Type "nudist family" into google and see tons of CP. WTF how is this legal?

type "nudist family" into google and see tons of CP. WTF how is this legal?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=1FFIFsK1duw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

CAUSE RULES ONE AND TWO FAGGOT!!!!!

Lol, howd you discover this? Gonna have to delete my history now

>Implying you don't jerk off as well

it's legal because its *not* CP.
Nudity != pornography.

Way to go faggot.
Now all the sjw are going to throw a fit.
Kill yourself you new fag cancer.

i was looking for nudist beach pictures. are they just allowed to show naked kids aslong as they are nudists? who is posting this shit?

i did this on Yahoo so I could find nudes of girls my age (this was like when i was fucking 12)

That is not porn. Porn must be 'sexual' in nature to be "P" for porn.

Simple nudism is not and was never porn, otherwise every classic painting with cherubs is horrific CP going back for centuries.

Gah! why did I do that? time to go bleach my eyes.

Who the fuck didn't know that summerfag?

It is not CP because the P in non-applicable. The depictions are not sexual in nature.

I don't think so matey.

Mods!

>CP

I don't think you understand what that actually is. Nudism isn't porn. There's nothing sexual going on there.

Nudists are protected for the same reason that parents taking pictures of their young children in the bath are.
Its not child pornography if it isnt exploitative and or harmful to the child. Just pictures of nude children isnt illegal but CP is generally exploiting the children and hurting them because their bodies are physically incapable of healthy sex.
Psychologically there is nothing wrong with being nude but there is something wrong with an adult using them for sexual favors.

Therefore, nudists taking pictures of their kids isnt illegal and you can google it.

See you all in prison.

idk man it's still naked kids.

Which there's nothing wrong with if it isn't sexual in nature.

It's not CP, nothing to worry about...right?

Because they aren't sexualized. Not everyone is so retarded that they think nudity = sex.

you're all sick pedo baby rapers

no u

If you try looking up nudist children on google then you can bet your ass you're going to jail.

well if you just google nudist family you wont
Nudist children will definitely get you on a watchlist though

True to a point. There is plenty of CP out there that is solo nude modeling. That occurs when there's a level of suggestiveness rather than simply being nudist or naturist.

Hey, if we all go to prison together, I may not be so lonely anymore!

you're and idiot

By that logic all those naked baby pictures everybody has are illegal. There is nothing wrong with nudity by itself, it's people sexualizing things that makes it wrong.

>you're and idiot
>and idiot
>and
what did he mean by this?

Pornography:
"printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings."

Being naked isn't a sexual thing, it's a perfectly natural and normal state of being. That's the entire creed of nudism.
Viewing such a thing from your prudish, historically Catholicism-based culture and coming to the conclusion that it should be illegal is seriously fucking obnoxious.

I met someone who was arrested for one of those years ago - the guy at walmart who developed the photos turned him in. totally nice family - lives totally fucked up. they got their kid back, but had to spend like $10k on lawyers and shit.

To be honest, i find naked baby pictures to be way worse than the idea of cp (unless its forced cp). A kid could say yes or no, a baby can not

im just saying man. you are telling me that pic related is not pedo bait?

Nigger are you in every pedo-related thread ever?

It's that "level of suggestiveness" that pushes it beyond nudism into child pornography.
When you see those pictures that have been taken in an artificial environment, a photo shoot, there's little doubt it's been tailored for people to jerk off to. It's not the same as some kids enjoying their time at the beach whilst they just so happen to be naked.

Taking pictures with the intent for people to be aroused - seedy as fuck.
Kids playing whilst naked - big fucking deal.

kids swimsuit catalogs are pedobait too. you cant just go outlawing everything pedos fap to

some of these pics really tow the line im saying.

Depends what you mean by "bait".
I think the picture was (at least originally) taken innocently. Friends and family who happen to enjoy being naked. Nothing wrong with that.

That really says a lot more about you and your point of view than anything else.

Examine yourself, paedo.

Yeah I agree. Sure some people do get turned on and use nudist images for sexual pleasure, but that is on them, not on the nature of the image. Some faggots on here jerk it to fully clothed women in normal pics that are totally nonsexual.

why?
Watches at $ 0?

So then why can't we post the pictures on here? That's the question

?

i say go 4 it. it's nonsexual so not porn i guess

mods ban it straight away

People get triggered and make a headache for the host and such.

Good.

Because the rules here aren't strictly governed by legality and they don't want to allow posting in an area where the legal line can be easily crossed.

KEK Dirty Pedo

...

literally pedophilia tbqh

>Madden 2004
DEAD

>trending on buzzfeed
>/r/yiff
>acre removal surgery
>girlfriend ASMR
too much user

Still hard to explain when they come to take you away

So, someone post set? If its légal, you can post it on Sup Forums :)

Because "Porn" is legally defined as "I know it when I see it".

Google this

Girl with tongue out

why would you need to post the pictures here
when they're right there on google?

It's just a bunch of stupid little kids.

prove you can/can't, I guess

What am I supposed to be seeing?

...

so what?

I always kek to this one, anyway also try "girl sitting on lap"

This is surely a trap. It's advertised everywhere on facebook and by cheap cucks like you on forums. If this website really gave out free watches there would be no need for such advertising.

i guess kids giving cock sucking look. i don't know i'm not pedo.

> trying this hard to imply you didnt fap to it

My reaction was an almost audible
Ahhhhhh

...

You're picking the odd pictures out lol

Not even that much, just search "nudism". Not specific at all, yet CP is all that is found

theyre the only interesting ones. the tongue ones i understand, but you have to be a really really desperate fucker to get off to girls sitting on laps

Where is your imagination

youtube.com/watch?v=1FFIFsK1duw

in next thread: OP discovering bing.com and jpg4.us

I understand the legality of it. Not being sexual or whatever.

But if it's that easy then why isn't Sup Forums full of "CN" I would have thought someone would treat it as a loophole.

They charge $15 shipping on the supposed "free" watches. They are Chinese tier watches that you could find on eBay for under $4 with free shipping. They just overcharge on the shipping and take the remainder as profit.

because posting pictures of children that the mods know entice people to fap is against the rules.

>thinks a "loophole" is relevant on Sup Forums
>thinks mods need a legit reason to ban anyone

Wtf bing

"free shipping" at $15, lol, obvious trap

It isn't, you are now on a watch list and the FBI will be deployed to your home shortly.

Hope you like prison, user, 'cos you're going to be there for a good while.

what happens if you buy 10?

ahh what its like to be young and naive again

you can find all sorts with bing image search.

There's nothing illegal about nudism itself, but websites like pure.nudism are a bit fishy.