Is Shill Nye the feminist guy qualified?

Is Shill Nye the feminist guy qualified?

Yes.
/thread

With that shit logic, half of construction workers should be women.

He is like real life SJW character from Tumblr

Great, half of the garbage workers and teachers can be women too.

> Intellect based job
> Physical labor
Totally the same. What a fucking nitwit.

And half of nurses should be Males kek

Why not? Are they not ''equal'' to do physical labor?

I think whoever is in charge of getting him money said, 'ride the feminist train as far as it will go'

And he doesnt believe in any moral God so fuck it. Play into thier bs and get paid.

Yeah he does strike me as a guy that gets off on being righteous as well. Probably was a teachers pet. If the prevailing culture was still socially conservative he would be all for it

One half of people have an IQ below 100. So half of scientists should have an IQ below 100.

This. But they are no more capable of real labor than commitment to science.

Most of the teachers already are (76% USA).
Garbage workers are still overwhelmingly male (98% USA), but this trend is slowly changing as the implementation of automated trucks has begun, alleviating a lot of the physical strength required. This is just a holdover socially, but you're not wrong.

Genders still have a tremendous impact on physical aptitude. Also, one requires years of dedicated schooling (generally) while the other can be performed by a trained monkey. Stfu until you think.

>needs god to have morals
Guess we know what kind of person you'd be without God, huh?

Sounds fun, maybe they would create something amazing because they didn't know it was impossible. Like time travel

It's much more then half if you count Non-Whites

/thread

All great scientists just happened to be Males.Pure accident ha?

>Trained money?
Oh so we have weak person here I see

Guy is a joke with only a B.S.

>I hate gender roles, but men should keep doing the labor because they're men

no they are not.

/threading your own comment
>being this new

Here's the truth about Trump.

They're not, and they know it. However, that would contradict their rhetoric. Most of them don't even really seem to see the contradiction though.

I'm not disagreeing you but you should take an IQ test as well. I did it and found out I'm technically retarded. Boy here's me thinking I could coast on white accomplishments that I had nothing to do with

One half of humans have less than 100 IQ, so half of all the scientists should have less than 100 IQ.

Note: he's not talking about forced science gender quotas. He's talking about encouraging more women and young girls to be interested in science and removing any barriers for entry that may inhibit women from moving into stem fields

Imagine having a technically genius IQ and being stuck in poverty because no one will hire you.

...

Fucking Dawkins is so unimpressed here. Fuck Nye I say, Dawkins is king. That man is actually brilliant.

who is marie curie

B-but user, I'm a grill, I can't touch garbage! Make the men do it!

What barriers? If some girls didn't have strict parents there would be no female doctors
They only like fun stuff, where are all the children scientists?

or sewer workers. or trash collectors.

feminists only seem to care about equality for the "cool" jobs

...

Jesus. This willful ignorance. I get thinking that the patriarchy doesn't exist today, it barely does. But not believing in institutionalized sexism in the 1800s and 1900s. That's some mental retardation right there.

There are no more barriers than there are die men. It's just hard, so women give up and go into gender studies because they don't have to do anything.

>(((Institutional sexism)))

You're in the wrong place to be making rational arguments.

That would happen if scientists were women

So by that, Thailand is the most gender progressive nation out there, I mean there is like half of the women are man.

Having a bachelor of science almost makes you over qualified to be a science communicator. He's not building space shuttles, he's teaching christians that dinosaurs existed.
You don't need a PhD to interpret and relay the scientific consensus to the masses.

Not the guy you responded to, but it really was a thing. It's not anymore, but it was. First and second wave feminism removed it, and now the third wave just hates men.

Gender spectrum =/= dinosaurs libtard

Women should work half of all hard manual labor jobs after all gender is social construct...oh wait it's NOT.

He communicated with kids that was his job not even professor to students but to kids

>thinking this matters to relay information
Do you have a bachelor's? If not, stop talking because, by your own logic, you're not credible.

I agree about there being no barriers but it's clear that genetics isn't wholly to blame for women not going into stem fields. It also has to do with how young children are raised and the kinds of activities they are encouraged to engage in.

This

I always wondered why they have so many lady boys, well it turns out some guys over there will just sell their ass for a few weeks to buy an iPhone. It is less of a big deal to sell yourself

Because you can't teach multiple things, no not ever

He was a good engineer, knows a lot about science, but it's more of a general knowledge.

Beyond that he has zero experience with actual science research.

It's not, but women are raised to be more exploitive of men because they can be successful with it. they can major in Gerber studies, never find a job, then marry some rich man and claim they take care of themselves. That's not an option for men, so we can't be as lazy with our life decisions. We can't get another man to come clean up the mess we made.

Half of humans have penis so half of Women should have penis too HAHAHAHA

Bill the Cuck Nye

So how many Christfags think dinosaurs didn't Exist? You have to create a cuckservative fuck tard of a straw man to give a man credibility.

Nothing existed trillions of years ago or what ever number libtards are using now

Alright. But gender isn't even science. It's a social construct. And if you don't like that, then call it "schmender". He's just trying to normalize the idea that people can be different without being "degenerate" and break the "who would win? 2000 feminists or a science text book?" meme. Scientist are probably the least likely demographic in the world to start shit about identity politics because it's not important.

