There's Toooootally no Bias Against DC, Guys!

>GOTG comes out
>MARVEL MARVEL YOU'VE DONE IT AGAIN
>MARVEL CAN'T LOSE
>THE BOX OFFICE IS PROOF THAT MARVEL HAS FOUND THEIR WINNING FORMULA
>UNPRECEDENTED SUCCESS, AND IN AUGUST NO LESS!!!

>Suicide Squad opens
>Yeah, yeah, big opening weekend - but it will sink like a stone
>DC just can't seem to get it right
>Disastrous reception all around
>Should the DCEU be rebooted?
>WB better get their fucking act together
>DCEU is an unmitigated embarrassment
>Hopefully they can turn it around

Why are the standards for success so different for these two companies?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/fIHH5-HVS9o
telegraph.co.uk/films/2016/08/02/suicide-squad-review-crushingly-puerile-comic-book-pornography/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Cus one was good and didn't make as much money.
The other was worse but made more money cus it was marketed falsely to a wider audience. It's actually very simple

One came first. It's as simple as that.

The critic sites are run by faggy sjw nu-males. Batman punched a women in the face. How'd you think these fucking four eyed losers would react.

Guardians is going to outgross Suicide Squad domestically, it already beat Batman v Superman and there's no way Suicide Squad is gonna beat Batman v Superman.

>one was good
They're both capeshit, so "good" does not apply to either.

lel wat

>>GOTG comes out

LOL FUCKING WHO MARVEL'S FIRST FLOP, MARVEL IS FINISHED

fixed that for you, you sure have a bad memory pal.

Conversation is terminated now that you've made a general judgement about a genre as a whole so can't look at things objectively.
What a shit guy

God you DC cucks are pathetic, this movie was absolute garbage.

Because Guardians of the Galaxy was a novelty - something new and a risk for Marvel.

Suicide Squad ain't nothing special any more

Without GotG boldly an nobly blazing the trail, Suicide Squad would have failed.

>GOTG is ANNOUNCED
>LOL FUCKING WHO MARVEL'S FIRST FLOP

>GOTG is RELEASED
>MARVEL CAN I SUCK YOUR COCK AGAIN

Fixed that for you.

And then the other so obviously copied that.

What, because of the soundtrack?

>movie heavily marketed with joker and batman (who combined have no more than 7 minutes of screen time) and Harley Quinn and will smith made more money that literally who: the film

It's fucking outrageous. Marvel has never copied DC. How is it even legal?

I'll give you Joker... but fucking Batman? There were one - MAYBE two shots of him released in trailers.

>Dark knight quadrilogy was dark and successful
>all DCEU is dark and unsuccessful

What is happening? Is success so elusive?

Keep backpedaling, Sup Forums was even rallying behind TMNT to beat it at the box office which it did for like 2 weeks before it went to number 1 again.

you sure seem hung up on penises.

>A rag tag bunch of B-List comic book characters reluctantly band together to defeat a common enemy in an end of the world scenario with plenty of quips and cameo appearances by characters within a shared universe
But yeah, just the soundtrack.

>bat mobile shot
>shit of batman diving off something
>shot of batman entering water
>shot of batman latching onto street light with his grappling gun
>shot of him carrying Harley Quinn to bat mobile

They exploited him as much as you could exploit 40 seconds of total screen time.

>This is what DCucks actually believe

>Guardians of the Galaxy was a novelty - something new and a risk for Marvel.
>it ends up being a success
FUCK YEAH MARVEL finally a movie for us nu males! Take that Alpha DC bros!

>Suicide Squad was a novelty - something new and a risk for DC.
>it ends up being even more of a success
Wtf I hate DC now this is literally the Donald Trump of cinematic universes, sexist, racist, fascist even. Vote Marvel and vote for Hilary in 2016!

This iteration of the Suicide Squad predates Marvel's iteration of Guardians of the Galaxy. But no, you're right, it's clearly plagiarism.

>good

Both had shitty villains but besides Bradley Coopers 2/10 voice acting I enjoyed guardians more

Though from a purely technical view point both are probably 7/10 FlŁÏÇKŠ

(You)

But Skwad has no chance of beating GotG in the box office. Your argument couldn't be more invalid

>Faggots actually believe this
Can you only think of things in terms of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton or are you just pretending to be retarded?

To be fair, the retro-cool pop music soundtrack built into the movie as a commentary on the narrative was a really cool touch. Back when I saw it in Zack Snyder's Watchmen.

I'm sure you will get the same answers as the last time you made this thread you dumb piece of shit

>it ends up being even more of a success

Suicide Squad won't beat Guardians, its frontloaded as fuck. It'll even out at the 600-650 mil range leaving Guardians on top.

