Why are artist that don't write or produce their own music prasied?
Why are artist that don't write or produce their own music prasied?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
because poptimists have transformed top 40 into "if you don't like mass-appeal pop music you're probably a closet racist/bigot/homophobe/etc"
because (and this may surprise you) people like the music
It's always been that way until a very recent period of time in modern history and it really doesn't matter at all, ever heard of folk? standards? the entirety of blues history?
What really irks me about it is that there's a huge width of diversity in pop music outside of Top 40 shit but they won't bother to even talk about any of that because it doesn't involve their "queens". They don't even actually like pop music, they just like being attention whores.
yaaassssssssssssss slay mama
>They don't even actually like pop music, they just like being attention whores.
whats life without attention?
Yes, music that they didn't even write or produce. So why is an artist considered amazing when they didn't do anything to make the music that people love beside sing? It's not her music, I bet she has people to tell her on what key for her to sing on for each song.
Because people who listen to top 40 and don't feel guilty are fucking stoopid.
>Not knowing this
poptimists now also reviewing One Direction solo projects. they're pretty silly.