There were a lot of points in this thread that took his logic and reversed it. This is not one of them, and you should probably post less.

Don't generalize too hard, you'll hurt yourself

Bill Nye is NOT a scientist is he delusional? Where is his PHD?

Pierre Curies wife...aka the bitch who kept hassling him while he was doing science and wouldn't give him any quim unless he said she helped.

Lefty media ran with her as the focus of the discovery and pretended she did all the work because it's 1903 GODDAMMIT!

then she fucked some other scientist

But if you gotta be mollycoddled and given a million people talks into taking a career maybe you really don't wanna do it? I think we should limit extra funding to poor girls that actually want to do science and leave it at that. Rich girls have raced speed boats against Gar wood in the 1930s they don't need anymore help to do what they want

>gender isn't even science
Topkek

hate to be that guy, but really, this argument is used by lefty's all the time when they challenge people on not having spent years researching gender or womens studies stuff.

Can't really have it both ways. Either an objective perspective is valuable or it isn't.

They seem to constantly change it.

Women have different options than men, so they can use them if they fail. This is why bullshit majors life gender studies even exist.
Good job missing the point and just being offended instead.

>bill nye doesn't exist
>he is a construct designed by the jews

Calm ya fedora down

Not every scientist has a PhD. Most just have bachelors or masters. He has a bachelors. Also, he's not a scientist, he's a science communicator, a role which a bachelors degree makes him more than qualified to do.

They need to be the same
>but they're different
they need to be equal
>but they aren't

We will be chasing our tails on this forever

Chekt

>no rational response
>say fedora
Guess my point is proven then.

As a guy with an MA, whose working on a PhD

No. He's not qualified. I had more qualifications than him back in 2012, I at least studied general physics and not a specific field of engineering.

The guy is a celebrity whose doing what he thinks is popular because he doesn't know the science.

''Equality'' is the only social construct.You are trying to construct it but you can't because nature doesn't allow it. Because it does not exist

i´d like to know why the opinion of a mechanical engineer is relevant to this stuff.

it is like an actor talking about politics or science, its okay that they got an opinion but honestly who the fuck cares?

Sex is science. We can argue whether or not sex is gender. If you think it is, then we can talk about "schmender" or "gender expression" as a social construct. The way the word "gender" is used has evolved to be different from "sex". But if you don't agree that's fine but why are you kicking up such a huge fuss about semantics?

I can see the standpoint of your argument, but he uses appeal to authority for himself, as a scientist. He sees himself as a scientist, not a communicator.

/thread

>someone promotes equal rights

REEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

Well all he does is preach to the converted. What good a science cheerleader that tells an audience what they already wanna hear? "Yeah ! We like science stuff not like those cave men, here's a show bill Nye"

You know school science teachers don't even need a BS. And they teach shit way more complex than what he does on his show.
You're saying someone with a bachelor of science doesn't know how to interpret and relay scientific consensus to the public?

to be fair he did debate that dumbtard ozzy in enemy territory.

Granted they picked him because he was a big enough name that they thought they would win against.

Definitely wasn't preaching to the choir though

Dude, don't feed the cucktrolls. You know damn well yours is the correct answer.

I'll agree with you there. It's on netflix too. So the only people watching are people in their 20s who grew up on him. good point

Rationality and faith dont mix. To believe something bigger then you exists isnt logical.

I know. It is obvious she was led by Pierre Curie. Without him, we would never have heard of her.

The argument isn't that women shouldnt be in science. The argument is that expecting a population's demographica to be consistent in every aspect of life is asinine.

There's no heed by feminists or libcucks to get more women into HVAC, construction, or manufacturing. We only NEED more women in middle class occupations.

Oh yeah let's all pretend that's what he is doing. Oh yeah I forgot about all those death squads pulling girls out of science labs and not giving them preferential treatment just for being female

I thought we were just talking about his new show...

>holy trips
His fedora exploded.

Apparently not, because he's saying stupid things.

To belive something bigger than you doesn't exist is arrogance, not logic. To believe it cares about you and wants the best for you and answer your prayers is delusion.
In a universe this large, it's quite illogical to assume humans are the highest form of life.

nope, we're talking about him in general.

His new show is for the new generation, where many kids already agree with the stuff without knowing why, like it's extremely fashionable. At least now they're getting some science.

If your school's science teacher doesn't have a degree in science then your school is shit.

You'll understand when u get older user. No one is against "promoting equal rights". That's a juvenile political opinion.

Saying your for "equal rights" is as meritorious in 2017 as saying you're against shitting your pants.

>Bachelor's degree
>degree
Try harder.

If you're talking about the gender as a spectrum thing. I agree it probably doesn't belong on his show and that it's certainly not something that is scientific. It's not scientifically WRONG just that gender (as a social construct) is not in the realm of science. Maybe psychology. But you get my point

I sense you think you've made some sort of point.

you didn't

What if we ARE the highest form of life? Maybe all this science leads to idiots being able to make neutron bombs out of milk jugs and jenkem and that's where every intelligent species ends up. Being destroyed by their own thirst for knowledge