Holy shit, Stefan's swallowed the pill:
Stefan Molyneux on Women
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
mises.org
youtube.com
youtu.be
theguardian.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
He's a monster. He'd be more popular if he at least tried to hide some of his biased hatred.
he spends hours debating people, giving them every chance in the world, and yet no one can find it in themselves to at least try to present anything approaching something that might be conseived of as an actual argument
youtube.com
It's funny, he just gives no fucks. He's right, but he has no reservations about hurting people's feelings.
youtube.com
Does this count as a molyposting thread?
Where the fuck are the arguments
>he spends hours debating people
Not an argument.
>giving them every chance in the world,
Not an argument.
>and yet no one can find it in themselves to at least try to
>present anything approaching something that might be
>conseived of as an actual argument
NOT AN ARGUMENT
O
T
A
N
A
R
G
U
M
E
N
T
Someone give me a TL;DW I can't be fuck listening to yet another autism king talk on youtube for 30 minutes.
It's a minute thirty autist
>croatian humor
Kasich pls
You haven't gotten your daily dose of autism yet
>statements aren't arguments
A
NOT
N
E
M
E
U
G
R
A
Didn't this guy come up with some terrible "philosophy" book where he tried to turn an is into an ought using outdated utilitarian nonsense?
That's a minute thirty I'd rather spend shitposting on a martian crop circle board.
you bet it does
Are you trying to argue against UPB? I'm not seeing any arguments, and even if you managed to make one, you've proven UPB. Thanks!
I don't even know what you're saying. Are you talking about your anus?
>implying hating women is somehow red pilled
>implying western women should have less babies
Good goy Molyjew strikes again
Not an argument
...
Pick your moments Paraguay. A forced meme still has it's correct times to be used.
95% sure this guy touches kids
All dem socialist refugees welcome voters though.
I'm having an existential crisis here
WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT???
Q. What is an argument?
A. Not.
I'm reading a review of the book it's hilarious how bad this guy fucks up.
mises.org
>dude no one prefers falsity to truth!
And this is a guy who claims to have read Nietzsche
>If doing something to one person is wrong it must be wrong for everyone!
LOL
Seriously though none of these are arguments. Could you make an actual argument about UPB?
I spotted the communist
>he didn't make an arguments
lmao come back once you've defoo'd your parents
Oh dear god, don't click on this image people
He asserts things and backs them up with faulty points.
The idea that "truth is always better than lies" is something he just takes axiomitically. While not even bother to contend with the giants of philosopher that debunkd it, Plato, Nietzche etc.
He wants us to think "forcing other people to do things is bad" without bothering to address the concept of Will to Power, that literally everything is force and all actions are one will being forced on another.
He provides no real basis to say why everyone should be treated equally, and doesn't bother to address the points of Nietzche and Aristotle that debunk this.
The reason I keep bringing up Nietzsche and Aristotle is he claims to be an expert on these guys but is unfamiliar with even their most basic points, points that defeated his own thinking before he was born and he hasn't bothered to address.
Your strawmen aren't other people's ideas, though.
So you're saying "truth is better than lies is proven", so proof is UPB?
isn't proven*
this guy has entered r9k territory
he is dead to me
>what you said
>argument
pick one
Stefan Molyneux admits to being jewish
youtu.be
Stefan Molyneux runs a cult where he convinces vulnerable people who had a decent childhood that they were abused by their parents
theguardian.com
youtu.be
Here's what happens when you give Stefan Molyneux money but not as much money as he wants
youtube.com
youtube.com
Stefan Molyneux Claims 'No War from 1815-1914 in Western Europe'
youtube.com
Stefan Molyneux and defoo, defined (ignore the libertarian claptrap)
youtube.com
Stefan debates Stefan on whether or not concepts exist and contradicts himself left and right
youtube.com
Stefan Molyneux: "Fuck physics, make iPhones."
youtube.com
Stefan Molyneux: "Nothing I say is original"
youtube.com
Stefan Molyneux tells followers to cut off all family that disagrees with his ideology
youtube.com
Stefan Molyneux believes the world needs his show for its survival
youtube.com
Stefan Molyneux forgives his mother by not killing her
youtube.com
Stefan Molyneux caims he doesn't think about his mother any more
youtube.com
Stefan Molyneux initiates force, proving all of his moral arguments invalid
youtube.com
Joe Rogan, Stefan Molyneux Lied To You About DeFOO!
youtube.com
Stefan Molyneux: A lot of people in my head are desperate for me to fail
youtube.com
Adventures in Stefan Molyneux's parenting:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Get fucked TruShibes literally none of this is an argument
youtube.com
NEW VIDEO
SWEDEN BTFO
Stef is a man wandering alone in a dark, dark world
>mfw I made this image
Now THIS is UPB
Whether truth is preferable to lies is context sensative. There's no absolutes in this. Plato's Republic pointed out that a "noble lie" can be used to keep the masses in public under control, Machiavelli expanded this and said the government activily lying can be a good thing, Nietzsche cites religion as an example of a place where lies can be useful. Yet at the same time these philosophers also point out times when truth can be useful. These are not based on absolutes but are relative to the will of the individual.
If you want to assert something is "universial" you need to actually address the problems with creating such a statement rather than just axiomatically assert it, as he does.
All new philosophy needs to grapple with the philosophy of the past. No one is going to take your "philosophy" seriously if it gets knocked out in the first round with Nietzsche or Plato. The 3 words "will to power" challenge the very foundation of all Moly's ideas, and he doesn't even attempt to provide a counter arguement. It's like he forfeits right from the start. And the saddest thing is he claims to be familiar with the big N.
...
Look up what strawman is. Now you're doing it to me.
Have an agument to back that up, mein Freund?
This man has gone off the deep end.
>Lance is a popular name for these guys
He should've said Chad for extra Sup Forums credit.
There is no such thing as non arguments. Only wrong and fallicious arguments. Prove me wrong, Molyneux.
huehuehuehue
there is no such things as a non-food item
just food items that will kill you
He's not handling the redpill well he's getting to the sperg rage point.