussy but to use her asshole

Fully clothed girl in no sexual context -> pedo

FUCK OFF

What is a gif? Do you mean gift?

Kek'd at the thought of someone believing this shit

...

why would someone do this

ITS PAEDO BECAUSE I SAID IT IS.

Was not expecting it to be yellow

got more? ;)

The context makes it illegal in most civilised countries.

lern2law

...

You're fucking retarded if you don't think OP is a paedo. Kys too

fuck your cousin, faggot paedo american

He maybe is but it's not explicit CP. Kids in regular videos doesn't mean cp.

how did that fit inside of such a young girl. i feel sick

Yeah that one

Snakes are such useless creatures.

...

Calm down cunts and let the candy man have some fun. It's /b ffs

>The context makes it illegal
>lern2law

"Let's all condone this filthy paedo lmao"

Kys

Wows
youtu.be/FY9BwIhkbsg

In the UK this is absolutely the case. I think it's similar in North America, too.

You're allowed naked beach pics of your own kids but if you have pics of other people's kids it's a different story.

I bring this up every now and then and people always fly into a rage. The law isn't hard to understand.

Still no pornographic content. Also don't you smell the bait you nasty fucker?

Still no nudity

Fags rage because of "loli" in file name. Don't care grown muslim men can marry 9 year olds in some arabic countrys.

I never said there was.

"Don't care"

We hate them too you fuck

...

>reaction image of a child making a funny face
>not your kid, therefore you're a pedophile and should be sent to prison

It must suck living in a dystopian shit hole like the UK.

Kek

That's what i meant with no cp or nudity. It's just from a casual video.

>breakable

The USA has the PROTECT act which is basically the same thing.

It must suck being a dribbling retard.

Not my fault that your are retarded and must suck a dribbling cock

So you have nothing to say because you've lost the argument. How embarrassing.

Child actors? Every adult who has seen any movie with kids in it is a fucking child rapist send them to the gas chamber fucking creeps protect our childrens faces from being looked at!!! get the burka!!! Fucking rape paedo retards everywhere. GAS ALL THE

Actually i just did

FUCKING NORMIES GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY BOARD YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT CUCKLORD HILLARY LOVERS
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

That wasn't me, but he's right. You look fucking retarded trying to argue this point and honestly I don't have the energy to keep arguing with someone so aggressively stupid.

>I bet this is illegal in the UK too

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

So what now? Who lost the argument?

So senate really fucked with our internet ipanon.com

everyone who read it

Are you autistic? Do you struggle understanding context?

I'm not arguing a point, I'm referring to objective fact.

See below:

The first conviction of a person found to have violated the sections of the act relating to virtual child pornography was Dwight Whorley of Virginia, who used computers at the Virginia Employment Commission to download "Japanese anime style cartoons of children engaged in explicit sexual conduct with adults"[14] alleged to depict “children engaged in explicit sexual conduct with adults.” He was charged with 19 counts of “knowingly receiving” child pornography for printing out two cartoons and viewing others.[15] His conviction was upheld in a 2-1 panel decision of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in December 2008.[14] This decision was consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition in which the Supreme Court held that virtual child pornography was protected free speech, provided that the virtual depictions are not obscene. Obscenity, including obscene depictions of children, either virtual or real, is unprotected speech.

Land of the free alright :^)

The person trying to deny it's clothed pics can't be classed as CP even though he probably lives in a country with laws to the contrary.

Right in the feels

moar pls

Well you see, she's actually a 3000 year old alien from a distant galaxy so she's not a child.

>
>Are you autistic? Do you struggle understanding context?

OP has loli in the file name. Joke and edgy bait. It's content from YouTube. Only because somebody can wank to it in his basement it isn't porn. Is an animal documentary porn because someone faps to it? is possesing the documentary illegal cuz somebody fapped to it? It's free fucking content with a spiced up file name. I don't give a fuck what he may or may not have tried to ask for because no lines have been crossed. It's free fucking YouTube content. What op thinks about it doesn't make it porn, obscene or child abuse.

Is it still illegal if it's a tattoo?

what the fuck did i miss

Lol that's awesome

Pls

Nothing, you pedo fuck. You can stop monitoring for cheese pizza now.

I wonder what that will look like when she is 60

>Prohibits computer-generated child pornography when "(B) such visual depiction is a computer image or computer-generated image that is, or appears virtually indistinguishable from that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct"; (as amended by 1466A for Section 2256(8)(B) of title 18, United States Code).

Wouldn't matter.

A good lawyer could railroad your ass if you were asked to explain what loli meant.

It's not illegal to fap over animals so that's a shit analogy. If it was a documentary on a kindergarten or something and you had it saved as "Sexy kindergarten kids" that could be considered illegal. Depends how strict 'they' want to be.

I'm not saying the law is morally right, just that it exists.

MODS MODS MODS

Fuck. So I have to change the filename of an episode of powerpuff girls from 'sex kittens want milk #5'?

>computer-generated
it's not

>appears virtually indistinguishable from that of a minor

maybe if you're autistic you could confuse a cartoon with a real person but I'm gunna say not again.

reticulated python, world's longest species of snake

> If it was a documentary on a kindergarten or something and you had it saved as "Sexy kindergarten kids" that could be considered illegal

Yeah... got a lawyerfag friend who's trying to muddle his way through this shit.
A lot of it is pretty much based on context. If they can prove you have a history of child abuse or are specificallly using pics and vids of kids as fap material, you're fucked.

One or two oddly-named non-sexual files in a folder that doesn't have porn in it is usually ok, but if they're in your fap folder you're fucked. Then they'll try to establish a pattern and pretty much any vid, pic, or mainstream movie with a kid in it could be a problem

If it was a documentary on a kindergarten or something and you had it saved as "Sexy kindergarten kids" that could be considered illegal.

I think i can't agree with you here. Ones perception of normal behavior doesn't make a difference in the court. people are not allowed to show their sexual organs ( don't know the correct english expression here but i hope you get what i mean) to kids ( in most countrys but let's just take it as a hypothetical basis) . So if a minor would have a massive foot fetish and he would see a persons feet in a not obscene way like on the beach you would not have broken the law. Only because the teen get's maybe aroused by that cuz he has a strange fetish doesn't mean that being barefoot is suddenly inacceptable behavior. So if content doesn't break the law and guidelines by it self, then how i fucking name the file or percieve the content doesn't suddenly change the rules.