Americans can't into trains

>Americans can't into trains
Why do they suck so much?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mbEfzuCLoAQ
youtube.com/watch?v=0B4_V_7X35E
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

youtube.com/watch?v=mbEfzuCLoAQ

Wealth in the US is hoarded among a select few whereas Europe is quite liberal in redistributing it, including greater investments in public infrastructure.

>Americans are so cucked by corporations they can't even use their train tracks
Just taking them would be "socialism" right?

>taxpayers pay for half of euro trains

Because we can't have anything coming even remotely close to the evil un-uttered "S" word that the elite of our nation has told us is the source of all evil.

Americans money is all in the 1%ers pockets. It'll never be spent on something for everyone, are you kidding!

>implying that's a bad thing

It's bait and I'm taking it, the European train is a magnetic monorail, these can't haul as great a load as a diesel locomotive so it's mostly used as transport for population. Americans don't really need train transport as we have cars that we buy and use. This allows a sense of freedom.

You know we too send cargo via train, right?
>Americans don't really need train transport as we have cars that we buy and use.
Jesus christ you really can't think about others can you?

youtube.com/watch?v=0B4_V_7X35E

European Cars Masterrace

>i dont understand the concept of a civil society

>America is not Germany
>Trains here carry stuff, not people
>The distance our trains travel are larger than all of Europe at times
>Eurocuck ideologies do not work here

You're not sending it on that monorail, dumbshit, you're sending it on that diesel locomotive on the right

>white people paying for a nigger shuttle

>Dis allows us freedom hurr durr

Guess what nigga
Pic fucking related, european train tracks

Can't wait until the EU implodes, Shengen is repealed, and you have to present your papers at every border like the fucking dominated peasants you are.

>>The distance our trains travel are larger than all of Europe at times
Washington DC to New York City isn't unnimaginable is it?
>>Trains here carry stuff, not people
That's the problem innit?

that left picture shows a monorail not a train

I think that's more of a mag Lev train

But yeah. We use trainee to ship things like steel, tanks and Ikea furniture. Our society uses either cars or aircraft. Fuck taking to days to cross what equates to the size of Texas

Actually we carry more stuff around than people

Germoney out

Uh i triggerd you didnt i ?

U mad bro

/thread

Rekt the amerifats

I live in Poland, that picture is really outdated.
Pic related.

America may not do trains, but we sure as Hell can do military. That's why we had to win two World Wars, to save the candy-ass Europeans from themselves. The way things are going, we may have to win another World War, since the shit-simple fuck-tard Europeans are Hell bent on the Islamifacation of their homelands. So, in closing, Europeans can shove their faggot-ass rail systems up their asses, along with their faggot-ass cheese & wine.

People here in America place a lot more importance on owning (and using) a vehicle than other countries.They are symbols of financial ability and individualism. Not to mention the public transport sytems here are no where comparable (and never will be) to the likes of London. Necessitating the use of vehicles anyways.

Trains will never happen because no one here wants to pay for it and a bunch of bureaucratic bullshit.

I know its old.
But still better than amerifats.

Wie gehts euch denn so da drüben in Polen ?

>America won both WW

Kek my sides just 404'd

>the one difference between Europe and America
Other than the fact one is a continent and the other a country?
Or the fact that European countries suck so much on their own they have to all lump into a union to compare to other countries?

With trains, it's like cars. You have two choices
>weak, electric-powered eyesores
>strong, fossil fuel-powered beauties

why would you ever chose the former?

Pathetic. Now i remember how Trump got elected

Where I used to live we had electric train's
Spoiler alert they had cables on the top to transfer the electricity slow ass fuck also

>Implying Germoney sucked in Economics

>I feel like the useless people are entitled to my money

You mean California?

We mostly use trains here to handle freight nowadays, because Amtrak sucks. Commuter trains and subways are still widely used though, but only for relatively short distances. For people and lightweight merchandise traveling long distance, planes are always a lot quicker.

hey eurofags, how goes the muslim gentrification?

kek

Posting from about 1/2 mile away from the home of George Stephenson. You bitches wouldn't have trains without him.

Americans write the history books and soon this will be a fact.
The war happened in the EU yet nobody in the EU even cares about WW1,2

to
This baby can do 250 km/h AND is comfy af

sexy train
I feel like I could build one of those in my garage

Nope the EU
They are like 25+ years old and I'm 19

Actually this is a common commute by train.

Trains like that only work in densely populated areas.

I like in Texas and would love a rail between Houston, Dallas, Austin and San Antonio.

The problem is once you get to those cities they are so spread out you still need a car.

>I am generally a selfish human being who cares little for the well-being of others.

Probably could.

theyre ashamed because europe got its ass kicked by the krauts. they needed america to come in and win their war

sorry you feel that way, but it's true. Europe can't defend itself, and your women are voting for refugees so they can suck brown cocks instead. I feel bad for you all, i really do.

I don't care about them. They don't deserve it.
The only people in the world worth caring about are my family and closest friends.

Americans literally have a saying "greed is good"
You can't get more selfish than that.

>being this immoral

Funny because a lot of people would say the same about you. And if they had their way or if you had yours, you'd be hundreds of thousands of dollars.

I wonder, do you think roads grow on trees or something?

This. Americans had the Cold War and since then, have been so spooped by communism that anything that even remotely resembles socialism in any form is automatically commie shit, and all the flag-waving burgerclaps will reject it, even if it's something that would be in their best interest to do (see: healthcare).

