Prove me wrong
Prove me wrong
you're wrong
what did you mean by this
>prove me wrong
>doesn't even post his proofs
Proofs or gtfo
that op is not a faggot? sorry, op is and always has been a faggot
Proof
Another angle
Geometry is just weird like that.
Nothing significant about the symbols themselves.
It's the arbitrary human value you are trying to validate.
Proof
Dubs of Truth.
Proof
is that real?
what significance does it have if it is
Fucking proved
Another one
Nice rabbit. Where's the hole?
The easiest one yet
...
You guys might not have seen this one before.
dude, stop posting this, we already have the message and are a go
what's the message?
wow did you freehand that?
...
>perfect circles
>free hand
Kek
This one will be on the test.
This one might require some thought.
there's nothing to figure out here. the red cubes get put on top of the green cubes... that's it
No. But I might write a book proving you right. Look to the shelves holiday 2019.
OP, what would you like me to prove next, the sum of squares of Fibonacci numbers or the cardinality of a real open interval?
In the meantime, triangle numbers.
Check the filename, this is a proof without words that the sum of the first n consecutive square numbers is n(n+1)(2n+1)/6, or as portrayed here, ⅓n(n+1)(n+½).
I'm not sure how this proves it. Help me out?
That's cool. Looked up Viviani's theorem and thought how the fuck, and now it's obvious.
Look at each black or white contiguous section as its own number, represented by the number of squares it has. Clearly, each one is the next odd number above the one below/to the left of it. And when you add them up like that, clearly you get n^2.
And yeah, the strength of proofs without words is that once you understand them, you get a much better grasp of why the theorem is true than when you work it out algebraically.