Revolvers are better. Pistols are a new fad fading with time. Why not use the tried and true form?

Revolvers are better. Pistols are a new fad fading with time. Why not use the tried and true form?

That's right, no jamming - no cases getting stuck in the slide - upkeep? Hah - mud and water? it'll turn - Did you forget to rack it? Oh no...

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_FBI_Miami_shootout
scientificamerican.com/article/how-can-a-bullet-be-trace/
ebay.com/itm/122443513236?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Did I fire five or six shots?

Who cares. I have 10 in the magazine and it tells me when it's empty.

hell if you want to go old school go single shot if you buy a cheap pistol it will jam spend some money and take care of you tools do not play in the mud or sandbox it is not a toy

I can't tell you when it's empty, it jammed.

Don't play in the mud? So you mean don't actually use your tools in real world scenarios? Gotcha.

it is not a real world scenario unless you are an idiot you drops shit in the mud remember it is a tool and can save your life treat it well and it serves well do you use your axe to chop rocks no

If I have to use my axe to split a rock it will, if I have to use my revolver after falling in the mud, I will.

I love my baby American Arms pocket revolver. I like to use #12 shot 22wmr, as it's like a extra tiny shotgun in my car.

I absolutely love my S&W 340PD as seen in the photo. The best EDC someone can have.

oh yeah revolvers never do that

ITT guys with tiny dicks

Maybe if you dip it in butter and then sand, and even then it has a good chance.

What happened to "if I have to dip it in butter and sand, it will" ?

It will, I'd bet my life on a revolver dipped in butter and sand over a pistol any day.

Best thing about a revolver...leaves no shell casings. No casings...no evidence.

Enjoy trying to reload when the shit hits the fan and blood is everywhere

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_FBI_Miami_shootout

They would yell time out kek

That's simply untrue you fucking mong.

The barrel leaves small marks on the bullet itself, after firing, which are unique. If you can remove bullet fragments and get a hold of the gun you suspect fired the bullet you can definitely link them to each other.

x dee dee dee dee

I have that too, its shit. it cant shoot straight 5 feet away

Quite accurate up to 15-20 yards. Above that, why the fuck are you using a snub nose?

You're retarded... "If you can remove bullet fragments AND get a hold of a gun" seriously...

Nope he's right. No evidence. No casing, no bullet, no body, nothing!

Why not both? I have a .357 ruger revolver, chiappa white rhino with exchangeable cylinders for multiple calibers and a kimber 1911..I love them all, but my favorite is the non-revolver of the three. The chiappa can shoot 9mm which I like for the range, and the ruger has that ol' fashion feel, if I had a single action revolver I would be content with enough pistols.

Bullet fragments would be removed during the autopsy for this specific reason faggot.

Unless you're some kind of pussy who would be serial killing then you'll likely have some relation to the victim. If your a suspect then the police will take your dumbass revolver from you and cross reference it.

>registering a fire arm

How's the weather out in California there buddy?

>Implying the police wouldn't get a warrant and search your house for your unregistered pea shooter.

Taping it to the bottom of your kitchen table "Just in case" isn't clever.

1911 is the true master gun.

I'm not a cop/don't know anything about police work, but working in an or I can tell you good fucking luck bringing a bullet to a specific gun. Maybe you can find out what caliber and search who has that kind of weapon in people that know the victim.., which is irrelevant sometimes, but working with only a bullet isn't going to find you a person in and of itself. And these weird mean fucking new modern defense rounds? I've seen so many samples of just warped shards..x-ray after x-ray fishing out Tiny pieces. Maybe a professional can identify the round, but I'm telling you it's so bad that they may not even be able to find out what caliber it is.

I fired guns a lot as a kid on a range, haven't in about 15 years. I think I fired a revolver maybe once, all the rest were pistols of various calibers, a shotgun or two a .22 rifle.

In all those times (30+) I fired pistols, I can remember a Beretta 9mm jamming once or twice because the barrel wasn't clean or something.

