Is Sup Forums as retarded as they say?

Is Sup Forums as retarded as they say?

33

35

>1

srry, 36

27

40

40

40

1: the whole thing
16: the small squares of the main grid
9: all of the 2 x 2 squares on the main grid
8: the two sets of small squares in the middle
2: the two sets of 4 small squares grouped
4: the 3 x 3 squares on the main grid

40

Looks like your question has been answered OP

Bunch of fuckin retards don't know it's 72

He's got it. 8 tiny ones+ 16+2 1x1s + 9 2x2s +4 3x3s + 1 4x4 = 40

Winrar

You're not counting the squares in the background of the image, or the square frame of the image.

Try again m8

...

...

The image is 250 x 233 pixels...not a square. And I zoomed in on the image...did not see any hidden squares, just jpeg noise.

See
You guys are also missing this one

> You guys are also missing this one
Because that's debatable.

31

That is a written word, not a square. Symbols for things are not the things they represent.

38

Yeah, uh no. Square is an ambiguous term and there isn't a consensus as to what represents a 'square' in this instance

Try again wanna be

>Square is an ambiguous term
but it's not, quit being a retard tryin to be a smartass

32

Try learning about deductive and inferential reasoning, then come back bub

Shouldn't of dropped out of school

17