Late 90's comedy

>Late 90's comedy
>College dorm hang out scene
>DO YOU HAVE THE TIME, TO LISTEN TO ME WHINE

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CX4Hd5UI7nM
youtube.com/watch?v=6F-IAAL4IdM
youtube.com/watch?v=Y5auZX3y22Q
youtube.com/watch?v=foyAOoVagWw
youtube.com/watch?v=mwnoNVOj1Fs
youtube.com/watch?v=cnRffxCIHUQ
youtube.com/watch?v=ec0XKhAHR5I
youtube.com/watch?v=2Beda3kFNjo
youtube.com/watch?v=_ue714d1V6I
youtube.com/watch?v=__69a-qDy-Y
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

never happened. i hate you

This thread failed hard earlier.

For some reason you thought it was worth trying again.

You were wrong.

>early 2000s teen flick
>IT JUST
>TAKES SOME TIME

>WELL I GUESS THIS IS GROWING UP

>pop punk still exists in the year 2016

>a nightclub filled with white people in 2000
>BURN THRU DA WIDGES AND BLUURB THRU THE WITCHES AND AND IN THE BACK OF MAH DRAGUUUUUUULAAAAAAAA

IT'S WHEN I COME AROUND RETARD

Better than meme rap you fucking wigger.

BLAH BLAH BLAH. BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH. BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH. HOTHEAD.

>Better than meme rap
No, not really. Nice try though.

youtube.com/watch?v=CX4Hd5UI7nM

Yes, yes really.

THERE'S A FUCKING DOG IN HERE

FUCKING BURN

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

DINO PROCESS DINO PROCESS

Pop punk is a shitty genre with no merit whatsoever. Please kill yourself.

i don't even wanna be a teenager again, i was a late bloomer so i looked about 13 when i was 18. shit sucked.

i'm nostalgic about a few things, but mostly it was just years of feeling physically like a freak and being crazy insecure. fuck that shit

Yes, it's a shitty genre, but rap is even shittier.

nope

...

Name three pop-punk albums as great or critically acclaimed as Aquemini, Paul's Boutique, or Illmatic.

CAN WE FORGET ABOUT THE THINGS I SAID WHEN I WAS DRUNK

>late 90s comedy
>college dorm scene
>Putting to death those who oppose you
>Will take control, no matter the cost
>Bodies are mounting the carnage around you
>At the last count, 10.000 have died

>Taken by force
>Controlled by fear
>Death squad police of the right
>Must stamp out subversion
>Dissention, unrest
>Those who oppose will meet death

>Automatic weapons in hand
>You say you're what the police want
>Why must you kill them to secure their vote
>Death squad escort them to the polls

>Puppet regime with you at the head
>You've rid them of a communist threat
>Your brand of "democracy" is now in control
>And all of your people lie dead

>Taken by force
>Controlled by fear
>Death squad police of the right
>Must stamp out subversion
>Dissention, unrest
>Those who oppose will meet death

>WHATS UP
>IM DRUNK
>SOMETHING
>WORK SUCKS

>Aquemini, Paul's Boutique, or Illmatic

I have literally no idea who those are and don't give a shit where they got their "critical acclaim" from. I'm also pretty sure it's bait, but I'll bite anyway. American Idiot by Green Day, Milo Goes to College by The Descendents, and The Young and the Hopeless by Good Charlotte.

Don't like them too much, but one can't deny that they are better than rap in every possible way.

name one flick

pop punk is pretty much just emo these days

>WW2 movie
>Edith Piaf starts singing

You ruined your unintentional pun, retard.

LATE NIGHT
COME HOME
WORK SUCKS
I KNOW
SHE LEFT ME ROSES BY THE STAIRS
SURPRISES LET ME KNOW SHE CA-ARES

dammit

>I want to be the minority

Green Day were cucks WAY before the internet made it a meme.

post-ironic bait is still bait

This.

