Mehmet of Akkad

Can we reach a consensus once and for all that this low energy patreon slug only goes after low hanging fruit?

He gets rekt in any "discussion" where someone disagrees with him that isn't a full blown SJW retard.

The same thing applies to the majority of these youtubers that got popular off the Anti-SJW kick that refuse to step their intellectual game up. The longer people listen to these entry level types, the more they handicap theirselves from making honest stances and arguments.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Vyj4xRDXMGw
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

WE HAVE THIS THREAD EVERY DAY

...

Hopefully like all shit british personalities we'll export him to the US

Because it's Sargon himself making the threads.

someone post him saying he isn't a cuck bc he raised someone else's child.

Fuck Sargon. Only a man, and a man bleeds the same as everyone else.

Him, Milo and all these other autists can fucking die

Leftism and feminism are low hanging fruit

Hes a hypocrite who loves science when its about gender differences but goes full retard when it comes to racial differences.

Hes part nigger somewhere down the line and has a anti european mindset that often slips through the cracks when hes pushed too much

In short a total faggot

He's a labour socialist too

-A leftist Bernie supporter who happens to be against SJW
-Makes 40 minutes long rants about irrelevant shit someone said on their twitter

Just watch Paul Joseph Watson - top notch arguments, short videos, always on point.

He's part "African," which he just immediately assumes means black. His ancestor is from North Africa though.

sargon frequently addresses the log hanging fruit point

the REAL low hanging fruit are random tumblr posters, random twitter posters, random SRSphere reddit posters

he more goes after journalists, commie professors/teachers, media personalities that do have impact (to the point of being able to shill their shit to the UN)

the only reason you don't like him is that he isn't racist (or at least isn't overtly racist), and if he was he'd lose every non-Sup Forums subscriber anyway

he knows his grandfather was full black

Practically touches the ground. If it was any lower it would be a fucking pig snare.

Hes has the "i am a minority" mindset despite being a stereotypical white fat neckbeard loser.

Hes the equal to your "hurr durr i am 1/64 native american!" faggots

I have already answered this. He has no idea, he says himself that he just "believes" he was black.

Nice fucking strawman at the end there. I'm not racist, and I don't dislike him because he isn't one. I dislike him because he is an intellectual cripple that slugs look up to because they are too lazy to form their own point of view or argument.

>-A leftist Bernie supporter who happens to be against SJW
He hates Bernie for pandering to Black Lives Matter, It's been that way a while, calling Bernie supporters cucks.

No, I don't like him because every fucking video of his is one of three things:

>LOOK AT WHAT THIS CRAZY COLLEGE KID SAID?!?!! CAN YOU BELIEVE IT?
or
>LOOK AT WHAT THIS OBSCURE FEMINIST SAID?!?! CAN YOU BELIEVE IT?!?!
or
>LISTEN TO ME READ AND RAMBLE ABOUT CURRENT EVENTS EVERYBODY KNOWS ABOUT AND SPEND 30 MINUTES STATING THE OBVIOUS AND WHETHER OR NOT I LIKE IT

This exactly. Sup Forums hates anyone that doesn't agree with them 100% in most cases. They'll tell you no, but actions speak louder than words.

answered this how? you're putting forth an assertion with no evidence, when I remember him specifically talking about his grandfather being black

your post made it sound like you didn't actually know it was his grandfather specifically, "ancestor" sounds more removed than grandparent

you're basically saying he didn't know his grandfather, doesn't have any picturs of him, etc. do you have any proof?

I am never going to understand this logic. Why support someone that you have this kind of difference with? Why support someone who stands for the same shit you have been campaigning against for your entire YouTube career?

This post just false though, it's literally the same as people who apologize for Islamic extremism.

>hurr durr not ALL muslims are like that tho!!!!!

Sup Forums hates faggots who deny the obvious and hes one of them which became clear with his stance on muslims and immigration in the UK coupled with the rape gang incidents

You're obviously remembering wrong. Sargon said plainly that he was a North African, and is only assuming he is black.

