G/fur

g/fur

...

who put the bump

...

hey how are ya

Anyone whose social circle is mostly furries feel like it's a weird and toxic environment?

...

...

hey, do we have a discord for g/fur?
If not I can make one tomorrow

Always the same pictures. It is almost as if it is one person spamming these threads because he is such a pathetic faggot that he literally has nothing better to do.

I'd consider killing yourself if this is how you waste your time

I remember there being one, but I don't think it is g/fur specific

If I was a woman,
would you still respect me
if I said that I was 'enjewing' the shit+posting?

I probably wouldn't

ah okay, I'll ask tomorrow during daylight hours and we'll see then.

Make one!

Why is this so hot?

What's discord?

That's the reason my social circle isn't mostly furries. I saw enough toxic retardation just as an observer to the online community to know I don't want it infecting my real life. Any fringe group attracts a larger than typical concentration of mental cases.

Essentially just a more modern chatroom

...

I'll set it up tomorrow, and post invite links in the afternoon. 1:20 am here and not feeling up to it.
skype but with less features but that's a good thing
my best friend's a furry, I don't really have a social circle

I thought so. I had to ask because I don't see the point when you can just talk here.

>Having a social circle
Heh Heh

Well, it is a bit faster

DM is fun, I like meeting new people

...

I got into the habit talking to furries online back in high school. I've always felt like I could relate to furries more, on some levels at least. Eventually they naturally became my offline social circle too.

It's not really that they're nutcases, but they're generally very dismissive of any conventional standard of success or fulfillment. Everything's just a construct, and OK, but there's something nice about having more than hedonism and nihilism right?

Mostly just saying this cause maybe someone will relate.

On one hand I probably should prioritize my non furry friends, but they don't relate to how deviant I honestly am. I guess that's the whole paradox of it; if you don't celebrate your degeneracy you're being fake to an extent, but celebrating destroys any hope you might have for not being ultra apathetic and valueless

A really shitty chat used by people who can't take 10 seconds to learn IRC

...

IRC is dead as fuck, and I say this as someone who would have called it alive a few years ago.

As furries, y'all should just be using telegram anyway

...

>images
>people
I like telegram

A chat client geared towards gamers as it offers free voice chat channels alongside text channels(supports image posting/linking). Considering the age-old alternatives like Ventrilo and Teamspeak required money to rent a server it really took off once word got around.

I'm probably a bit older than most posting here. I've very rarely known any furries in person. High school it was basically unheard of. I keep up offline with a handful of other furries and I'm social with them beyond sharing animal dong pictures. Basically like any other friend.

Wasn't trying to imply that furries are all nutcases either, just pointing out that any fringe group or subculture will tend to attract the nutcases.

Sure, and I don't mean to deny that it has its share of nutcases either.

Just not sure where to go to generally muse on dynamics in the fandom

...

...

The paint on my 15th painting cracked and peeled off so I had to reapply the color. I also started a new drawing and I feel like I've already hit a breaking point with my work. That's not to say that the previous paintings have been negated, rather I'm discovering even newer areas to explore.

>IRC is dead as fuck
Have you ever been in #Sup Forums? Shit's active. So many active networks, too. Anthrochat, rizon, furnet, efnet, ircnet

telegram is even worse than discord though
it's for phoneposters

...

mumble
murmur

into the cute folder you go

pc chatting master race huh
I haven't, furnet and anthrochat seem really dead to me though. what channels do you like on those two?

I've never actually made a discord before so this is kind of weird

David met both the fellow he lost his virginity to and his current boyfriend on telegram. David is an insane person, but still.

#zoo
Though to be honest I haven't been on either of those two networks for a few months, since my life has unfortunately been busy. But their room lists aren't that sparse, IIRC.

And oh yeah, if you do like Sup Forums, you really should join #Sup Forums.

Look up Alty on FA

thanks for the tip

Eh, I'm the guy who's fairly disillusioned with the fandom itt, and I don't feel such a strong identification with Sup Forums either, so I was just wondering without any plans on getting back into the scene. I only use google hangouts, facebook and discord for a single music related group

a bit too much of a pussy to be in zoo anyway, honestly. Not surprised the sex related chats are holding up though, but it's pointless.

