Le evolution is real

>le evolution is real
Then why are there still niggers?

creationists: 1
atheists: 0

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependent_territories_by_fertility_rate
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Arguments_for_the_existence_of_God
bibviz.com/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Fire
telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/1311064/Mystery-of-Jerusalems-Holy-Fire-comes-to-light.html
onthewaytoithaca.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/the-holy-light-of-jerusalem-debunked/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

because the environment in which they live didn't require niggers to evolve in order to survive

Are you implying that G-d wants niggers?

Well thats a good question - if god created humans in his image, why are there any niggas at all??

Cucks: 0
Atheists: 1

Go kiss some big black dirty feet, cucktians.

At least my God is worshipped by people who know how to use a toilet.

Italy bro has a good point, we don't require niggers to evolve in the U.S, we just blame ourselves and give them more welfare.

BLM! BLM! BLM!

Niggers have already cucked white people in America, we should have just picked our own cotton, god dammit. Could have avoided all this shit, we'd probably have a utopia by now.

Also, niggers exist ONLY because of evolution you stupid faggot; reproduce, reproduce, reproduce, that's what threatened and impoverished populations do. It increases their odds of survival.

so you're saying when they still shit, their just using the opportunist strategy of survival--reproduce and have as much offspring as possible, with out ever evolving any skills.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependent_territories_by_fertility_rate

Literally top 20 are African

Essentially, yes, that's what you have to do in that case. Until you develop some skill or figure out a niche in nature that you can flourish within.

>why are there any niggas at all??
sin

so you're saying they're literally a different species..

>implying humans at our current state are the epitome of evolution

>implying no variations within species

Have you ever met a smart nigger? If you have, then doesn't that prove they're just a product of their conditioning/environment?

If you haven't then doesn't that at least lead to the point that maybe they are different species?

I've met smart niggers, and can name some famous ones.

So the question is, why are "niggers" inherently bad? If at all? You basically made this claim in your post

Researchers "can't find" the missing link because pointing it out is racist and will get them fired.

>>implying no variations within species
Yes, that is what i'm implying. in biological evolution, at least to my knowledge, there is no such thing as a species in which some use one strategy of survival, and some use another. A species is either opportunistic, like mosquitos and insects, or they're not- honestly forget what they're called but species like bears n shit. instead of reproducing as fast as possible and having as many offspring as possible, they have one or two cubs and do their best to take care of those cubs. and niggers aren't actually "opportunistic" in that way. that was a joke. if they were, they'd have thousands of offspring and they would have no genetic predisposition to take care of their young. degeneracy aside, humans, including niggers, are not biologically opportunistic species. that just doesn't exist in biological evolution.

>Researchers "can't find" the missing link because pointing it out is racist and will get them fired.
they can't find the thousands of missing links that should exist because there are none.
>le punctuated equilibrium, or rapid evolution in bursts
is their excuse. now why don't atheists regurgitate that shit?

>>le creationism is real
>Then why are there niggers? you saying god is a nigger lover?
>creationists: 0
>atheists: 1

>you saying god is a nigger lover?
I think God loves who people could be, m8.

>if they were, they'd have thousands of offspring and
They have millions of offspring, and millions get aborted, thankfully.
>they would have no genetic predisposition to take care of their young
They don't, see: Black single motherhood

Niggers are entirely opportunistic, see: Welfare

>still falling for the missing link meme
It's like Google doesn't even exist to you people.

you, uhh, you saying they all exist, m8? You gonna post a link to thousands fossils of Lucy's homies, m8?

>Why are there niggers?
Your telling me Lucifer's children arent allowed to have sex with humans for the purpose of soiling the genepool of humanity?
Thats really offensive and bigoted user

P.S also Kuk is a green nigger not a frog why do you think he liked that name? Kuk=cuck like the autistic people that worship him(cucking the old egyptians)

>are you saying they all exist
There's about 30 of them found so far, so yeah.
>you going to post up thousands of intermediate species
Where the fuck did you get that number? Hominids related to us are less than 300,000 years old. Do you think evolution is magic or some shit? How the fuck would thousands appear when it took millions of years for everything else?