He didn't know him.

The guy regularly namedrops Sup Forums and complains about us being "right-wing bigots."

it's not a strawman of Sup Forums's position of him, because for 90% of them that's the reason they have. it seems you have a different opinion but it's probably influenced by the general Sup Forums opinion with some other reasons post-rationalized on top of it

I'm not sure how much of an intellectual cripple he is, but he doesn't have enough experience to properly argue against high-tier SJW sophists and generally gets destroyed by them (such as in his recent stream)

>that slugs look up to because they are too lazy to form their own point of view or argument.
what opinions of his do you disagree with other than racial ones?

That is category one bullshit, my friend. Don't make generalizations. If you have spent more than a week on Sup Forums, the first thing you learn is to protect yourself from the echo chamber trap.

>my memory vs your memory
I'm going to go with my memory then, until you can come up with proof

cripple chan blew his ass out of the water several times including some of the gamergate boards at the time so now he throws a hissyfit regarding user boards

'The obvious' to you people is always what you happen to think. His response to al of these incidents have been level headed. He didn't sperg out and declare all non-whites to be subhuman vermin like you want him to, so he's 'denying the obvious' now to you.

Dr. Danglers is better.

why dont you start youtube channel then and show us all how its done

He isn't wrong. You are bigots in the actual meaning of the word. You aren't open to ideas contrary to your own.

>He didn't sperg out and declare all non-whites to be subhuman vermin like you want him to, so he's 'denying the obvious' now to you.

Yeah but then someone made this and he sperged out in the comment section calling everyone who disagreed with him/posted facts that hurt his feelings a stormfronter

youtube.com/watch?v=Vyj4xRDXMGw

Hes not level headed hes a pretentious asshole

>Don't make generalizations.
Tell that to the rest of Sup Forums.

>You are
>You aren't
>You

>''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''Libertardian Realist''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>Uses phrenology as an argument

toplul

Sargon using his proxy again

I haven't touched on the racial shit this entire time, so you need to drop that. I have had a problem with him for a long time for reasons to numerous to count.

His success has given him a big fucking head for one thing. Which is unbecoming of a lowly dreg like him. Needs to be humbled on the quick quick.

For another, he has created a community that worships him like a cult leader. They hang on every word he says and they go to him for guidance. One: this scares the shit out of me, thinking that he could have that kind of influence on people freshly woken from SJW nonsense to the point they blindly believe all his opinions. Two: this community had a sort of lazy culture to it. You make videos where you lay down commentary over some retard teen-early twenties kid's video going on an autistic rant and profit from it. It gives incentive to be sit on your ass and parrot the same arguments ad nauseum for patreon bucks.

Libertarian Realist is a classic case of collectivist generalizations masquerading under the pseudo-intellectual label of libertarianism. He can go kill himself. His opinions hold no water to me.

You just described every youtuber's fan base. You've also described most of Sup Forums. Every community has lazy elements in it.

>His opinions hold no water to me

Good thing that he posted stats about the epidemic of paki inbreeding be it in pakistan or the UK then

Fanboys are the downfall of all these jewtoob celebs. I'm so fucking sick about hearing little kids obsess over these dumb fucks. I hope we have threads like this all day every day, until everyone hates him. I fucking hate them all.

Alright? So what? Get rid of the trouble makers. Don't paint all Pakis with the same brush.

I have a problem with group mentality taking over individual thought. I don't know what specifically it is about Sargon that I can point out that couldn't be applied to others, but all that does is lump him in with the slime.

he defends jews, what more is there to say?

Jews will always be preferable to Mudslimes, just by the fact that they are literally 11 million people and not 1.6 billion and aren't pouring en masse into Europe to replace the native culture.

Amen, brother.

