How smart is Sup Forums? Let's find out!

How smart is Sup Forums? Let's find out!

60$ + goods, those answers are shit

30$ + goods * fuck

I don't understand the question

about 1 job

100$

100 still.
30 pure money and 70 in goods.

...

170

You're all joking right? The owner lost 200 dollars

$100 + $70 goods = $170

I'm pretty sure an autist would actually get this immediately. That's the kind of stuff they are good at.

$100

wrong

She stole 100
Comes back, buys 70 worth of goods with 100 she took, and owner gives her 30 in change.
70 in goods plus 30 in cash is 100.
Anyone who says anything different is retarded.

$100 (stolen)
+ $70 (taken in goods)
- $100 (given to buy the goods)
+ $30 (taken as change)
= $100

130

she takes 100, hes down 100

she basically swaps 70 of that cash for 70 in goods, hes still down 100

he gives her another 30, hes down 130

or am i just that retarded?

This /thread

$70
$40 worth of goods marked up to $70 + the $30 in change.

Jesus, people are stupid.

You are indeed retarded

fuck sake, yes i am, i get it now

penny dropped

$70 is the only answer between $30 and $100, which are both wrong

a store's business model doesn't operate on buying goods and selling them for the same price

100
Although I guess you could say it depends on how much he paid for the $70 worth of goods he sold.

lol you so silly

the answer is don't over think it.

5 mins bc the owner could've made the sale when the customer was first there but insted they had to wait

so if someone comes to your store and buys something for 10$ you'd say you lost 10$ that day?

she stole 100 dollars. so he lost 100 dollars.

dont need to read further since there isnt enough info to make use out of it.

I change my answer. It's $100

you're not supposed to think of him giving 30 in change as a loss unless you also think of him getting 100 for 70 in goods as a a 30 gain.

-100 dollar stolen
-30 dollar change
-goods
+70
BUT
Goods = 70 - they got sold so Goods = 0 because he had to buy them.

Guy lost 130

she now has 30 of his dollars & 70 of his merch. He has his c-note but not that 30 in the register or 70 on the shelf. He lost 100.

$100

She comes back and swaps the stolen $100 for $70 worth of goods and $30 cash

She stole 100 dollars.
She comes back and basically steals 70 dollars worth of goods because the money wasn't heres in the first place, thus the store is down 170 dollars. The cashier gives an extra 30 dollars back which means the store is down 200 dollars.

100, yes. Penny dropped. Sorry.

fuck, you must be stupid m80

i dont know why this thread is even still active. this is clearly the answer.

The purchase was legit, but the cash theft was not.

Imagine if she stole the cash from the next store over then made the purchase. How much did each shopkeeper lose?
Next guy: 100
This one: 0

Somewhere between $30 and $100, but closer to $100:
$30 in change + the purchasing price of the goods

30 in goods and 70 in cash

You went full retarded. 30 is the change bro.

ssshhhht..

$potatos

you guys are fucking retarded she steals 100
he's down 100
she comes back buys 70 worth of stuff
he's now down 30 cash and 70 goods
you dont lose the money something was worth by selling it

you all are stupid. At the end of the day, only missing from Store owners books is $100

Even if the money was stolen, all the interactions 5 minutes later were completly legimate according the information given.

-$100 +$70 -$30= 60 dollars lost

Only if you think paying with a hundred is +70