He still beliefs in the lucy meme

>beliefs
>Lucy is the only fossil found ever, and we don't have piles of other bones and fossils
Are you retarded?

>Buddha
>a deity

Love this meme

>There's about 30 of them found so far, so yeah.
I think you may have a numbers problem, m8.
>Where the fuck did you get that number? Hominids related to us are less than 300,000 years old. Do you think evolution is magic or some shit? How the fuck would thousands appear when it took millions of years for everything else?
Let's be generous and assume that only 0.00001% of transitional hominids would have eventually become discovered fossiles. 30*100000=30,000,000. So only 3 million transitional hominids would have had to existed in order to produce modern humans? About 55.3 million people die per day, today. So what obscenely low percentage do you have to come up with, in order to excuse 30 missing links (assuming they are real and that they exist) to account for human evolution? Not to mention there would necessarily have to be a plethora of transitional forms to show any kind of progression. Of those 30 "missing links" how many of them show different states of evolutionary progression? Also, source, not that it's particularly that relevant if the number is so low.

oh and
>Hominids related to us are less than 300,000 years old
nigga, every species prior to use in our lineage is related to us since the abiogenesis meme. Much more than 300,000 years needs to be accounted for.

30* million
can't into numbers right

>Are you retarded?

are you ?If one is a hoax why would the others be real, i grew up with the lucy meme the missing link in evolution . Look at it, it does not even have hands

ITT: People who still believe in le epin Dog maymay.

Magic is not real guys, grow the fuck up.
I mean, when was the last time that epic almighty loving god did anything good for you?

if god is real, why would he create niggers?

>Magic is not real guys
redundant. "magic" is defined as being non-existent. Why don't you come up with an actual argument, kid?

>I mean, when was the last time that epic almighty loving god did anything good for you?
Allowed me not to be a retarded idiot who denies His obvious existence.

And the meme actually goes:
>Believe on me and you will be saved

he did not niggers created them self trough inbreeding and decay of sin

My argument is as follows:

If there is an omnipotent deity that created universe, what proof do you have that it is actually truth?

+ Bonus question: How come is it exactly the God of your religion, boy.

Also, I didn't asked any gods permision to exist, neither Im aware of any gods approval. Another bonus question, if there was a gods approval, how come Im not aware of it. Also, how come it was yours god and yours only.

I mean, come on man, you can't trust things just because someone told you so. Or can you?

Listen, you fucking retard. As I already touched on in this
post, niggers aren't "opportunistic" in that way.
there is a difference between being "opportunistic" by stealing a VCR, and a species being biologically opportunistic. Sorry it sucks, but niggers are people to, according to biology anyway, and thus, they are not an opportunistic species.
Now if you want to argue they're literally, biologically not human, fine. But that still wouldn't make them technically, biologically opportunistic.

oh boy the most standart 4 chan strawmans

>what proof do you have muh burden of proof bla bla

...

How are niggers not opportunistic in that way? I provided you with examples, you provided me with gibberish.

If there is an omnipotent deity that created universe, what proof do you have that it is actually truth?
Something being "is," as in being, implies it is true that it is, as in, there can be no false thing that is. But assuming you mean so ask "What proof do you have that God exists?" you are the one making the truth claim that He doesn't, and then attempting to shift the burden of proof. If your assertion is that God does not exist, you are the one who needs to show proof He doesn't exist.

>How come is it exactly the God of your religion, boy.
What religion?
>Also, I didn't asked any gods permision to exist, neither Im aware of any gods approval.
One obviously needs pre-existence in order to ask for such a thing. What you're implying as a contention is logically absurd.
>Another bonus question, if there was a gods approval, how come Im not aware of it.
Well, I would argue that if God exists, it would be impossible to exist without his approval, so again, what you're implying is logically absurd. Even if it weren't, why would you necessarily need to have awareness of it?
>hurr, see: asking for approval of existence
What is this? Are we on acid?
>Also, how come it was yours god and yours only.
I didn't claim ownership of God, m8.
>I mean, come on man, you can't trust things just because someone told you so. Or can you?
First somewhat sane thing you've said.

