The Mark of the Rani edition. What do you think of it?
First rate banter, third rate story if you ask me.
Turned into a tree:
The Mark of the Rani edition. What do you think of it?
First rate banter, third rate story if you ask me.
Turned into a tree:
Other urls found in this thread:
saberpunk.net
glyphobet.net
games.usvsth3m.com
goodreads.com
pastebin.com
twitter.com
twitter.com
twitter.com
twitter.com
...
dump continuation
...
...
Isn't dumping without discussion just shitposting and against forum rules?
...
Did you change IP with your VPN for this one, cats?
It's obviously you.
...
...
>/who/ presents:
DOCTOR WHO: SHIT TRIPS Vol. 1
- The Anthology -
>Are you a true fan of Doctor Who?
>Have you ever written down a sequence of words?
If the answer is yes or no, then you are ready to contribute a literary masterpiece to the first ever /who/ collection of original Doctor Who-based short fiction.
/who/ is finally making its unique mark in an age-old tradition of p̶a̶c̶k̶a̶g̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶f̶a̶n̶f̶i̶c̶s̶ ̶t̶o̶g̶e̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶g̶i̶v̶e̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶m̶ ̶a̶n̶ ̶a̶i̶r̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶l̶e̶g̶i̶t̶i̶m̶a̶c̶y̶ / celebrating the magic of Who and the talent of a community.
There are no limits (except the story must be at least 1 word long, and preferably not in excess of 10,000, it's short fiction you fuck).
>- Can involve any Doctor(s), companion(s), side characters, spinoff characters and beyond, as your heart desires
>- Can be in any style, whether it's "legitimate writing", "pisstake", or "shitpost".
>- Can be about absolutely anything
>- The main focus is on good fun in the vein of the wiki, although serious entries are allowed. (If you're going to write smut, maybe approach it with a degree of levity)
Stuck for ideas? Try starting with your favourite TARDIS team (or for timeliness, 12/Clala) and one of these authentic titles:
saberpunk.net
glyphobet.net
And free scenario prompts:
games.usvsth3m.com
We are going to be starting an index on the wiki for the collection. Anyone can contribute, no signups/pitches required. If you have ideas, feel free to broadcast them. So far we are looking at at least 10 submissions and there is always room for more.
The rest is self-explanatory. Format for uploading your work is up to you, as long as it can be conveniently copied across (and ideally don't dump long texts in /who/ directly).
Anyone who wants to do illustrations or comics is encouraged.
...
Hi cats
>forum rules
And he has proved he changes IP beyond doubt.
...
The Mark of the Rani has one of my favourite crap cliffhangers.
It's a shame we don't have many colour pics of the Sensorites set because it looks pretty nice (low-quality pic related).
I've seen/participated in quite a few dumps before so I doubt it. Whether the rule is enforced probably depends on the quality of the dump.
>PUSH, PERI! PUSH!
>NO PERI, THE OTHER WAY!
The one which happens to be one of your overused reaction images, cats, by any chance?
...
I don't come here often, but what I'm seeing is someone posting a bunch of cool good resolution production stills and everyone bitching about a specific user.
I don't know what the history is here but it certainly makes it feel like you fuckers don't want to talk about Doctor Who.
Cats please don't reply to it, you know it's retarded witch hunt shit that only exists to pollute the thread further. Stop feeding it and post something else.
Last one from me. Thank you to 4K dump user for the rare pics.
...
Sure thing, cats, we all buy this one. Not. Another IP?
>old doctor who shit
why
It's not "everyone" bitching. We basically have one or two extremely brain damaged posters, who like to spend their existence in here perpetuating a hate complex against certain users and accusing every single anonymous poster of being them, as a surefire way of generally turning the environment into cancer. The best recommendation is to ignore it.
"You're witty little cunts, I'll give you that."
It was a minor skirmish by /who/'s blood-soaked standards. Not exactly the Time War, but enough to finish it. In the end, it was too much for the old general.
...
...
Are you angry now, cats, so you are going to shitpost this rubbish again?
...
...
Last one because you realise you gave your IP changing away, cats. OK.
...
Tell that to the leader of the genderfluid geniuses Claudia, or Adam the set reporter, or Girly Letters, or Jon Blum. /who/ lives its life in darker hues, day upon day, and it will have other names before the end: the Storm, the Beast, the Valeyard.
...
...
Cut the shit m8
...
...
...
>tfw had to sit out a 3 day ban for responding to cats because static IP
What doctor who have you infosorbed lately?
None of these are rare at all.
I don't understand. Are you saying your IP is not static, cats?
