One month.
One more month, and the 2nd Migrant Rush begins. Chaos and anarchy will happen again, but this time even worse than what happaned last year.
One month, and he'll rename his channel to SStefan88 and will make videos like "The Truth about Mein Kempf", "Why I was wrong about Fascism", and he will have discussions with some Italian professor on La Dottrina del Fascismo.
Other urls found in this thread:
fbi.gov
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.metapedia.org
fdrpodcasts.com
twitter.com
He'll also renounce Aristotle and praise The Baron
people change their tune about fascism when they realize cultural invasion is a thing
He loses all credibility with this video desu
For a dude who tries it on as the head honcho final boss philosopher king of the internet he sure loves to obfuscate the truth
>claims he doesnt know anything about candidate
>lists connections to random Muslims to justify opinion
>somehow didn't see background as human rights lawyer in his google necessitating those meetings
10/10 sophistry and gaming of public opinion. >One fucking dollar is too much for this clown.
>Aus flag
Opinion discarded.
>human rights lawyer
People like that were just simply called communists, jews, and traitors a hundred years ago
>random muslims
Nation of Islam is not random muslims, and you know it well, Abu Hajjar. It is a black islamist supremacy movement.
>evola
>spent half his career risking his own skin denouncing fascism in italy
>some how loved by modern fascists.
And they're entitled to a fair defense just like everyone else you rule of law hating wog slime
gotta say it's pretty surreal to hear stefan talking about race politics like this
More like Stefan "KIKE KROWD KRUSHER" Molyneux
I'm not a fascist. But do you really think anything better could come out of this Dark Age? It's our best chance until our society completely breaks down and true Order aka Tradition can be set up again. Same thing he said.
Until then, it is still better than some lefty shit or some pseudonationalist party that is still jerking off to democracy, liberal values, and equality - and has a blue cartoon flower as a symbol.
i see your point
This. He argues that unless we exhibit ingroup preferences, white culture is going to get destroyed. A few minutes earlier, however, he argued that universal ethics, which, as a matter of fact, has now evolved into the principle of the rule of law, is a main feature of western culture and civilization.
I fail to see how by abandoning one of the fundamental principles that has constructed western society, we are going to preserve western culture. If we treat whites differently than non-whites on a state/legislative level, we would be going against the foundations of the societies we live in.
your illiterate
Not at all.
What he says is that it has been proven time and time again - so it must be finally realized by our societies - that this universality can be only entertained in the minds of white people and societies.
Therefore, the principle itself is faulty.
In it's biggest extant, it can only be "white-versal" instead of universal.
You can't be tolerant with intolerant people, because you would just play against tolerance itself.
It is the same as the "lol your Christian so yeah something like Jesus said you should like take in refugees haha what now, Christie?!".
By taking in people who despise Christianity, therefore, the values of tolerance, you go against Christianity.
See, it is not so hard, right?
Now fuck off, hillary shill.
You are proposing a system which discriminates based on ho is "tolerant" and who is not, assuming that whites are and non-whites are not. You need to prove such an assertion before designing a political system around it, especially when big proportions of the population are non-white people with voting rights who have been in the country for generations.
I know that it might seem simple to you, and I understand that you might see the lives of some as less worthy based on the colour of their skin, but until anyone can conclusively prove that this is a significant contributor to human behaviour, which has so far proven to not be, no laws in any western country can be passed based on your assumption.
That film is absolute shit 2/10
Stefan "DEEFOO the Hebrew" Molynuex has been, forever and always, a devout national socialist
one day soon there will be a backlash against multicult, and white folk (volk?) are gonna fight back
>implying
seriously tho, there will be
and the sad part? those of us nonwhites who have adopted, accepted, loved and respected western values will be carried away by the storm, as the backlash will go against all non whites
but you know what? if it saves western culture and civilization, it's worth it
i just hope you actually do wake up, europe and usa, before it's too late
>strawman argument
It's not "ther skin".
It's their evolution which has been fairly different during the last ~100,000 years.
And no, I'm proposing a system which discriminates based on who belongs to our sub-species, which has superior intelligence and civilization compared to other sub-species on the world.
If you haven't experienced that black (gypsy, turkish, arabic) people are wastely less intelligent on average, and thanks to that more agressive and less likely to think on the long term, it's you who has conformation bias, not me.
Here's your proof, which is not that hard to find:
fbi.gov
(Hispanics are put into "Whites" category)
You can see blacks commit at least as much crimes if not more than whites+latinos together, when blacks only make up 13% of the US' population.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
And nice move putting tolerant into quotation marks, like it's some relative thing that doesn't even mean anything (aka social construction)
Seems like you wanted to show off what you learnt in Marxism 101. Tough luck, pal.