I'm not a fandom guy either, just here to share porn and have conversations

...

still not enough dog dong

...

I thought I'd never been in the fandom, but seven years after I began fapping to it, it seems I joined the fandom this year. Oh well. I have fun socialising!
I see, though. You should really consider joining those channels, but that's your choice.

I might. I like talking to furries and I like the porn. I'm weird though, I don't like combining the two very much, and feel there's too much casual sexuality between furries for my taste. Anyway just pretty ambivalent

I was going to ask if anyone wanted to help me set up the discord but it's 2 now so I'll do it tomorrow. See ya

Horse dong>dog dong

I understand.
I myself am a free love sorta person. I wish people recognised that sex is a social activity, like chatting, chilling, playing vidya, or the like.

dog personality > horse personality

...

bull shit friend, no horse dong can beat the sweet feeling of a knot on a dog dong

horses are for butts
canines are for dongs

Same artist?
More of this

i think different artist, but i is not shore

I haven't personally met any horses but my dog is my best friend so I gave to give you that.
I just think horse dongs look nicer.

Yeah, I respect that. Every furry I know agrees with you too. There's no good argument against that.

Lately I've been trying to figure out why I feel differently. It makes me feel pretty alienated in the fandom and sort of depressed, not to be too self pitying, but anyway that makes it seem like something I need to figure out for myself. I'm really clueless as to why I feel as I do though

The GSD is by truegrave9.
Not sure on the other.

Lucky you: 99% of furries I know are normies. Complete normalfags. Nearly Christian. Monogamous. Boring.

the other is okunawa

Your body is a very personal thing. It's understandable that you want to save it for someone you're intimate with.
Sometimes I feel that way, other times I just want to fuck. I don't know, I guess I'm weird.

>Sometimes I feel that way, other times I just want to fuck.
I know this feel.

Where the fuck do you live? I've met TONS of furries, only met one that was ever like me

It might be because I meet most furries through other ones that I know, but I doubt it cause it seems like it's the main folks in the local community

I only resent you equating monogamous and christian to normalfag and boring a little bit. Based on my perspective, it's 100% the opposite, and if you try to look at your community objectively and notice promiscuity's more common than not, maybe you shouldn't phrase it like that either.

The USA, which is a Christian nation.
Specifically, slightly north of Miami.

How long do I have to wait for portal technology?

I didn't mean to conflate those either: I simply meant the furries I know are ALL those things.
But no, promiscuity is not common in religious nations like the USA or Saudi Arabia.

...

I mean, you don't have a point when you consider that the fandom isn't representative of most people. But maybe you do have a point if you mean to say that furries seek refuge from mainstream conventions through the fandom. But still, I shouldn't have to be seen both as an oppressive majority /and/ be in the minority when I'm with other furries, all I did was like anthro animals without adopting what I suppose is just a gay convention

I understand. Recently enough I also noticed something that may benefit you. Gay people (especially SJWs) are pushing for gay marriage and hardcore monogamy.
I think it hurts gay people, but it may help you.

How would monogamy and wanting marriage be harmful to homosexuals?

"Recently," but sure. I think it would help integrate gay and straight people, and for that reason and for my own selfish reasons, gay marriage is probably the only issue I feel particularly confident in giving a fuck about.

I guess I can only speak from experience, but as a gay person, it's at least helping one of us.

Marriage is simply a religious and statist construct with no benefits inherent to itself.
It also raises taxes for singles.
In intention, gay marriage is just an attempt to get gays to participate in more judaeo-christian practices.

True. The thing is, I think this integration is negative, and it'd be better to see straight people integrate into gay society, if any integration had to happen at all.

Not really. Marriage exists across multiple cultures in both the East and West. Marriage was a necessity with the rise of society in the west to allow the man to be sure that the child he was providing for was his own. This was in a time before DNA tests. The woman provided monogamy, meaning that she would only reproduce with the one person, and in exchange the man would provide food and shelter for that woman and their offspring. Marriage has evolved over time to bring into itself the religious aspect.

