What does Sup Forums think of my photography?

What does Sup Forums think of my photography?

This one I like, good lines. Post more

Bump

Im assuming you're going for symmetrical photography? Its meh, find a better place to photo.

Dulles?

...

OP here
This is a little off center

I think it's more impressive you managed to get a shot of the inside of presumably a busy place without any fucking people ruining the shot.

Im guessing you either work there or got in fucking super early and staff didn't care that you did this.

Thanks

I took this in the St Louis airport. I guess nobody comes here often or it's just a coincidence nobody was there. I don't work there and I got there around 5

5 pm, just for sure

That's fucking crazy!

Just took this

did you press an entire button to do that?

I think it lacks a center, and the staircase is the most interesting this here, but it's not captured well.

...

No I pressed 16

It's called editing

Do you want me to move the plant?

It's nice fodder for my architecture folder.

Im sorry... its mediocere at best.

...

>16

>an entire button

...

I like this one, do you have a Skype?

these are the only ones I find good and interesting so far. the rest look too basic
I liked this one before I saw the ground. you should've only captured the top half

Might want to work a little on the contrast there, buddy.

...

I hope you didn't pay too much for your camera because the quality in this is pretty bad. either that or you have a shaky hand. + would be much better without the basic black and white filter. and what's the purpose of capturing the tourists at the bottom?

Every photo in this thread

...

Its pretty easy to take like 10-20 shots on a tripod and run them through a tool to remove all moving objects and stitch together a picture like OP's, its the secret to getting great travel shots.

everything in this picture looks uncomfortable

I'm not sure if it's the shakey hand or just that the Sigma 12-24mm isn't always sharp.

Tourists are a fact of life. Sometimes I can blur them out with a ND1024 filter.

It seems a little tilted judging by the horizontal tile line that isn't leveled. But that's something that can be easily cropped.

Lambert STL?

The other shots you have posted ate better.. this one is not level.. the lights at the top slop off which is catching my eye too much. (DOP here)

...

They are all kind of uninteresting

...

I'm an art major, and I always bitch about photography. I'm not easily impressed by it, and it's basically the every-man art form for brain dead white girls. It's fine for things like documenting and whatnot, I understand it has it's place. But a photo on the wall usually just pisses me off

This isn't photography.

Most of these have either no subject or too many subjects
for example could've been a nice picture but you chose to include too much. both the ferris wheel and the blue lights on the building can't be the subjects. I get no sense of mood or intent in these photos. you need to guide our eyes better.

...

>I'm not easily impressed by it, and it's basically the every-man art form for brain dead white girls.
Think about this again.

You are totally right. I think the problem is that I go someplace, and but I haven't planned the angles and composition... Sometimes I stumble into something nice, but that's just by chance.

Stop shooting black and white with color sensors, or at least learn how to edit black and white photos properly

I have, and it's very rare to find someone's photography I like because so much of it is unimaginative and simply point and click, as opposed to something like a good non-pollock painting

...

The lack of PP is disturbing.

What are the origins of the word "Photography"?

You're kind of degrading photography as a whole, because you say it's easy and everyone can do it, while at the same time acknowledging that it's actually difficult to take a good picture. So I'd say the problem is that everyone is presenting their shitty photos as art, just like all these modern art paintings that are just shit on a canvas.

Do it properly.

The first two weren't mine

Another one done properly

Ghost people everywhere.

Not mine

Android

Never said it was, was replying to who posted it.

heres some real photography, film shot, chemically developed, printed on paper, untouched by software, because as a real photographer i never needed to digitally enhance any of my work.

Fuji Neopan400
F11
1/60
hot shoe flash + 2 slaves on tripod
taken just after midnight in almost complete darkness, last frame on roll, one shot one pic

Agfa Chromogold 50
F4
1.5 seconds
no flash
lit only by the flames

don't recall the film
f22
27 seconds
first couple of trucks rolled out during exposure
taken at around 1:30am Glasgow Airport

.

Fuji Neopan400 again
F8
1.5 seconds
taken in film change cupboard, no light, lit only by match and cigarette glow

/

>a pic of a dirty garage from eye level
Shit, how have you not won the nobel yet, OP?

First one in here I like.

All good art is difficult, but the world has become so over-saturated with cameras and pictures that anyone with a iphone thinks they're a photographer, and then those esame people go out and buy digital cameras without still knowing how to take a good photo. In all honesty, it isn't that difficult, just be at the right place at the right time

get on my level, faggot

oddly, when i got home i nearly deleted it but decided to play around with some editing software i'd just got.

wtf is up with that old ass CRT on there?

Avatar isn't a real movie, because they used CGI.

GTFOH.

Times change, technology changes. The best photographers in the world digitally edit their photos.

Go on with that "purity" crap. Get back in your horse and buggy, and take 3 days to drive home to fuck your butter churning wife.

PP is everything.

see OP, /this/ is how you use black and white.

That's a super dangerous area of east London

It's in Greenwich lol

>anyone with a iphone thinks they're a photographer
But this is what I mean. They're not, so what they do is not photography.
>In all honesty, it isn't that difficult, just be at the right place at the right time
I disagree with this. That's not art, that's luck. The art is to pick the right place and the right time to achieve the result you were aiming for.

My Nikon D500 is for photos, my phone is for phonecalls.

Nice whitebalance.

I'd like to say it's original, but I've seen THEMALL....

...your pic is good, OP. I'll see myself out

Atleast this nigga knows what he;s doing.

I was being sarcastic. The white balance is absolutely disguting and reflects the fact that either you do not know how to set it in your prescious A7R, or you are too daft to do so.

...

And you're obviously a blind cunt. I don't use a Sony thanks, i'll leave that to homos like you.

I shoot nikon. specifically weddings and human form with a Df in a studio. Thanks.

If you think your stuff is better than that other guy then why not post proof you know what you are doing