>Can we reach a consensus once and for all that this low energy patreon slug only goes after low hanging fruit?
Certainly

He is, without a doubt, the king of Sup Forums and he should forever re-branded as such

Everybody should back this Idea and here is why.

a) It's a way for his fanboys on this sight to show their love for him
b) It will piss him off to no end which will amuse his detractors

Everybody wins

so you can't point out a single opinion of his that you disagree with.

your argument is "I don't like that people who espouse their opinions become popular and end up with people them"

he doesn't need to be humbled really because he already is every now and then by a SJW who knows how to argue at an extremely high academic level

> don't know what specifically it is about Sargon that I can point out that couldn't be applied to others
and into the trash it goes

>Don't paint all Pakis with the same brush.

Or how about they stop acting like subhuman scum be it in their home country and abroad?

Not my job to take everyone in and give him a chance. This mindset has already caused too much damage to the west

He's the other side of the Anita coin. Him and all the other Youtube "Support me on Patreon" pseudo-intellectuals.
He doesn't support individual thinking, he and others like him just want to create their own echo chambers in which they can be looked upon with admiration by the politically illiterate and children in order to take money from their pockets. He's just pandering to people who think they're 'too smart' for feminism and other things.

Him and the other cucks all banding together to support a charity was one of the most vile things they've done. They didn't do it out of a genuine care for people struggling with real equality issues, they only did it so they could create 40 minutes videos exclaiming how much better they are than Anita or another irrelevant tumblr whore.

plz no. first piers morgan and then current year man, we've had enough

Jews are the reason muzzies are pouring into Europe, baka.

Also funny enough they exploit third world women just like feminists when using them for a appeal to emotion.

Sarcuck, Thundercuck and the gaming cancer cuck who are all brits could have used the chance to help the local rape victims but like feminists they steer away from muslim rape

if he wanted to create echo chambers he wouldn't frequently hold debates with SJWs, not only ones below him or at his level but ones far above his level

this is something that echo chamberists specifically do not do. because that's not an echo chamber. you will never see anita discussing anything with someone who doesn't share her view. you will only see her preaching to the choir at SJW conventions and in comments-disabled youtube videos

Swallow the rest of that sentence.

not until you remake your thread to complain about people who have popular youtube channels in general

>Jews are the reason muzzies are pouring into Europe, baka.

Sure Mohammad.

>Can we reach a consensus once and for all
Probably no

>low energy patreon slug
>low hanging fruit
>He gets rekt in any "discussion"
All of this!

>The longer people listen to these entry level types, the more they handicap theirselves
Possibly

There's no point. You'll just pick out what you want from what I say all the same.

>We'll deal with the far right once we're done with the SJW
What did he mean by this?

who is Milo Yiannopoulos/Stefan Molyneux

He is no better than the people he complains about, censorship only when its in his favour. Removal of pertinent discussion. He is the biggest cuck I've ever seen

he's actually a mossad agent.501

you haven't said anything about sargon in general. you specifically admitted you don't have anything to say about sargon except he has a following that hangs on his word, and maybe that he's not very intelligent (but you can't actually point to which views of his that you disagree with, despite complaining about how his userbase can't form a nuanced philosophy on their own)

where's your nuanced philosophy and its contradictions with sargon's beliefs?

he's just another internet commentator who enjoys the sound of his own voice far too much.

Its gonna end like the day tumblr tried to invade Sup Forums

he hasn't removed videos where he gets BTFO by sjws

Internet culture is autism.

Can we reach the consensus that youtube faggots need to be banned from this board?

Sargon is afraid of becoming too controversial, because that would mean no youtube partnership, no patreon money, and a polarized fanbase, who I'm sure he believes will become "violent".

It's much easier to pick on "low hanging fruit", aka, radfems who your average person doesn't like anyways.
It would be very difficult for him to talk more on subjects that require more thought and research. Plus, as I've said above, are too "sensitive" even for the staunch anti-SJW types.