If you want to do a bit of research on arguments for the existence of God though, instead of just being a faggot anti-God cuck on Sup Forums, here are some:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Arguments_for_the_existence_of_God

>How are niggers not opportunistic in that way?
Well, one, they're not classified in biology as such. They're classified as humans.
And two, if they were opportunistic by the biological classification of types of species definition, they would produce thousands of offspring per nigger.
and three, not a single one of them would take care of its thousands of children.

Classic theist bullshit. You have nothing except for a fuzzy warm feeling of belonging.

Fuck you and fuck your feels. There is no god and you are living a lie.
Have a nice day, boys.

So burden of proof and all the arguments for God are bullshit? Please explain, emotional kid who wants so badly for God not to exist that you probably preach it more than the most religious of people..

That's not what he meant but okay

I will not react in a reasonable way to an unreasonable arguments.

I'm asking for a simple proof. In that wiki link you posted was even a "God of gaps" as an argument for the existence of god, which is actually argument against it. Did you even looked at that link, my young gullible friend?

I mean, of course all arguments for the existence of god are bullsht, because, you know, there is no god as there is not a chines teapot orbiting jupiter.

If there is a God, allmighty and allknowing, then I double dare him to strike me by lighting right here where I sit comfy in my chair.

Well, nothing is happening.
So much for a omnipotence...

Atheists: 2
Cucks: 0

But I bet you will go to terrible mind-crushing mental loops to defend this... Well, you can't free fools from the chains they revere.

Also, reminder that this exists:

bibviz.com/

If bible is a holy word of allmighty, allknowing god, how come it is full of shit?

Atheists: 3
Cucks: 0

Your turn, theists.

>I'm asking for a simple proof
what about the holy fire in jerusalem?
every easter my country broadcasts it on TV and this year i think i heard they had scientist over there havent heard anyone disprove it
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Fire
>tldr
>fire that doesnt burn faithful christians on easter

also
>If there is a God, allmighty and allknowing, >then I double dare him to strike me by lighting >right here where I sit comfy in my chair.

careful because you might end up like
>pic related

This is too much.
>I will not react in a reasonable way to an unreasonable arguments.
I myself have no problem responding to idiots, as you can see.
>I'm asking for a simple proof.
You're making the assertion that God doesn't exist and asking for proof He does?
> In that wiki link you posted was even a "God of gaps" as an argument for the existence of god,
That link only attempts to document arguments for God's existence, obviously regardless of their being good or bad. The "god of the gaps" argument is an atheist contention of an argument they think theists are making, thus the presence of the link. I explicitly provided it for further research.
>I mean, of course all arguments for the existence of god are bullsht, because, you know, there is no god as there is not a chines teapot orbiting jupiter.
And you were talking about unreasonable arguments? Are you suggesting that because Russel's teapot is presumably not orbiting the sun, that God necessarily does not exist?
>If there is a God, allmighty and allknowing, then I double dare him to strike me by lighting right here where I sit comfy in my chair. Well, nothing is happening. So much for a omnipotence...
So you're saying God doesn't exist because he doesn't snuff your feable existence out with a bolt of electricity when you triple dog dare Him too?
>But I bet you will go to terrible mind-crushing mental loops to defend this
I'm flattered that simple folk might see rational people this way
>If bible is a holy word of allmighty, allknowing god, how come it is full of shit?
Fuck, you got me.

It seems people forget what we accomplished before nogs were free. Slavery gets shit done and they served a purpose where many other races failed. They're work horses and you can't deny that America is where it is today because of all of the free hard labor. Liberals are to blame, not nogs. Liberals set them free and allow them to exist without evolving. We bred them for work, it worked out until they were set free. Never forget that.

You have literally made no arguments
Refuting other people's fallacies (which are ultimately based off of christian fallacies) don't count.