Sticking to your beliefs and "fundemental principles" in the face of extinction (which is looming for white people globally), is pure fucking insanity.
>those of us nonwhites who have adopted, accepted, loved and respected western values will be carried away by the storm
There is only one way out for nonwhites during a backlash, and that's to fight on the side of the whites.
Even the Nazis allowed black Africans to join the Free Arabian Legion, where they fought against the British in Iraq and Syria.
European colonial regimes throughout history have organized nonwhites to fight far-flung enemies and bolster their manpower. Even during the American revolution, both sides had black regiments and native allies.
Also, depending on who you are, it may not be that difficult to make common cause with whites. In the LA riots it was the Koreans who bore the brunt of black anger.
tl;dr whites can tell the difference between a Gurkha and a nigger
>And no, I'm proposing a system which discriminates based on who belongs to our sub-species, which has superior intelligence and civilization compared to other sub-species on the world.
There is no biological proof or historical accuracy behind your statement. There have been non-white civilizations during times that many of the progenitor of modern western states were nothing but tribes. In addition, the haplogroups of the peoples within the borders of what we broadly define as "The West" are vastly different from one-another, so they are not exactly the same "subspecies" as you put them.
>If you haven't experienced that black (gypsy, turkish, arabic) people are wastely less intelligent on average, and thanks to that more agressive and less likely to think on the long term, it's you who has conformation bias, not me.
You are putting forward what is known as a "primordialist" argument, and while I believe there is not sufficient evidence to completely debunk primordialism, it is also shown time and time again to not be the decisive factor in human behaviour by a long shot. Taking a child from one group and raising it with the beliefs on another would result in it being next to nothing like the original group it was taken from other than physical appearance.
In addition, you are putting forward an argument akin the the ones feminists make, taking the average of one arbitrary group and pitting it against the average of another. You need to prove causal linkage between skincolour and crime, which has yet to be done. If left-handed people have a higher IQ and lower crime rates than right-handed one, this does not mean that people who are right-handed should be stripped of constitutional rights.
the reason it was in quotation marks was that we were speaking of it in the terms defined by the previous points in the conversation, giving it more concrete meaning rather than leaving it in the abstract.
I do not care about white people, I care about culture, principles and civilization. The colour of one's skin is irrelevant as long as they observe the principles I value.
we will fight with you, no doubts there, but i doubt in general whites will ever trust non whites again if they manage to free themselves from the hordes
And shitskins demonstrably do not follow the values of white civilization, and if they keep being imported into western societies, western societies will change from civilized and cultured societies, into backwards shitskin socities, because shitskins will eventually replace the white people who seem to be the only ones in addition to east asians who actually value a civilized, law abiding society.
>i do not care about white people
but non-whites do. prepare for pogroms and oppression of whites unless something is done.
>SStefan88
Gold
>we would be going against the foundations of the societies we live in.
the only real "foundations" of the societies we live in are race/ethnicity based. anything else is a recent invention that doesn't survive honest scrutiny.
Not all, but many western countries have constitutional provisions which would prevent an oppressive, discriminatory regime to come to power (for example, the irrevokable principle of human dignity in the post-WWII German constitution).
However, I agree that we can not just keep accepting more and more people from the middle east. I am not argung that what the west is currently doing is the right thing to do, I am arguing that the solution of discriminating against non-whites based on their skin is not the right thing to do either.
I for one, would gladly see 10 000 mudlsimes die if it saved the life of a single westerner.
Mudslimes are worth nothing.
>constitutional provisions
memes.
only real unifier in society is blood.
...
Do not reply to him. It's a marxist subversor, probably a paid shill.
As long as our territories remain in stable white majority and white rule, there is still a bit of a space for minorities who follow us.
The problem begins where they try to propagate the only culture they ever made up by themselves: the culture of animals.
Read up on Evola and his "Spiritual Race"
Libertarians are hilarious. This is a guy who in the past has preached non violence and anarcho capitalism.
This all goes out the window when you realize people won't make the society YOU want.
Fucking libertarians.
Listen Muhammad, da ebul liberdarianazis aren't coming for you. (yet)
>Want a system where government is light and people police themselves
>Realize it is pretty much only white people that care about these values
>Only way to ensure society is mostly white is to go back on your libertarian values
>In the meantime, looking at the facts on race slowly makes you a race realist
>Before you know it you're a 1488'er and looking for Goldberns and Silversteins whenever something bad happens
Pretty standard path to the far right actually. I had a feeling it would happen.