>tfw found out a little while ago that Good Charlotte still exists
What the fuck

didnt they do a song with nelly or was that simple plan? either way both of them sound like generic pop rock bullshit. its awful.

I NEVER THOUGHT
I'D DIE ALONE

when has pop punk ever been anything but emo? you can throw a genre bitch fit but they are basically interchangeable.

this

emocore is the correct term. All of them, Penny, Blink, Bad Religion. The only ones who are of this sound but could be considered punk are NOFX.

Pop punk used to be a lot faster and catchier. Nowadays it's pretty much just sad bullshit.
youtube.com/watch?v=6F-IAAL4IdM
youtube.com/watch?v=Y5auZX3y22Q

Why do you keep making these threads every day you fucking autist?

If you don't know what Emo means, don't talk about it. There are clear differences between Pop-Punk and Emo, just as there are similarities and crossovers. It's like I'd say Industrial Trance and Psychadelic Trance are the same because I don't really listen to Electronic music and they sound pretty much the same for me.

Which generation had the best music?

>graduation scene
youtube.com/watch?v=foyAOoVagWw
>and
youtube.com/watch?v=mwnoNVOj1Fs
>plays

>don't talk about it

whoa, we hurt your thing? sorry mister ultra punk, please don't point your mohawk towards my eyes!

>the notorious pop-punks are threatening our lawns

IT'S AN OUTRAGE

This bed is on fire with passionate love
The neighbours complain about the noises above
But she only comes when she's on top

My therapist said not to see you no more
She said you're like a disease without any cure
She said I'm so obsessed that I'm becoming a bore, oh no

Ah, you think you're so pretty...

Caught your hand inside the till
Slammed your fingers in the door
Fought with kitchen knives and skewers
Dressed me up in womens' clothes
Messed around with gender roles
Line my eyes and call me pretty

Moved out of the house so you moved next door
I locked you out, you cut a hole in the wall
I found you sleeping next to me, I thought I was alone
You're driving me crazy
When are you coming home?

Nah, I actually like Pop Punk better than Emo (though both aren't very appealing to me), it's just irritating to see two ignorant faggots talking about shit they don't understand.

Pop punk never died and IMHO it is better than ever.
There are still god tier pop punk bands in 2016. Pop punk and emo can be related (Brand New, Saves the Day, etc. have elements of both), but nowadays the genres have separated. Emo is slower and less energetic than pop punk. I recommend listening to:

>The Story So Far
>The Wonder Years
>State Champs
>Seaway
>Gnarwolves
>Knuckle Puck
>Valencia (broke up in 2011)
>Neck Deep
>Four Year Strong (more accurately referred to as "easycore" "or melodic hardcore")
>Set Your Goals (same as above)

>t. rap listener

No one gives a fuck about what Pitchfork thinks or the rest of the Kanye West, Future, etc. dick riding train.

>PvP Video/AMV/Action Scene Cut

>THIS IS 10% LUCK 20% 15% CONCENTRATED POWER OF WILL 5% PLEASURE 50% PAIN AND 100% REASON TO REMEMBER THE NAME

X > Y > Boomers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Z

>Pop Punk better than Emo

they are the same thing

just like hard rock is interchangeable with heavy metal.

everything else is just magazine labels.

it's just how it is, you can't change it, no matter how you make it out to be in your head.

>It aint me starts playing

>just like hard rock is interchangeable with heavy metal.

Just because you're too stupid or ignorant to notice the huge differences, doesn't mean everyone is.

let the bodies hit the

F
L
O
O
R

>That pic

see? this is what I mean: you label fanatics miss the whole point and get mad when you are pointed at the truth.

Punk died as soon as it was born. It failed to tear down the rock establishment and got incorporated, thus becoming part of it itself.

Hard rock is a term given to heavy metal bands before "heavy metal" began to be widely used.