I have no such obligation. Refuting their absurd arguments is enough to show they have no valid reasons for asserting God doesn't exist, and thus should be agnostic, rather than emotionally pushing atheism. But if you must have one, here's one I made, as not to copy-paste one of the plethora of good arguments for God's existence that already exist >hurr where? Why do you think William Craig never loses? >durr he's good at debate doesn't mean God exists:

1) You're aware.
2) You're conscious.
3) Consciousness exists.
4) If God doesn't exist, then the only thing in existence that could create consciousness would be some interaction between any or all of the four fundamental forces of the universe.
5) If God exists, then He can create consciousness.
6) There is no empirical evidence that any interaction between any of the four fundamental forces of the universe could possibly create consciousness.
7) There are no mathematical posits that show how any interaction between any of the four fundamental forces of the universe could possibly create consciousness.
8) There is no reason to believe that any interaction between any of the four fundamental forces of the universe could possibly create consciousness.
9) It is unreasonable to believe that any interaction between any of the four fundamental forces of the universe could possibly create consciousness.
10) Therefore, God exists.

admittedly, it could be better. but it's the only one I have saved and I don't think its underlying point is at all bad.

Lol at holy fire is one of the longest hoaxes in humanity. Wake up, or praise my flying tuna fish monster too.

telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/1311064/Mystery-of-Jerusalems-Holy-Fire-comes-to-light.html

onthewaytoithaca.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/the-holy-light-of-jerusalem-debunked/

Atheists:124757292746583
Religion: -1

>Atheists:124757292746583
I get it; it's funny, sort of. But if you were so sure, why would you exaggerate your rightness so much? This is more of a question than a contention.

even if it showed that god exists, how would you know god is personal rather than impersonal? and if you can show god is personal, how can you show that god is a particular person (e.g., the god of abraham)?

>how would you know god is personal rather than impersonal?
I'm in destroy retarded atheists mode. To show that God is personal would take a different (though that doesn't mean invalid or non-existent) line of reasoning than I'm one right now. Such an argument would require arguing about purpose, meaning, and the actual Christian God, rather than just this vague notion of God and "God's" existence. Honestly, I'm busy getting drunk. I like this stuff, but I'm honestly not the greatest of christfags, hence it being easier to debate an ominous God, rather than specifically the Christian God (again, that doesn't mean He doesn't exist or than it's not true).
I'm sure other christfags could do much better than I at that.

>how can you show that god is a particular person
Personally, I don't think that notion of personhood or personality could adequately describe such a bing as "God."

>what proof do you have muh burden of proof bla bla

i guess adding 'muh' and 'bla bla bla' to a sentene somehow makes it less true

The lack of evidence for one thing is not evidence for another thing.

True. I just think it's a true dichotomy and that cosnciousness being a product of any interaction between the four physical, fundamental forces of the universe is inconveivable. The argument (and again, I know it's not perfect) is alluding to the impossibility of consciosness as a product of material interactions, as an a priori truth.

There's no goal of evolution. They adapted to wander around Africa and catch easily available animals. The environment didn't require them to become more creative or intelligent to deal with a harsh or variable climate, scarce resources, etc. I imagine it's the same for abbos.

because that's subversion.

the true creator created our spirits in his image. the flesh cages are the product of el, or satan, and are just vessels that we get forced into when we're born, and get out of when we die.

when you get into a car you don't suddenly become a car, and then claim the car was made in your parent's image.

>There's no goal of evolution.
by "require" i don't think he manes "goal." It's the same concept you're talking about.

>behold, satan falls from heaven
>"second coming"
>christians think it's jesus coming down, not satan falling from heaven
>satan gets imprisoned
>christians think the next 1000 years will be a cakewalk
>satan really gets imprisoned on earth, not in hell, and thus becomes its king
>1000 years of satan's rule
>christians think they'll rule together with jesus, not that the nwo will rule for 1000 years together with the false trinitarian counterfeit "jesus", or zeus, son of el, or kronos, who is really satan.