I understand in a life or death situation you want a weapon guaranteed to work, but can anyone provide ANY example someone was killed because their pistol jammed? What's the likelihood of a well maintained pistol having a shell casing lodged in the barrel? 1%? 10%? 0.1%?

Please, someone help me out.

...

Shlomos got these guys paying $500 for a glock. Top kek.

> muh superior quality

I have a hammer less S&W EDC but I like my Beretta 9mm way better. So many bullets

you are correct, back in the day when most people used ball point ammo in which the round didnt deform too much when impacting. but new frangible type ammo that is used for self defense and police, but usually not cheap nigger criminals, is designed to break apart and cause a more massive wound.

Great reference.

its the shell casing and the hammer strike on the primer that they use to identify bullets to guns nowadays

Theres a reason no modern military uses revolvers, and trust me those sidearms see plenty of mud.
For a private person fucking around or for protection? Sure, but if you need actual technological progress on your side, like say enough ammo to atleast suicide your whole squad, youll want a proper pistol.
"Pistols are a new fad fading with time" also is just false. Where would you get such numerbs? on what do you base that? I havent seen a single revolver in my life, plenty of pistols though. And thats only anecdotal sure, but its moer than you provided.

Or we could just stop shooting each other.

Right cuz I'm going to bring that fucker back to my house after I kill somebody with it. How retarded are you?!?

You can still compare the markings on a hollow point fragment. If you shoot a round from a rifled barrel it'll leave reproduce able marks.

Any forensic jackass with a microscope can make the comparison.

>its the shell casing and the hammer strike on the primer that they use to identify bullets to guns nowadays
Junk science

Go suck a dick liberal faggot

Once you get comfortable with a gun, and you don't experience any jams after over a thousand rounds..and you know how to clean/lubricate it, you're aware that magazines can get weak over time..that your gun doesn't feed some specialty rounds well, or cycle different grains well..once you know and practice all of that, it's almost 0 when you find a dependable weapon.

That being said revolvers are more simple, and thus more reliable. Your Beretta experience is the easiest to find examples for, it has a long history as being America's pistol side arm..and there will be Tons of anecdotal and lists of occurrences online.

you have to file off the serial number, take a drill to the barrel, take it apart and throw it away in various places around town, but you have to leave your phone at home so they cant track the signal.

Only US manufactured weapons jam. That's why you're still using revolvers.

>Any forensic jackass with a microscope can make the comparison.
You watch too much CSI son

And thats how the convict you and send you up the river
>junk science

i know that, i watch a ton of murder porn documentaries. but you can change the pattern of the rifling or buy another barrel for cash and use that to murder blacks and then throw it away and happily give the gun to police for testing, you cant do that with a gay ass revolver

I've had more misfires from my S&W revolver than any other gun I have. Its not even close.

I don't even watch TV. It's basic shit you learn after taking any forensic course. There's a shitload of ways to track a bullet to a gun.

scientificamerican.com/article/how-can-a-bullet-be-trace/

yes you can are you retarded?

Listen here you gun loving animal, there's a time and place for automatics. The whole reason the US cops went to automatics over revolvers is because they're a bitch to reload and a bunch of FBI agents got schooled by a guy with an automatic. I love my .357 and I want a .44 colt but there's a difference between 'firing power' and 'stopping power' and people using autos want to be able to put more lead down range.

ebay.com/itm/122443513236?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649

Also ballistics testing has been proven to be shit. Can't tell us all the things the cops and DA's would like us to think it does.

So it's settled then.

Revolvers are gay.

That's interesting to hear, but I'm far more familiar with magazine fed pistols..I guess what I'm saying is that experience has a big impact on how often a person's gun will jam..even though that sounds kinda stupid.

The blowback from a 9mm on a soft target is much more devastating than a .357 or a .44

Gotta be doing something wrong. Or a manufacturer defect

Correct. Mine is 99 years old.