You DC and marvel fans make console dick riders seem tame by comparison

Because one of those movies was a nice surprise that nobody thought would be successful and the other has some of the biggest names in comics and fell flat on its face because of editing and a horrific story that made no sense.

We aren't talking about comic book iterations here, friend.

BvS didn't beat GotG at the domestic box office

I guarantee SS will be far from beating it when it's out of theaters

your tears make all this more enjoyable

SS made more on the Monday than Civil War and Deadpool, but you won't find any sites writing about that,

Why are bloggers/journalists constantly writing about SS being a "box-office failure" but they barely write shit for movies like X-men or Ghostbusters?

Suicide Squad needed heavy marketing by Batman (their most popular hero) and Joker (their most popular villain) and Harley to trick people into seeing the movie.

GOTG was an unknown property that turned out to be really good on its own. Without featuring any popular Marvel characters to help it out.

Literally the only reason SS gets so much hate from critics is because they thought the abusive Joker/Quinn relationship was problematic.

If Quinn had some agency and refused to be 'saved' from prison in the end this would have gotten at least 80+ % on RT.

>turned out to be really good on its own

le talking tree man dancing xD
le raccoon so funnay :^)

Found the reddit

>DCucks take this movie seriously
>Director call this shit "art"

gotg = 9gag
ss = ifunny

Wait, is this actually in the fucking movie?

They introduce the characters with title cards?

everyone was hyped about the movie because the trailer looks cool but ended up being dissapointing

very simple reasoning, DC tricked you

yep

>A bunch of nobodies (BOTH CHARACTERS AND ACTORS)

>3 of the most popular DC characters (Batman, Joker and Harley, and I'd even dare to say "THE 3 MOST POPULAR"), plus Will Smith and Cara Delevigne

Gee I wonder why do they consider it a flop?

WHEN WILL THE WARNER BROS SHILLS LEAVE

ITS NOT FUNNY ANYMORE

Yes, and it's animated with cute SFX

basically

I like suicide squad im looking forward to dr.strange

There is a bias for marvel

I feel bad because movies like xmen first class got good reviews when it wasnt any better or worse than suicide squad.

Literally cringed. Who wrote this a 13yo autistic kid?

no one cares about harley

and i think no one cares about will smith now

Harley quinn is awesome

Were talking movies and how DC is copying Marvel's formula for GotG.

To be fair GoTG were no name actors and no name characters

SS has Leto, Smith and Joker, Batman.

If SS was good it would have made much more than that.

>no one cares about harley
>Comic-Con most cosplayed character: Harley Quinn, normies and feminists loves her, Harley DLC for Arkham game has been the best selling DLC so far.

>Okay guys, these are obscure characters
>No one knows who they are, so this movie is the perfect time to introduce them and help flesh out the world we're trying to build, and maybe through their interactions and experiences flesh out the heroes we're building up to with Justice League.
>The best way to do this would be through their interactions with each other, their personalities, and the things they do during the movie, so anything that isn't explicitly spelled out can at least be discerned from subtle clues in the movie.

>But man that's a lot of fucking work and sounds really hard.
>Dave, your 8 year old reads this comic shit right?
>Have him write up a bio for these guys, then we'll slap it on screen for 2 seconds and call it a day.

this is Leto inspiration for the new cringy "joker"

>If SS was good it would have made much more than that.
If we had Baleman vs Necksnapper, directed by Nolan, we had something to compete against Marvel, but WB picked the worse of the 2 directors and completely ditched TDK trilogy.

>Good movie gets good reviews
>Bad movie gets bad reviews

WHY ARE THEY SO BIASED

>DCucks

You can literally see how Ayer's vision was scrambled by incompetent editors and execs. Real shame 2bh
BvS was great tho

BvS was poorly edited trash just like SS

really makes me think

Suicide squad rode on guardians success. Marketing made it look like itd be dcs version of it. They hired the guys who did guardians trailer to edit their movie for fucks sake. So now instead of trying to compete with marvel instead of doing their own thing theyre copying them and hoping people dont realize. Its like that Asylum studio but the dc has a bigger name. And for the record everyone i know who saw the movie didnt like it, they were very excited from the trailer

It was an editing masterclass compared to SS.
SS was a music video tier abomination

DC has gone full Marvel because they don't care about consistency, they want money.

youtu.be/fIHH5-HVS9o

WB probably thinks the capeshit fad is dying and is desperately trying to milk everything they can out of it.

Unfortunately, they don't realize they're the only capeshit movie company floundering right now.

>They hired the guys who did guardians trailer to edit their movie for fucks sake

Please tell that this is a joke.

It's true.

The thing that actually went around was that they "hired the company that made the Bohemian Rhapsody trailer", but it's the same company that made the GotG trailers, so...

>The critic sites are run by faggy sjw nu-males.
I can confirm this.