Fixed it for you op. Easy mistake.

Minuteman'd my side away.

Europeans literally have a saying "Refugees Welcome"
You can't get more cucked than that.

hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt

rekt dubs for truth too

>I don't understand that paying taxes for things like free healthcare, education, public transit, and daycare services isn't just "giving handouts to useless people" and actually directly benefits me as well.

lel

So?
What exactly is wrong with having a diverse population? What's wrong with Muslims?
Or are you just being racist like the Trump supporter you are?

Dubs confirm, Europe is fucking cucked. Enjoy sharia law.

>I already have an education that I paid for
>I already have a great healthcare plan
>I have a vehicle and never use public transit
>I don't have kids and if I did my wife would take care of them, not some stranger at a daycare

We don't even have to talk about hypothetical systems. There's already plenty of democrat socialist concepts already applied.

Our roads are made and maintained, electricity is heavily subsidized, water is drinkable, etc etc. People here can be so far removed from reality even when they "know" it for themselves. I guess that's the power of doublethink when you're that scared of "socialism".

>Why won't you give all your money to the poor?

Wealth redistribution does not benefit people who have wealth.

Fuck Trump. But what's wrong with Muslims? Lol. First off I'm not being racist because Muslim isn't a race. Second off look into sharia law. The future law of your land. Your culture will soon be history as your streets are littered with shops with squiggle-speak names.

>I
>I
>I
>I
Ameriflaps are so self centred.

see
I get greed, duh, who doesn't want the best for their own. My question is, if no one was worrying about where the next meal was coming from, where the roof was for their heads when the rain starts coming down, or where they could go and study and become another contributor to the overall wealth of the world - why would you not allow those people the right to do that?

Obviously, there will be folks to abuse the system. Though there are people who don't have the chance to get out of their situation, who, given the chance, would jump high and hard to give back.

You can always give user, but you can't always get. Plus, what are you going to do with all that wealth when you're dead? It's just material.

>education that I paid for
Education that was subsidized by tax payer dollars.

>I have a vehicle and never use public transit
Roads made and maintained using tax payer dollars.

Where do you think this stuff comes from?

I'm fine paying taxes for roads because I use the roads

But you're paying for roads that you won't ever use. That doesn't add up with your original statement.

We all have cars you pleb.

i think he was making a holocaust joke

>BUT MUH ACCESS TO THOSE ROADS

You're also paying for the people who don't have cars.

Why would I take a slow train?

So if you suddenly lost a foot and couldn't drive you'd be upset?
Why are Americans so selfish? Can't you see how they benefit society as a whole?

I've driven in 26 of the 50 states. Try again.

>implying it's impossible that you might get fired or injured and lose coverage
>implying if you have kids, it won't cost you a shitton of money to insure them and send them to college
>implying having good public transit doesn't create less traffic for you to have to drive through

Most people here are not wealthy enough that having free healthcare, college, etc. would be a net loss for them in the taxes they'd pay for them. 95% of people who post here would save significant amount of money over a lifetime by not having to pay for those things out of their own pocket.

Sorry, *freedom to access. Gotta stick that in there.


Fuck you Ted Cruz, you dumbo.

Can your car do 240km/h?
I don't think so. Even if it did you couldn't do that on roads.

They're slow because you're so retarded you can't even concieve of a fast train, thus you don't invest in them.

>26/50
>Likely just on the interstates
>Not using every single road maintained by taxes
>Not getting his moneys worth

>being this retarded

I've had my car up to 217km/h on the road several times

You're just upset you ran out of arguments.
The country couldn't survive without well-maintained roads.

This. Not even checking that guy's quads because he's too retarded. Lots of other countries have trains that can get you all the way across the country in a couple hours and are much more comfortable and cheaper than flying.

Does your train go from your front door directly to where you want to go at the time of your choosing and stop wherever you please for as long as you want ? Yeah, I didn't think so.

What hyperloop? That isn't a train

That's at their peak, trains don't have to stop on lights or crossings. Not to mention it's more economically viable.

That doesn't mean anything. For starters you interstate roads are maintained by the state, so you didn't pay for most of those roads anyways.

My original point still stands. Why are you seemingly ok with paying for roads that you won't use (you yourself proved as much) yet you're not ok paying for, say, universal healthcare (which you would presumably use)?

>Americans are so fat they can't even walk to a bus stop

>The country couldn't survive without well-maintained roads.

Wait, are you serious?

It costs like 20 euro to travel the lenght of the entire coutry, I can walk for ten minuites.

Ok, that's a reasonable argument.

So lets change it around a bit to a more hotly debated issue. Are you ok paying for education that you personally will not use?

>Also doesn't know his history
>What are trains doing carrying all those supplies?
>Oh fuck, what about all those shipping containers on boats?
>OH SHIT, WHAT ARE ALL THOSE LAND BASED, TRAIN DRIVEN SUPPLY CONTAINERS DOING ON MY LAND???

Roads help, but trains have been around well before them. 1950's interstates were primarily designed for national defense, as well as commercial support, with the superseding commercial support coming from train transport.


Do you just not get that things go on outside of your little bubble?

>more economically viable
Sorry you can't afford a car Eurofag.

It's not the 1800's any more. No one travels by horsedrawn carriage. We live in a MODERN country.

this thread isn't about trains that carry supplies it's about commuter trains, which are useless.

No you don't.
I do.