But that was 2000 years ago...

that prophecy extends for 3000 years. each of the seven symbols symbolizes big events in a millennium.

the seven seals were from 70 ad to 1070 ad.
the seven trumpets are from 1070 ad to 2070 ad.
the seven vials are from 2070 ad to 3070 ad, which is also called "the millennium".

after that, the age of satan, or kali yuga ends and golden age begins.

there is war in heaven. satan loses and falls to the earth. jesus says behold! but nobody beheld it.

there is a "second coming" event that's said that everyone on earth will behold it. catholics are now preparing for something to arrive to earth, observing it with their telescope.

it didn't happen yet. therefore it wasn't 2000 years ago, but may happen in our lifetimes.

Yeah, rereading his post you're right

>the seven seals were from 70 ad to 1070 ad.
>the seven trumpets are from 1070 ad to 2070 ad.
>the seven vials are from 2070 ad to 3070 ad, which is also called "the millennium".
Can you explain where you got this?
>jesus says behold! but nobody beheld it.
beholds what?
>there is a "second coming" event that's said that everyone on earth will behold it.
>it didn't happen yet. therefore it wasn't 2000 years ago, but may happen in our lifetimes.
Is this the crux of your argument? What do you think "behold" in the bible means?

r/k selection theory is what you are referring to

>"le"

Fuck off back to Le Red Dit, fagit.

thanks m8

the events tied to the first two sets of symbols match up with real world stuff. that was the original protestant interpretation of the revelation too before the subversive version of "lel israel and jews and antichrist obama" we have today became popular.

behold. watch and see. observe.

this second coming has been described in several cultures, not just christianity. ancient jews also had that prophecy, for them it was jehovah, not jesus. ancient babylonians also had that prophecy, for them it was anu, not jehovah nor jesus.

hollywood is furiously pushing the "omg, aliens came to earth" narrative in their movies recently. vatican also "leaked" some info that something is coming to earth.

second coming = aliens = nephilim return (as it was in days of noah) = annunaki return (sumerian gods, same as jewish elohim) = satan falls from heaven

he is imprisoned for 1000 years on earth to be judged, and in the meantime wages war on humanity and enslaves it, then after 1000 years he is released from earth to receive judgement, attacks heavens again, judgement is passed onto him and his people, the elohim/annunaki and all are banished to "hell", the state of eternal separation from the source, permanent exile.

and since we have the canaanite tablets, dead sea scrolls, sumerian tablets, nag hammadi library and such (knowledge has increased), we now know that the El from the torah is the golden calf, or kronos, anu, satan. thus, his son, the "jesus" of trinitarian doctrine is really zeus, enlil, the antichrist (pseudo christ, substitute christ).

i came and you received me not. he will come, him will you receive.

so if the guy who comes down says "i'm really jesus guys, now bow down to me!" you'll know who he is, unless you get deceived.

Actual answer. There are 100 mutations which involve the loss of information in our code every generation. We diversified because we are falling apart slowly but surely from our original creation.

>christians think it's jesus coming down, not satan falling from heaven
>1 antichrist
Nigga the real antichrist are 3 people Satan doesnt even care:
1 is the thinker
1 is the speaker
1 is the prophet
when these 3 meet each other(they dont know their destiny and will never accept it no matter how much you point it out to them or present them with facts) it would signal that a few months have passed after all the "true" christians or "sheep"(whoever they are) have passed away there are now only left "goats" there wont be a rapture only corruption of the church so im pretty sure the antichrist the "Illuminated" branch of masonry is pushing is actualy a lost but neutral guy who is their last enemy and test (one eyed false prophet with Cain's mark on his forehead(which gives him immense spirtual power) who would oppose Muhammeds teaching that is islam(religion made by jewish Kabbalah mages)) after the defeat of this hero the caliphate will spread globally but they will end up nuking each other. The survivors will pick up the teachings of the light and establish the real NWO which would not last very long before Armageddon also no amount of timetravel will reveal the date when exactly the world will end because that knowledge is somehow the only thing not obtainable in existance all that can be known is that it will be happening all around the multiverse and all of creation like a room full of mirrors

i dont care if anyone believes me or not im just posting this so i dont feel guilty later

>he is imprisoned for 1000 years on earth to be judged
Where does it say this? Does the bible not talk of Michael casting satan into hell for 1000 years in past tense, and that he now roams the earth?

