Political Compass Thread

Political Compass Thread

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ussCHoQttyQ
spekr.org
youtube.com/watch?v=gUpKIj7OrqM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

...

cant be arsed to take tht fuckin test again, but i usually score (-4,-2), moderate left/libertarian

there's only two genders

By the way, where did this "Libertarian left are gay druggies" meme come from?

Because they support gay rights and weed. That's it. The only reason that the purple is not involved is because the green likes to suck the governments dick.

Not even white.

'sup

...

respect..

>because the green likes to suck the governments dick
Well that's what whole left-wing is all about

Exactly, that's why I'm a proud purple fag

Purple quadrant freedom race reporting in

Glad to see one of my fellow brothers here. Mind posting your compass?

hello purple brethren

Don't want to find the pic. I'm center left (0,-4/-5).


MAGA!

...

Hello to you too.

>being anything but green

...

Wat me prise ^-^

Security in the knowledge that you're not a complete faggot.

About the faggot part._.

Communism is green and antivax is more popular in the green than in the purple or blue quadrants.

Well, I did say you're not a COMPLETE faggot. You can still be 99 percent.

No faggot, a socialist revolution and the abolition of money is not gonna work.

^-^ yay

how to people actually score upper right? it's like you aren't even human anymore

>i already know what i am: libertarian
people of the left thinks i'm a capitalistic brown-nosed, neo-nazi that rapes babies and make soap from their dead bodies.

people on the right thinks i'm a filthy communist scumbag, nigger-lover & muslim apologist.

all i really care about are three things
>living my life as i please
>the freedom to defend it
>not caring about who will build the roads

...

...

The state should only control the entities which can ruin the most lives.
I.E. Corporations

most people would find this to be true. not sure if i'd go that far left and liberal tho

...

>trusting the government to reliably run a corporation
"No"

I don't think he meant controlling directly, just preventing abuse of power. Could be wrong here.

Dear lord man you're quite literally nearly Hitler

Same can be said about the lower left.

Regulatory control. I apologize for miscommunication.
Otherwise I'd be an authoritarian left. Gross.

actually, i'ts the consumer that controls the corporations, not the other way around. no one is forcing you to buy anything.

Seems reasonable.


Side question based on where you landed, between only the two main US presidential hopefuls, who did you hope would win and why?

...

Mostly I just think we should be able to do whatever drugs we want and fuck however we want. I'm also pretty pro-guns.
I think free-markets would lead to Feudalism. McDonald's Army and the BK Brigade raising levies to take the KFC wasteland.

This is not entirely true. While yes we don't *need* things like clean water and electricity to live, it is needed for a "normal" life.


Take hospitals for example. They can charge insane prices, because people "can't" turn them down or shop around.

When nearly every product is a subsidiary of some mega-corp, voting with your dollars is hard unless you live in an area with a shit load of local artisans and whatnot.

Moderate left-libertarian. Sounds about right.

Between the two main US Presidential hopefuls, I hoped a nuclear winter would occur and neither would take office.

That being said, I expected Hillary to cave under popular opinion and at least do some progressive policy work while fucking us over in other ways. Donald is looking out for his corporate buddies because loosening regulations enriches him and his family, too.

Slight ashamed of my result. Whip me Sup Forums, Ive let you down :(

Oh, and Donald Trump is seriously ignorant and doesn't wish to learn. He's content to sit back and let the people who bought positions within his cabinet to do the major policy work.

i agree. most same people should score somewhere near the middle i think. and from there, whatever square they might fall in are just their political beliefs, if they are left or right. then again, this is just a dumb chart made by a few people, so its no way to judge people or identify your own political standing

Mostly true. One thing I do like is, while he is lowing taxes, he also (claims, we'll see) to be cutting loopholes that lets him and other get taxed at 15-25% anyway. And once those are closed a dem can get back into office and raise taxes.


For me I just can't stand SJW pandering. I want a democrat to say "islamic terrorism, race isn't a major issue in the US, nor is sexisim". As someone who scored similar to you on the compass, I don't want to keep voting for reds.

how can one person be so centrist??

youtube.com/watch?v=ussCHoQttyQ

they charge insane prices because the market is regulated by various means, instead of being free.
>competition = lower prices
>regulation = higher prices

spekr.org Is superior

...

Huh, ok.

...

OP here, more spekr shit

...

I think it's probably because I have radical views from all directions. I think the market should be as free as possible, but I also think corporations need to be regulated for the longterm interests of the people. I think that the government should have no say in who/what you can/can't fuck, but at the same time I'm 100% against all abortions. My political views are fucked.

