When will you accept A-10 as your Lord and Savior?

When will you accept A-10 as your Lord and Savior?

BRRRRTTT

Other urls found in this thread:

businessinsider.com/f-35-vs-a-10close-air-support-air-force-test-pilot-2016-5
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3144873/U-S-air-force-s-sophisticated-stealth-jet-beaten-dogfight-plane-1970s-despite-expensive-weapon-history.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Lives in the clouds and rains down justices

F-35 is vastly better in every aspect. deal with it.

Answers your prayers for salvation.

>Said the plane beaten by F-16s
Go cry some more F-35 fags, your platform is garbage

When you ask? When it killed my enemies in command and conquer generals zero hour.

I doubt that. How much does a single F-35 cost and what are the operational costs like compared to A-10?

F35 could never handle the damage the Lord A-10 could.

Cost does not matter, the US isnt on a budget, they dont have to pinch pennies and settle for mediocre

Strikes fear in the hearts of the wicked

Then how come the F-35 project isn't finished yet?

F-35 would never have been damaged in the first place though

Sinners repent!

How do you sell for free?

>When will you accept A-10 as your Lord and Savior?
When I became a JTAC

because it hasn't been field tested yet

why havent you killed yourself yet?

Savior of the skies.

...

go back to /k/ you sperging edgelord. This is a BRRRTTTTTT appreciation thread. Nobody truly cares about your pseudo-intellectual armchair generaling. Your opinion is shit.

...

u mad

Even in this article, the AF needs to modify conditions to say its better than an A-10

businessinsider.com/f-35-vs-a-10close-air-support-air-force-test-pilot-2016-5

>clearly doesnt know what field testing is

it got released like a broken video game. they are still fumbling through Block 3F.

Waiting for a F-35 to do it for me.
Still waiting

Up until May 2017, a pilot couldn't weigh more than 136 pounds due to its shitty ejection seat.

it is now after may 2017 so that doesnt matter. have anything that is actually relevant?

>F18 Hornet
>basically F14 Tomcat but even more awesome
>can launch from a carrier
>pretty cheap
>both AA and Air-Ground capabilities
>overall more than good enough unless faced with glorious Su27/35

it's targetting system is still being worked at accurately deploy munitions. so yes, it's not ready for battle. Block 4 is already in the works for all the shit they can't fix with 3F

>basically F14 Tomcat
lol. user, are you drunk again?

Yes, yes I am

accept for the OBOGS

Except when it had they rubbing wiring harness issue.

>Sucks when your wiring harness shorts out on a fly-by-wire plane.

then why are F35s forward deployed? oh right, because they have IOC.

Lol NO

Mein fighter is better than your fighter, sweinehunde.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3144873/U-S-air-force-s-sophisticated-stealth-jet-beaten-dogfight-plane-1970s-despite-expensive-weapon-history.html

F35 is an expensive mess, they should have gotten the memo when still working on the F22 Raptor. Why even bother making a multirole when you can have a much more effective and varied fleet for the same cost. Lockheed is corporate scum and not even in the good way. Not to mention all the NATO members paying for new 35's, just to bail Lockheed out. Ffs.

Explain.

They put a plane on that glorious gun!? That's genius!

this shit again ?

>hurr muh flying gun
fugly and useless unless other, superior machines deliver air dominance

thinking Japan or Bulgaria is forward deployed

You rang, jerry?

I'll develop a plane with a bayonet and then we'll rule the skies together.

...

Already built. It was the F-106 Delta Dart

...

F104 had a pretty good javelin

army loves it, marines sure love it.

>Starfighter
Muh BONER

The F-16 has a pitot tube there too.