IT'S THAT SIMPLE.
there's no science behind it.

youtube.com/watch?v=cnRffxCIHUQ

ONE NOTHING WRONG WITH ME

>IT'S THAT SIMPLE.

No, it's not. Those labels are used because there are differences between the genres and fans want to distinguish certain sets of sounds or attitude apart from each other.

>Hard rock is a term given to heavy metal bands before "heavy metal" began to be widely used.

Nope. And it is still being used today, to distinguish certain bands from Heavy Metal

>there's no science behind it.

True. Just simple listening.

>Those labels are used because there are differences between the genres and fans want to distinguish certain sets of sounds or attitude apart from each other.


If you actually believe that, you are most likely a teenager and a prime target client for record companies (whatever's left of them anyway).

What is the most overused, memed song that movies use Sup Forums?

Did you have to ask?
youtube.com/watch?v=ec0XKhAHR5I

>If you actually believe that, you are most likely a teenager

Damn, you're so fucking retarded it hurts.

First, I'm 25. Second, I don't "believe" it, I use genre names even since I was a pre-teen to better describe and distinguish what I like. Those weird, obscure sub-genres which "sound the same" to you don't pop out of a void. They exist because one guy likes to emphasize that he enjoys Metal that is very fast, uses double-bass and blast-beat drumming, has screaming vocals and deals with the occult, rather than Metal that is slower, uses d-beat drumming and low growls and deals with violence and gore.

>I use genre names even since I was a pre-teen

seems like it's a habit you took too seriously. I won't post again over this matter, one day you 'll hopefully realise that most labels, like 8/10, are magazine inventions to promote records.

>one guy likes to emphasize that he enjoys Metal that is very fast, uses double-bass and blast-beat drumming, has screaming vocals and deals with the occult, rather than Metal that is slower, uses d-beat drumming and low growls and deals with violence and gore.

allright. Tell me then what the fuck Viking metal is.


If they sell it like punk, it's not punk. It's a standard F-G-A-C record. And it's emocore. There's no cultural value or origins to the music, therefore it does not warrant its own label. It's company trash. get real.

>are magazine inventions to promote records.

No they aren't.

>allright. Tell me then what the fuck Viking metal is.

I can, but you don't seem to be interested in listening anyway. And just in general, the confusion with Viking Metal comes from the fact that it can be defined separately using musical characteristics and lyrical themes. That's why Amon Amarth and Turisas might both be labeled like that, even though they sound very different. I'll spare the finer details for someone who actually wants to listen.

>It's a standard F-G-A-C record

If you think that a genre can be defined so simplistically, then you really don't understand anything about music...

>There's no cultural value or origins to the music, therefore it does not warrant its own label.

...Or culture, for that matter.

the fuck are 13-18 year olds innovating?

the song is actually called 'It ain't me'

youtube.com/watch?v=2Beda3kFNjo

>And just in general, the confusion with Viking Metal comes from the fact that it can be defined separately using musical characteristics and lyrical themes. That's why Amon Amarth and Turisas might both be labeled like that, even though they sound very different

bull
shit


>No they aren't.

Where did they appear first? And how did they come to use? I am not talking about articles on music scenes already existing, I 'm talking about terms coined in magazines. I won't even deny it for the term "heavy metal".


>...Or culture, for that matter.

what do you mean by that?
Rock music carries a weight from a certain era in history. Musically, everything born after it was being increasingly incorporated into the system, so despite bands, genres and lyrics that kept it rebellious, it was on the road of incorporation. Heavy metal was one of said genres. Everything born after it (thrash, death, black, power) is still heavy metal, but it wasn't moving as many people as rock originally did in the 60s, it wasn't the music of rebellious demonstrations and violent strikes because those genres were a product of their time and the 80s were a period of social setback. So, as a grandchild of rock, they strayed from mainstream music/music pushed through the system, but at the same time they were still a product; no matter how many pentagrams and socially sensitive lyrics, those bands weren't playing at concerts to support political prisoners, they were playing to make a name for themselves. And they were giving an alibi to capitalism i.e. "see? the free market and its democracies have a place for everyone to buy whatever they want!"

user, I'm sorry, you're just too mentally challenged to understand basic concepts like categorization, not to mention culture, so as I said, I really won't make the effort to educate you about this.

