Is Sup Forums as retarded as they say?
Is Sup Forums as retarded as they say?
33
35
>1
srry, 36
27
40
40
40
1: the whole thing
16: the small squares of the main grid
9: all of the 2 x 2 squares on the main grid
8: the two sets of small squares in the middle
2: the two sets of 4 small squares grouped
4: the 3 x 3 squares on the main grid
40
Looks like your question has been answered OP
Bunch of fuckin retards don't know it's 72
He's got it. 8 tiny ones+ 16+2 1x1s + 9 2x2s +4 3x3s + 1 4x4 = 40
Winrar
You're not counting the squares in the background of the image, or the square frame of the image.
Try again m8
...
...
The image is 250 x 233 pixels...not a square. And I zoomed in on the image...did not see any hidden squares, just jpeg noise.
See
You guys are also missing this one
> You guys are also missing this one
Because that's debatable.
31
That is a written word, not a square. Symbols for things are not the things they represent.
38
Yeah, uh no. Square is an ambiguous term and there isn't a consensus as to what represents a 'square' in this instance
Try again wanna be
>Square is an ambiguous term
but it's not, quit being a retard tryin to be a smartass
32
Try learning about deductive and inferential reasoning, then come back bub
Shouldn't of dropped out of school
17