I don't even have big hands and I can't shoot that damn thing effectively

totally adorable, though, and I won't sell mine, but i won't carry it, either, not even as a snake gun

Of course revolvers are better you get to play russian roulette and someone with bad luck dies

Mine is less than a year old, still love it.

you just have to assume your gun will jam your experience should be on how to clear it rather than whether it will happen or not.

No but all the legal system ever does is work in probabilities. If there's a decent chance that bullet A came from gun A and not somewhere else then that helps build that case.

No one was ever put away just for DNA or ballistic evidence. You need other shit like probable motive, lack of an alibi, video or audio recordings, eye witness testimony etc.

The point is, using a revolver over a semi in a murder won't leave "No evidence". There will always be something left behind that can help build a case against you.

russian roulette with a semiauto has way better results.

kimber is trash.

they get dirty really quick and the internal spring tends to get fragile

overpriced by a mile

i had the ultra carry 2 and it jammed all the time. ftf and fte i hated it. sold it and got a colt 1911 commander and have been loving it.

how many bullets can a revolver hold again please inform me.

8 or 9 i think

depends on the revolver. .357 magnum is 8 rounds standard.

if you need 10, you're doing it wrong.

Depends on the gun. 5-9. Anywhere in there.

Might be able to have less. But I don't know why you would.

this

the miami FBI shootout one of the suspects was shot 12 times and had no drugs in his system

nice reference but it's not relevant these days, enforcement is militarized.

samefagging

just because you cannot afford guns, or have a criminal record because you are a black, does NOT mean most gun owners have tiny dicks. as a owner of guns and tiny dicks i want to tell you a big fat HOWDY!

it was probably with ball point ammo that just goes through the body leaving no real damage

11 of those where double taps though

S&W model 586 .357 caliber
I've shot hundreds of rounds thru it.
Never had a misfire or jam. I'd take this to a fire fight over my 9 mm. I have speed loaders for it so no bullshit about lack of rounds.
1 shot 1 kill. I don't spray & pray

Then you have shit taste in pistols.

As a man with an above average sized penis, I feel obligated to inform you that it does not aid in self defense.

As much as I like revolvers, I don't like blowhards who post pictures of their guns, and there's an airsoft gun in their collection.
IT DOESN'T BELONG THERE.

There's got to be a reason why 1st world militaries don't issue revolvers

>reductio ad absurdum
I will find you, and I will kill you

>en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_FBI_Miami_shootout

and a pistol was also innoperative and caused 2 death,but for better reason

That's what I keep hearing, but I haven't had any issues with it..and at 700 brand new, I'm not sure that's insanely overpriced.

Get a fucking Glock, then. Revolvers are not effective for law enforcement/military use or for your cringey ideas of self defense. Get with the fucking times.

you can find the ballistics gel test on youtube its really obvious that 9mm is the way to go not sure what ammo is being used in the tests

>Cringey ideas of self-defense

Damn that got me pretty hard, yeah I just like guns for guns and I don't want it jamming at the range or to have shit stuff. But then again I'm not OP

mines hammerless maybe thats the problem I like my 9mm shitloads of bullets and the recoil is almost non-exsistent

Well....revolvers do jam. Plus you have the issue where the casing will expand and then the extractor has trouble getting the empty cartridge out when you're done shooting slowing your reload time.

There's a lot more mechanical stuff going on in a revolver. If you drop a revolver on concrete with the cylinder open it's probably going to have to go to a gunsmith to work properly again (if it ever works properly again). If you do that with a semi auto it will most likely be fine as long as you didn't drop it on the sights.

That said, I do keep a S&W 629 in .44 for home defense. But then I also keep an old Russian service pistol as well in 7.62x25 cause that will shoot through things.

>hundreds
ahahahahaha fuckin normie fudd nigger

oh and one shot one kill is some dipshit way of thinking read up on the FBI Miami shootout

6 bullets
More than enough to kill anything that moves

my cop friends all use 9 glocks with leo +p+ rounds.

Ya'll get on MY level

see

And the vast majority of modern tech/r&d focuses on 9mm. That's just the truth. All my pistols are .45 and .357 but I concede 9mm is the superior round in many, many ways.