Why are Spurs so popular in the US? Is it a Jew thing?

Why are Spurs so popular in the US? Is it a Jew thing?

Funny how they have more American fans than the similarly named basketball team

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=iBJRzdCj81k
twitter.com/AnonBabble

People probably saw some dumbass celebrity bandwagoning them.

NBA Spurs have a reputation for being boring as fuck which is why everyone hates them.

give you 3 guesses

Spurs and Bale ruined his career.

The only good american athlete. I literally cant be proved wrong

>named like muerican "clubs" (just imagine "manchester devils" Tielsi Lions" Liverpool Birds" etc)
>literaly kike team
>clinton dempsey

He's probably not even the best. The best American players all play handegg. Look at the foot work, balance, and concentration of the receivers and backs and tell my I'm wrong.

Maybe it's soccer fans in general because they're surprised

coys stands for 'come on you spurs' you'd only type such a hashtag if you supported them, otherwise you just type #thfc

>Is it a Jew thing?
It's a Jew thing?

This

t. Spursfanbecauseofthedeuce

>Why are Spurs so popular in the US?

Dempsey

>Funny how they have more American fans than the similarly named basketball team

They don't. There are more San Antonio fans in Texas alone than Tottenham fans in the entire country.

Spurs got rid of him so they could use Soldado....fucking christ.

This meme

I love it when retards use twitter trends as an actual legitimate measure of popularity.

First off, most people still don't use twitter, or use it rarely. Secondly, the trending list is rigged as fuck, its basically paid advertising or what the SJWs at Twitter HQ think they need to promote.

I've never met a real Spurs fan in my life.

Blame it on that cuck avb. Dempsey still had 2-3 good seasons in him

>London Wasps
>Exeter Chiefs
>Sale Sharks
>Leicester Tigers
>Northampton Saints
>London Sarracens
>London Harlequins

all actual teams, most of them with more than 100 years of existance

Yep, being popular on Twitter means nothing and has literally zero real world consequences.

Yes yes, but you're forgetting literally nobody gives a shit about club rugby, I don't think any of those teams have a stadium that can hold over 20k.

And it's not London Harlequins or London Saracens, it's just Harelquins RFC and Saracens RFC. Also it's just Wasps RFC and they are in Coventry now.

America loves the jews. Spurs are a jew club

youtube.com/watch?v=iBJRzdCj81k

Harlequins FC*

It's just because the owner is a Jew right? They're not the historical Jew team, like Notre Dame is for Catholics in the US, right?

I like the spurs because their logo and unis don't blow

Even now, he would be a good backup for Kane.

No, they are full on kike, the fans call themselves "the yid army". Although many of the fans aren't Jewish they are super proud to be on the jew side and stand up to evil racists like Chelsea, Millwall and West Ham.

The owner is a Christian. He's not even ethnically Jewish. But yes, Spurs historically had a lot of Jewish fans, so that identity stuck even though Jewish Spurs fans are a tiny minority of the fanbase nowadays.

lol, it's because of Dempsey, nobody in America knows that Spurs are the "Jewish club" unless they already watch the PL. It's not really a factor for anyone.

The "Jewish" team doesn't stick in the US because all of our Jews live in New York and obviously follow those teams

There's a non-american Spurs team?..

>my personal anecdote is more representative of real life than metrics taken from the world's second most popular social media site

Well that's pretty dumb and extremely delusional.

'
the tottenham hotspurs. and they are objectively better than that team from san antonio in all facets.

Except manlets don't play handegg. The only manlets are running backs who are just 1 player on a field of giants.

Manlets play soccer though. America is full of manlets who are not playing hand egg. So where are all the American messis that you claim exist but are all involved in handegg?

Reminder that the most successful and most popular clubs in Netherlands, Germany, and Italy are all Jew clubs.

Also reminder that Chelsea are owned by jews too

I don't understand why you all seem to forget that one.

I agree, but Landan Donovan is pretty good.

Spurs?

Was Dempsey rated that highly in the Prem? I thought he was just a marginally above decent striker during his time in Fulham. Not world class but 15+ goals a season type forward.

dude lmao you got it all wrong

shit, there are probably more San Antonio fans in Texas than Tottenham fans in the UK.

