Is Sup Forums still a Libertarian board?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OKmKVBiGLlk
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

no, Sup Forums is still a hitler board

>mfw people aren't feeling the Johnson

Sup Forums is a contrarian meme board

fuck off faggot with this libertarian shit.

>open borders
>dude weed lmao
>it's totally justified to force people to bake gay wedding cakes against their will

top fucking kek

No, because people here are too retarded to understand that Libertarians can support borders.

I should add
While the NatSoc people have a relative majority on here very very few actually have any grasp of what it is outside of sound bites and claims directly from Nazi era propaganda and are just contrarian conformist aka like Reddit with their Commies that know nothing about it outside of sound bites and old tired propaganda.

Nationalist-Libertarian, not Left-Libertarian.

>open borders
As long as the welfare state is gone. God forbid your NEET ass will have to compete

>dude weed lmao
[freedom intensifies]

>it's totally justified for me to erect strawmen
This is the exact opposite of what libertarians advocate. You have the liberty to serve whomever you want.

Go read up on Johnson's positions. You don't even know what he stands for.

No fuck off trying to figure out how to build roads.

>open borders
>rape the America worker with unrestricted trade
>be a PC pussy

Sup Forums never stood for those things, even back in the day when NatSocs and Libertarians were the two biggest groups

no

Or maybe they would just like to shoot you Jews in the back of the head

I do. Johnson doesn't represent all libertarians. Libertarians generally allow for businesses to reserve the right.

Johnson's like the marketable compromise needed to insert our libertarian johnson into the mainstream.

Left is an economic pov. Nationalism is often the opposite of libertarianism which advocates for individual liberty vs collectivism and tradition

So then why are you arguing from some platonic ideal of libertarianism when the candidate that we're actually talking about it against it? You don't get to do that. His positions are his positions, and he's fucking shit.

no

Every libertarian that posts gets shit on, because libertarian is a retarded ideology, and then they backpetal to the point it's not libertarian anymore.

>so then why are you arguing from a position of power....ahem I mean platonic ideal of libertarianism
You're free to feel Johnson is shit. You should learn to compartmentalize arguments because I nor OP were making a case for johnson. Get wrekt dumbass

Hi Sup Forums,

I am an insider working with Roger Stone. Stone has informed his staff that Hillary and her campaign strategists plan to split the Republican vote by promoting Gary Johnson. This is why you are seeing a greater coverage of the Libertarian candidate on MSM news.

Please ignore these Johnson threads. Copy pasta this text and share with other Sup Forums members in any Shill Johnson threads that appear.

Sincerely,
user

National socialism is maybe a good alternative to libertarian ideas. Just think about it, there's alot of whites that matter alot, and maybe whites have some correlation to importance and success? I dont' know, its just worth considering.

Go for an exxxtreme hike, Gary. You're boring when you're stoned.

No. Libertarianism is unsustainable. Free states cannot exist without taking special care with ethnicity because diversity increases crime and corruption.

Also blacks are unfit for the modern world.

stop speaking for everyone on Sup Forums

fags

Sup Forums is an anti-establishment board, which would usually mean libertarian. But since those guys always lose, it is now a Trump board.

MAGA 100%

>dude weed lmao
I can agree with Johnson there. No need to get triggered because someone else wants to do something you personally get assblasted over. Learn to get the fuck over it if you want to live in a free country and not one of your nat soc nanny state abortions that come and go when people are only being reactionary.

youtube.com/watch?v=OKmKVBiGLlk

let's get this shit started

...

sounds true but without dubs I can't be sure

No. Full on nazi

>lmao who needs laws and shit
>every person is a capable and sane human being
>Other countries don't exist

Enjoy your permanent paranoia :) You can't chemically fuck with your brain with zero consequences, professor.

I still come here.

Sorry Leaf, I like Gary too, but you can't dump the Trump.

Johnson/McAfee would take millennials, urban high income whites, maybe some chauvinistic minorities, tech people, recreational drug users,pro-choice, and then anti government types. That takes on net more from Dems than GOP, and if we take the last poll that included a Libertarian (Johnson), that bears fruit as he "took" 2% more from Hillary.

