Makes you think doesn't it?

makes you think doesn't it?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/T08T5]
nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opinion/actually-prohibition-was-a-success.html
tradingeconomics.com/portugal/unemployment-rate
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

No one is being paid to shill for Hillary by the way. It's a Republican-funded lie and a pathetic attempt to smear her campaign.

>common theevery and delinquency didn't create Australia
>prohibition did

Same happens with CP.
CP is legal = Less sex crimes and rape
[archive.is/T08T5]

But well, who cares?
Hypocrisy is better than anything.

Fuck off, you spick.

Not a counterargument, silly Abbo.

nice double standards mate

The addicts I know are almost all thieves. If it's easier to get them on possession charges than locating the stuff they stole so be it.

Most drug runners are shitskins let's ban them too.

I'd honestly make drugs in general legal. I mean fuck it, you can do whatever you want and inject yourself with heroin, cocaine, whatever... Just get rid of welfare and shit like that so I don't have to pay for your sorry ass when you overdose yourself.

>wants to legalise cp
>flag checks out
BUILD WALL NOW

Isnt that bitch in an aussie tv show?

No, it doesn't.

Because banning them just makes them an economically viable option for these groups. Making drugs legal will not make violent crime go down, because the fuckos who perputated it will still be around.

And hopped on legal cocaine while they're doing it.

>vagina didn't give rise to violent feminism in america
>prohibition of rape did

Been saying it for years, legalize it all, let god sort them out.

So what would happen when you tried prohibition of guns?

The only one who's suffering is the one who uses the product in a voluntary way. Why persecute a victim-less crime?

If you had a meth junkie neighbour, you might've changed your mind.

Good one. Got me there.

Yes it reduces crime, when you translate the black market to a legal zone, all the business problems can be solved in the curt and not with an AK-74.

no it doesn't make me think

you could literally prohibit toilet paper and shit won't all of the sudden get crazy

it will be the same, it will just be illegal to obtain toilet paper and thus people end up in jail for wiping their asses

idiots like you think stuff like this is a big deep thinking revelation when it's not, you could outlaw anything and the people doing what you just outlawed are criminals and they use guns to do crime

Think you'd realize you dun fucked up long before that...

Great comeback. Stumped me, memelord.

Hopefully some cartel member with a child is going to find you and behead you

Some of us dont live in the ghetto.

Drugs are hell of a drug.

>methhead stabs your son on his way home from school for the 10$ in his wallet
>emt doesn't make it there in time

yeah drugs are so great mate

>Nicolay II prohibits vodka before ww1
>Russian Empire collapses
>Gorbachev prohibits vodka
>Soviet union collapses

Vodka, it's important

...

Meth junkies are going to use it no matter if its legal or not, if they want to dig their own graves, give them shovels. Actually this is america, sell the shovels. Maybe you should have to buy a permit to do hard drugs. Easy way to tax stupid people.

Same could happen with alcohol or another legal drug.
So, I don't see your point.

Search up 'Portugal drug policy' It was done 10 years ago and at first it was controversial, yet it helped addicts take control over their lives and actually decreased addicts and drug related crimes

Can someone explain how in Singapore, they have banned drugs and yet.... No violent crime?
Oh wait, they don't jail traffickers, they execute them like any good nation would.

and prohibition stops this how exactly?

Yet it led them to have a 70% unemployment rate.

Russia knows better.

actually dispite what the pic says prohibition was successful in reducing alcohol related deaths. less drinking and less public drunkeness and disorderly conduct

yes organized crime became more visible but there was no impact on the crime rate

nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opinion/actually-prohibition-was-a-success.html

(yes I know it's the Jew york times but the stats check out)

Once again libertarians are BTFO

You think it was not caused by the average EU Policies and the crap decisions by the parties? Just like yours truly, and ESPECIALLY you Canacuck. Look it up, and then try and find an argument please

>yes organized crime became more visible but there was no impact on the crime rate

Except everyone getting drunk illegally, right?

Alcohol didn't give rise to violent crime and the mafia.

Italians did.


Drugs didn't give rise to violent crime and the cartels.

Mexicans did.


Case in point: Ban shitskins, not drugs or alcohol.

>Portuguese unemployment rate increased to 12.2 percent

tradingeconomics.com/portugal/unemployment-rate

> Alcohol didn't give rise to violent crime
....yes it did.
So does crack.
It was also pushed by feminists looking to control society. Feminist never = liberal.
The flaw was implementation by government imposed law rather than implementation through promoting a culture of abstinence.

But i guess you made me think.

learn to read leaf
>why persecute a victimless crime
just proves my point, drugs are bad, people who do drugs make bad decisions and ultimately drag other people down with them to further their habit

>they only count those who are looking for work

I don't think that makes sense or is even comparable in any way.

You must be retarded to think that the unemployment rate its 70%

You're being a little short sighted. Things do not happen in a flash.. It took 10 entire years for Portugal's drug problem to sort itself better, and to say that all of a sudden that the public will be instantly good to go is very short sighted

>Guns didn't start the Second American Civil War
>Prohibition of guns did!

Yeah, but I don't think child pornography is a substitute for child rape and abuse. If anything, simply creating child porn is abuse already. There is no reason to ever legalize CP.

>tfw there were no lawbreakers until laws were invented
The whole system needs to burn baka desu onii-senpai

Sup Forums is too contrarian and "enlightened" to understand that this is correct. Pro tip, dick heads, Rockefeller was behind prohibition because he didn't want people to be able to get their cars to run on ethanol.

Mate, for some reason things like that don't drill in

>Sup Forums is too contrarian and "enlightened" to understand that this is correct.

some of us understand what the war on drugs is really about and don't give a damn.

the only downside i can think of regarding full drug legalization is having tax dollars go to addict life support or something. but i guess that would beat financing the war on drugs. the whole degeneracy concept is so gay, plenty of CEOs can responsibly engage in vice

The only thing preventing legalisation of drugs is the United States government and the DEA. Everyone else is openly or secretly pro-legalisation. Even former DEA agents and US government employees are.

Yeah, let's legalize everything. Screw boundaries, let's let our children have access to everything. Nothing is wrong, nothing is off-limits in this Brave New World. God hates us.