Read this review:
>Suicide Squad is a crushingly puerile semi-pornographic slog - review

>For here we have a motion picture in which a new incarnation of the classic Batman villain the Joker – essayed by Jared Leto as a kind of Halloween-themed version of Rik Mayall’s Richie, from the Nineties BBC sitcom Bottom – slurpingly offers up a sexual encounter with his girlfriend-stroke-protégé Harley Quinn (Margot Robbie) to a fellow career crook as a kind of underworld bargaining chip.

>Here is a comic-book adaptation in which Batman (Ben Affleck) himself – one of the most universally beloved superheroes ever created – hauls Harley from the Gotham River, gives her creepily insistent mouth-to-mouth, then immediately pins her down by the throat, erotic asphyxia-style, when she comes around.

>Here is a film in which model-turned-actress Cara Delevingne gives not only a personal worst performance, but something close to a former-profession-worst performance, as a gyrating, bikini-clad villainess called Enchantress, who kisses men full on the lips to turn them into her slaves (of course!) and talks like Vanessa Redgrave on rhinoceros tranquiliser.

The guy gave it 2 out of 5 stars mainly because he hated the sexuality and adult themes in it.

And people say there is no Marvel biasism? YOU KNOW THERE FUCKING IS

telegraph.co.uk/films/2016/08/02/suicide-squad-review-crushingly-puerile-comic-book-pornography/

>this guy...

And now I realized why WB trailers are better than the movies.

That doesn't mean the movie isn't garbage

it was an enjoyable fun ride from start to finish.

I do not understand the critics who fucking hate it to bits and give no positivity about it. SS was way better than BvS with fun and enjoyment

he's 100% right about Delevigne being unbelievably bad though.

>this movie was absolute garbage.
Suicide Squad is way better than Civil War with way better interesting characters and plots

Wow man you really are a great writer and critic wtf i love SS now

Okay, so a movie based on a comic book is not based on a comic book, but based on another movie based on a comic book because you made up a stupid opposite day rule? cool, friend.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahhahahaahhahahaha

>half the movie is them shooting helpless and harmless demon-things in darkly lit streets and buildings
>fun

The bar scene was cool, and the Z-tier finale enjoyable in a so bad it's good way, and that's about it.

Yep. The movie will end around 600 million making it the lowest grossing DCEU film

Right, so I take it the Justice League movie is a rip-off of Avengers, even though the Avengers as a concept is a rip-off of the Justice League, right?

But as long as we're only talking movies, aren't all Marvel films just rip-offs of the old 1930's Superman adventure serials if you go back far enough?

good post.

Pretty much this.

She was 100% cute on screen

And Superman is just a rip-off of the Odissey and the Illiad

What the fuck kind of mental gymnastics are you doing? Suicide Squad, which directly takes it's story from two comic book storylines that predate the Guardians of the Giggleverse movie, is somehow ripping of Guardians of the Giggleverse?

>SS album no.1 on Billboard

>PEOPLE CAN'T BE ENJOYING THIS

What the fuck does Superman have to do with the Odyssey? You had it with the Iliad, why keep going?

You are morons. Big budget hollywood adaptations of SS and JL are being released directly following marvel's equivalents.

>>half the movie is them shooting helpless and harmless demon-things in darkly lit streets and buildings
Did you even watch the movie? There was tons of subplots going on. There was only 3 small action scenes as well. Them roaming the streets didn't even feel that long at all.

What? This is seriously a lot more enjoyable than Civil War with way more interesting characters.

What would you rather watch Scarlet Johhansson's boring character over Harley Quinn, Deadshot, Joker, Batman etc?

>no one likes the suicide squad soundtrack
>is listed as a best seller in my store

This is all Marvel bias and propaganda trying to bring DC down and you all know it is.

I am not talking about the people on Sup Forums that say they hate it, I am talking about the thousands of reviewers who gave it negative reviews and didn't even mention 1 scene that they enjoyed out of it.

Yet the reviews say they cried during Civil War (no joke I read that) and that Civil War is the best super hero movie ever (one review said that).

And Marvel Studios as a studio was established directly following Sony, Fox and WB's equivalents. Who fucking cares? If you want to argue who ripped off what you're fighting a losing battle. Marvel has been ripping off DC since before it was even called Marvel Comics. Marvel Studios did not invent the concept of the Superhero movie nor the Superhero teamup.

>Civil War is the best super hero movie ever (one review said that).
Multiple reviews said that

This, half the critics are just nu-males angry they didn't get to see Will Smith fuck Harley.

So what, does Marvel have a copyright on comic book movies now? No one else is allowed to make a comic book movie?

You also won't ever see those reviewers give DC a positive review, even if that movie is great and panders completely towards them, because they're too deeply invested in hating them.

>He thinks critics give a shit about Marvel vs DC fanboy wars


Bad movies are bad no matter than type of fanbase they have.