I also think he's a bit insecure about his african ancestry. One of the reasons why he refuses to be a "racial realist".

None of them give a shit about the actual problems women have faced in recent memory. They will avoid any opinion that would see a decrease in their patreon money.

His level is rock bottom. Its much the same as that retarded interview that Gavin did where he just grabbed some random woman who clearly had no fucking idea (and said as much) what was going to happen and then just threw random statistics around. Sarcuck just points out retarded people to other retarded people but assures them that they're super smart for not being in the former camp of retards.

These people are the parasites that come with any rise in a political movement. He and others are no different to Anita, they are riding the wave of counter culture to fill their pockets and have created the modern day version of a fedora tipping atheist that Dawkins did years go.

He's a 'Middle of the road, I am above having extreme opinions because I am enlightened by my superior intellect' faggot. Nothing more and nothing less.

whether or not he's a racial realist deep down, he will never be one publicly

and if he doesn't actually believe what he says on race, then you're right he hides it because he would lose all his allies and all his money and all his credibility. you just can't be openly racist and get anywhere

radfams are no longer low hanging fruit because they are getting more and more things under their control. the true low hanging fruit in this regard are tumblr posters, twitter posters and SRS posters. which he doesn't really go after in comparison to ones that actually have media influence

>It would be very difficult for him to talk more on subjects that require more thought and research.
his entire reason for creating his channel was to speak out against SJWs. you want his channel to change topics?

>Its much the same as that retarded interview that Gavin did where he just grabbed some random woman who clearly had no fucking idea (and said as much) what was going to happen and then just threw random statistics around

Except that Gavin was right on about the stuff he talked about and she was a walking lefty stereotype which is why it was so funny to watch

wew

>He's a 'Middle of the road, I am above having extreme opinions because I am enlightened by my superior intellect' faggot. Nothing more and nothing less.
so the same old "I don't like sargon because he isn't openly racist" talking point

you didn't actually address my point as to the key difference between, just re-asserted yourself with no actual arguments. he would debate any high-tier SJW who would debate him (which is to say, basically none of them). he would debate anita if she would accept, but she would never accept. he got BTFO by a doctorate SJW in the last month. do you think anita would ever have a debate with ben shapiro or anyone?

SJWs keep twitter blocklists that recursively search followers to make sure to block anyone who follows anyone who has the wrong view. that's the real essence of echo chambers.

In his attempt to be seen as reasonable or that he's open to changing his views, there is little remaining by comparison to what he has removed.

>he more goes after
Nice 8 year old grammar. Typical Sargon fan.

>there is little remaining by comparison to what he has removed.
could only possibly be true regarding videos from years and years ago. it's not true for his modern videos

how many of 2015's videos has he removed? 1? 0?

I doubt you even pay enough attention to his channel to be able to accurately say something like this

>I am above having extreme opinions
Not even extreme opinions, he thinks having an exactly middle "non-position" is automatically correct.

He responds well to authority. If the BBC tells him race is a social construct, he will say "well, it must be at least somewhat true, but since I don't want to pick a side it must be exaggerated."

In almost every situation he concedes that something "exists," but claims that it means nothing. This means he enables liars and automatically refuses to listen to criticism, since you can make something up and he will never accept the possibility that it is entirely false, just partially false. He will always concede that:

1. Racism is a serious problem.
2. You need the government to pay for healthcare.
3. Communism has never really been tried.
4. Gender is a social construct with no basis in biology.
5. The "refugees" are Syrians fleeing war.
6. All races are the same.
7. Rape culture is real.
8. White privilege is real.
9. Most Muslims are "moderates" and the violence is only a small subset of terrorists
10. Terrorism is caused by white racism.

In an argument he will never concede that these are made up entirely because that is taking a side in the question of true or false. As long as you introduce an idea he will never outright reject it, just try to find a "balance." It makes him look like a god-damned moron in the subject he specializes in. He preferred opponents just pile on theories made up on the spot, so he can never really refute them. One of his primary complaints about "right-wingers" is that they will wholly dismiss something like "rape culture," as though it must exist in some capacity just because someone mentioned it.