...
i know more about rare doctor who pics than you (im an expert) and i can tell you that most of the pics in this thread are actually rare IN THIS QUALITY. you fucking pleb
>tfw had to sit out a 3 day ban for responding to cats because static IP
wait what
I replied to one of your posts talking to you directly without making any reference to doctor who in a thread where someone kept reporting you and your posts were getting deleted
I don't have a dynamic IP anymore so I can't just reset my router, so I couldn't post on Sup Forums for 3 days
do you have any production pictures of the tardis sets?
Wrong. Anyone can scan the same picture in 4k resolution. That does not automatically alter the quailiy in any meaningful way.
Also, none of these belong to you and you never acknowledge the source.
>That does not automatically alter the quailiy in any meaningful way.
Except it literally does
the original pictures are camera negatives, not something printed on an inkjet printer with dots
oh yeah, i got a 3-day ban too. meanwhile cats hate user gets to shitpost freely and the janitors do nothing
>do you have any production pictures of the tardis sets?
no, but there are plenty on chronovore.org or the tragical history tour website
Wrong, cats. You have just made a fool of yourself.
You have no way of knowing if these are scanned from a print or whether the original negs exist, mate.
Photographic film also has a grain made of nitrate crystals and is pixellated when you try to scan at higher resolutions.
>Anyone can scan the same picture in 4k resolution.
if you have the original negatives, which would either be owned by the bbc, a collector or a photograph archive. it isn't easy to access those negatives and some people hoard them greedily because they are assholes. i share any rare pics i come across with /who/ because people deserve to see them
>Also, none of these belong to you and you never acknowledge the source.
rare pics seldom come with a source. the very fact that they are "rare" means a reverse search brings up nothing, or at most 1-2 results that clearly aren't the original photographer
If he quoted the source, we could find out, but he is trying to steal credit for these.
Absolute rubbish, mate.
great reply
Are you trying to suggest to found these images on the internet but now mysteriously cannot remember where you found them?
Dr Foster writer is writing the sequel to Blink
Do you have a link to anything implying it's Weeping Angels?
I think it's currently conjecture based on the fact that they're filming at the blink house
I wouldn't put it above moffat to do a sequel to his most famous episode in his farewell fluffing series
For the record - genuinely rare finds usually DO have a known source - usually the set designer; costume designer; BBC publicity photoshoot etc - as random photographers taking snaps weren't allowed anywhere near productions, as a rule.
I'd put it beneath him. He went on record saying the idea of doing a 'farewell tour' would be shit, and more importantly I highly doubt he'd let anyone else do the Angels while he's in charge.
Big Finish already did a Blink 2.0 fanfic.
this one will be canon though
No, mate, Connor is making this shit up as usual.
Q What is Mike Bartlett's most famous play called?
"I know!!!"
Ignoring it doesn't even work anymore.
They find new ways to keep the retarded shit going. /who/ is dead.
A "Cock"
This is actually 100% true.
...
The holey jumper again.
I would have said King Charles III?
...
...
Why would you have said that?
How would that have been a joke?
A better phrasing might have been "Which play won Mike Bartlett his first Olivier Award?" for which Cock would actually be the right answer.
It stops being a funny observation if you have to bend the facts.
Did you see the submission from last thread?
Bad autism, mate. You should get help with that.
Yep!
>I replied to one of your posts talking to you directly without making any reference to doctor who
You mean like you're doing now? *opens and closes my hand in your face*
>I wouldn't put it above moffat to do a sequel to his most famous episode in his farewell fluffing series
Neither would I. But I can't picture him letting somebody else write it.
This only makes sense if you are cats, mate, do you realise that?
If you mean this (pastebin.com
Bill confirmed for being a Weeping Angel
He's dropped himself in it again!
It's not the Blink house. It's Pearls house.
Sorority house. Girlyletters is so retarded.
House confused her. She evidently doesn't equate that with 'home'.
Severe autism.
Why the fuck would anyone want to live in that house?
Looks pretty comfy desu
Why wouldn't they?
Have you seen it? It's literally the old spooky haunted witch house at the end of the street.
Social medias were a mistake. They're nothing but trash.
You can tell this cunt is another attention seeker.
Watermarking his lo res phone pics and demanding likes for more scraps of video filmed on his phone.
Prick.
>George Baker @GeorgeBaker26 10m
>Can't get the video to upload! Will do it shortly when it works #dwsr
>George Baker @GeorgeBaker26 7m
>Videos at 50% sorry guys keep waiting
I'll laugh if it turns out this fucker is just rusing and there's no video
>35 likes and I'll upload!
How much of an attention whore do you have to be?
ohhhhh guess who's back