>i came and you received me not. he will come, him will you receive.
What verse is this? Actually, where are you getting any of this?

>so if the guy who comes down says "i'm really jesus guys, now bow down to me!" you'll know who he is, unless you get deceived.
this is similar to how in revelation, it says to be watch out for people who come out and say they are the Christ, because they are surely an anti-christ. But Jesus never demanded anyone bow before him.

What you need to do, if you want to be convincing, is show a an irrefutable continuity in your position. Half of what you've said comes off as bullshit speculation, at face value. So, if you honestly believe what you're saying is true, explain your entire line of reasoning.

Pure racism; the poster.
Evolution doesn't work that way, and neither does Creationism, for that matter.

Dude, too true. It's devolution, not evolution.

Its is an act of humility. (You may have to look that up, I know. Evidence of evolved humans, too.)

>1) You're aware.
>2) You're conscious.
>3) Consciousness exists.
>4) If God doesn't exist, then the only thing in existence that could create consciousness would be some interaction between any or all of the four fundamental forces of the universe.
>5) If God exists, then He can create consciousness.
>6) There is no empirical evidence that any interaction between any of the four fundamental forces of the universe could possibly create consciousness.
>7) There are no mathematical posits that show how any interaction between any of the four fundamental forces of the universe could possibly create consciousness.
>8) There is no reason to believe that any interaction between any of the four fundamental forces of the universe could possibly create consciousness.
>9) It is unreasonable to believe that any interaction between any of the four fundamental forces of the universe could possibly create consciousness.
>10) Therefore, God exists.


this one is pretty good

I don't imagine crazy people CAN forget their crazy notions. Don't they get them refreshed via the mind-radios every night?

What is an emergent property?

meh, i feel you brev

a property that somehow emerges from its parts. the definition itself begs the question.

i meant the son of perdition antichrist, not a generic antichrist. a spiritual being, not material man.

the final one who will be received in place of the real jesus, who will enter the temple (human heart) and declare himself as god, who has been advertised by the corrupt roman bible that both catholics and protestants use.

the one from trinity, son of el, known by many names, first one being babylonian anu, and his son, the pseudo "jesus", enlil who is now worshiped as a god. spiritual mystery babylon.

i know there will be no literal "beam me up jesus" rapture. it'll be a removal of those who have christ-like qualities (anyone with righteousness and goodness in their hearts, not idolators who worship jesus's name), aka persecution and death, likely by muslims, atheists and leftists.

after all, the flesh is corrupt and has to be removed first if the soul is to be saved and "clothed in light", which symbolizes a new body of pure light/energy, no flesh.

satan is the god of this world. everything in this world has been manipulated/created by him. what makes you think your catholic-sourced bible wasn't?

if you can look at it through the spirit's eye, not with a beast's literal mind, and aren't ignorant to reject outside knowledge you'll see the book of genesis in an entirely new light, realizing El, the guy who "clothed adam in animal skins", which symbolizes trapping the spirit in "evolved ape" flesh was none other than satan, deceiving mankind, then causing the fall of man.

our flesh is satan's creation, and this is repeated in many other religions as well. everything in this material world is satan's.

but our souls and spirits don't exist in this satan's world, and can't be measured, seen or touched. they are the true "created in father's image" part, not the flesh.

they're outside of satan's control, that's why he can only deceive us, and why people commonly believe demons need your permission or contracts to deal with you.

Haven't even read everything you've said yet, but I feel like everything you've said is a blatant rejection of the holy spirit, which is the ultimate proof of Jesus as Christ. In order to accept the holy spirit's existenct and tell me that I follow satan at the same time, you would have to show me how what I experience as the holy spirit isn't real or true, and further, how what I experience is evil--that either love of God is evil, or it's not what I know it is.