I disagree, I feel marriage is mostly divorced (yuck yuck) from religion these days.

While I'm closest to agnostic, I feel people are drawn to and probably need to an extent structure, ideology and stability. Institutions may not be "true," but they are to a pragmatist. Something "true" like hedonism or nihilism fails to provide those things. I'll be glad when gay people aren't seen as outsiders, and therefore don't bar themselves from the metrics that define others' success

Marriage does exist in multiple cultures, but the marriage common today comes mostly from one of those. I don't think any form of marriage I know of is okay though.
And hopefully gay people are smart enough to not be raising kids.
>I feel people are drawn to and probably need to an extent structure, ideology and stability
I think they're fooled into that. I think if they were never shoved into it, they'd never feel a desire for it. Most people have individualism hammered out of them in their lifetime.
>I'll be glad when gay people aren't seen as outsiders
Same.
>metrics that define others' success
What are these metrics? Aren't these subjective?

Why the fuck are you opposed to integration of homosexuals into the majority? I feel your thinking is fundamentally flawed in that you make a distinction between homosexuals and heterosexuals. Gay and straight has absolutely no importance in the West. There are only people. What you put your wiener in or what you want in your vagina or butthole or whatever doesn't matter. Sexual attraction as a defining characteristic of a person is completely pointless. It's an arbitrary distinction at this point.

Why would you not want homosexuals to raise children?

Because the majority right now is more fucked up than gay people are fucked up, right now. It's not caused by sexuality, but it's mostly caused by homosexuals usually not being religious, and heterosexuals usually being religious, in this religious nation, the USA.
I don't think gay people need to integrate into Christian society.
I said they might be smart enough to know that raising kids is not a good idea unless you have the very specific mindset to not dislike it.

...

STOP CIRCLEJERKING AND POST PORN YOU LITERAL FUCKING SUMMERFAGS

>HOLY SHIT

They're subjective, but there's an objective difference between observing some metric and observing none. Sure, many people won't prioritize their standards for sex, and will emphasize others instead like their career. But, as far as sex and relationships go, I think monogamy suggests "standards," while promiscuity doesn't. I'm not as off-put for the record when people are casual sexually when they emphasize other parts of their life.

What I notice more in the fandom is just a general rejection of structure, ideology and stability- so, any metrics, sexual or otherwise. I disagree that people are fooled into that. After all, how can you expect to feel content with yourself if you have nothing to measure yourself against? Sure, whatever, it's just a feeling and it can be brought about however it can be. But in my experience, it only comes about through structure.

For the record, most of the people I know that reject the concept of standards barely scrape by. I do too... so maybe it's irrelevant

THIS ISNT YOUR FACEBOOK GEN Z FAGGOTS GET OUT

...

what it this tl;dr existential drivel? what the fuck don't you newfags understand about a PORN THREAD>!?

fucking kill yourselves if you save and post bullshit convo and no porn

>just a general rejection of structure, ideology and stability
Reminds me of a great guy: Max Stirner
>After all, how can you expect to feel content with yourself if you have nothing to measure yourself against?
By trying to be the best person you can be, only for yourself, and no one else.
>reject the concept of standards
I mean
I have some standards as for who I'll fuck, but they're informal and only mine.

if you want no discussion

lol he right tho. fucking newfag esix isn't a board you stupid cunt.

The idea of a "gay society" is inherently abhorrent and disgusting to me. I only see society. I only see people as a whole. There are subcultures, but those are all informed by the overall society that the subculture exists within. We do not live in a Christian society. We live in a secular society. Most of the religious talk you see about featured in federal things, such as the Under God in the flag and on the money was placed there specifically as a fuck you to the USSR. Our nation was not founded by Christians or on Christian morality. The first amendment of the Constitution specifically establishes religious freedom, Jefferson wrote in his letters about the need to keep the church and the state separate.

Nobody should raise children unless they want to.

Can't we have porn with discussion?