Where do you stand politically /b?
Where do you stand politically /b?
die commie scum
Yes
heard you liked free stuff OP...
Let's see where your fascist ass lands then.
...
>70 questions
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFUCK OFF
no u
Look at how sensible and boring I am
nigger
This is fairly accurate.
>Muh redpill
...
Jesus fucking Christ you are far-centrest. There's no hope for you.
Kek
>far-centrest
>centrest
C'mon man...
I'm satisfied with this.
...
G'day Comrades
You are a idiotic child
jesus, if it's possible to be an extremist moderate, its you
Basically you have tumblr politics
You're my nigger OP.
Hello Trumptard.
...
...
...
...
>Trump
>NeoCon
You have no idea what you're talking about moron
>idiotic child
Why are conservatives such insufferable cunts? This is especially confusing since you're all juvenile edgelords yourselves. The liberal normies from your high school don't like you so you swing way over to the opposite direction as part of your rebellion against them.
looks like I'm a big ole fascist.
Why are liberals such smug self-righteous masturbatory jackoffs?
Serious question.
Not at all.
Most of us really aren't. Serious answer.
Yeah, fairly accurate.
>looks like I'm a big ole faggot
ftfy
OP here, finally an updated version of my results.
...
You and I would get along just fine.
Most aren't, you see groups and organizations are comprised of individuals in pursuit of common interest, but you idiotic liberals fail to realize that, therefore blanket idiotic statements such as yours occur.
I got what most would call, 'common sense'.
This is a comfy thread. R8 me.
...
muh glorious leaders!
>condemns blanket idiotic statements
>makes a blanket idiotic statement in the same sentence
wew
...
>I still think liberal = all leftists
Read up some before you insult people. None of us agree with the Democrats. There's nothing libertarian or socialist about them.
Mah comrades...
...
...
...
Am I a SJW?
>Economic centrist
>Slightly liberal leaning
>tumblr
Do you know what any of these words mean.
accurate
What blanket statement did I make, that individuals form collective groups? Mancur Olson garbage can model, individuals will tend to not form collectives unless motivated by personal gain, economic, power or other, in forming groups individuals surrender part of their initial power and competitiveness for cooperation thus concede to pursue the common goal. While that works for small groups, large ones, such as parties, will have to ensure individual gain on all levels of participation.
Or that liberals disregard this- the very facet of modern liberalism is equality, usually ensured and secured by the state, there is no individual gain, all that must be secured is the "common good". Groups do not facilitate or ensure individual "profit", society is divided between large social groups-oppressed and oppressor, divided on several strata-economic, social, religious, gender, even territory (center, periphery) and society must lessen the gap between this divisions.
You clearly have no idea what are the basic propositions of your ideology.
Again I ask what blanket statement
...
Seriously, fuck liberals. They pretend to represent equality and workers, but are controlled by bankers and capitalists.
If it weren't for liberals we'd have socialism back in FDR's day.
>Hurr durr we can't afford socialism
That's what they said during the leftist populist uprising in the 30s and 40s when we were pushing for a 40-hour work week, workers comp, union rights, and a safe work place. We immediately became more successful.
...
Old one
New one
tl;dr
>libertarian
>communist
Is it even a thing? How the fuck you have a communist society with no government?
Fairly consistent.
>be me
>spend solid 12 hours tripping on acid last night
>fucking around with a hammer and sickle on pixel canvas between games last night
>Turns out I'm a dirty fucking commie
Sorry for fucking with your-
O-our shit.
C-comrades.
hmm
...
...
...
Libertarian, in this context, means that the state does not intervene on issues of morality.
US Libertarianism typically is a bastardization of the word. It typically means pro-gay, pot-smoking right wing populists.
This guy gets it.
Go back to r/neolibral you capitalist pig.
And yer another empirical example of liberals being idiotic children. I should really use this or some other ideology quiz and formulate a questionnaire that measures maturity, this hypothesis seems more and more valid
SIMPLY THE MOST RATIONAL
I'm coming for your precious property.
>liberals being idiotic children
I stopped reading there
>empirical example
Tihi
Stay with the traditions that you know about.
Let the science to the progressive ones will you.
About right
You still didn't answer me how the fuck someone can be a communist and a libertarian. Communism means no private property. Who is gonna enforce that I cannot keep some property to myself, even if I don't need it (I am a greedy jew btw)?
Still the most revolutionary in this thread.
I still don't see anything wrong with pro gay pot smoking right wing populists.
Don't really care what the other axis say.
But I guess we can all agree that the ones with big-blue authority block are humongous faggots.
...
Actually, friend, communism according to Marx has no state. It's exactly for this reason that LibComs, not Marxist-Leninists, are most suited to usher in such a society. If you have questions, I can try and answer them for you.
>Let the science to the progressive ones will you.
I have no idea what you were attempting to say but I have a bachelor's degree in poli sci and minored in economics, saving up for a masters, probably quantitative methods and econ modelling, we'll see
No friend, you're a decent person
They're certainly better than right-wingers that hate gay people and weed, but right now, it seems that we need a true leftist government to sort out the extreme inequality we're seeing.
Got the same user
Jesus, I got a libertarian socialism result with a 92% progress bias. Revolution now. Let's Smash the State
Thanks, I am actually curious. In a anarcho-communist society, what could prevent others to take property that I consider mine? (e.g. I raised some livestock to feed my family, and some asshole steal it to feed his)
As a pro gay pro pot socialist, i guess it isn't so bad
Comrades need to deal with these fascists
Libertarian =/= Anarchist
>Communism means no private property
You are right, kinda. Communism draws a distinction between "Private Property" and "Personal Property."
Yeah, that Macbook you are using is YOURS and YOURS only. The state will defend your right to own it. You don't own companies. You don't own roads, or farms. But you do own your own personal shit.
nigger, you cant own private property in any case.
sure, you can put a shitload of money down and theyll let you stick your name over the door for a while, but stop paying your tax rent to the US government, and see who really owns your property. doesnt matter if youve paid it off to the bank or not. you die, and if you dont leave it to another qualified rent payer, right back into the gov's hands it is. they dont have to buy it from you, because its theirs. their laws still apply to it. you dont get to just make up your own laws and claim its your private land.
My man
Pretty balanced over here.
A hint then before you start any reasearch project.
Learn the meaning of empirical.
(what you think it means is quite the opposite of empirical, aka anecdotal)
> Wrong: And yer another empirical example of liberals being idiotic children.
> Correct: And yer another anecdotal example of liberals being idiotic children.
Dumb to spend your fathers hard earned cash on an education just to fail on the most basic of things.
like all the survey sights, it leans left. they pegged me and a neocon. WTF? not even close
...
Incompetent.
lolwat
Anarcho-Communist can't work, unfortunately. The power-vacuum would be filled nearly immediately, probably by fascists and capitalists.
Now Libertarian Communism can. You need central planning for certain core industries as well as scientific enterprises, but the govt won't get involved in moral choices.
Rate me.
THIS. This is exactly the difference between Communism and Capitalism. (in both, you can have personal property, but in Capitalism, only the elite have PRIVATE property)
Capitalism involves the banks owning nearly all your private assets, except your personal belongings.
Communism the public (including you) own all the resources, except you own your personal belongings.