>you're just too mentally challenged to understand basic concepts like categorization

can't admit you got BTFO?
read a book, you don't know shit about anything, much less about "categorisation".
What I said was not my opinion, it's how it is and I dare you to refute.

you agree with me it's not a science but then post phrases like

>make the effort to educate
>I can, but you don't seem to be interested in listening anyway. And just in general, the confusion with Viking Metal comes from the fact that it can be defined separately using musical characteristics and lyrical themes. That's why Amon Amarth and Turisas might both be labeled like that, even though they sound very different. I'll spare the finer details for someone who actually wants to listen.


you imply it's complicated.

>can't admit you got BTFO?

When people stop talking to you it's not because you BTFO them, it's because you are not a good conversationalist.

>What I said was not my opinion

So you're just aping things you've read in a book. Gotcha.

>I dare you to refute.

I already did, you just don't want to listen.

>What I said was not my opinion

>self reliant 12 year olds

lmao, at least we know they will make great shitposting trolls when they grow up.

>So you're just aping things you've read in a book

Ok, if someone asks you about world war 2, were you there? Does that mean you can't explain?

>When people stop talking to you

I was replying to a post, I wasn't just stating/provoking.

>I already did

how? when? all you say is "I would explain it to you BUT you don't want to listen". I didn't understand your phrase "...or culture". What did you mean by that? If you meant that rock hasn't got any culture, I posted a mini wall of text about that. Understand what I wrote there, then you will see how magazines are tied to the whole system of music promotion.

>Does that mean you can't explain?

The difference between WWII and music genres is that I am part of the actual scene and have been so for 13 years, have seen how it develops and have taken part in it.

>how? when?

When I pointed out how people define different subgenres in order to distinguish between them. This is apparently too complicated of a concept to you.

>What did you mean by that?

That you don't understand what culture is, and don't understand what "cultural value" is. In regards to your question, if basic categorization is a concept you struggle with, than I'm not even going to try to explain culture to you.

>That you don't understand what culture is, and don't understand what "cultural value" is

I do. How can you assume I don't?


>how people define different subgenres in order to distinguish between them

then let me repeat that if the terms are universal, how were those terms communicated? Through Sup Forums? No. Through magazines. One-sided communication, like television. They define, we adopt the definition.
And it's one thing to distinguish heavy metal from the beatles, but you can see my argument clearer if you look at the new term "viking metal" (I puke as I am typing this ).

>There are kids who didnt grow up with American Pie

How do they even function in life?

>how were those terms communicated? Through Sup Forums? No. Through magazines.

>user believes that the only way to communicate is either through Sup Forums or through magazines

come on mate. give me an alternative that reaches wide audiences that isn't marginalised.

Internet forums, TV, interviews to name a few, but many Genre terms were actually defined by the small scene or clique that started them, for instance, House music was so called because it mainly started in a club called The Warehouse.

Sure, magazines may coin a term, but they don't do so to over-impose some imaginary difference between bands or to sell records, but simply to better identify different sounds. Terminology is mostly an organic process.

"Boo-hoo I miss you, I hate you I have lots of emotions because my target demographic is saddos who post our quotes on tumblr who're retarded teenagers"
~literally pop punk

>something dark or otherwise edgy comes out in the late 90s/early 2000s
>DIG THROUGH THE DITCHES AND BURN THROUGH THE WITCHES

Still like that song kind of.

What if I grew up with Superbad?

>TV, interviews

one-sided communication

>Internet forums

when I said Sup Forums, I didn't mean Sup Forums. It was an example.