...

Why must me fellow gheys be lazy pigs who want the government to provide everything provide everything:c

I'm honestly a bit more socialist and like redistribution. Taxes are at an all time low. Of course, wages have stagnated so bad that most Americans have trouble with taxes. I know the rich are already contributing a significant amount (in comparison to us peasants) but many are able to claim massive and end up paying effective rates that are near to or lower than those earning significantly less.

Of course, if we slashed military spending and stopped being the world police and trying to develop new weapons while weapons that aren't even remotely obsolete sit unused, raising taxes probably wouldn't be as necessary. I'd like to pay down the debt a little, though, so raising revenue and cutting spending in the forms of corporate subsidies and military spending would be nice.

youtube.com/watch?v=gUpKIj7OrqM

But how can you compete? Shit happens, you go to the nearest one. You don't shop around.

Same with the internet. ISPs have a deal with one another to keep service shit among other things. It costs literally millions (close to hundreds) to break into the market. How the fuck will there be competition there?

I have an idea. Try to find one standard view (left libertarian, statism, conservatism, libertarianism) and stick to that belief. You'll be surprised how far away you end up from the center.

i agree with fucking whoever we want. thats what condoms, birth control, etc. are for. however, i differ with you on the drugs. it might reduce crime, but to legalize all drugs would be a minor disaster due to the addictive nature and side affects. many people would shouldn't have been drug addicted would become addicts, which would lead to a decline in productiveness, a danger to the general population, as well as the destruction of family dynamic, which in my opinion, is almost as bad as literally separating a family from one another. hard drugs are awful, and i think there is a reason they are illegal. that being said, illegal marijuana is absolute nonsense. as for the free markets leading to feudalism,.. i'm not seeing it quite yet. perhaps give the right a bit of time to see how their time of power plays out. i am an idiot though. just giving my opinion

...

I agree with all of that. I just feel the political censorship and misinformation(Google, for example, nor relies on politifact and snopes to "fact check" searches).


I'm also a nationalist (which people confuse with isolationist for some reason). But I am that way for the same reason I support the EPA. I don't want to see things go extinct. I don't want global cultural homogenization. I like global diversity, in race and culture.


>Yes, even the (((them)))

This shit is so fucking stupid, I've been seeing a shit ton of profile pictures on youtube with these fucking things on it

if we both have a private practice, who a mostly similar, except yours is somewhat cheaper, where do you think most people will go for common health issues?

and internet is both common & cheap. the big thing right now is internet services: streaming media, vpn, gaming. if you think it's to expensive, look around for something cheaper.

Is this private practice a hospital? Because if someone is dying they'd to to the closest one ffs. We aren't talking about a gas station or something.


Internet in the US is some of the worst in the world, and some of the most expensive.

i wonder what y'allanswered to this one
also I'm moderate-libertarian left

Pinochet did nothing wrong! GTFO lazy faggot

Communism is red. The only form of communism you'll find in the green is Chomskyan anarcho communism, like here.

What a waste of time that was...

cbf filling in the survey again since my internet keeps cutting out and reconnecting but I normally land comfortably in the blue zone

Libcap represent

...

More like pic related.

I'm , btw.

Libertarian right wing here, we agree on astrology and morality, but I answered "agree" for charity, "agree" for unlucky people, and "strongly disagree" on religious values and children.

This was a much more extreme result than I get on the usual test.

Hell yeah, user

No faggot, communism is green because Marx was anti-state.

Am I a centrist still?

Wtf. What kind of a rational person believes in luck?

Same, I took the test and got middle purple (pure libertarian) and I was farther bottom right in the spekr.

...

I put agree for the unlucky one (I'm )

Shit, that makes you ancap. This is me on political compass

More like this

...

Now a spekr

thank you for fixing that

>anarcho communism
Pure meme.

Really? I've always considered myself more of a minarchist, though I'd probably be an ancap if anarchy had any chance of working as intended in the real world. Usually I'm much closer to the middle, is me.

Liberal as in free to do whatever the fuck. Not liberal as in "EVERYTHING IS OFFENSIVE."

Because some people are seemingly able to reach those smaller probability events and encounters than others. I don't necessarily think a bunch of superstitious crap though can automatically ruin or improve your shit because a guy in a robe on the street gave you a laminated placard for six bucks but I'm not gonna rule out it's existence in some form or another.

...

Agreed

They aren't far off from each other really, I suppose that could be minarchist.