>Scaruffi's top 20 vs Rolling Stone Magazine's top 20
who was in the right here?
>Scaruffi's top 20 vs Rolling Stone Magazine's top 20
who was in the right here?
Other urls found in this thread:
both of them
List on the left has great albums with little to no influence on the greater sphere of music culture or industry at all.
List on the right as great albums with much influence.
Geek the Girl belongs on neither, however.
wtf I wish I lived in the 60s
I hate Scaruffi but his list has way more true innovation and personality
Fuck Scaruffi
I don't listen to a single word that comes out of the piece of garbage's head
He can go suck a cock for all I care
Rolling Stones may have chosen some weak albums, definitely too much Beatles representation, but at the very least their picks are the ones you can show to people and they will say "this is timelessly good music, but for the time they were released they were innovative and they shaped music and culture as a whole"
While the shit on the left is just "i like it cause it's not the obvious picks and it sounds cool to me lol"
He doesn't have a single Beatles album which is fucking stupid, you have to admit that Sgt. Pepper's was at least worthy of being on there somewhere, even if begrudgingly.
And, Trout Mask Replica at number 1?
God. Fuck Scaruffi. Fuck him.
Piero's scores on RS top 10:
>Sgt Pepper's
7/10
>Pet Sounds
7/10
>Revolver
5/10
>Highway 61
8/10
>Rubber Soul
5/10
>What's Going On
no score
>Exile
8/10
>London Calling
7/10
>Blonde on Blonde
9/10
>White Album
6/10
if i had to pick, RS has more albums i love.
>Pet Sounds
>7/10
>Rubber Soul
>5/10
>Blonde on Blonde
>9/10
as boring as RS' list is I can't really back one that has the Doors at #5 and the worst, most forgettable Nick Cave at #14, above Blonde on Blonde