Why do religious people think all Athiest are the same

Why do religious people think all Athiest are the same.
I believe in Jesus, but he had no magic powers, and a just a normal man.
God could be anything in the world. Even the big bang

God caused the big bang and guided evolution.

So you believe that he lived in this world?

That is not what is considered belief in Christianity.

We believe that he was the Son of God. Read a gospel or two from the New Testament and the book of Acts.

What you believe is some soft pantheism + what is historically provable. Not at all what we Christians believe.

Believing IN Jesus means that we literally have hope in his claims which were:
- believe that he is God incarnate so you will be resurrected at his 2nd coming
- live according to what he taught as this is proof of your faith
- by his dying on the cross our sins will be forgiven so that we may walk before God

It is necessary to follow his Way so that his promises will include us at his 2nd coming. And that is what we hope for.

"I'm atheist" "God can be anything",

Make up ur mind you agnostic fuck

>guided evolution
Evolution has its ups and downs
Mostly downs
Gid must be dtunk or just not care anymore

"We christians" Which ones?
There are over 44 thousand versions of the bible which all contradict one another.

How come god has to speak through paper written by man?
Shouldnt or rather dont you agree the most important teachings should be in our dna or something?
What if every bible on earth just vanished?
Do you think the world woyld be worse or better without christianity?

"I literally look forward to the fucking super apocalypse where 99% of people on earth will suffer eternally for shaking their penis 3 times or more after peeing"

Didn't Jesus promise his followers he would return within their lifetimes? It's been two thousand years and still not even a postcard.

kek I swear some Christians have a hatred for humanity and hope for the Rapture so that billions of people will suffer excruciating deaths while they get a golden ticket out before it happens to them.

That's literally why the religion still exists
Christians are wirse than muslims
At least the muslims are actually doing something to quench their bloodlust
Christians are all fat inbred hicks

You telling me he didn't live in this world what

There are 44k+ versions of the bible who knows which crazy story he read

I was actually trying to be nice and reasonable
And here we go people reply with comment like read the book and you will know
Then I find out some other shit
The someone tells me I can't believe in Jesus and not believe in god at the same time

Jesus was just a cuck
God is just an illusion

atheists have 0 morals buddy

why don't you rape your cat or kill your little sister

Common sense
Do you know what that is user

Jesus is angry you're posting porn

making up your own interpretation just means you're a rouge christian denomination of one

atheists do have morals you stupid yid. in fact atheist morals mean more because they aren't inspired by being scared of getting tossed into a flaming pit.

we are moral and ethical without any chance of some reward or punishment.
of course it now dawns on me that i am saying this on Sup Forums

what are your morals based on? There are no absolute morals without faith

Bait

Said the same shit every faggot ever said

How many times a month do you go to church 0
When was the last time you cleared your cins
God is watching you

I don't see how this is bait? There are no morals without faith. An atheist could shoot up a day care and feel no remorse as he has no objective morals and values.

I go to church 3 times a month

What are you talking about
Your telling me Christians don't kill People every year
They are all atheist.?
The people stat steel from others your telling me they are not Christian

the majority of christians don't kill anyone, that's right.

you are avoiding my question

how can an atheist have objective morals?

if you need religion to tell you not to kill people you're a fucking retard

in an atheist framework, there is no objective reason not to kill anyone

Are you for real


Its 2017 we live in a civilized world we have schools.
Look at Africa they are christian in some places. No education and mother fuckers kill each other
Could say we almost live in the future because technology changes too fucking fast

what does that have to do with an atheist lack of morality?

so your telling me that all morals and acts of kindness cant truly be good without a basis in faith.
our morals are based on being good people and a little something called empathy and kindness.

...

What caused God? Evolution is sufficient to guided evolution. Your inserting God where it is not necessary.

I guess during war we are all atheist
After war we are religious Christians than never killed anyone

>so your telling me that all morals and acts of kindness cant truly be good without a basis in faith.

Sure their actions can be good, there is however no reason for an atheist to perform ethically good actions

>our morals are based on being good people and a little something called empathy and kindness.

that's not an objective basis. Therefore you agree with me on the fact that atheists have no objective morality.

Something, something, word salad. spiritual awakening something,you just don't understand as the devil, standard apologetics something.

When will you realize you are a worthless piece of meat just l

this is exactly what i'm talking about

atheist just see human beings as "you know, we're just bags of water, pieces of flesh".