Grorious nippon

It never was

Johnson is the fucking worst and he goes against everything the libertarian party *should stand for. He's 1% "capitalist" and 99% bleeding heart liberal. There's a reason why people like Rand Paul hate him. He's only "libertarian" because dude weed lmao, and he controls the libertarian party like Hillary controls the dems. I would do anything to see Petersen beat out this piece of shit. Even Bernie is better than Johnson.

The only people here bringing up libertarians only started doing so as an alternative to Trump. So you can take your anti-Trump libertarian shilling somewhere else, you closet Clinton-fag.

>believing in memes

fpbp

Sup Forums was never majorly libertarian, we've always been mostly national socialist

McAfee's a bit too shady and seems sort of opportunistic (joining the libertarian party because it's bigger than his own party).

Trump and Hillary both are extremely unfavorable with millennials, Johnson has tried to appeal to Bernie voters by being anti-establishment and pro-civil liberty. Petersen VP would bring in Cruz voters because he's pro-life and NeverTrump people.

I think they would take from both. Personally if I were American I would vote my principles than for the lesser of two evils.

How new are you?

>triggered

>We need you to help Hillary win

I hope every single one of you neck-beard faggots gets the kick-in you deserve when Trump loses.

DELETE THIS

this

To my libertarian bros,

Which libertarian candidate do you support most? (exluding le happening gramps aka "Ron Paul" because he's retired.)

McAfee is best candidate

*Communist board

Why are you so nervous?

Trump says he doesn't need a unified GOP and will get all the blacks, hispanics and women, so why are you worried about people voting Lbiertarian on principle?

I wish Petersen was 15 years older and wasn't such a smug cunt.

I'm 100% behind McAfee.

>voting for the lelbertarian SJW
Can you faggots get someone else?

It never was, fuck off Ron Paulist.

I actually saw a Gary Johnson sign today.

>johnson as a libertarian candidate
he would fit in nicely on the democratic ticket

This I like Peterson's ideas but he looks like he could go to my college

>unironically opposing social programs so corporations can pinch pennies and squeeze labor while millions of people go without housing and basic necessities

Disgusting

PASS THE STONE

we should have dropped three

third post best post
If Trump wins, Sup Forums will become a lefty board within a year

>le happy weed merchant
DUDE

nope.

ffuuuuuuug......

Based.

liberty IN
canada OUT

why the fuck are YOU even here?

Someone please shut this stupid fucking guy up, third parties are shit and everyone knows it...you eat away at a system from the inside and it's a two party system, just the way it is. There's absolutely no logic in this goofball running.

>Le Ron Paul was a Libertarian meme

Lolno. The Pauls are Constitutionalists.

no, kike

America First.

Once upon a time in Anatolia was a masterpiece.

Newflash: When you overuse and abuse substances, it can have side effects.

Welcome to drugs newfag. Also your post isn't an refutation. You're illustrating my point. Stoners reserve the right to assume risk of their behavior as long as it isn't directly effecting you.

muh feelings isn't a real oppression, tumblrina

only bastards, inbretas and mixlings are lolbertardians.

I'm too white to be such a thing.

You must be new.

2012 Sup Forums was a Ron Paul board. Since then, the quality of the board has diminished. As well as average age of posters, case in point.

I have some libertarian views, but I disagree with other things that are libertarian.

Step 1: see Step 2: fuck off

so was Cruz

Ron Paul is a self described libertarian.

Mind your leaders Germany. You're the last fucking cuntry we should listen to.

>lolberts
>sane
Pick one.

Petersen is probably the strictest libertarian, but McAfee is a memester, so it's a toss-up. McAfee basically hijacked the party and schlonged Johnson which I find hilarious.

But I mean the fact that Johnson slipped up and said he would basically force u to bake the cake makes me wonder if his beliefs are actually grounded in anything tb.h

He's registered to the party.

>blaspheming the one and only king of Sup Forums: Dr. Ron "Lead and Gold" Paul

I'm pretty sure that'd normally be grounds for public execution but we generally don't believe in that here on our libertarian board.

sometimes

Johnson is a fucking faggot. McAfee or bust

>he would rather live a happy slave than die an unhappy freeman
Statist cucks are hilarious

Naw, /leftypol/ already exists.

...

Trump is a statist cuck

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

TRYING TO DEPOWER THE TRUMP MOVEMENT WITH LE THIRD CHOICE THAT WILL JUST MAKE HILLARY WIN

NICE TRY

...