There is no Marvel bias over DC?

This "critic" said out loud what makes a super hero movie sell well.

>It is kid friendly with not too many adult themes

Suicide Squad as you know had a lot of adult themes. It also starred the Joker who is meant to be very disturbing and psychopathic because that is how his character was originally written and how he SHOULD be displayed in the film. I do not understand why critics believe that every super hero film should be kid friendly.

DC aren't even super hero films in my opinion but detective thrillers. Marvel = super hero action. There is a big difference between the 2.

Read this review:
>Suicide Squad is a crushingly puerile semi-pornographic slog - review

>For here we have a motion picture in which a new incarnation of the classic Batman villain the Joker – essayed by Jared Leto as a kind of Halloween-themed version of Rik Mayall’s Richie, from the Nineties BBC sitcom Bottom – slurpingly offers up a sexual encounter with his girlfriend-stroke-protégé Harley Quinn (Margot Robbie) to a fellow career crook as a kind of underworld bargaining chip.

>Here is a comic-book adaptation in which Batman (Ben Affleck) himself – one of the most universally beloved superheroes ever created – hauls Harley from the Gotham River, gives her creepily insistent mouth-to-mouth, then immediately pins her down by the throat, erotic asphyxia-style, when she comes around.

Other urls found in this thread:

telegraph.co.uk/films/2016/08/02/suicide-squad-review-crushingly-puerile-comic-book-pornography/
telegraph.co.uk/films/2016/07/10/ghostbusters-review-paul-feigs-fun-female-led-reboot-captures-sp/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>Here is a film in which model-turned-actress Cara Delevingne gives not only a personal worst performance, but something close to a former-profession-worst performance, as a gyrating, bikini-clad villainess called Enchantress, who kisses men full on the lips to turn them into her slaves (of course!) and talks like Vanessa Redgrave on rhinoceros tranquiliser.

Let's not talk about how well Cara acted in this because that is not the point of the last quote. The point is how the critic purposely points negativity on a female villain kissing men and making them her slaves with the way he puts in brackets (of course!).

What is the fucking problem with having a villain do something unfriendly and something wrong? Why should DC have to sugar coat their villains and characters?

I am happy that WB did not completely water this down (yes I know they cut out Joker slapping Harley but at least the darkish adult tone still remained in this film).

telegraph.co.uk/films/2016/08/02/suicide-squad-review-crushingly-puerile-comic-book-pornography/

when will you retards get that all capeshit is trash, it doesn't matter if there's bias against one company or the other, its all the same shit

This.

I'm biased against shitty popcorn flicks, and you should be too.

puerile is not used to mean kid friendly often times

Stop watching movies if you hate them so fucking much. Read a book. Oh wait-

The modern "critic" is a propagandist trying to promote a narrative rather than tell you whether a movie is good or not.

telegraph.co.uk/films/2016/07/10/ghostbusters-review-paul-feigs-fun-female-led-reboot-captures-sp/

This same critic gave Ghostbusters a glowing review. He's just angry that there wasn't a sex scene between Harley and one of the black characters.

Why are plebs like you pretending to care about film criticism now?

For years you iqlets called Brody and White pretentious and anyone that agreed with them hipsters. Has your taste film improved now or are you still the tasteless drones you were when you cried hipster and that fun should be allowed since film is supposed to be """entertainment"""

or is this another excuse to shitpost and stay away from developing better taste again?

m-m-muh DC movies are detective thrillers, they are pure masterpiece..


what a capeshit fagot, dc is shit and marvel is generic shit.. get over it

>He gave a boring Ghostbusters female reboot which had women saying unfunny jokes and dancing majority of the time a high rating while hating Suicide Squad which actually had some entertaining scenes with cool characters
This guy is a fucking joke...

He can't get anymore SJW enough

>which actually had some entertaining scenes with cool characters

You really think boring Scarlet Johannson's character is more entertaining and engaging compared to Harley, Deadshot, Joker, even Boomerang?

just no

>You really think boring Scarlet Johannson's character is more entertaining and engaging compared to Harley, Deadshot, Joker, even Boomerang?

Fuck you 1978 Superman was great and the two Burton Batman films really still hold up!!

nice comeback... you really showed me

>oh wait-
Meaning you know I have been pretty regularly since 2007? The last remotely good year in film?

But yea, the problem with suicide squad is it goes for maturity by way of the adolescent boy's intellect. When I was 13 I thought la blue girl (then urotsukidoji) was the most adult shit possible, because it said right on it, "absolutely not for children." Even though its the most puerile garbage possible.

>73284299
I think it's more a question of stronk womyn being represented as evil temptresses because of some internalized mu sogy knees.

At least that's what I imagine this cuck thinks.

Bump

I like adult themes, kids movies and this reviewer can go fuck herself. I don't understand whats so bad about showing a darker side of hero's. hell Harley and joker are the only true edgy ones

and what deep character have boomerang, harley or the joker?

yeah deadshot was the only one with deep charcaterization, but Harley and Leto are very poor developed charaacters in this movie, they are here just for the romatic psycho fangirls, there no complexity in either of this two characters.. the only gimmick harey has is shake his ass and be sassy "crazy" girl

and boomerang is just meh... i really dont give a fuck about this guy

but that pic shows how DC fans react, if the movies Dc is making right now are bad theres no reason to attack marvel, yeah we all know marvel have generic capeshit movies.. but DC movies still sucks

>the Joker who is meant to be very disturbing and psychopathic because that is how his character was originally written

he was originally written as a foil for batman who wore a purple suit, had green hair and made bad puns while he robbed banks (for big sacks of money with dollar signs on them)

he's a comic book character, not an edgy character study

can someone explain to me why every critic says that joker offered harley quinn to some crook? it was obvious that if he touched her he would die

at least marvel understand they're just simple capeshit movies..

DC is trying to show they are "more mature" than marvel with PG13... at least marvel dont give me bullshit, i know it is generic shit, but DC is trying to sell me generic shit like it is pure gold

They are too busy looking to be offended and can't see the obvious no-win situation the Joker put him in. It's a cliche at this point and they still missed it.

You decide to stop using the one that shows Evans's hairline receding?

Kek.

A lot of things seem to be trying to be tallest midget these days.

>MOST MATURE CAPESHIT
>BEST VIDEO GAME WRITING
>BEST DIRECTED SHOW ON TELEVISION
>BEST STORY IN PORNOGRAPHY
>HIGHEST PRODUCTION VALUES IN HIGH SCHOOL PLAYS

etc.