If you've seen him try to debate, he concedes to feminists on every point. He just raises his voice and yells at conservatives for wrongthink. Guy's a moron and his whole thought process makes him sympathetic to the weird social justice theorycraft.

Fantastic argument. You sure showed him.

Mister Metokur is pretty much the only good Sup Forums e-celeb, but the butt fucker stopped posting videos. I guess you can't fuck big tits asian gf and make videos at the same time... oh wait

Gavin is doing the exact same thing lots of other people are doing, He's playing the counter culture card to get views and money. Lots of what he said was followed up by "I don't know the statistics but..." even most of his youtube videos are him just giving circumstantial evidence at best or at worst just fabricating shit to support his argument.
The woman was a complete walking stereotype but Gavin gave her no forewarning on what the interview was going to be about or how he would be going. That is just bad play. It's no better than the leftists who jump people in the street with a camera and start asking questions, the person is going to be off guard and a little bewildered.

He's willing to debate them because he (and any sane person) knows they're wrong. Anita won't debate him because she's a con artist and she knows it. He'll gladly debate people who hold stances that are obviously wrong and take no effort to prove wrong.

He fucks up every now and again by debating people who actually know how to debate. I highly doubt he'd agree to debate someone who he knew would rape him on his own show. It's all a created hustle to ensure he's seen as a paragon of intellectual purity and keep those patreon £££ coming.

I also don't care if he is racist or not, his views are middle of the road tripe.

He's a product of the culture of critique. Like almost all other youtube intellectuals, he's nothing but a mere contrarian and it actually shows how clueless he is whenever he steps outside his usual topics of feminism and social justice. I don't have a problem with him as long as he stays in these topics, but his views on real politics are just hopeless. His one video about the refugee crisis last year was the pinnacle, it's as if he has read out a huffpost article. But what do you expect from a literal cuck and fat neckbeard?

I guarantee my grammar is better than the average Sup Forums poster, considering you see shit like its/it's and your/you're getting mixed up all the time

what you're pointing out is more a colloquial slang thing than a grammar mistake. and I would not write that way if I was writing anything remotely formal

He isn't racist though and he has a gook gf. He is also not voting Trump.

Instead of simply naming the Jew he just sits there and complains like a pacified pussy.
Trying to make a living off his shitty videos that change NOTHING

>Implying some SJW fruit is not low hanging.

>implying 'da joos' isn't one of the stupidest conspiracy theories out there.

it's better than
>big businesses fund SJWs

>I highly doubt he'd agree to debate someone who he knew would rape him on his own show
this is unfalsifiable

"sure, he debates people who proceed to blow him the fuck out, and he doesn't take those videos down, but you see, that's because he didn't KNOW he would lose. if he knew beforehand, he wouldn't do it!"

you could say that for anyone who has ever willingly debated anyone with an opposing view because you can't prove that's not what they're doing without seeing inside their head.

he can't think he doesn't stand a good chance of losing when he debates a phd in a liberal arts field. sophistry is what they're all about.

>He isn't racist though

yeah, yeah he is. just watch his videos about blacks and BLM

>and he has a gook gf.

that's the thing, if you go into it you find out from all the 24 hr OPS they did, that he only likes them because he thinks they are submissive. He even wanted to move to Thailand because of this reason.

>He is also not voting Trump.

He isn't voting at all, and the only bad thing to him about Trump is the internet privacy thing, this because of his paranoia

Big business is code for 'da joos' to Sup Forums. There's really little difference.

I wrote all this years ago after reviewing approximately 10 minutes of his work. Why are people just now coming to this obvious conclusion?

Making fun of stereotypical niggers does not a racist make. I do this all the time and I don't hate blacks people generally. He isn't racist like Sup Forums is.