I'm curious as to where you're getting what you're saying, because it seems to me that, if anything, you're the anti-christ here.

didn't the bible say that the proof of having the holy spirit is doing works greater than christ? i don't think you can walk on water, turn water into wine or heal the sick with your touch.

you only think you have the spirit because you recited a "dear jesus, i accept you into my heart" style magic spell and feel good about it, but you have no works such as jesus's or apostle's exploits to prove it.

you follow the same jesus catholics do since both came from the same bible, not jesus of nazareth, who the gnostic bible speaks of much more accurately. rejecting catholic traditions doesn't suddenly change the protestant jesus. he's still the same, even if his birthday is different or his mother is a human, not a goddess.

catholic jesus is enlil. even the catholics admit it through their symbolism.

>didn't the bible say that the proof of having the holy spirit is doing works greater than christ?
No

Am I supposed to keep reading after that? Tell me where you're getting all of this retardedation, then maybe I'll entertain you.

try reading more stuff than just your catholic-corrupted bible. try reading the gnostic christian bible to see jesus. check out sumerian tablets to learn of anu and enlil, the prototype for jehovah. look into dead sea scrolls for more expanded christian myths. check out canaanite tablets to learn about the jewish El, or jehovah.

if you're still just going to go "i won't read what you write", then stop replying. you obviously want an echo chamber.

>doesn't what you believe say this?
No
>try reading this other shit because this is a valid point

I've asked you two or three times, and you still haven't answered: Where are you getting your information. What is your source and inspiration for saying what you've been saying? Be specific and, if you can, conceptual.

did't i list them?

the sources that show similarities between the old testament's god and other religious gods, and their common links to satan.

if that proves the bible was tampered with (and catholics had over 1000 years to tamper with it before protestants got their hands on the catholic scripts recovered from istanbul when it fell), it shows that it can no longer be trusted.

>gnostic christian bible

14. Simon Peter said to them, "Make Mary leave us, for females don't deserve life."

Jesus said, "Look, I will guide her to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every female who makes herself male will enter the kingdom of Heaven."


From the gospel of thomas

so, you're saying you meant to but didn't post zeitgeist shit that's already thoroughly been shown to be false to the point of being a hoax? Or do you mean something else?

wtf

does not the dead sea scrolls proof that the bible is untouched

Stop comparing apes to niggers.
You'll offend the apes.

>18I testify to everyone who hears the words of prophecy in this book: If anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book. 19And if anyone takes away from the words of this book of prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book.
I think it's relatively clear that if God exists, He wouldn't allow His word, that it the true meaning of His word, to be altered.

>gospel of thomas
>another guy's word of how jesus was
yeah.

then there's its own version of genesis, where the corrupt, demented spirit, jehovah/satan creates the world to imprison human spirits within it, and torment it with suffering.

all that proves is that romans didn't change the old testament much (they still did. changing names, removing names and such), which was already changed by the time of babylonian captivity.

anything can be painted a hoax to make unsuspecting people dismiss it.
>how does poison work
>99% food, 1% poison
that's why you need discernment, to find the poison within that and discard it. same with the bible. find poison (el worship, el is the god, trinity doctrine which is a repainted babylonian pagan worship with changed names) and discard it.

the bibles keep getting changed even today, with dozens of new versions every year. nobody who does that gets plagues.

satan is the god of this world, and he doesn't care. all he cares about is installing demonic qualities such as fear and division in his followers.

any religion or god that promotes that (fear of god etc) is demonic.

>the bibles keep getting changed even today, with dozens of new versions every year. nobody who does that gets plagues.
Are you purposely misunderstanding?

>satan is the god of this world

>any religion or god that promotes that (fear of god etc) is demonic.

Satanist or troll confirmed.

Fourth time I will ask and last time: Sources, my surely sincerely righteous friend?

>Satan, who is the god of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don't believe.
>2 Corinthians 4:4

>The time for judging this world has come, when Satan, the ruler of this world, will be cast out.
>John 12:31

>Judgment will come because the ruler of this world has already been judged.
>John 16:11

>how do i google