We are tolerating inverse racism and affirmative action in our societies, thats the problem, and this is just the visible part.
...
>19 hours since last molyneux video
I'm suffering withdrawal guys. I've watched every single video for months back, I need some fresh relevant molyneux
Stef, if you're reading this UPLOAD SOMETHING
And when they do, I have a ready supply of plastic sporks.
I will use force if necessary.
>Race is just skin colour
We all know that feel, Mike, you don't have to shill here.
Great gif though.
Fdrpodcasts.com
He uploads shows here first before they get cut and end up on YouTube.
...
...
...
>Using any semblance of reasonableness on Sup Forums
When will Bulgarians learn
This is what WHITE PEOPLE in WHITE COUNTRIES vote for after being brainwashed for decades upon decades.
We MUST demolish the U.S/EU/NATO system within 10-15 years if our race is to have ANY chance of survival and independence. If we do not succeed in breaking the U.S/EU/NATO system within the next 10-15 years, our race will be doomed to a slow but steady path down towards extinction. It is the duty of every single decent human being, not only white men and women (although especially), to STAND UP AGAINST THE ONGOING GENOCIDE OF THE WHITE RACE. Start ASSASSINATNIG high-profile individuals in the U.S/EU/NATO system. Once the elite starts feeling the heat against themselves and their families, they will either BACK OFF or they will go OVERT with their agenda.
It is your DUTY to stand up against the ongoing oppression against your race.
>I do not care about white people
Then you are completely irrelevant, you are not a nationalist, you are just another ANTI-WHITE who wants to EXTERMINATE THE WHITE RACE through MASSMIGRATION of NON-WHITES into WHITE COUNTRIES.
>we would be going against the foundations of the societies we live in.
The foundations of society are not 'values' or 'principles.' The foundation of society is blood. We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. To hell with the rule of law.
After reading his thread i just realised something.
For countries lime france its over, even if we all go 1933 again you need the army to control the streets and shitskins..if the armed forces is infiltrated by browns and or islam its over.
They wont help and you cant do anything because you wont have the numbers, even if right wing fascist partties become more acceptabel
Libertarianism is only compatible with whites thus Libertarianism can only exist in white only nations which means you first need to be fascist and nationalist and toss out all non whites.
> Except they don't.
Relativism and separatist institutions have been state imposed and the "community leaders" that dictate the self image and political direction/affiliation of "BAME" "POC" don't want this to change. It's like asking a Mafia Don to dissolve his own mob. It's too profitable to throw away. By both the politicians and these petty despots. protection of European values can only be "pro-white" or assimilationist (irrelevant of colour) in Europe as they are the only ones that earnestly perpetuate the culture surrounding it. All else is perpetual undermining of European society. (American pro-consumerist institutions are guilty of undermining this also)
It's not racism (Europeans happen to be white) but protection from the impositions of others who only make a show of holding these egalitarian values to self-aggrandize and propagate their own self interested, ethnic nepotism (in another continent while their homelands remain a vanguard of completely different values).
Libertarianism is not about non-violence you fucktard faggot.
you have been visited by the ONE FUCKING DOLLAR man of good fortune. peaceful parenting and anarcho-capitalism will come to you, but only if you comment "NOT AN ARGUMENT" in this thread
We are safe, bro.
The kangz and shiiiet haven;t figured out how to climb a 3 meters tall fence yet.
>all they need to do is to build a pyramid and jump over from its top into the chosen land....
What I'm really waiting for is his next video where it's just him talking to the camera. Call ins and guests are the worst.
And it's not the same without his face being there, ready to introduce a new supply of fresh Stef faces into the rare molyneux market.
Here's a NON-WHITE who calls Stefan a twat for that video.
he still wont ditch his stupid ancap shit. notice how in the video he says "I REALLY WISH HE COULD MOVE TO A POST-RACIAL SOCIETY, I REALLY DO BUT WE HAVE THE STATE BLAH BLAH"
He only cares about race to the extent it means they can vote for bigger government. If they couldn't he would NOT be against it. He's said this numerous times.
If a group of Somalians want to homestead unused forest land in Sweden, they should absolutely be able to if they couldn't vote away his money for welfare according to Stefan.
and on the 7th Day he Rested
>stupid ancap shit
WEW LAD, start arguing anytime,
>One dollar is too much
Do you want me shot?!
so stefan is god after all