>15+ goals a season type forward
lel
He had one season where he scored 15 goals, the year before Spurs signed him. I don't think he even broke 10 in any other year. He wasn't awful but mainly he was a kit salesman for burger fans, kinda like park ji-sung for United when EPL merchants tried to exploit the surge of football's popularity in korea a few years earlier.

Its official. I'm old.

Not even trying to be hipster. I don't know what any of these things are, Obama are only because the mini description

Park was unironically good.

>#COYS

more like #GOYS

The main reason is because all the Johnny-come-latelys used the "I want to support a good team but I don't want to seem like a bandwagoner" logic when picking a team. This explains the vast majority of Spurs, Liverpool and Arsenal """fans""" who started following the Prem in the last ~5 years.

Meme replies aside.

Dempsey was considered a good player in the EPLEL but nothing more than that. He was a big fish on a small pond that got his head twisted by Liverpool. At his best he was a Europa league quality player but nothing more than that.

He was stupid for thinking he can replace Spurs fan favourite Van der vaart or he can challenge Bale for his favourite spot. The only Yank player that was consistently very good was Brad Friedel since Howard became a meme in his last 3 years at Everton.

>Le park three lung meme
Kawaga was better

Owned by a Jew sure, although Abramovich doesn't strike me as a devout follower, he just cares about money. Chelsea isn't a Jew club like Ajax or Bayern Munich where a large part of their identity stems from standing up to the antisemitism during the 30's and 40's and as a club actively fighting against it ever since. Chelsea are renowned for being Neo-Nazis more than anything.

Those numbers were low but decent for someone playing in a mid to lower table club like Fulham at the time.

he was a mid-table player, and not good enough for a team like Tottenham. should've stayed at Fulham

>Chelsea are renowned for being Neo-Nazis more than anything.
Anything else you can share about PL clubs, especially the big names? I've tried researching political leanings of clubs before and the English ones seem surprisingly apolitical, at least from an outsider's perspective.

no he wasn't, he was a fucking awful footballer. he was managed by sir alex, that's all.

Sir Alex could put a plate of dog shite in centre-midfield and it would perform well.

remember how terrible park was after he left man utd.

Liverpool are a bunch of dirty socialists, Arsenal fans want Sharia law, Millwall fans just hate everyone

For Spurs, it's more because of Dempsey than anything else. Also, Spurs, Liverpool, and Arsenal have all had periods in the last 5 years when they looked like title contenders (11/12 and 15/16 for Spurs, 13/14 for Liverpool, basically every season for Arsenal), that attracts bandwagoners.

>Liverpool are a bunch of dirty socialists, Arsenal fans want Sharia law
I noticed they're more often associated with the left. What did the supporters do to earn this reputation?

Also what can you tell me about both Manchesters and Everton?

>What did the supporters do to earn this reputation?

Arsenal fans trapped a white chelsea fan in a train toilet and beat him and shouted Arabic at him last season.

This is the most accurate answer. I have seen people do this in real life multiple times. I judged them all

This was happening even before Dempsey. If having Americans was really the deciding factor then Fulham would be huge here. Being real good but not the best is what really gets us Americans

this

>Except manlets don't play handegg. The only manlets are running backs who are just 1 player on a field of giants.
Haven't looked at any of the top wide receivers or cornerbacks, have you?

>Being real good but not the best is what really gets us Americans

Then why have Man United, Real Madrid, and Barcelona traditionally been the most popular teams here?

>So where are all the American messis that you claim exist but are all involved in handegg?

Edelman and Beckham, two of the best receivers in the league, are both manlets with incredible agility. They're exactly the kind of people who would be well-suited to soccer.

>Why are Spurs so popular in the US?

They really aren't. It's

1. Man United
2. Real & Barca
3. Arsenal & Chelsea
4. Liverpool
5. Spurs/Bayern/Juve/Man City/Milan

50,200 tweets isn't much in a country of 330 million, especially when a lot of fans are tweeting many times during the course of a game.

>no Chivas

True, I completely forgot about Liga MX teams. Chivas and Tigres are both at the top of the list, they average literally 10 times as many viewers in the US per game as any other soccer league.