>many Genre terms were actually defined by the small scene or clique that started them

and I already mentioned that I 'm not talking about reports/articles on already existing scenes.


>but they don't do so to over-impose some imaginary difference between bands or to sell records

they do it exactly because of that. Their card, especially on rockers, is called "standing out"; always search for fringe scenes and if there isn't one, create one. Buy the new record! It's from this new band! It's totally happening!

And of course, music is a commodity that really needs the "new" factor. All commodities do; they call it "progress", even "revolution". One of their new inventions may catch on and create a new space where bands and industry can move onto. Until it does, they always come up with "NEW" stuff that will make their payday at least. Sad but true.

>early 90s cult classic drama series
>JUST YOU, AND I starts playing

Its been a couple hundred years.

youtube channels and twitch streams.

>Until it does, they always come up with "NEW" stuff that will make their payday at least.

No, musicians come up with new stuff, because we frequently feel the need to explore and innovate. Your look on the music scene is obviously that of an outsider, and looks at it strictly from a business side, while today (and especially in the Metal scene) there isn't much profit in it. And still you see idiots naming a genre "Djent" because of its particular shitty sound.

Point is: Emo and Pop-Punk describe two different types of music, and you have bad observation skills if you can't notice the difference between them.

IM HAVIN TROUBLE TRYING TO SLEEP

BAH NUH BUH NUH BAH NUH

dude, you are fedoring to unreachable levels. If my observation skills are bad, what are yours if you think I am "obviously" an outsider? Strictly from a business side? What planet do you think you live on?

My observation skills are pretty good, because I can tell the difference between a Hard Rock and Heavy Metal song, and can tell when someone is an outsider to the music scene when he thinks genres are controlled by magazines that try to sell. That means business side. Because it deals with business rather than art. Get it?

meme rap is fucking ear cancer

>Because it deals with business rather than art

you hold art very highly if you think business doesn't interfere with it AS A WHOLE MEANS OF HUMAN EXPRESSION.

As far as the other two things you mentioned, you can't tell a tiger from a hedgehog from what I can see...

youtube.com/watch?v=_ue714d1V6I

>you hold art very highly

Nope, just realistically. There is little business in the extreme Metal scene. I know because I work in it. The term "Viking Metal" wasn't termed by magazines in order to sell, it was coined by vikingboos who liked Metal that dealt with viking themes, or that contained elements of Nordic folk music (thus the crossover with Folk Metal bands - I don't really need to tell you where that term came from, do I?)

this is the only correct answer

>autism speaks

Dammit was Blink's best song and Dude Ranch was the best album IMO. I love modern pop punk, but that was my jam through middle and high school. Pic related is a CLASSIC emo/pop punk album. (STD sounds like shit now since Chris Conley's voice got dramatically higher pitched over the years).

Dude no one gives a fuck about metal anymore

THAT'S WHAT IT LIKE WHEN WORLDS COLIIIIIIIIIIIIII

i was the same as you. but i was still mates with heaps of people and i have fond memories of our nights out together, including girls, even though they weren't physically attracted to me.

atleast that's what i thought. i taught myself all those years that i was a freak and that noone would want to be romantically involved with me, even when some qt girls asked me out for lunch or said i looked like some hot guy i just assumed they were being friendly. god i have so many regrets.

>MOM I POSTED IT AGAIN LOL MY MEME HAS FLAVOR

Millenials are the people born between 1984 and 1999, dude.
>one generation lasts 15 years
>the next one lasts 6 just so all the faggots on this website born in 1996 can feel superior to someone now that they've realized insulting everyone for being millenials is a waste of time because they are millenials themselves

>Late 90's
youtube.com/watch?v=__69a-qDy-Y
Shit's still rampant today. Also it randomly gets played at clubs and shows amongst hip-hop and dance music for god knows what reason.

I didn't grow up with American Pie, I grew up IN American Pie
Seriously though, I went to the school that movie is based off of