An understanding that I live in an environment where my actions have an effect on others and theirs on me and that if we are going to mutually cooperate we need agreeably. My morals come from an understanding of reality not an 'carrot and stick' authority. I'm going to have faith enough in you to hope that you would not decay into anarchy if your magic sky daddy wasn't threatening to torture you for eternity but offering free tickets to Wonka Land if you use bad logic and follow jealous immoral laws while ignoring many of them you disagree with in a modern society. I hope that wasn't bait and I'm not wasting my time on a non serious comment.

Was the big bang really a big bang or did it sound loud because there was nothing there to stop the sound?

An understanding of wellbeing. This is objective. A chimp or a dog can understand this. If I kill someone this negatively affects their wellbeing. As a person who like to be alive I seek wellbeing. I objectively seek a system that protects wellbeing ---> morality.

You can objectively evaluate decisions in their effects on wellbeing. As a person who enjoys being alive I value well-being and seek to protect it. Anyone can make a objective judgement of wellbeing. This is an objective basis for morality.

There is zero evidence that Jesus exists. All books of the bible are anecdotal written 40-50+ years after Jesus supposedly lived. The only historical document of the time that mentions Jesus is a proven counterfeit. There literally was no Jesus just as there is no such thing as God, imagine that.

a subjective consensus on morality>moral objectivity

especially because there's no evidence moral objectivity even exists

Well, I read that they did find cave paintings of a man with a long beard and the inscription "Jexuh".
They didn't have s back then but used x instead and h were pronounced as s.

>An understanding of wellbeing. This is objective.

why is well being the goal? Did you come up with that yourself? if so, then your morality is still subjective.

my morals don't come from a supposed "carrot and stick"

i'm also not claiming everything would go to shit if people stopped believing in god (though look at sweden). I'm just saying that atheist have 0 objective basis for their morals.

I also do not appreciate your arrogance into claiming you have an "understanding of reality", whatever that even means. in the grand scheme of things you know nothing

still not objective

>All books of the bible are anecdotal written 40-50+ years after Jesus supposedly lived

That's what they always say until they dig up something earlier refuting everything they've been claiming.

This guy right here is trying to say somehow he is a better human than I am

Am I not human to you

when did i say that? why do you try and make this about a value judgement? I'm not responding to bait aren't I?

It's called a social contract and natural empathy user.
I don't want people to kill or rape me or my cat or sister.
I can feel empathy for people who have had this done to them and I think behavior like that is horrible.
I don't need a god to not kill and rape, do you really need one to stop you from doing these things?

Well one objective basis for morality being biological is how we survived as a species.
We're a social animal that survived by working together and avoiding behavior that would be detrimental for the tribe, i.e. killing, raping and stealing. These things could fuck up the cohesion of the group and basically spell doom for the tribe, since cooperation is how they survived.
We've just expanded our tribe to include all people and made the social contract for tribal cohesion into law and made arguments for it being moral behavior.

big bang still requires a miracle.....u cant get something from nothing unless we live in a simulation....but even the simulator would need a beginning...its a vicious no answer cirle best to just shrug ur shoulders and go meh dunno.....i once heard some scientist say 'we can explain everything, all we need is one miracle the big bang'.....dont work like that

We don't even know if the big bang came from nothing, so you can't use that as an argument.
So far we've only been able to figure out what happened after the big bang, no one has found any information on what preceded it.
Saying I don't know doesn't automatically mean miracle time.

heres the thing....what was before the big bang......and before that? and that? etc etc it doesnt end

That is a good question and an excellent reason to go into science and trying to figure it out.
My greatest contention with the notion of god, is that people use it to stop investigating things we don't understand yet.
It's basically the difference between asking "Why is the sky blue" and getting "god made it so" from religious people and "That's a good question, lets find out" from science minded people.

Why can't the big bank be a god
Shit a cow in India is a god
The Sun used to be a god back in the day
Planets used to be gods too
When you don't even know what an actual god is yourself

i personally dont have a problem with god and science existing together or not at all or interchangeably i think ya there prob is some sort of a creator....dunno what it is,...that does not mean there is or isnt an afterlife....god and after life are not mutually inclusive

i had a professor say something i found enlightening and cool....we r literally the universe being aware of itself....kinda neat

I'm kind of in the same boat, but on the other side.
I wouldn't mind if a God happened to exist, but I would only credit the notion if people actually had proof of said god.
Would I worship that god? Depends on the character of the god. If it is a sadistic creator who just likes looking at us suffer, like a kid killing ants with a magnifying glass, I would have an imperative to fight this thing.
If it turned out to be a loving creator, that for some reason couldn't stop suffering, how can it be a god?