If you aren't in the green quadrant your a fucking idiot

If you aren't in the green quadrant your a fucking idiot

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/h7OyzcdvEyY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Pretty much /thread

Fucking libtards gtfo

Kill yourself Neoliberal scum.

Fucking normie liberal scum.

Red master race

Green is actual autism

Yuck

Your actually retarded

Another one bites the bait

Not understanding that "libertarian" does not mean anarchy.

Also claims that right leaning libertarianism is correct.

The autism is real. I never believed in it before now.

...

...

...

It makes sense because no one can be that retarded

Dead center of the chart reporting in. All of you people are so far into your respective dogmas you refuse to listen to the merits of the other side of the table. This is why we're dealing with Trump, or if he had lost? Hillary. America lost either way.

Im listening whats your perspective ?

get rekt faggots

his perspective is he likes to choke on dicks

My nigger. I'm not quite as authoritarian, and I'm further to the left, but basically this. I don't have my pic on my phone.

Good shit man. And yeah I shifted a bit I used to be a bit less authoritarian too

Ya authoritarian capitalism (fascism) is fail proof

>your
You're the idiot.

I try to blend all sides as equally as I can. I understand that right wing policies can hurt the worker, but left wing tends to hurt him in a different way. Right wing usually aims for a decrease in regulations and taxes. Sometimes these regulations legitimately are needed to protect the people. The left of course, adds regulations and increases taxes to pay for them. While some of these services are vital to the poorest among us, it ends up making many more people poor as the poorest.

If you are literally anywhere else but the bottom left you're a spook.

...

Fucking normie.

nice

I tried to take the test answering like a dumbass and this is what i got

...

Whats so different about you and me ?

Hello comrade. Where are we meeting for may day protests. Fuck this loyalty day BS.

That depends will there be a stateless socialist democracy in which every citizen has a say and the capitalists have nowhere near as much wealth as the people as it was intended?

Try answering like a total dick and see what you get

real liberterian hours who up

Lib right, without a doubt.

...

Sure thing. I'm somewhere between mutalism or anarcho-sydaclism. I can be happy either way. Let's smash the state. Fun fact I used to be in the top right quad a decade ago. I now think nothing short of revolution will fix this.

I'm literally the opposite of you on all four of these.

...

Libertarianism used to mean the opposite of what it means is now the term was reinvented in the book the new Left libertarianism used to refer to a stateless social government not free market faggots

You'll get jaded into hating the state more in the coming years

My man

...

yeah, probably

unironicaly kill yourself.

...

>
>Lib right, without a doubt.

Are you a dick? Your not "anarcho" capitalist so you might be redeemable

Should I Just kms?

/thread

Like a total dick

...

Apparently Hitler was a total dick and Thatcher is a fucking dumbass

youtu.be/h7OyzcdvEyY

In in dat shyt...

This seems historically accurate

Anything but anarcho-socialism is flawed

Libtards gtfo, commies and socialists. Only poor people believe in communism.

Only naive pampered capitalist bourgeois believe in capitalism

Did I do ok?

Fascist here, I got lost, how do I get back to /pol?

>implying capitalism doesn't work

No you did horrible turn off fox news authoritarian statism

You did fine my nigga

Do a large extent it doesn't

Wage slavery which refers to a situation perceived as quasi-voluntary slavery, where a person's livelihood depends on wages, especially when the dependence is total and immediate. It is a negatively connoted term used to draw an analogy between slavery and wage labor by focusing on similarities between owning and renting a person. The term wage slavery has been used to criticize economic exploitation and social stratification, with the former seen primarily as unequal bargaining power between labor and capital (particularly when workers are paid comparatively low wages)

Feels Friedman
Libertarian capitalist master race.

because making my own way instead of relying on others and the govt to get shit done made america great.

And yea degree in econ. in finance, and have a side business.

i am in the green quadrant and i can tell this is b8

I've never seen fox news so I'll just take that as a compliment.

...

...

>implying america was great at some point in time

This system has worked for many years, centuries on end, how does it not work? The majority of us who are basing our lives off of it are living well, and those who work hard are able to move up the ranks in order to get to a better place they were before. Yes, the welfare for these elderly people is lacking when they retire, but that is because it is often discouraged for people of such cultures to have many children. This is not part of the economic basic system. Albeit that some socialism is good, it would have to be internalized important socialism, National Socialism. This being said, I understand that there is an inequality in the gap of power for those who are at the bottom of this ladder, but if you are cunning and smart, not to mention innovative, then you can raise yourself up.

I guarantee you're on the economic side you oppress

Stalinism is the only way to go

You made a typo.
Hitlerism is the only way to go.

You mean nazism

this entire website though

...

This.

hell yeah my man
anyone who doesn't want some of that sweet moolah is probably too poor or stupid to realize that they can do it too

>libertarian
>non-retarded
>choose ONE

The greater good?

...

Okay what happens when those not cunning and smart can't support themselves and decide to stop putting up with the excess of those that are cunning and smart.

Robespierre is what happens. Being real cunning would be having a bit less excess and keeping society functional by allowing people live more equally.

Don't mix greed up with success

...

>Okay what happens when those not cunning and smart can't support themselves

So... literally evolution?

Well said.

see

I sympathize with this feeling until you realize that in a post information economy it is likely that ever larger segments of the population are going to lose thier livelyhoods. We are reaching a point where the production is so great that not every one needs to work.

Do we allow this wealth to be concentrated more and more under a system that protects them and screws most of the rest? We have a distribution problem not a productive problem. The government exists to keep this status qou. The corporation cannot exist without the threat of violence provided by the state.

Always

sup y'all

...

You need to study history user. What happens is lots of people die. Some group of assholes take over and then they to get killed. More folks die. The system then stabilizes until excess builds up again and it repeats.

Social Darwinism is a discredited theory. Ironically supported by people who frequently don't believe in biological evolution.

...

...

...

>implying capitalism works

Yes but the reason generations carried on is because of choice. If we were to live in a society where there was no economic choice, and then that system were to collapse, what would happen?

Simply dropping everybody's cash income to a small amount in favour of ''equality'' is quite a reckless thing to do, never mind against common moral.

I was surprised. I consider myself conservative.

oh.... wait. I am conservative. in the English tradition. durr

Turns out your far more intelligent than you thought