You have 10 seconds to explain - without memes...

You have 10 seconds to explain - without memes, "cuck" or general stupidity - what is wrong with the democratic process electing a Muslim mayor for London.
Remember to articulate your point in an intelligent and civilized manner.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_citizens_of_Israel
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

IMG Posted.

>You have 10 seconds to explain

Your flag explains everything.

Because a Muslim man has no business ruling over non Muslims in a non Muslim country.

Also figures you'd shill for Mudskins, Scholomo. You're basically the less aggressive, more sneaky version of those human Orcs.

I know you're just doing the 'expected' responses, but replies such as these just go to show that most Sup Forumstards are clueless morons who cannot justify their stupid beliefs in any serious debate or discussion.

Britain is not a democracy. The Queen should dismiss him and deport half of London.

The people of London elected him, why does he have "no business" doing what the citizens he represents want him to do?

Kike.

Britain is not a republic, but it is a democracy.
Unlike the USA, which is a republic but is not a democracy.

He'll be more tolerant towards creeping extremism and Muslim segregation.

Khan seems well integrated, but he will naturally look after his co-religionists first.

His loyalty lies with Islam not the empire

Gee I wonder whose behind this threa... oh wait.

imported votes.

The u.s is neither. It is a plutocracy.

well since you ask, it's because the turnout was only about 45% and khan has only just about got 50% of the vote

less than 25% of london actually voted for him. he has no mandate from the population.

The invaders realized that if they just walked in without weapons, you'd let them in and they'd take over.

And as you can see, it's happened. All over Europe, one wave of "refugees" at a time.

>Because a Muslim man has no business ruling over non Muslims in a non Muslim country.
Which is good since the mayor of London has no real fucking power to rule. he's a glorified transport coordinator

Boris Johnsons greatest accomplishment as mayor is a bicycle hire schme
His predecessors was intorducing some giant ass busses that kept bursting into flames

The government is supposed to be secular. The man can be a muslim in his own home and personal life, but as soon as his faith intertwines with his job as a government official it becomes a problem. By default, he is biased towards giving muslims in general special treatment for the sole fact that they are religious and borderline zealots.

What makes them "invaders", then?

When will Tel Aviv elect its first Muslim Mayor and when will Israel stop bombing Gaza and the Palestinians?

>OMG. Antisemitism on Sup Forums!
Gas yourself.

>You have 10 seconds to explain why electing a Muslim mayor for London within my own personal logic frame work that assumes anything against being Muslim is inherently wrong

I'm sorry I can't

But to answer your question, the only right answer would be that people do not like them. only if people do not like them, because the law is that of a democracy, he shouldn't be elected.

Now this brings me to why people shouldn't like him, and why it's wrong to do so, and it has a lot to do with the globalist agenda that keeps pushing the pro Muslim progressiveness that will keep fucking up Western nations.

That's not what he said you tryhard beta

>make stupid meme thread
>get stupid, meme responses
Who could have seen this coming?

Nothing is wrong with it. We always have the same white guys dictating what we should and shouldn't do. I'm glad we are starting to mix things up a little. My people are finally given a chance to prove themselves.

You're a Jew that wants a Muslim mayor. I don't think I can explain it to you.

It's the equivalent of a hostile takeover, but instead of a company, it's one of the West's great cities.

Let's move a bunch of Palestinians into Jerusalem and have them start trying to enforce Sharia law. What would you d- oh wait! You fucking kill them when that happens.

They're conquering new lands. We use the c-word because globalists let it happen. Handing over their birthright to somebody else.

Your people know what it's like to wander the world for millennia, and now you use every trick in the book to maintain your homeland. Is it really so odd that some of us want to do the same?

Grovelling.

No different than america electing black president, black mayors, asian mayors, latino governors, bible thumping rednecks, whatever.

Just a different population that's come to have a place in the society.

You can kick your feet and drag your heels all you want, but it's a reflection of society that a muslim could even reach that point.

That's how change (positive or negative) slowly comes to advanced civilizations.

Kek thinking this guy is a Jew because of flag

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_citizens_of_Israel

There is nothing wrong with it. The Anglo Race HAS to be get extinct. Only his way the Aryan Race can live in peace. I hope Khan expelles the ANGLO scum out of their own capital and exerminates the rural Anglo subhumans later on.

Look user, your I.d is the same colour as your skin :)

This.

The minute you enter your work space religion should be tossed out of the window.

If he wants to be a Muslim at home fine. As long as it doesn't interfere with his work and his decision making. The moment he does start making Islam biased decisions is the moment he should be kicked the fuck out of power, God knows that shit won't ever move people forward

Very funny. Go cry somewhere else.

Based Libya

You know, the world has become a chaotic place when Libya has to teach Londonistan about the values of secularism.

this

youre divide and conquer anglo/aryan comedy was exposed months ago

time to let it go bud

its annoying now at its very best

>people of London
Lmao, what a funny Jew.

>Go cry somewhere else.

Go fuck up your own country instead of doing it to the UK.

A practicing muslim is to urge to implement sharia law throughout the world, which is the opposite and diametrically opposed to western democracy and its values.

What's the %population of muslims in London?

Because a leader should have above 50% of the vote, especially when his views and religion represent 5% of the population.

Muslims cannot into democracy.
When elected they govern only for those who elected them (other Muslims).
See His Excellency & Mayor For Life, Lutfur Rahmen (East London Mayor) for how this will work across the whole of London with the new mayor).

Britbong abroad in land down under.

We are improving it.

So why the fuck you are not answering to this guys

these*

Aren't Anglos german

>We are improving it.

Beheadings, terror cells, clitoral mutilation, grooming gangs, electoral corruption, street gangs, and sharia courts are not an "improvement" of any kind, Abdul. But of course, you already know that.

>Because a Muslim man has no business ruling over non Muslims in a non Muslim country.
Seems that the election of Khan is completely legitimate then.

Grooming English girls is OK. They are filth in the eyes of Allah.

It is basicly the same as electing a german as mayor during 1940 or 1941 in the middle of the airplane battles.

both idealogies are anti semitic. And you are also fighting the fundamentalists at these times of those ideas.

libya of all people.

Electing Muslim mayors is new?

So nice to see the old ally is achieving what we couldn't in the Battle for Brtain.

>Democracy was a mistake